1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.BICYCLES.TECH

  • =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBUb2xkIHlvdSBzby4=?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 16:09:58 2025
    On Wed Jun 11 20:29:17 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:50:29 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    Whoever gave that ridiculous information should be arrested
    for perjury, or whatever you call lying under oath. Assuming "Senste"
    is "Senate" and not some new ultra-sensitive condom.

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

    Our Tom is having trouble interpreting simple facts.

    Covid uses the spike protein to enter the cells. So EVERY
    SINGLE person infected with Covid should have a positive blood test
    for spike protein(or their antibodies). That includes everyone that
    was STUPID enough NOT to get vaccinated.
    Maybe what Tom is saying is that, of all the people that died
    of Covid, 74% were people that refused to get vaccinated. So the
    authorities responsible for vaccination ARE guilty, because they
    should have made it mandatory. Shame on you Fauci (and Trump who hired
    him).




    The fact that you are retired is showing since apparently you no longer read medical articles. Covid-19 is a RESPIRATORY disease and remains in the lungs ans respiratory passages. How many people have to die from incompetent medical people such as you.
    Are you perhapos related to Anthony Fauci?

    The ONLY way to get the spike protein into the blood was direct injection of it into the bloodstream with the mRNA vaccine which then using reverse transcriptase reverted to DNA and spread the spike protein throughout the body.

    By all means use Reuters to try and prove that a news agency knows more about your stupid beliefs than medical authorities testifying before congress. You certainly do not have to believe me but it is obvious that I know far more about Covid-19 than you
    ever bothered to learn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 16:16:34 2025
    On Thu Jun 12 06:25:40 2025 zen cycle wrote:

    lol...no, that's not what tommy is saying at all. He legitimately
    believes covid 19 was no more dangerous than the common seasonal flu,
    and that all the deaths attributed to covid 19 were caused by the vaccine.

    Of course, he hasn't squared that with why so many millions died before
    the vaccines were available.

    I'm sure in his mind it was Obamas fault....somehow (or maybe he's
    twisted it around enough that it was Bidens fault people died before the vaccine was ready....who knows what weird scenarios can come out of his perverted little mind)




    I'm absolutely certain that Flunky believes it absolutely normal for there to be a 20% above normal death rate.

    There was medical authorities testifying before Congress and it wasn't worth his time to bother with while dancing about because some retired Brazilian doctor makes the claim that a virus breaks the respiratory system barrier and enters the bloodstream.

    Flunky, you are nearly there. Just keep showing everyone your intelligence. Soon everyone will know that you're a complete jackass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 16:28:33 2025
    On Fri Jun 13 17:36:49 2025 Rolf Mantel wrote:

    It's coming up perfectly fine for me, soe somebody seems to have put an US-block on the picture.

    Now that you mention it, those ads even come through to my work PC where sexually based entertainment normally is blocked.




    One has to question what some jack-off happy non-cyclist is doing on this group spreading vicious rumors and claiming that he is a doctor. His claim that a respiratory disease can leave the respirqtory system and entire the bloodstream is certainly
    unique. In the meantime 6 medical authorities say exactly the opposite to Congress. And one so-called authority directly lies to Congress claiming that mRNA vaccines stopped the spread of Covid-19 when EVERY medical authority including Pdizer and Moderna
    themselves said that their vaccines do not stop the spread of the virus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 16:32:11 2025
    On Wed Jun 11 17:23:41 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 4:50 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths
    attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the
    blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines- may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

    You're attempting to counter tommys fabrications with facts? Yeah,
    that'll work....




