Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": ><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, floriduh dumbass
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": <https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" ><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
On 5/30/2025 12:15 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
... a USA population of 3.5 million ...
Wow. SMH
On 5/30/2025 10:28 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
"Braindead magatards like the floriduh dumbass will consistently look
for a political scapegoat for any issue ...
Yep. Just like with Tom Kunich. Nothing can be discussed without a hair >triggered right wing idiocy response.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski ><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": <https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" <http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
On 5/30/2025 9:25 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, floriduh dumbass <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
In https://rec.bicycles.tech.narkive.com/xy8HyQvE/new-york-s-crackdown-on-ebikes#post16
I wrote:
"Braindead magatards like the floriduh dumbass will consistently look
for a political scapegoat for any issue they have based their ignorant opinions on, as is shown by his parroting of magatard groupthink nonsense."
Q.E.D.
Not really "obscure": <https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
You're replying to a kunich-esque willful idiot who ignores facts in
favor of political fantasy.
On 5/30/2025 10:28 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
"Braindead magatards like the floriduh dumbass will consistently look
for a political scapegoat for any issue ...
Yep. Just like with Tom Kunich. Nothing can be discussed without a hair triggered right wing idiocy response.
On Fri May 30 06:25:00 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
1.3 million subscribers is NOTHING. I'm sure that they will declare bankruptcy before long.
Not really "obscure": <https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
On 5/30/2025 6:25 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
<snip>
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
Great magazine. Long time subscriber. Haven't received that issue yet.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million,
and some of them are in other countries.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >>><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million,
and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 >million.
<https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >> >>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the printing costs. Who is paying the writers?
On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the >>>>"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >>>><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million,
and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 >>million.
<https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
Yeah, I know. That makes the subscription rate even less impressive.
The largest magazine distribution in the USA: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States> >is "AARP The Magazine" at 23.7 million per issue. By issue, that can
be per week, per month, per year, quarterly, annual, etc.
"The following list shows the 100 largest magazines in the United
States by paid circulation as of 31 December 2023 based on data from
the Alliance for Audited Media".
3.5 million is smaller than 23.7 million, but hardly "obscure".
You might also notice that "AARP The Magazine" and "The New Yorker"
address different audiences with different number of prospective
readers.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:34:34 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the >>>>>"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >>>>><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million, >>>>and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 >>>million.
<https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
Yeah, I know. That makes the subscription rate even less impressive.
The largest magazine distribution in the USA: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States> >is "AARP The Magazine" at 23.7 million per issue. By issue, that can
be per week, per month, per year, quarterly, annual, etc.
"The following list shows the 100 largest magazines in the United
States by paid circulation as of 31 December 2023 based on data from
the Alliance for Audited Media".
3.5 million is smaller than 23.7 million, but hardly "obscure".
You might also notice that "AARP The Magazine" and "The New Yorker"
address different audiences with different number of prospective
readers.
Great magazine. Long time subscriber. Haven't received that issue yet.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:30:30 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >> >>>>>
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >> >>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the printing costs. Who is paying the writers?
Advertising and contributions usually pay most of the bills.
<https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/the-new-yorker-advertising-profile>
"The New Yorker is part of Advance Publications Inc.. They spent under
$100 million on advertising in digital and print in the last year.
They invest in premium ad units and advertised on over 50 different
Media Properties in the last year across multiple Media formats. The
New Yorker launched and advertised 6 new products in the past twelve
months. We have 11 people on file in marketing roles at The New
Yorker, and 1 at their agency."
The New Yorker print circulation is 1.3 million magazines.
725,000 are paid printed subscriptions.
548,000 are paid digital subscriptions.
There is some overlap because some subscribers get both digital and
priinted subscriptions. There are also a small number that get
complimentary subscriptions.
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-New-Yorker-Freelance-Writer-Salaries-E1418343_D_KO15,31.htm>
"The estimated average salary for a Freelance Writer at The New Yorker
is $82,604 per year or $40 per hour, but some professionals have
reported earning up to roughly $139,632 per year (90th percentile).
The typical pay range is between $63,093 (25th percentile) and
$109,321 (75th percentile) annually."
On 5/31/2025 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
Would you kike to place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business in 5 years?
I would!
On Fri May 30 15:47:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:30:30 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>>>
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>>> him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>> and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the printing costs. Who is paying the writers?
Advertising and contributions usually pay most of the bills.
