• About argument

    From AMuzi@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 5 13:14:48 2025
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    with photos
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to Shadow on Sat Apr 5 19:37:38 2025
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.

    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Mark J cleary on Sun Apr 6 12:34:18 2025
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single issue aspect of it, ie do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a horrible thing to go through I’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Sun Apr 6 12:34:18 2025
    zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 2:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with keyboards,
    leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just give up and
    throw punches:

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-
    she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    with photos

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.


    Indeed some of the, centers in uk have dispersal orders (posting in the
    advert breaks in Flanders) due to the behaviour of the anti lot.

    It’s the idea that balance is between two points of view when it’s rarely that and can be 100% one side etc.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Sun Apr 6 13:11:26 2025
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, itÂ’s the single issue aspect of it, ie >> do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that itÂ’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) >> what is womenÂ’s rights, and not one taken lightly itÂ’s a horrible thing to >> go through IÂ’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion’s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sun Apr 6 08:18:52 2025
    On 4/5/2025 2:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with keyboards,
    leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just give up and
    throw punches:

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment- she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    with photos

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Sun Apr 6 14:36:08 2025
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>>>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>>>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>>>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >>>> on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) >>>> what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to >>>> go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    AbortionÂ’s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some >> time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.

    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will
    be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never
    asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days
    at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections
    such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they
    will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks.

    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 19:16:50 2025
    On Sun Apr 6 08:18:52 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.




    Do you mean like a left wing judge ordering Trump to return a planeload of vicious and murderous gang members returned to El Salvador simply to embarrass the administration? Whoever would have thought that the right would finally use violence to end
    lawfare? I explained that I saw with my own eyes election fraud by the Democrats and later saw poll workers of both parties agreeing with me and helpless to take any steps under California laws.

    They eliminated automatic vote counting machines because even with election fraud they could not win. We countered by moving the polls to the police service yard and the police COULD take action against voter fraud. They then recountered by moving the
    poll to a place very difficult to find and even then, changed the election form gathering box to a suitcase with a slot in it and counted the votes after hours and without any republican observers.

    Yes, while the election of Trump is going to reduce these cases.they will continue to grow until people like you are frightened to walk on the streets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 19:21:17 2025
    On Sun Apr 6 12:34:18 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 2:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with keyboards,
    leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just give up and
    throw punches:

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-
    she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    with photos

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.


    Indeed some of the, centers in uk have dispersal orders (posting in the advert breaks in Flanders) due to the behaviour of the anti lot.

    It?s the idea that balance is between two points of view when it?s rarely that and can be 100% one side etc.




    Killing babies is NOT a point of view. It is a prosecutable offense in any civilized society. It took my step daughter 3 years to adopt a baby because they were being mudered. And my step son was considering it when he was married to his fist wife before
    he found out that she was the neighborhood punch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 19:26:05 2025
    On Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...



    Here in California girls will get pregnant just so they ccould kill the baby. During Obama it was an "in" thing. The media would paint them as heartbroken having to get rid of the baby. So heart broken that they would do it time and time again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 19:34:57 2025
    On Sun Apr 6 12:34:18 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.




    There are years long waits for babies. There is no shortage of homes for babies regardless of race, color or the idiology of its parents. It took my step daughter three years to find a baby that the authorities in California would let her adopt since
    they demaned that black babies could only be adopted by blacks.`And despite that story, blacks are the single largest prolife group in America.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 20:07:45 2025
    On Sun Apr 6 13:11:26 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >> on?

    Let alone the fact that it s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women s rights, and not one taken lightly it s a horrible thing to
    go through I m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.




    Roger! Historectomies are FAR more unpleasant and yet 15% of the American female population voluntarily go through that procedure every yearf! Some from cancer but a great many of them for fear that they could get cancer. By comparison an abortion is
    nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 20:24:26 2025
    On Sun Apr 6 09:08:01 2025 John B. wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    with photos

    If she had only been wearing her helmet.........