    Apparently Eeuters removed that article. But nither you nor meathead noticed that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 16:19:09 2025
    On Thu Jun 12 15:00:32 2025 Shadow wrote:

    I get the picture
    <https://thumbsnap.com/i/AJxh4frF.jpg?0612>




    So your present hobby isn't cycling but pornography?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 17:27:53 2025
    On Wed Jun 11 16:50:29 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/




    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8709364/ https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10022421/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34945172/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10874131/ https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/heavily-censored-autopsies-study https://drjessesantiano.com/sars-cov-2-spike-protein-and-mrna-can-get-inside-the-human-nucleus/


    Oh, wait a minute - these papers are ALL incorrect according to Shadow and that medical dean - Flunky. Meathead also denies their very existance. They show nothing because ONE paper was withdrawn for questionable methodology. Not that it was wrong but
    because it allowed room for argument.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 17:17:20 2025
    On Fri Jun 13 14:55:59 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/13/2025 2:46 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:32:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed Jun 11 17:23:41 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 4:50 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths
    attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the >>>>> blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines- >>>> may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

    You're attempting to counter tommys fabrications with facts? Yeah,
    that'll work....




    Apparently Eeuters removed that article.

    Trump must be censoring it. You KNOW you're under a
    dictatorship when you can't access public documents.

    No, it works. Tommy is just being tommy again.


    Here are the first few paragraphs of the article:

    //

    Fact Check: Study does not say COVID vaccines may have fuelled excess deaths
    By Reuters Fact Check
    June 13, 202410:20 AM UTC
    Reuters Fact Check logo
    A newly released study does not say COVID-19 vaccines may have fuelled excess deaths across the world, contrary to claims on social media.
    The journal which published the analysis has issued a statement, opens
    new tab calling news from various outlets about the paper misreporting
    and emphasising that the research does not support the claim that
    vaccines are a major contributory factor to excess deaths since the
    start of the pandemic.
    Health data experts interviewed by Reuters also said that while the
    paper, published, opens new tab by BMJ Public Health, discusses excess mortality during the 2020-2022 pandemic, it does not say COVID
    vaccines were driving the deaths.




    Reuters is BRITISH and Trump can have no control over it. But Flunky being Flunky doesn't know this. The beleieves that because you can access it on the Internet which never forgets, it must therefore be correct.

    Doctors of good experience including one who was permanently crippled by ONE shot of covid-19 vavvine testified about the many types of illnesses but Flunky being a board certified MD charading as an EE tells us that they are all wrong and he is the real
    authority on everything under the sun which just happens to coincide with the far left point of view.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 17:54:36 2025
    On Fri Jun 13 21:48:12 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/13/2025 5:31 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:32:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed Jun 11 17:23:41 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 4:50 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths
    attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the >>>>> blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines- >>>> may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

    You're attempting to counter tommys fabrications with facts? Yeah,
    that'll work....

    Apparently Eeuters removed that article. But nither you nor meathead noticed that.

    The article did not disappear. What happened is Frank forgot to
    include angle brackets <URL> also known as sideways carets, to
    prevent the next comment, by Zen Cycle, from bisecting the URL with a
    line break. That's why I include angle brackets in every URL I cite.
    This should work. Try again: <https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/>

    Hmm. I don't normally need to do that trick with angle brackets. I
    generally just highlight a URL, hit Ctrl-C then paste it into whatever
    I'm writing. It almost always works fine. In fact, I don't recall any complaints.




    Frank, you are doing it correctly as long as you include the entire address. The reason I haven't been able to read Liebermann's so-called references is because his browser is not smart enough to know that his trailing ">" is not part of the address. So
    now if I actually bother to look at his typically wrong citations I have to manually remove the ">".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 18:38:21 2025
    On Sat Jun 14 10:41:08 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:17:20 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Reuters is BRITISH and Trump can have no control over it.

    Thomson-Reuters has its headquarters in Canada: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reuters>
    Thomson Corp bought Reuters Group in 2008. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reuters#Thomson_acquisition_of_Reuters>
    "In 2009, it unified its dual listed company structure and stopped its listing on the London Stock Exchange and NASDAQ. As of October 2022,
    it was listed only as Thomson Reuters Corporation on the New York
    Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol: TRI)."




    So what you're saying is that Reuters USED to be a British company but has since been sold to a Canadian company. And it just happened to occur when I was having no memory and seizures most of the time.

    What difference to the conversation did it make since the point was that it WASN'T an American comapny and so couldn't have any effect from President Trump?