<https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/the-new-yorker-advertising-profile>
"The New Yorker is part of Advance Publications Inc.. They spent under
$100 million on advertising in digital and print in the last year.
They invest in premium ad units and advertised on over 50 different
Media Properties in the last year across multiple Media formats. The
New Yorker launched and advertised 6 new products in the past twelve
months. We have 11 people on file in marketing roles at The New
Yorker, and 1 at their agency."
The New Yorker print circulation is 1.3 million magazines.
725,000 are paid printed subscriptions.
548,000 are paid digital subscriptions.
There is some overlap because some subscribers get both digital and
priinted subscriptions. There are also a small number that get
complimentary subscriptions.
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-New-Yorker-Freelance-Writer-Salaries-E1418343_D_KO15,31.htm>
"The estimated average salary for a Freelance Writer at The New Yorker
is $82,604 per year or $40 per hour, but some professionals have
reported earning up to roughly $139,632 per year (90th percentile).
The typical pay range is between $63,093 (25th percentile) and
$109,321 (75th percentile) annually."
Why don't you send this to the New Yorker, Maybe they will give you a job as chief assistant propagandist. It there is something you don't know about, it is sure to be something you tell everyone about. Would you kike to place a bet on whether the NewYorker will be in business in 5 years? After all - you are absolutely sure that 1.3 million subscribers are worth multimillions from advertisers.
I have said that you have made every important decision in your life wrong and something as simple as numbers of subscribers and running costs baffles you.
On 5/31/2025 2:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:Yorker will be in business in 5 years? After all - you are absolutely sure that 1.3 million subscribers are worth multimillions from advertisers.
On Fri May 30 15:47:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:30:30 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>>>>
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>>> and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the printing costs. Who is paying the writers?
Advertising and contributions usually pay most of the bills.
<https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/the-new-yorker-advertising-profile>
"The New Yorker is part of Advance Publications Inc.. They spent under
$100 million on advertising in digital and print in the last year.
They invest in premium ad units and advertised on over 50 different
Media Properties in the last year across multiple Media formats. The
New Yorker launched and advertised 6 new products in the past twelve
months. We have 11 people on file in marketing roles at The New
Yorker, and 1 at their agency."
The New Yorker print circulation is 1.3 million magazines.
725,000 are paid printed subscriptions.
548,000 are paid digital subscriptions.
There is some overlap because some subscribers get both digital and
priinted subscriptions. There are also a small number that get
complimentary subscriptions.
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-New-Yorker-Freelance-Writer-Salaries-E1418343_D_KO15,31.htm>
"The estimated average salary for a Freelance Writer at The New Yorker
is $82,604 per year or $40 per hour, but some professionals have
reported earning up to roughly $139,632 per year (90th percentile).
The typical pay range is between $63,093 (25th percentile) and
$109,321 (75th percentile) annually."
Why don't you send this to the New Yorker, Maybe they will give you a job as chief assistant propagandist. It there is something you don't know about, it is sure to be something you tell everyone about. Would you kike to place a bet on whether the New
I have said that you have made every important decision in your life wrong and something as simple as numbers of subscribers and running costs baffles you.
I'll take that bet.
New Yorker is not to my taste but it's well done for their
readers who are strongly loyal and resubscribe for decades.
How much? Even money or do you want to weight it?
On 5/31/2025 2:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 15:47:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:30:30 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-
story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going >>>>>>>>> to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-
magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion
Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the >>>>> "This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the printing costs. Who
is paying the writers?
Advertising and contributions usually pay most of the bills.
<https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/the-new-yorker-advertising-profile>
"The New Yorker is part of Advance Publications Inc.. They spent under
$100 million on advertising in digital and print in the last year.
They invest in premium ad units and advertised on over 50 different
Media Properties in the last year across multiple Media formats. The
New Yorker launched and advertised 6 new products in the past twelve
months. We have 11 people on file in marketing roles at The New
Yorker, and 1 at their agency."
The New Yorker print circulation is 1.3 million magazines.
725,000 are paid printed subscriptions.
548,000 are paid digital subscriptions.
There is some overlap because some subscribers get both digital and
priinted subscriptions. There are also a small number that get
complimentary subscriptions.
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-New-Yorker-Freelance-Writer-
Salaries-E1418343_D_KO15,31.htm>
"The estimated average salary for a Freelance Writer at The New Yorker
is $82,604 per year or $40 per hour, but some professionals have
reported earning up to roughly $139,632 per year (90th percentile).