    Krygowski would suggest she wear a cycling cap.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Sun Apr 6 21:31:32 2025
    cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On Sun Apr 6 13:11:26 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>>>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>>>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>>>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, its the single issue aspect of it, ie >>>> do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >>>> on?

    Let alone the fact that its wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) >>>> what is womens rights, and not one taken lightly its a horrible thing to >>>> go through Im told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.




    Roger! Historectomies are FAR more unpleasant and yet 15% of the American female population voluntarily go through that procedure every yearf! Some from cancer but a great many of them for fear that they could get cancer.
    By comparison an abortion is nothing.

    Yes there are more major operations such as Hysterectomies, though as these mean one is infertile and instantly to post menopause, it really needs a
    good medical reason to do so!

    One of my wife’s friends had to do that, not fun at all!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Sun Apr 6 19:29:58 2025
    On 4/6/2025 2:26 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...



    Here in California girls will get pregnant just so they ccould kill the baby. During Obama it was an "in" thing. The media would paint them as heartbroken having to get rid of the baby. So heart broken that they would do it time and time again.


    Amidst our very serious moral, legal and policy problems in
    this area, that it not only wrong, it implies you haven't
    met many actual humans.



    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Mon Apr 7 10:38:23 2025
    On 4/6/2025 8:29 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 4/6/2025 2:26 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025 Shadow  wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

        To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-
    moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

        I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
        Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

        More interested in psych evaluations than photos...



    Here in California girls will get pregnant just so they ccould kill
    the baby. During Obama it was an "in" thing. The media would paint
    them as heartbroken having to get rid of the baby. So heart broken
    that they would do it time and time again.


    Amidst our very serious moral, legal and policy problems in this area,
    that it not only wrong, it implies you haven't met many actual humans.

    +1
    Thanks Andrew.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Mon Apr 7 10:41:16 2025
    On 4/6/2025 3:16 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Apr 6 08:18:52 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.


    <snipped unhinged rant>

    <yawn>

    um....what?

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to John B. on Mon Apr 7 17:44:55 2025
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>>>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>>>>>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some >>>> time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.

    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will
    be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never
    asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days
    at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting >> pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections >> such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they >> will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks.

    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent
    wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more
    bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai
    and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was
    a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can
    get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above 20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to mcleary08@comcast.net on Mon Apr 7 16:47:56 2025
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 19:37:38 -0500, Mark J cleary
    <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.

    Are "illegal" immigrants a "life form"?
    IYVO, of course.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 17:13:19 2025
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:58:50 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single issue aspect of it, ie >>do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >>on?

    Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) >>what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a horrible thing to >>go through I’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?

    The decision to do an abortion because you don't think your
    child is going to get a chance to live happily.
    I know dozens of women who have had abortions, and almost all
    do not regret it. But it's a tough call.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to Shadow on Mon Apr 7 15:24:48 2025
    On 4/7/2025 3:13 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:58:50 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >>> on?

    Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a horrible thing to
    go through I’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?

    The decision to do an abortion because you don't think your
    child is going to get a chance to live happily.
    I know dozens of women who have had abortions, and almost all
    do not regret it. But it's a tough call.
    []'s

    What a way to see life. I hope these women you know are ok. Mentally the
    toll of abortion is huge. The pro-abortion folks never talk about it
    because it is such a deep wound. Healing can happen but it takes a real dedicated discernment of just why we are on this earth. There is nothing
    really about it as a tough call except to take the child and love it.
    Loving that child by bring it into the world even if the mother lets
    someone else handle that part, is a grace. A gift from God. The other
    side you never hear all the real rotten stuff that goes on. A complete disservice to a woman and degradation to somehow say abortion is ok

    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to Shadow on Mon Apr 7 16:51:32 2025
    On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 17:13:19 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:58:50 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >>>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >>>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single issue aspect of it, ie >>>do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so >>>on?

    Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem) >>>what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a horrible thing to >>>go through I’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?

    The decision to do an abortion because you don't think your
    child is going to get a chance to live happily.
    I know dozens of women who have had abortions, and almost all
    do not regret it. But it's a tough call.
    []'s

    On the other hand I know lots of women who did not have an abortion
    and none of them regret it.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Mark J cleary on Mon Apr 7 15:55:57 2025
    On 4/7/2025 3:24 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
    On 4/7/2025 3:13 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:58:50 +0700, John B.
    <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman
    <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument
    just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-
    activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-
    harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a
    plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did
    not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of
    life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the
    image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as
    important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it’s the single
    issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or
    medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it’s wishing to intervene
    (largely men would seem)
    what is women’s rights, and not one taken lightly it’s a
    horrible thing to
    go through I’m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?

        The decision to do an abortion because you don't think
    your
    child is going to get a chance to live happily.
        I know dozens of women who have had abortions, and
    almost all
    do not regret it. But it's a tough call.
        []'s

    What a way to see life. I hope these women you know are ok.
    Mentally the toll of abortion is huge. The pro-abortion
    folks never talk about it because it is such a deep wound.
    Healing can happen but it takes a real dedicated discernment
    of just why we are on this earth. There is nothing really
    about it as a tough call except to take the child and love
    it. Loving that child by bring it into the world even if the
    mother lets someone else handle that part, is a grace. A
    gift from God. The other side you never hear all the real
    rotten stuff that goes on. A complete disservice to a woman
    and degradation to somehow say abortion is ok


    I've largely skipped this discussion as I dated, for a year,
    a nurse who worked in an abortion mill. You really don't
    want to know the details of that system. Wish I didn't.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 18:08:30 2025
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:16:50 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Apr 6 08:18:52 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    I just love how you nearly always try to paint the political left as
    being the instigators of violence.




    Do you mean like a left wing judge ordering Trump to return a planeload of vicious and murderous gang members

    It was just ONE person. The others were proven gang members,
    This guy was "legal". He's probably dead by now..... a terrorist jail
    is not a place for an innocent man.
    []'s

    PS You must be using a really weird new source.
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 18:14:48 2025
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:21:17 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Killing babies is NOT a point of view.

    No, it's as bad as conceiving them and then letting them die of
    disease.

    It is a prosecutable offense in any civilized society.

    Of course it is. Nobody was talking about killing babies. An abortion
    is removing a cluster of cells with less neuron that you have.

    It took my step daughter 3 years to adopt a baby because they were being mudered.

    It must have been hard to adopt a murdered one. Really weird
    paperwork. Is she a registered necrophile?

    And my step son was considering it when he was married to his fist wife before he found out that she was the neighborhood punch.

    I hope people stopped drinking her...
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 18:22:24 2025
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:26:05 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...



    Here in California girls will get pregnant just so they ccould kill the baby.

    Weird. A death wish thing. Abortions are not devoid of risk. Painful,
    very depressing.
    Funny thing is I thought most unwanted pregnancies were from
    Texas(which has the highest rape and pedophile rates in the US), and
    people went to California because that was where they could get a
    safer abortion. In Texas it's usually done with a big knitting needle.

    During Obama it was an "in" thing.

    Stats ?

    The media would paint them as heartbroken having to get rid of the baby.

    Most were. I rarely trust the "media" but this time they were telling
    the truth.

    So heart broken that they would do it time and time again.

    After a number of abortions the uterus gets so scarred it becomes
    difficult to get pregnant. Are you sure someone is not selling you
    #FAKE_NEWS ? Again, sources please.

    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 7 18:26:31 2025
    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:07:45 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Apr 6 13:11:26 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >> >>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care >> >>> for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of >> >>> God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >> >>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to Shadow on Mon Apr 7 19:44:56 2025
    On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 18:26:31 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

    On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 20:07:45 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun Apr 6 13:11:26 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>> >>>>
    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.

