• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJFOiBSZTogUkU6IFJlOiBTZXR0aW5nIEdhcm1pbiAxMDMwIGZvciBtb

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 29 21:13:41 2025
    On Sun Jun 29 21:04:33 2025 cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 09:13:01 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/28/2025 7:30 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Jun 28 07:47:07 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 21:40:54 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:47 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:37 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 00:11:21 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 6:39 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 4:00 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Jun 23 13:32:57 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/2025 11:19 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    it's possible he's having trouble getting the moving average
    to display.
    he might need some guidance getting the datafield menu, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm done
    helping him.

    I was suffering some irritation with my new cell phone. A 13-
    year-old
    fixed it for me within minutes.

    Tom should hire a 13-year-old.

    Frank, are you saying that you don't know anything about a >>>>>>>>>>>>> Garmin but
    someone else should?

    I have no interest in Garmins. But I'm saying _you_ don't know >>>>>>>>>>>> enough
    about your Garmin, and that today's teenagers are often adept at
    electronic devices and their menu systems.

    But forget it. Figure it out yourself, while bitching that you >>>>>>>>>>>> are right
    and the rest of the universe is wrong, as you usually do. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed does seem to believe all sorts of things about the Garmin?s
    that a
    clearly not correct!

    I agree with Jay Beattie that I don't need electronics to tell me
    how
    much slower I'm getting. I wonder what you're hoping to achieve with
    your Garmin. Training for your next race?

    Personally they are handy for navigation, while I use maps (yes >>>>>>>>>>> paper) to
    plot a route a device that can keep one on that route, this sort
    of thing
    is much less with roads, which are by some degree easier to navigate.

    There was a movie called Hard Miles that came out a few years ago
    starring Mattew Modine. The IMDB synopsis reads:

    "A prison social worker assembles a cycling team of teenage >>>>>>>>>> convicts and
    takes them on a transformative 1,000-mile ride. Inspired by the >>>>>>>>>> life of
    Greg Townsend and the Ridgeview Academy cycling team." >>>>>>>>>>
    I saw it in the theater when it came out. I gave it a solid B/B+,
    partially since it did a reasonable job in the technical aspects,
    but it
    was a good movie overall with a very positive message. >>>>>>>>>>
    The relevant point to my response, was when Modine's character was
    teaching the kids how to read a map - which they would need since they
    weren't' going to be allowed to bring cellphones on the trip. >>>>>>>>>>
    One of the teenagers suggested they avoid a city center since the map
    had the roads shown in red, meaning they had a lot of traffic. The
    interaction between the two about how a paper map could possibly be
    updated in real time was hilarious.

    To be fair that?s one feature Strava has which is one can see if >>>>>>>>> anyone has
    used a segment and this year/month/week to gauge does this exist on the
    ground and is it rideable? Names occasionally give the name away, >>>>>>>>> segments
    named Bramble tunnel for example I might avoid!

    Ie that there is a right of way is one thing but is it possible to
    ride it?
    The paper maps can?t tell me, sometimes I can be fairly sure for >>>>>>>>> example
    some of the rarely used stuff on the Ridgeway is open land so be >>>>>>>>> passable.



    I do use Strava etc for the social and so on aspect. >>>>>>>>>>>
    And I do prefer Strava route builder over others particularly as I
    do ride
    routes less traveled so that?s always useful.

    Roger Merriman





    Roger Merriman


    I haven't looked at a paper map for decades. I'm surprised that they
    still make them.

    Note the maps Im talking about are UK Ordance Survey so their focus >>>>>>> is for
    land and rights of way, way beyond tarmac roads, they do have digital
    download which is handy, as a mobile is generally more waterproof and
    easier to carry.

    Google maps and similar will do little in such areas.
    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Roger Merriman




    My experience as well. Good mapmakers are a wonderful resource. >>>>>
    Heartily agreed! I love USGS maps, and I once had an article published
    in _Bicycling_ explaining and praising them for bicycling, especially >>>>> for the contour data.

    When a good friend or family member moves to a new location, I mount and
    frame a 1:24000 series map of their location as a gift. If their place
    is near an edge or corner, I include the adjacent maps, carefully fitted
    together. I think the resulting wall hanging is quite beautiful. >>>>>

    Uk Ordnance Survey you can buy them centred on your house etc, no digital
    down load and so on but nevertheless fun.

    I do also use the old online versions to find stuff that has disappeared,
    and go for an explore.

    Roger Merriman


    Being a it of a history nut, I like to do that, but I think old
    antique maps are best for that. I have copies of old maps that show
    the old stagecoach road that ran through two of my ancestors farms.

    I tend to find the very old ones aren?t particularly detailed and large >> scale which is why Ordance Survey was set up, and there are fairly detailed
    ones 18xx (late)

    Which to be fair is often more curiosity why is that track there? Roman and
    so on roads are normally fairly clear.