The typical pay range is between $63,093 (25th percentile) and
$109,321 (75th percentile) annually."
Why don't you send this to the New Yorker, Maybe they will give you a
job as chief assistant propagandist.
It there is something you don't
know about, it is sure to be something you tell everyone about. Would
you kike to place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business
in 5 years?
After all - you are absolutely sure that 1.3 million
subscribers are worth multimillions from advertisers.
I have said that you have made every important decision in your life
wrong and something as simple as numbers of subscribers and running
costs baffles you.
On 5/31/2025 2:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 15:47:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 17:30:30 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri May 30 07:46:24 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker
magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/
cover- story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist
magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-
defies- magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The
American Legion Magazine
and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to
2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of
the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation"
<http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but
hardly obscure.
1.3 million subscribers doesn't even pay for the
printing costs. Who is paying the writers?
Advertising and contributions usually pay most of the
bills.
<https://advertisers.mediaradar.com/the-new-yorker-
advertising-profile>
"The New Yorker is part of Advance Publications Inc..
They spent under
$100 million on advertising in digital and print in the
last year.
They invest in premium ad units and advertised on over
50 different
Media Properties in the last year across multiple Media
formats. The
New Yorker launched and advertised 6 new products in the
past twelve
months. We have 11 people on file in marketing roles at
The New
Yorker, and 1 at their agency."
The New Yorker print circulation is 1.3 million magazines.
725,000 are paid printed subscriptions.
548,000 are paid digital subscriptions.
There is some overlap because some subscribers get both
digital and
priinted subscriptions. There are also a small number
that get
complimentary subscriptions.
<https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-New-Yorker-
Freelance-Writer- Salaries-E1418343_D_KO15,31.htm>
"The estimated average salary for a Freelance Writer at
The New Yorker
is $82,604 per year or $40 per hour, but some
professionals have
reported earning up to roughly $139,632 per year (90th
percentile).
The typical pay range is between $63,093 (25th
percentile) and
$109,321 (75th percentile) annually."
Why don't you send this to the New Yorker, Maybe they
will give you a job as chief assistant propagandist.
You might be interested in actually finding out what
propaganda is first. Hint: what jeff wrote isn't propaganda
(It's telling that you seem to think facts are propaganda).
It there is something you don't know about, it is sure to
be something you tell everyone about. Would you kike to
place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business
in 5 years?
I'd also like to bet that that million dollar invest you
claim to have is still only worth a million dollars in the
next 5 years - the same as it has been for the past 5.
After all - you are absolutely sure that 1.3 million
subscribers are worth multimillions from advertisers.
Apparently so is the New Yorker and Conde Naste. Why don't
you take that "senior business consultant" skillset you
somehow acquired with no college background (while you were
designing medical electronics, building things for the space
shuttle and "reading out" three libraries) and and tell them
what they're doing wrong? If they _were_ going to fold in 5
years, that would certainly seal the deal.
I have said that you have made every important decision
in your life wrong and something as simple as numbers of
subscribers and running costs baffles you.
ok, mr "business consultant", If you seem to have some sort
of innate understanding of the magazine business, run some
quick numbers here showing the number of ads and the cost
per ad that would be necessary for the New Yorker to be
profitable, and then prove they aren't meeting the required
revenue to meet profitability.
Have you figured out how Zwift can calculate Crr and CdA for
accurate simulations yet?
ok, mr "business consultant", If you seem to have some sort of innate >understanding of the magazine business, run some quick numbers here
showing the number of ads and the cost per ad that would be necessary
for the New Yorker to be profitable, and then prove they aren't meeting
the required revenue to meet profitability.
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 06:10:26 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
ok, mr "business consultant", If you seem to have some sort of innate
understanding of the magazine business, run some quick numbers here
showing the number of ads and the cost per ad that would be necessary
for the New Yorker to be profitable, and then prove they aren't meeting
the required revenue to meet profitability.