    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
    give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>> >>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without >>> >>> life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it|||
    (and the rest went to /dev/null)

    Tom must be a master of hacking. He introduces code that looks
    like ||| and that deletes anything I write.

    Roger! Historectomies are FAR more unpleasant and yet 15% of the American female population voluntarily go through that procedure every yearf! Some from cancer but a great many of them for fear that they could get cancer. By comparison an abortion is
    nothing.

    A doctor that performs a hysterectomy on a women just because
    she's "scared" of cancer should be struck off the board. He probably
    lops their breasts off and takes out a lung. Halves the chance of lung
    cancer.
    Submitting someone to a high risk surgery for purely financial
    reasons is a crime.
    []'s"

    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Mon Apr 7 20:16:10 2025
    On 4/7/2025 7:59 PM, John B. wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2025 17:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just >>>>>>>>>>> give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus? >>>>>>>>>>>
    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>>>>>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.

    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will >>>>> be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never >>>>> asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days >>>>> at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting >>>> pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections >>>> such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they >>>> will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks.

    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent
    wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more
    bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai
    and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have
    had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.


    Do you think I'm making this stuff up? I'm not, I'm simple repeating
    what I've been told by the girls that have had it done and as I've
    said they tell me that its "no big deal" in the early months. But do
    note the "early months" as I have also said "they also told me that in
    the later months it was a much different story"

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was
    a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can
    get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above
    20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last >> date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Perhaps because in the late 20's the fetus may be able to survive
    outside the mother and thus can be thought of a "person" which might
    raise all sorts of moral problems in a Buddhist society. However that
    is just a supposition on my part..


    I sincerely do not know how Buddhists define inception of
    human life and I'm curious now, if you know.

    For Christians, it's at conception but for Jews it's 'first
    breath'. That's a huge difference as regards attitudes
    toward abortion.

    I am making no argument, just asking about Buddhist thought.
    In Thailand anyway.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to John B. on Tue Apr 8 10:58:00 2025
    On 4/7/2025 7:59 PM, John B. wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2025 17:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
    keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just >>>>>>>>>>> give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
    suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
    Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus? >>>>>>>>>>>
    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. >>>>>>>>> All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly.

    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will >>>>> be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never >>>>> asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days >>>>> at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting >>>> pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections >>>> such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they >>>> will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks.

    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent
    wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more
    bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai
    and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have
    had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.


    Do you think I'm making this stuff up? I'm not, I'm simple repeating
    what I've been told by the girls that have had it done and as I've
    said they tell me that its "no big deal" in the early months. But do
    note the "early months" as I have also said "they also told me that in
    the later months it was a much different story"

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was


    What you have heard is a small anecdotal amount of information and
    nothing else. Real life stories that are far great show the huge impact
    it has on the mother. It is degrading her and her body to the deepest
    sense of the core. The only thing that can become human is from another
    human. That is more powerful than anything we know. They have scanned
    the universe with all kinds of technology but never have found other intelligent life. Spending huge sums of money and time to figure out
    what 2 humans can go it in about 5 minutes. It is human from the point
    of conception.
    a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can
    get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above
    20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last >> date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Perhaps because in the late 20's the fetus may be able to survive
    outside the mother and thus can be thought of a "person" which might
    raise all sorts of moral problems in a Buddhist society. However that
    is just a supposition on my part..



    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to John B. on Tue Apr 8 11:02:36 2025
    On 4/7/2025 10:03 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:10 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 7:59 PM, John B. wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2025 17:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with >>>>>>>>>>>>> keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just >>>>>>>>>>>>> give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer >>>>>>>>>>>> suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born? >>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
    []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly. >>>>>>>>
    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will >>>>>>> be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never >>>>>>> asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days >>>>>>> at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting
    pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections
    such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they
    will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks. >>>>>>
    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent >>>>> wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more >>>>> bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai >>>>> and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have
    had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.