    When I said I haven't looked at a paper map for decades, I was
    referring to using them for navigation, but I enthralled with old
    antique maps and using them to find places with history. I used an old >>> map and old books to find and hike to the place where I believe my
    great grandfather and his cavalry mates crossed the Rappahannock River >>> to attack Jeb Stuart. I sat on the stone fence where his brother, my >>> great uncle died.

    That for me at least in the close term would probably be the world wars, >> going further back it?s much more diluted, and sometimes on both sides such
    as Battle of Hastings and so on.




    Romkan Roads were a marvel of engineering for their time. They were dug deep and then followed with gravel and then stone. They had better be plain because they were built to carry 4 columns next to each other. Hadrians Wall is still there after
    over 2,000 years. Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over Roman roads.

    WTF?

    "Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over
    Roman roads." is not even remotely believable. It's just
    not true.




    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Why+are+Belgian+cobblestone+roads+built+like+that&atb=v366-1&t=chromentp&ia=videos&iax=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DkUIsFv_JNYs




    Oops, https://youtu.be/kUIsFv_JNYs

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 3 20:07:14 2025
    On Sun Jun 29 16:29:48 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/29/2025 4:13 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 21:04:33 2025 cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 09:13:01 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/28/2025 7:30 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Jun 28 07:47:07 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 21:40:54 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:47 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:37 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 00:11:21 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 6:39 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2025 4:00 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Jun 23 13:32:57 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/2025 11:19 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

    it's possible he's having trouble getting the moving average
    to display.
    he might need some guidance getting the datafield menu, but
    I'm done
    helping him.

    I was suffering some irritation with my new cell phone. A 13-
    year-old
    fixed it for me within minutes.

    Tom should hire a 13-year-old.

    Frank, are you saying that you don't know anything about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garmin but
    someone else should?

    I have no interest in Garmins. But I'm saying _you_ don't know
    enough
    about your Garmin, and that today's teenagers are often adept at
    electronic devices and their menu systems.

    But forget it. Figure it out yourself, while bitching that you
    are right
    and the rest of the universe is wrong, as you usually do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed does seem to believe all sorts of things about the Garmin?s
    that a
    clearly not correct!

    I agree with Jay Beattie that I don't need electronics to tell me
    how
    much slower I'm getting. I wonder what you're hoping to achieve with
    your Garmin. Training for your next race?

    Personally they are handy for navigation, while I use maps (yes
    paper) to
    plot a route a device that can keep one on that route, this sort
    of thing
    is much less with roads, which are by some degree easier to navigate.

    There was a movie called Hard Miles that came out a few years ago
    starring Mattew Modine. The IMDB synopsis reads:

    "A prison social worker assembles a cycling team of teenage >>>>>>>>>>>>> convicts and
    takes them on a transformative 1,000-mile ride. Inspired by the >>>>>>>>>>>>> life of
    Greg Townsend and the Ridgeview Academy cycling team." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I saw it in the theater when it came out. I gave it a solid B/B+,
    partially since it did a reasonable job in the technical aspects,
    but it
    was a good movie overall with a very positive message. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    The relevant point to my response, was when Modine's character was
    teaching the kids how to read a map - which they would need since they
    weren't' going to be allowed to bring cellphones on the trip. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    One of the teenagers suggested they avoid a city center since the map
    had the roads shown in red, meaning they had a lot of traffic. The
    interaction between the two about how a paper map could possibly be
    updated in real time was hilarious.

    To be fair that?s one feature Strava has which is one can see if >>>>>>>>>>>> anyone has
    used a segment and this year/month/week to gauge does this exist on the
    ground and is it rideable? Names occasionally give the name away,
    segments
    named Bramble tunnel for example I might avoid!

    Ie that there is a right of way is one thing but is it possible to
    ride it?
    The paper maps can?t tell me, sometimes I can be fairly sure for >>>>>>>>>>>> example
    some of the rarely used stuff on the Ridgeway is open land so be >>>>>>>>>>>> passable.



    I do use Strava etc for the social and so on aspect. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    And I do prefer Strava route builder over others particularly as I
    do ride
    routes less traveled so that?s always useful.

    Roger Merriman





    Roger Merriman


    I haven't looked at a paper map for decades. I'm surprised that they
    still make them.

    Note the maps Im talking about are UK Ordance Survey so their focus
    is for
    land and rights of way, way beyond tarmac roads, they do have digital
    download which is handy, as a mobile is generally more waterproof and
    easier to carry.

    Google maps and similar will do little in such areas.
    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Roger Merriman




    My experience as well. Good mapmakers are a wonderful resource. >>>>>>>>
    Heartily agreed! I love USGS maps, and I once had an article published
    in _Bicycling_ explaining and praising them for bicycling, especially
    for the contour data.