That will be rather tricky. The New Yorker is owned by Conde Nast,
which in turn is owned by S.I. Newhouse, which is owned by Advance Publications.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_Publications>
All the above companies are privately held, issue no stock and
therefore are not required to publish quarterly 10Q financial
statements. Advance Publications has a large list of subsidiaries,
making The New Yorker a rather small part of the puzzle: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Advance_subsidiaries#Cond%C3%A9_Nast>
The best I can find is the Conde Nast UK Profit and Loss report up to
Dec 31, 2023: <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00226900/filing-history>
<https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00226900/filing-history/MzQ0NTEwMzI0OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0>
The Conde Nast balance sheet starts on document Page 11. It looks
like it only includes UK financials.
On 6/3/2025 1:12 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 06:10:26 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
ok, mr "business consultant", If you seem to have some sort of innate
understanding of the magazine business, run some quick numbers here
showing the number of ads and the cost per ad that would be necessary
for the New Yorker to be profitable, and then prove they aren't meeting
the required revenue to meet profitability.
That will be rather tricky. The New Yorker is owned by Conde Nast,
which in turn is owned by S.I. Newhouse, which is owned by Advance
Publications.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_Publications>
All the above companies are privately held, issue no stock and
therefore are not required to publish quarterly 10Q financial
statements. Advance Publications has a large list of subsidiaries,
making The New Yorker a rather small part of the puzzle:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Advance_subsidiaries#Cond%C3%A9_Nast> >>
The best I can find is the Conde Nast UK Profit and Loss report up to
Dec 31, 2023:
<https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00226900/filing-history>
<https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00226900/filing-history/MzQ0NTEwMzI0OWFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0>
The Conde Nast balance sheet starts on document Page 11. It looks
like it only includes UK financials.
It should be a breeze for our tommy!
He wrote:
"something as simple as numbers of subscribers and running costs baffles
you. "
The clear implication is that he has some in-depth understanding of the >magazine business, and someone with that knowledge _should_ be able to
do a bal-lpark guesstimate of estimating the advertising revenue
necessary to profitably run a glossy print magazine with that number of >subscribers.
Seriously jeff, don't you know by now that tommy knows _every_ thing
about _every_ thing?
Seriously jeff, don't you know by now that tommy knows _every_ thing
about _every_ thing?
I'll take that bet.
New Yorker is not to my taste but it's well done for their
readers who are strongly loyal and resubscribe for decades.
How much? Even money or do you want to weight it?
I really like one of Tom's methods. He proclaims that someone
(usually me) does NOT know anything about a topic, and then declares
that this implies that he knows that he is an expert on the topic.
On 5/31/2025 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
Would you kike to place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business in 5 years?
I would!
On 6/4/2025 12:45 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Actually, calculating the number of subscribers is tricky. What does
one do with complimentary free copies, varying media formats,
libraries, discounts to distributors, shrinkage, and so on.
I've had the experience of not renewing a magazine subscription, yet
having it continue to arrive for many, many months. I suspected at the
time that it was a strategy for using an inflated subscriber count when selling advertisements. I think that's where the real money comes from.
But yes, Tom in his brilliance should be able to account for that.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski ><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": <https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
On 5/30/2025 1:59 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 5/30/2025 12:18 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 06:25:00 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>> him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-
downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
1.3 million subscribers is NOTHING. I'm sure that they will declare
bankruptcy before long.
I'll take that bet.
Set the wager and set a date.
Can I get in on this?
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled.
I wish we'd bet on that.
On Sat May 31 21:32:22 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 5/31/2025 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
Would you kike to place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business in 5 years?
I would!
OK, $1,000, that the New Yorker is gone in 5 years.
On 6/8/2025 8:09 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 16:15:18 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled.
I wish we'd bet on that.
Only you could believe that a 32 billion dollar surplus reduced to a
27 billion dollar deficit is sound government management.
I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you were wrong in predicting Newsom would be recalled - just as you're wrong on countless other things.
If Californians cannot interpret those meanings, they are nothing less
than a lost cause that President Trump has every right to cut off from
Federal funding.
You choose to live there. Why not move to someplace where the residents
share your views?
There is a reason why I have money and you don't - I have common sense
and you don't.
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
On 6/8/2025 8:09 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 16:15:18 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled.
I wish we'd bet on that.
Only you could believe that a 32 billion dollar surplus reduced to a 27 billion dollar deficit is sound government management.
I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you were wrong in predicting >Newsom would be recalled - just as you're wrong on countless other things.
If Californians cannot interpret those meanings, they are nothing less than a lost cause that President Trump has every right to cut off from Federal funding.
You choose to live there. Why not move to someplace where the residents
share your views?