    Do you think I'm making this stuff up? I'm not, I'm simple repeating
    what I've been told by the girls that have had it done and as I've
    said they tell me that its "no big deal" in the early months. But do
    note the "early months" as I have also said "they also told me that in
    the later months it was a much different story"

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was >>>>> a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can >>>>> get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above >>>>> 20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last
    date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Perhaps because in the late 20's the fetus may be able to survive
    outside the mother and thus can be thought of a "person" which might
    raise all sorts of moral problems in a Buddhist society. However that
    is just a supposition on my part..


    I sincerely do not know how Buddhists define inception of
    human life and I'm curious now, if you know.

    For Christians, it's at conception but for Jews it's 'first
    breath'. That's a huge difference as regards attitudes
    toward abortion.

    I am making no argument, just asking about Buddhist thought.
    In Thailand anyway.

    I don't know in detail but, for instance, if you buy live fish, to
    eat, in the market you might ask the seller to kill them for you. Thus
    while the fish was killed at your command you would not be seen as
    causing the death.

    But my nephew was a Monk for 5 years I'll ask him when I see him.

    But religions are Strange, if that is the correct term. The perpetual virginity of Mary is a Christian doctrine that Mary, the mother of
    Jesus, was a virgin "before, during and after" the birth of Christ.
    Declared in AD 533 :-)

    She was in is and that is a statement of faith. You can believe it or
    not. It might seem odd and strange and go against all the rules you
    normally know and understand, however God is beyond rules.

    Here is another rule. You cannot go to the Christian God first. He must
    start the process since he is god all powerful. God must make the first
    move yet you have human freedom. My suggestion is to Study Aquinas he
    was the master a long time ago.

    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 9 05:30:22 2025
    On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:26:45 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:02:36 -0500, Mark J cleary
    <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 10:03 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:10 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 7:59 PM, John B. wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2025 17:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly. >>>>>>>>>>
    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will
    be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never
    asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days
    at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting
    pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections
    such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they
    will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks. >>>>>>>>
    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent >>>>>>> wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more >>>>>>> bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai >>>>>>> and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have
    had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.


    Do you think I'm making this stuff up? I'm not, I'm simple repeating >>>>> what I've been told by the girls that have had it done and as I've
    said they tell me that its "no big deal" in the early months. But do >>>>> note the "early months" as I have also said "they also told me that in >>>>> the later months it was a much different story"

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was >>>>>>> a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can >>>>>>> get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above >>>>>>> 20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last >>>>>> date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Perhaps because in the late 20's the fetus may be able to survive
    outside the mother and thus can be thought of a "person" which might >>>>> raise all sorts of moral problems in a Buddhist society. However that >>>>> is just a supposition on my part..


    I sincerely do not know how Buddhists define inception of
    human life and I'm curious now, if you know.

    For Christians, it's at conception but for Jews it's 'first
    breath'. That's a huge difference as regards attitudes
    toward abortion.

    I am making no argument, just asking about Buddhist thought.
    In Thailand anyway.

    I don't know in detail but, for instance, if you buy live fish, to
    eat, in the market you might ask the seller to kill them for you. Thus
    while the fish was killed at your command you would not be seen as
    causing the death.

    But my nephew was a Monk for 5 years I'll ask him when I see him.

    But religions are Strange, if that is the correct term. The perpetual
    virginity of Mary is a Christian doctrine that Mary, the mother of
    Jesus, was a virgin "before, during and after" the birth of Christ.
    Declared in AD 533 :-)

    She was in is and that is a statement of faith. You can believe it or
    not. It might seem odd and strange and go against all the rules you >>normally know and understand, however God is beyond rules.

    Here is another rule. You cannot go to the Christian God first. He must >>start the process since he is god all powerful. God must make the first >>move yet you have human freedom. My suggestion is to Study Aquinas he
    was the master a long time ago.

    So for 500 years Mary was not a virgin an suddenly became one?

