• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBIYW5kbGViYXJzIGFuZCBvdGhlciByZWd1bGF0b3J5IGlzc3Vlc

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 25 18:33:47 2025
    On Wed Jun 25 10:17:00 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 7:23 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/24/2025 4:38 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    https://www.renehersecycles.com/our-handlebars-are-not-uci-compliant-
    and-we-dont-care/

    I just measured mine on my ~40 year old touring bike and my 53 year old
    utility bike. Neither meet current UCI standards.

    I've long noticed that I slightly outcoast almost everyone in our club
    when riding the brake hoods, and I'm far from the heaviest. That's even
    without using my aerobar, which gives a further huge benefit. Maybe my
    (slightly) narrow handlebars (~38 cm?) are a partial explanation.


    I believe they give a marginal advantage, but I?d suggest body position and clothing would have greater impact.

    Roger Merriman


    For us mortals that's correct. In the professional world where
    milliseconds or single 100ths of CdA count, it can make the difference between a win and _not_ a win.

    Frank is likely in a more aerodynamic position - even though others may _appear_ to be in the same position. Nuances count more at higher speeds.




    While I agree with you I strongly dounbt that Frank is in a more aero position on a touring bike. More likely a higher weight which carries more energy at any speed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)