There is a reason why I have money and you don't - I have common sense and you don't.
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
On 6/8/2025 8:09 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 16:15:18 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled.
I wish we'd bet on that.
Only you could believe that a 32 billion dollar surplus reduced to a 27 billion dollar deficit is sound government management.
I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you were wrong in predicting Newsom would be recalled - just as you're wrong on countless other things.
If Californians cannot interpret those meanings, they are nothing less than a lost cause that President Trump has every right to cut off from Federal funding.
You choose to live there. Why not move to someplace where the residents
share your views?
There is a reason why I have money and you don't - I have common sense and you don't.
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
On 6/9/2025 12:13 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
lol...how much common sense did it take to claim 'half the chinese
population was killed by the covid vaccine'?
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 00:13:50 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 6/8/2025 8:09 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 16:15:18 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled. >>> I wish we'd bet on that.
Only you could believe that a 32 billion dollar surplus reduced to a 27 billion dollar deficit is sound government management.
Hey Tom. Is that the federal surplus, California surplus, or some
other surplus? Got any sources? You might enjoy this article:
"In major turnaround, California will have a budget surplus, Newsom
says"
(Jan 6, 2025) <https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/major-turnaround-california-surplus-newsom-says-20018643.php>
"The budget outlook Newsom describes is a major turnaround from the
$47 billion deficit last year and the $32 billion shortfall the year
before."
I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you were wrong in predicting >Newsom would be recalled - just as you're wrong on countless other things.
If Californians cannot interpret those meanings, they are nothing less than a lost cause that President Trump has every right to cut off from Federal funding.
You choose to live there. Why not move to someplace where the residents >share your views?
There is a reason why I have money and you don't - I have common sense and you don't.
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
Tom's millions
04/18/2021 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/cgGQO6bPU8w/m/EKViBoe-AgAJ> "So I cashed in my stock options from a successful company and used
that million dollars to pay for her treatment."
12/25/2022 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/njA7DYpUtww/m/uTnjTb6DAwAJ> "I'm worth nearly two million now and can live almost entirely on my
social security. Can you? Even with my expensive bicycle hobby I own
less than $1,600 TOTAL. And I knocked my bank account down to just
enough to cover emergencies since the Democrats are now attacking
banks which will drive them into bankruptcy."
12/30/2022 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/8F27oh1Cy4s/m/yHneeKi8BAAJ> "When I said that I made $12,000 on my investments the previous month
I didn't mention that I made $20,000 the previous month."
01/07/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/2FS5CrA2NTs/m/3RMpAhArAQAJ> "Imagine that Frank believes me in misery with a sum worth of a
million and a half dollars and no bills..."
01/20/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/85qODEJbdFE/m/uHojwq_tAQAJ> "If I had not needed to cash in my stock option to gain cancer
treatments for my mother and then getting a divorce, I would easily
have been a multimillionaire. Instead I am only worth about a million
and a half due to Biden's latest market recession."
03/05/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/JG80Gv6eFz4/m/I5iXXkCRAgAJ> "Lou, I am worth a million and 3/4 dollars. Exactly what are you
worth?"
04/29/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/vRf9zk39jnc/m/Pccwf7dbBAAJ> "I was making up to a quarter of a million dollars a year while
Krygowski was making $2.50 a day."
05/08/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Xe0OfRKbW30/m/COmHdGuLBgAJ> "I am now officially a millionaire aside from the investment in my
home."
06/02/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/zq7Xw0dOUx4/m/2vLwSWEKAQAJ> "Yesterday my investments made me over $20,000"
06/24/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/5ePyZOO6V9g/m/SUaP7P6lAAAJ> "Last month I lost $7,000 from my investments. Bad news for them is
that I still have well over a million dollars."
08/11/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/xEhLHBZeFGU/m/m2CWQe6OAwAJ> "Actually I held a job at one firm for more than 20 years. It simply continued to change hands because we made products that people wanted
and needed."
08/15/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/qMylsLSMx_A/m/B_hJoZNfAQAJ> "I am making $40,000 a MONTH in interest. on my investments which are
now in protected tax free bond funds."
11/15/2023 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/cowbx-VJiEI/m/uiPZshyECAAJ> "Yesterday I got my financial report and although I lost around
$12,000 from the market being down, I still have a million in stable investments."
