On Wed Jun 11 20:02:48 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 6/11/2025 5:28 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sat May 31 21:31:05 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 5/31/2025 3:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Fri May 30 13:27:04 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 5/30/2025 11:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
... we now know that 74% of people taking the vaccine suffered permanent
heart damage ...
Fascinating! And your source for that factoid is ... ???
Frank, it is very difficult to discover the actual paper ...
Because it doesn't exist, and never did. You pulled your WAG out of the
usual orifice.
As a question, why are you arguing about this unless all you want to do is claim that I am wrong?
Like several people here, I _do_ want to point out that your are wrong.
Part of my motivation is to reduce the likelihood that some naive reader >> will actually believe you. You consistently try to spread nonsense. Your >> posts are harmful to society.
I spent 50 years working on medical devices or laboratory devices designed to detect diseases. Be very sure that you show that as a teacher you know far more about it than I do.
From what we can tell, you once programmed motion control in a tabletop >> instrument to squirt drops of liquid into an array of test tubes. You've >> also claimed to have installed telephone systems, designed critical
communications equipment for space operations and other probably
imaginary projects, which means you didn't put a solid 50 years into
medical equipment. You've never given evidence of any great medical
knowledge, and almost daily you post plenty of evidence that you don't
know your ass from your elbow regarding medicine, economics, history,
bike mechanics and more.
Back to your 74% claim: Post a link to a legitimate reference source or
shut up.
Frank, your rediculous ideas of science are just as well thought out as BECAUSE you taught machanical engineering you are a mechanical engineer. If you didn't believe me you ONLY had to do a simple search but either you're too lazy or too stupid to
do so.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/covid-vaccines-caused-74-deaths-dr-peter-mccullough-shocks-senate-with-bombshell-claim/videoshow/121425442.cms
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/the-autopsy-data-are-in-what-they-reveal-about-covid-19-vaccines-and-public-health-oversight/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/3420162/gop-senate-report-biden-health-officials-misled-public-risks-covid-vaccine-myocarditis/
None of those are reputable sources, Tom. All seem to be right wing
kooks. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lyons-Weiler#Controversies
Now here is an opposing paper by the Lancet. Since they published paper after paper singing the praises of mRNA vaccines and how well they worked and how rare the side effects were this is NOT a "fact check" but a CYA.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2023/07/fact-check-preprint-paper-submitted-to-the-lancet-did-not-find-74-percent-of-deaths-in-reviewed-autopsies-were-caused-by-covid19-vaccine.html
Right, Lancet. Its history and reputation are dozens of times more
legitimate and respected than Washington Times, or Lyons-Weiler's blog "Science, Public Health Policy and the Law"
But I understand your standards. If anything is not hard right wing, it doesn't meet your approval.
We've previously discussed and thoroughly disproved your claims of the deadliness of Covid vaccines. But still, if you truly believe those
vaccines effectively murdered so many innocent people, you _really_
ought to go after the president who so proudly fast tracked and financed their development, with his "Operation Warp Speed."
Do you remember who that president was? Why don't you demonstrate your fearsome fighting skills by doing to him as you threaten to do to me?
Then WHY didn't you watch the Senate subcommittee on vaccines this morning (yesterday morning?). Your claims about reputation really compares well with a 20% increase in the death rates in the USA. Funny how where the mRNA vaccines were not being touted
and/or forced upon people the death rates were normal.
The actions of the Lancet OCCURRED noit from reliable studies for which the mRNA vaccines HAD NONE, but where cheap journalism from people ordered to convince people to gobble down the products of Big Pharma.
Why is it that you would even DARE to argue with the immense deaths in every country using the mRNA vaccines? Why is it that you don't know that a serious health incidence of 1 or 2 in a HUNDRED THOUSAND is liable to pull a vaccine off of the market,
especially for children's vaccines, and this was 2.5% of the vaccinated and was being FORCED on people?
There is something really wrong with you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)