    I wonder if there is no point no matter how small that you could actually understand. A reservoir fills with mud in a very heavy rain year and you deny it was ever a reservoir. For the last three months, they have even been digging the mud out of the
    creek below the reservoir. I'm sure that you don't mind telling me that it ain't so, despite you haven't been there and I have. But then you claimeed that the road in Cull Canyon wasn't covered in mud as the County had bulldozers pushing it off of the
    roads.

    A normal human being would be embarassed by the things you say, but not only are you not but you continue with your BS on and on trapped in your hole in the Santa Cruz mountains

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 16:48:09 2025
    On Sat Jun 14 16:20:48 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:54:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri Jun 13 21:48:12 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/13/2025 5:31 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:32:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed Jun 11 17:23:41 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 4:50 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 2:48 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Information given to the Senste Committee on the vaccine program:

    "the mRNA vaccines are responsible for 74% of all of the deaths
    attributed to Covid-19"

    This is strongly supported by the findings of spike protein in the >> >>>>> blood of people who died supposedly from covis-19.

    https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines- >> >>>> may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/

    You're attempting to counter tommys fabrications with facts? Yeah, >> >>> that'll work....

    Apparently Eeuters removed that article. But nither you nor meathead noticed that.

    The article did not disappear. What happened is Frank forgot to
    include angle brackets <URL> also known as sideways carets, to
    prevent the next comment, by Zen Cycle, from bisecting the URL with a
    line break. That's why I include angle brackets in every URL I cite.
    This should work. Try again:
    <https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-does-not-say-covid-vaccines-may-have-fuelled-excess-deaths-2024-06-13/>

    Hmm. I don't normally need to do that trick with angle brackets. I
    generally just highlight a URL, hit Ctrl-C then paste it into whatever
    I'm writing. It almost always works fine. In fact, I don't recall any
    complaints.




    Frank, you are doing it correctly as long as you include the entire address. The reason I haven't been able to read Liebermann's so-called references is because his browser is not smart enough to know that his trailing ">" is not part of the address.
    So now if I actually bother to look at his typically wrong citations I have to manually remove the ">".

    All newsreaders remove the <> when they pass the address to
    the browser. The browser does not even "see" the brackets. But you
    know that, you're a programmer, right?




    I'm a programmer and you're not. You make false statements and expect people to agree with you Newshosting does not remove the trailing ">" because the leading "<" does not appear as part of the address.

    But the Doctor always knows right doesn't he?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 16:51:53 2025
    On Sat Jun 14 23:46:36 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 6/14/2025 3:20 PM, Shadow wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:54:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    The reason I haven't been able to read Liebermann's so-called
    references is because his browser is not smart enough to know that his trailing ">" is not part of the address. So now if I actually bother to
    look at his typically wrong citations I have to manually remove the ">".

    All newsreaders remove the <> when they pass the address to
    the browser. The browser does not even "see" the brackets. But you
    know that, you're a programmer, right?
    []'s

    I'll note that everyone else seems to be able to use Jeff's links with
    no problem.




    What Newsreader are you using with Eternal-September? When I was trying to find a newsreader that worked with Ete4rnal-September, you remained quiet. That left me trying to use several that in fact did not work correctly until I was forced to use the
    commercial Newshosting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 16 16:55:20 2025
    On Sat Jun 14 21:48:06 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:54:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    The reason I haven't been able to read Liebermann's so-called references is because his browser is not smart enough to know that his trailing ">" is not part of the address.

    That's really amazing. I don't use a browser to read Usenet news. I
    use a reader called Forte Agent. <https://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php>

    However, that's not the amazing part. What's amazing is that my
    choice of Usenet news reader somehow affects your ability to read
    messages on your computer. Thanks for letting me know. It suggests
    that I have the ability to do remote manipulation (telekinesis). I'll
    try it and see how much damage I can do to your computer using my
    newly discovered psychic abilities. Please send me a damage report
    after your computer recovers from the plague of mis-behaving trailing
    angle brackets.




    I see that that is also a commercial newsreader so Frank was also strangely quiet about his use of the free Eternal-September to you as well. Could it be that someone else set him up and he doesn't know anything about it except how to use it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)