02/15/2024 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/6t1qDqyJtsk/m/43AG-IZuAQAJ> "My latest investment report can in and it is !,114,000 or $13,000
more than last month"
10/21/2024
<https://rec.bicycles.tech.narkive.com/w7VWgtiv/flunky#post17>
"I just got my latest financial report and I am now close to $1.2
million."
11/14/2024 <https://rec.bicycles.tech.narkive.com/twndhAxc/selling-used-bikes>
(article missing in archive)
Message-ID: <J7tZO.166$_Zee.9@fx39.iad>
"Sure makes yoyu sad that my last financial report was down from the
previous because of the uncertainties of the election and I was all
the way down to $1,030,000.
01/15/2025
Message-ID: <ykVhP.814228$DPl.533594@fx13.iad>
"I was indeed a professional consultant for Embarcadero Systems
electronics department because the only people in the company that
knew what they were doing were the technicians and the board designer.
And THAT is the job that was paying me $223,000 a year."
03/05/2025 <https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=121640&group=rec.bicycles.tech#121640>
"I GAVE $60,000 to my brothers... In order to protect my investments
from any possible recession I have moved from growth stocks into fuds
like Govertrnment bonds which pay low interest rates rather than
growth. And I still have increased my investments to over $1.1
Million."
06/07/2025 <https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=127251&group=rec.bicycles.tech#127251>
"I'm sitting here with a total worth of about $1.7 million..."
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>>>>
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>>>>>him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the
"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million,
and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 million.
<https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
On Fri, 30 May 2025 16:14:50 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
The largest magazine distribution in the USA: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States>
is "AARP The Magazine" at 23.7 million per issue. By issue, that can
be per week, per month, per year, quarterly, annual, etc.
"The following list shows the 100 largest magazines in the United
States by paid circulation as of 31 December 2023 based on data from
the Alliance for Audited Media".
3.5 million is smaller than 23.7 million, but hardly "obscure".
You might also notice that "AARP The Magazine" and "The New Yorker"
address different audiences with different number of prospective
readers.
Incidentally, "The New Yorker" publishes 47 print issues per year
while "AARP The Magazine" publishes 6 print issues per year.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 16:14:50 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:34:34 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the >>>>>"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >>>>><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million, >>>>and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 >>>million. >>><https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
Yeah, I know. That makes the subscription rate even less impressive.
The largest magazine distribution in the USA: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States>
is "AARP The Magazine" at 23.7 million per issue. By issue, that can
be per week, per month, per year, quarterly, annual, etc.
"The following list shows the 100 largest magazines in the United
States by paid circulation as of 31 December 2023 based on data from
the Alliance for Audited Media".
3.5 million is smaller than 23.7 million, but hardly "obscure".
You might also notice that "AARP The Magazine" and "The New Yorker"
address different audiences with different number of prospective
readers.
It seems that obscurity is a subjective evaluation. I think the NYer
is obscure. You disagree. I'm OK with that.
On Fri, 30 May 2025 16:14:50 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 18:34:34 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:24:57 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 12:15:03 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:46:24 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:59:05 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:47:36 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:25:00 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>>>>>>wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>>>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>>>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get
him much recognition.
Not really "obscure": >>>>>>>><https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
In the USA, they're rated as 21st, after The American Legion Magazine >>>>>>>and American Rifleman, both of which are also obscure..
Actually, all magazines are obscure, nowdays.
Sorry, forgot the cite; >>>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation
The Wikipedia circulation list is only up to date to 2016. See the >>>>>"This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the page.
This list seems a little better:
"Top 100 U.S. Magazines by Circulation" >>>>><http://www1.psaresearch.com/images/TOPMAGAZINES.pdf>
The New Yorker is 88 out of 100. Not great, but hardly obscure.
A million and a half subscribers in a USA population of 3.5 million, >>>>and some of them are in other countries.
You're off by factor of 100. The US population for 2025 is about 347 >>>million. >>><https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population/>
Yeah, I know. That makes the subscription rate even less impressive.
The largest magazine distribution in the USA: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_magazines_by_circulation#United_States>
is "AARP The Magazine" at 23.7 million per issue. By issue, that can
be per week, per month, per year, quarterly, annual, etc.
"The following list shows the 100 largest magazines in the United
States by paid circulation as of 31 December 2023 based on data from
the Alliance for Audited Media".
3.5 million is smaller than 23.7 million, but hardly "obscure".