    When a good friend or family member moves to a new location, I mount and
    frame a 1:24000 series map of their location as a gift. If their place
    is near an edge or corner, I include the adjacent maps, carefully fitted
    together. I think the resulting wall hanging is quite beautiful. >>>>>>>>

    Uk Ordnance Survey you can buy them centred on your house etc, no digital
    down load and so on but nevertheless fun.

    I do also use the old online versions to find stuff that has disappeared,
    and go for an explore.

    Roger Merriman


    Being a it of a history nut, I like to do that, but I think old
    antique maps are best for that. I have copies of old maps that show >>>>>> the old stagecoach road that ran through two of my ancestors farms. >>>>>
    I tend to find the very old ones aren?t particularly detailed and large >>>>> scale which is why Ordance Survey was set up, and there are fairly detailed
    ones 18xx (late)

    Which to be fair is often more curiosity why is that track there? Roman and
    so on roads are normally fairly clear.

    When I said I haven't looked at a paper map for decades, I was
    referring to using them for navigation, but I enthralled with old >>>>>> antique maps and using them to find places with history. I used an old >>>>>> map and old books to find and hike to the place where I believe my >>>>>> great grandfather and his cavalry mates crossed the Rappahannock River >>>>>> to attack Jeb Stuart. I sat on the stone fence where his brother, my >>>>>> great uncle died.

    That for me at least in the close term would probably be the world wars,
    going further back it?s much more diluted, and sometimes on both sides such
    as Battle of Hastings and so on.




    Romkan Roads were a marvel of engineering for their time. They were dug deep and then followed with gravel and then stone. They had better be plain because they were built to carry 4 columns next to each other. Hadrians Wall is still there after
    over 2,000 years. Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over Roman roads.

    WTF?

    "Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over
    Roman roads." is not even remotely believable. It's just
    not true.




    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Why+are+Belgian+cobblestone+roads+built+like+that&atb=v366-1&t=chromentp&ia=videos&iax=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DkUIsFv_JNYs




    Oops, https://youtu.be/kUIsFv_JNYs


    Flagstone and pavers are not cobbles.




    I'm afraid I don't understand what you're getting on about. Most of that reference was about Roman cobblestone roads. Notice that they said thatg cities were built at main intersections of Roman roads. Paris in fact, has all of its northern road fujjnnel
    through Paris and then split south of Parris into many smaller roads. But like I said, France merely used the Roman cobblestone roads as a base for today's roads. Driving down these roads and coming to Roman road houses pretty much shows this practice
    pretty clearly.

    France was left pretty much untouched by the war (bombs and very heavy fighting) so those roads were stgill usable. Belgium was certainly another story.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Thu Jul 3 15:46:10 2025
    On 7/3/2025 3:07 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 16:29:48 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/29/2025 4:13 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 21:04:33 2025 cyclintom wrote:
    On Sun Jun 29 09:13:01 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/28/2025 7:30 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Sat Jun 28 07:47:07 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 21:40:54 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 8:47 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/27/2025 4:37 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
    On 27 Jun 2025 00:11:21 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

    Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 6/25/2025 6:39 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/25/2025 4:00 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Jun 23 13:32:57 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/2025 11:19 AM, Zen Cycle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    it's possible he's having trouble getting the moving average
    to display.
    he might need some guidance getting the datafield menu, but
    I'm done
    helping him.

    I was suffering some irritation with my new cell phone. A 13-
    year-old
    fixed it for me within minutes.

    Tom should hire a 13-year-old.

    Frank, are you saying that you don't know anything about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garmin but
    someone else should?

    I have no interest in Garmins. But I'm saying _you_ don't know
    enough
    about your Garmin, and that today's teenagers are often adept at
    electronic devices and their menu systems.

    But forget it. Figure it out yourself, while bitching that you
    are right
    and the rest of the universe is wrong, as you usually do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Indeed does seem to believe all sorts of things about the Garmin?s
    that a
    clearly not correct!

    I agree with Jay Beattie that I don't need electronics to tell me
    how
    much slower I'm getting. I wonder what you're hoping to achieve with
    your Garmin. Training for your next race?

    Personally they are handy for navigation, while I use maps (yes
    paper) to
    plot a route a device that can keep one on that route, this sort
    of thing
    is much less with roads, which are by some degree easier to navigate.