    Strange, this concept of virginity being such a valuable commodity for
    females and, not quite so valuable for males. I suspect it only became
    an issue because of so many human male's fragile egos not being able
    to handle the thought of their lady eagerly wrapping herself around
    another man.

    There is also the issue of a man wanting to insure that the children
    he is supporting are carrying on his, and only his, blood line. As for
    me, having, and knowing about other men having accepted another man's offspring, I think that's also pretentious bullshit.

    As for the Jesus's supposed virgin birth? I don't understand why
    that's an issue, either.

    --
    Speaker Pelosi to Congress
    "We need to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 9 09:41:16 2025
    On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:26:45 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:02:36 -0500, Mark J cleary
    <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:

    She was in is and that is a statement of faith. You can believe it or
    not. It might seem odd and strange and go against all the rules you >>normally know and understand, however God is beyond rules.

    Here is another rule. You cannot go to the Christian God first. He must >>start the process since he is god all powerful. God must make the first >>move yet you have human freedom. My suggestion is to Study Aquinas he
    was the master a long time ago.

    So for 500 years Mary was not a virgin an suddenly became one?

    The miracles of modern medicine !!!
    If they had an EEG back in the day they probably would have
    discovered that what's his name probably wasn't dead at all. He was
    just "pining". Took a quick 3 day holiday.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to John B. on Wed Apr 9 11:31:53 2025
    On 4/8/2025 7:26 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:02:36 -0500, Mark J cleary
    <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 10:03 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:10 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 4/7/2025 7:59 PM, John B. wrote:
    On 7 Apr 2025 17:44:55 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 14:36:08 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 13:11:26 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 6 Apr 2025 12:34:18 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Mark J cleary <mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give up and throw punches:

    To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

    I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    with photos

    More interested in psych evaluations than photos... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> []'s
    Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
    for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
    All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
    God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
    life there is nothing.


    Without wishing to speak for Shadow, it?s the single issue aspect of it, ie
    do they want to help or support family with kids or medical issues and so
    on?

    Let alone the fact that it?s wishing to intervene (largely men would seem)
    what is women?s rights, and not one taken lightly it?s a horrible thing to
    go through I?m told.

    Roger Merriman

    What's horrifying?


    Abortion?s are deeply unpleasant for anyone to go through, and takes some
    time to recover from. Not something people will choose lightly. >>>>>>>>>>
    Roger Merriman


    It depends on the length of the pregnancy. Here, "Business Girls" will
    be seeing the doctor as soon as they miss a few days and while I never
    asked them the details they never seem to miss more then a couple days
    at work.

    Even so it will be rather brutal and frankly if they are regularly getting
    pregnant they will also be getting various sexually transmitted infections
    such as Aids.

    Could someone in a desperate situation push through? Probably yes but they
    will still be bleeding and generally recovering for a few days/weeks. >>>>>>>>
    Ie not something they would choose to do.

    Roger Merriman

    I don't know where you get your information but it is, to some extent >>>>>>> wrong. Abortion in the early days of a pregnancy results in no more >>>>>>> bleeding and pain the a normal "period". Or at least that is what Thai >>>>>>> and Japanese women have told me.

    That’s not what the either the NHS information says, or what women who have
    had an Abortion say, ie it’s not just a minor thing.


    Do you think I'm making this stuff up? I'm not, I'm simple repeating >>>>> what I've been told by the girls that have had it done and as I've
    said they tell me that its "no big deal" in the early months. But do >>>>> note the "early months" as I have also said "they also told me that in >>>>> the later months it was a much different story"

    But having said that they also told me that in the later months it was >>>>>>> a much different story.

    Currently, here in Thailand, a woman pregnant up to the 20th week can >>>>>>> get an abortion at the hospital of her choice simply by asking. Above >>>>>>> 20,weeks it becomes much more complicates.

    Not sure at what point or rather can’t remember but I’d imagine the last
    date would be fairly similar, bar medical exemption.