You might also notice that "AARP The Magazine" and "The New Yorker"
address different audiences with different number of prospective
readers.
It seems that obscurity is a subjective evaluation. I think the NYer
is obscure. You disagree. I'm OK with that.
On 5/30/2025 12:18 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 06:25:00 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 16:36:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Major Taylor made the cover of The New Yorker magazine.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-06-02 >>>>
He deserves more recognition than he commonly gets.
An article in an obscure paywalled leftist magazine isn't going to get >>> him much recognition.
Not really "obscure":
<https://deadline.com/2025/02/new-yorker-centenary-defies-magazine-downturn-1236296103/>
"The New Yorker with its 1.23 million subscribers..."
1.3 million subscribers is NOTHING. I'm sure that they will declare bankruptcy before long.
I'll take that bet.
Set the wager and set a date.
I'm still waiting for your taking my $1000 bet that "The New Yorker" will be out of business within 5 years.
After all, you believe that a circulation of just over a million is "hardly obscure" despite half of those subscriptions either already or expected to become nothing more than Internet publications.
I'm still trying to work my way through Liebermann's claims that the New Yorker prints 47 editions per yuear.
Doesn't he understand printing costs for full color high quality paper magazines?
On Sun Jun 8 19:16:52 2025 AMuzi wrote:
On 6/8/2025 6:23 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sat May 31 21:32:22 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 5/31/2025 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
Would you kike to place a bet on whether the New Yorker will be in business in 5 years?
I would!
OK, $1,000, that the New Yorker is gone in 5 years.
8 June, 2030. You're on.
Have you ever read even one New Yorker in its entirety?
Like it or not (I don't) it's an unique thing. The people
who do like it like it very much. And are rabidly loyal.
Andrew, I worked in a rather high class industry with very high class people. The sort of people who had lots and lots of awards for their work. And they entrusted me with their actual jobs. Nobel Prizes when that still meant something were common.I much cared for their nose-in-the-air and the "Letters to the Editor" tended to be even worse than the editorial content, but I read them none-the-less.
That means that their office waiting rooms all had The New Yorker Magazine before they made the mistake of taking the snobbish appeal of the New York City upper crust. So yes, I have read many New Yorker magazines from cover to cover. I cannot say that
You cannot survive taking a magazine into the spectacularly left wing position of cover art of Trump as Mussolini without paying the price.
It is my belief that almost ALL of the supposed common man comments that are so negative are entirely fomented by George Soros and Trump has rendered him impotent.
So would I, except that I don't gamble. In 5 years, I will be 82
years old and Tom will be 86 years old. Collecting on a bet, when
everyone is that old, will be problematic.
The New Yorker is not an independent business. It's a "brand" owned
by Conde Nast:
<https://www.condenast.com/brands>
Therefore, the bet would need to be whether The New Yorker remains in business as part of Conde Nast or if Conde Nast sells or licenses The
New Yorker brand to a different conglomerate or equity capital group.
#-----
After all, you believe that a circulation of just over a million is "hardly obscure" despite half of those subscriptions either already or expected to become nothing more than Internet publications.
I'm not worried because I'll have plenty of company as your fearless
leader sinks the ship that's keeping us all afloat.
On Tue Jun 10 15:22:10 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
So would I, except that I don't gamble. In 5 years, I will be 82
years old and Tom will be 86 years old. Collecting on a bet, when
everyone is that old, will be problematic.
The New Yorker is not an independent business. It's a "brand" owned
by Conde Nast:
<https://www.condenast.com/brands>
Therefore, the bet would need to be whether The New Yorker remains in
business as part of Conde Nast or if Conde Nast sells or licenses The
New Yorker brand to a different conglomerate or equity capital group.
#-----
After all, you believe that a circulation of just over a million is "hardly obscure" despite half of those subscriptions either already or expected to become nothing more than Internet publications.
I'm not worried because I'll have plenty of company as your fearless
leader sinks the ship that's keeping us all afloat.
You have fluff where others have brains - we are speaking of whether the New Yorker magaine remains in print, not whether some mother company remains in business after they are forced to divest themselves of a dump truck
And when I said that I argued with her about this on the internet chat group it hurt Flunky's feelings to think that either she was too inportant a person to discuss her theories with or that I had to be lying that I argued with his Godess of Finance.
On 6/10/2025 4:14 PM, cyclintom wrote:
The New Yorker crippled itself by taking and EXTREME left stance on everything.