    There was a movie called Hard Miles that came out a few years ago
    starring Mattew Modine. The IMDB synopsis reads: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "A prison social worker assembles a cycling team of teenage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convicts and
    takes them on a transformative 1,000-mile ride. Inspired by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life of
    Greg Townsend and the Ridgeview Academy cycling team." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    I saw it in the theater when it came out. I gave it a solid B/B+,
    partially since it did a reasonable job in the technical aspects,
    but it
    was a good movie overall with a very positive message. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    The relevant point to my response, was when Modine's character was
    teaching the kids how to read a map - which they would need since they
    weren't' going to be allowed to bring cellphones on the trip. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    One of the teenagers suggested they avoid a city center since the map
    had the roads shown in red, meaning they had a lot of traffic. The
    interaction between the two about how a paper map could possibly be
    updated in real time was hilarious.

    To be fair that?s one feature Strava has which is one can see if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone has
    used a segment and this year/month/week to gauge does this exist on the
    ground and is it rideable? Names occasionally give the name away,
    segments
    named Bramble tunnel for example I might avoid!

    Ie that there is a right of way is one thing but is it possible to
    ride it?
    The paper maps can?t tell me, sometimes I can be fairly sure for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> example
    some of the rarely used stuff on the Ridgeway is open land so be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> passable.



    I do use Strava etc for the social and so on aspect. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    And I do prefer Strava route builder over others particularly as I
    do ride
    routes less traveled so that?s always useful.

    Roger Merriman





    Roger Merriman


    I haven't looked at a paper map for decades. I'm surprised that they
    still make them.

    Note the maps Im talking about are UK Ordance Survey so their focus
    is for
    land and rights of way, way beyond tarmac roads, they do have digital
    download which is handy, as a mobile is generally more waterproof and
    easier to carry.

    Google maps and similar will do little in such areas. >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    Roger Merriman




    My experience as well. Good mapmakers are a wonderful resource. >>>>>>>>>>
    Heartily agreed! I love USGS maps, and I once had an article published
    in _Bicycling_ explaining and praising them for bicycling, especially
    for the contour data.

    When a good friend or family member moves to a new location, I mount and
    frame a 1:24000 series map of their location as a gift. If their place
    is near an edge or corner, I include the adjacent maps, carefully fitted
    together. I think the resulting wall hanging is quite beautiful. >>>>>>>>>>

    Uk Ordnance Survey you can buy them centred on your house etc, no digital
    down load and so on but nevertheless fun.

    I do also use the old online versions to find stuff that has disappeared,
    and go for an explore.

    Roger Merriman


    Being a it of a history nut, I like to do that, but I think old >>>>>>>> antique maps are best for that. I have copies of old maps that show >>>>>>>> the old stagecoach road that ran through two of my ancestors farms. >>>>>>>
    I tend to find the very old ones aren?t particularly detailed and large >>>>>>> scale which is why Ordance Survey was set up, and there are fairly detailed
    ones 18xx (late)

    Which to be fair is often more curiosity why is that track there? Roman and
    so on roads are normally fairly clear.

    When I said I haven't looked at a paper map for decades, I was >>>>>>>> referring to using them for navigation, but I enthralled with old >>>>>>>> antique maps and using them to find places with history. I used an old >>>>>>>> map and old books to find and hike to the place where I believe my >>>>>>>> great grandfather and his cavalry mates crossed the Rappahannock River >>>>>>>> to attack Jeb Stuart. I sat on the stone fence where his brother, my >>>>>>>> great uncle died.

    That for me at least in the close term would probably be the world wars,
    going further back it?s much more diluted, and sometimes on both sides such
    as Battle of Hastings and so on.




    Romkan Roads were a marvel of engineering for their time. They were dug deep and then followed with gravel and then stone. They had better be plain because they were built to carry 4 columns next to each other. Hadrians Wall is still there after
    over 2,000 years. Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over Roman roads.

    WTF?

    "Virtually ALL of the roads in northern Italy are paved over
    Roman roads." is not even remotely believable. It's just
    not true.




    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Why+are+Belgian+cobblestone+roads+built+like+that&atb=v366-1&t=chromentp&ia=videos&iax=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DkUIsFv_JNYs




    Oops, https://youtu.be/kUIsFv_JNYs


    Flagstone and pavers are not cobbles.




    I'm afraid I don't understand what you're getting on about. Most of that reference was about Roman cobblestone roads. Notice that they said thatg cities were built at main intersections of Roman roads. Paris in fact, has all of its northern road
    fujjnnel through Paris and then split south of Parris into many smaller roads. But like I said, France merely used the Roman cobblestone roads as a base for today's roads. Driving down these roads and coming to Roman road houses pretty much shows this
    practice pretty clearly.

    France was left pretty much untouched by the war (bombs and very heavy fighting) so those roads were stgill usable. Belgium was certainly another story.


    You called Roman paventum 'cobbles'. They are not:

    https://hghgranite.com/differences-between-cobbles-pavers-and-setts/

    https://traveltoitalyguide.com/what-are-the-stones-of-roman-roads-called/


    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)