    Perhaps because in the late 20's the fetus may be able to survive
    outside the mother and thus can be thought of a "person" which might >>>>> raise all sorts of moral problems in a Buddhist society. However that >>>>> is just a supposition on my part..


    I sincerely do not know how Buddhists define inception of
    human life and I'm curious now, if you know.

    For Christians, it's at conception but for Jews it's 'first
    breath'. That's a huge difference as regards attitudes
    toward abortion.

    I am making no argument, just asking about Buddhist thought.
    In Thailand anyway.

    I don't know in detail but, for instance, if you buy live fish, to
    eat, in the market you might ask the seller to kill them for you. Thus
    while the fish was killed at your command you would not be seen as
    causing the death.

    But my nephew was a Monk for 5 years I'll ask him when I see him.

    But religions are Strange, if that is the correct term. The perpetual
    virginity of Mary is a Christian doctrine that Mary, the mother of
    Jesus, was a virgin "before, during and after" the birth of Christ.
    Declared in AD 533 :-)

    She was in is and that is a statement of faith. You can believe it or
    not. It might seem odd and strange and go against all the rules you
    normally know and understand, however God is beyond rules.

    Here is another rule. You cannot go to the Christian God first. He must
    start the process since he is god all powerful. God must make the first
    move yet you have human freedom. My suggestion is to Study Aquinas he
    was the master a long time ago.

    So for 500 years Mary was not a virgin an suddenly became one?
    Your understanding of Catholicism and theology is quite telling. It
    explains some of the things that I see in your post. God is God he
    cannot be put in a box. He does no need humans or anything to do with
    them to be better off. The Blessed Mother is beyond really the norm that
    some modern people can handle. Her wisdom would make Einstein seem
    brainless in comparison, yet she could not do or understand the theory
    of relativity I am pretty sure. The mystery of life can only be answered
    by God.

    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark J cleary@21:1/5 to John B. on Thu Apr 10 10:32:00 2025
    On 4/9/2025 11:54 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 23:42:07 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 4/9/2025 9:56 PM, John B. wrote:


    Lets not start a war here...

    I thought starting wars was the main purpose of Usenet! ;-)

    but my point was, and is, that for 500 years
    Mary's condition was ignored and then suddenly she was declared a
    virgin. And even more recently, in my youth probably the most common
    "sin" to be confessed at Saturday Confession was eating meat on
    Friday. 10 "Our Father's" and 20,"Hail Mary's" or no Communion on
    Sunday and your mother asking why. Now, I read, it's not a sin except
    during Lent.
    You might be able to take that as a sign of hope. Apparently dogma can
    change.

    Some people praise science over religion because science adjusts to new
    ideas. For example, "Atoms are made of protons, neutrons and electrons,
    period!" Except "Oops, particlec says there's a lot more to it..."

    Or "Force equals mass times acceleration ..." Except "Darn, relativity
    says there's a lot more to it..."

    Theology and religion have changed as well. Heck, it used to be that it
    was immoral for Christians to charge interest on loans! You don't hear
    much about that these days.

    I anticipate other changes in the future - not that I'll necessarily be
    around to see them.


    Errr... science is one thing but the supposed "Word of God" is a
    different thing all together.
    (In Catholic Dogma the Pope can basically invoke "God's Word" and then
    say something that is considered infallible and considered God's
    word.)
    This is completely incorrect about the Infallibility of Pope. He is only infallible when speaking about Faith and Morals. Even then it is rare
    because he has to be speaking from the Chair and declare it as such. It
    has nothing to do with science or the Popes own sins. The Pope can be completely wrong about science and be in massive sinful state but that
    has zero to do with Infallibility clause. The doctrine has only be used
    once as such since is was declared back in 1879. That was used in 1950
    which said the Blessed Mother Mary was assumed into Heave body and soul
    at her death. Not just the soul but body and soul.


    --
    Deacon Mark

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)