That's bullshit, and it makes me think you've probably read very, very
little of that magazine.
The New Yorker crippled itself by taking and EXTREME left stance on everything. That may have pleased the annointed New York audience of the time but EVERY prediction about a Trump Presidency has turned out vastely overstated if not entirely wrong.
On 6/10/2025 1:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Jun 9 00:13:50 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 6/8/2025 8:09 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 16:15:18 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
I'm reminded of Tom's absolute certainty that Newsom would be recalled. >>>>> I wish we'd bet on that.
Only you could believe that a 32 billion dollar surplus reduced to a 27 billion dollar deficit is sound government management.
I didn't say that. I just pointed out that you were wrong in predicting
Newsom would be recalled - just as you're wrong on countless other things. >>>
If Californians cannot interpret those meanings, they are nothing less than a lost cause that President Trump has every right to cut off from Federal funding.
You choose to live there. Why not move to someplace where the residents
share your views?
There is a reason why I have money and you don't - I have common sense and you don't.
Tom, nobody believes you are wealthy.
Frank, exactly what do I care if you think I'm wealthy or not?
You care enough to repeatedly brag about it. But still, nobody believes it.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:06:16 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
And when I said that I argued with her about this on the internet chat group it hurt Flunky's feelings to think that either she was too inportant a person to discuss her theories with or that I had to be lying that I argued with his Godess of Finance.
Occam's Razor. You were lying. You never argued with Janet Yellen on
some unspecified internet chat group. If you had, there would have
been evidence of the argument available online. Try your luck at
finding your "arguement" or your name: <https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=janet%20yellen>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:45:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
I'm still trying to work my way through Liebermann's claims that the New Yorker prints 47 editions per yuear.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Yorker>
"The New Yorker is published 47 times annually, with five of these
issues covering two-week spans."
If you don't believe me, you can always ask your favorite AI. For
example:
<https://chatgpt.com/share/6848b19a-6be0-800c-a5b7-c768c07aa813>
"The New Yorker publishes 47 issues per year.
It is a weekly magazine, but it typically combines a few issues during
the summer and holiday periods (e.g., a double issue for Christmas/New
Year), which reduces the total from 52 to 47."
Doesn't he understand printing costs for full color high quality paper magazines?
You're right. I don't understand. Please explain how you know what I
do or don't understand.
Oops. I left my car door open. The neighbors cat is now digging
through my groceries. Tom, if anything is lost, it's your fault.
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:11:16 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 6/10/2025 4:14 PM, cyclintom wrote:
The New Yorker crippled itself by taking and EXTREME left stance on everything.
That's bullshit, and it makes me think you've probably read very, very >>little of that magazine.
That's what I thought. Then I found these: ><https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-yorker> ><https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-yorker/>
which rate The New Yorker as hard left.
On 6/11/2025 5:25 AM, zen cycle wrote:
On 6/10/2025 8:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:06:16 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
And when I said that I argued with her about this on the internet
chat group it hurt Flunky's feelings to think that either she was too
inportant a person to discuss her theories with or that I had to be
lying that I argued with his Godess of Finance.
Occam's Razor. You were lying. You never argued with Janet Yellen on
some unspecified internet chat group. If you had, there would have
been evidence of the argument available online. Try your luck at
finding your "arguement" or your name:
<https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=janet%20yellen>
Yup. he could settle this simply and rapidly by posting a link to the
facebook "argument". BTW, as with all of tommy's laughable claims, I
wasn't hurt at all, I was amused by the idea that he though anyone would
actually believe him.
That is perhaps the weirdest part of Tom's posts. He seems to think
people believe him!
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 20:14:25 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
The New Yorker crippled itself by taking and EXTREME left stance on everything. That may have pleased the annointed New York audience of the time but EVERY prediction about a Trump Presidency has turned out vastely overstated if not entirely wrong.
Is The New Yorker liberal (left) or conservative (right)? Toss a coin perhaps?
The New Yorker (10/18/2024)
"How Biased Is the Media, Really?" <https://www.newyorker.com/news/fault-lines/how-biased-is-the-media-really> "The people who work in the media might be liberal, but the people who
own the media companies are not, and they all want Trump to win not
only to save on taxes but because Trump is good for the media
business."
Are The New Yorker readers liberal or conservative. From skimming a
few articles, the readership seems to be mostly liberal.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 12:28:16 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,717 |