• Mismatched hub and rim hole count

    From bp@www.zefox.net@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 29 15:08:54 2025
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty. The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to bp@www.zefox.net on Tue Jul 29 10:25:09 2025
    On 7/29/2025 10:08 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty. The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska


    Yes, it's possible but probably a game not worth the candle.

    Your spoke lengths are all over the place which can be
    frustrating. IMHO rims are not expensive enough for that
    sort of suffering. YMMV

    https://unicyclist.com/t/wheel-building-36h-hub-with-32h-rim/127356/2
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bp@www.zefox.net@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Jul 29 16:00:31 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 7/29/2025 10:08 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty. The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska


    Yes, it's possible but probably a game not worth the candle.

    Your spoke lengths are all over the place which can be
    frustrating. IMHO rims are not expensive enough for that
    sort of suffering. YMMV

    https://unicyclist.com/t/wheel-building-36h-hub-with-32h-rim/127356/2


    Thank you! spoke length issues never crossed my mind 8-(
    The phrase "You can combine 4x scare-crows + 2x a pairs of cross-1’s.
    makes (4x 3) + (2x 2) = 16 (one side, and 2x 16 = 32)."
    made me smile....

    I'm not sure what it means exactly, but the idea of mixing
    spoke crossings within a wheel also didn't cross my mind.

    Thanks for writing!

    bob prohaska

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to bp@www.zefox.net on Tue Jul 29 11:20:55 2025
    On 7/29/2025 11:00 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 7/29/2025 10:08 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty. The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska


    Yes, it's possible but probably a game not worth the candle.

    Your spoke lengths are all over the place which can be
    frustrating. IMHO rims are not expensive enough for that
    sort of suffering. YMMV

    https://unicyclist.com/t/wheel-building-36h-hub-with-32h-rim/127356/2


    Thank you! spoke length issues never crossed my mind 8-(
    The phrase "You can combine 4x scare-crows + 2x a pairs of cross-1’s.
    makes (4x 3) + (2x 2) = 16 (one side, and 2x 16 = 32)."
    made me smile....

    I'm not sure what it means exactly, but the idea of mixing
    spoke crossings within a wheel also didn't cross my mind.

    Thanks for writing!

    bob prohaska



    That's had it's fashion moment (not with mismatched
    drillings) 50~60 years ago. Bird Brothers (England) built
    dramatic-looking mixed-pattern wheels to some success and
    were copied here in those days.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Jul 29 12:41:35 2025
    On 7/29/2025 11:20 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 7/29/2025 11:00 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 7/29/2025 10:08 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched
    hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole
    hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty.
    The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong
    enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim
    seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub
    and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels
    don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska


    Yes, it's possible but probably a game not worth the candle.

    Your spoke lengths are all over the place which can be
    frustrating. IMHO rims are not expensive enough for that
    sort of suffering. YMMV

    https://unicyclist.com/t/wheel-building-36h-hub-with-32h-
    rim/127356/2


    Thank you! spoke length issues never crossed my mind 8-(
    The phrase "You can combine 4x scare-crows + 2x a pairs of
    cross-1’s.
    makes (4x 3) + (2x 2) = 16 (one side, and 2x 16 = 32)."
    made me smile....

    I'm not sure what it means exactly, but the idea of mixing
    spoke crossings within a wheel also didn't cross my mind.

    Thanks for writing!

    bob prohaska



    That's had it's fashion moment (not with mismatched
    drillings) 50~60 years ago.  Bird Brothers (England) built
    dramatic-looking mixed-pattern wheels to some success and
    were copied here in those days.


    p.s. asymmetric front build by a wheelbuilder who was much
    impressed by them while living in England:

    https://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/am19a.jpg https://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/am19a.jpg

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 29 20:40:12 2025
    On Tue Jul 29 10:25:09 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 7/29/2025 10:08 AM, bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
    Is it practical to lace hubs into rims with mismatched hole counts?

    I could imagine that lacing a 32-hole rim onto a 36-hole hub would
    work ok, simply leaving the four unused hub holes empty. The rim
    would be (nearly) evenly supported and the hub strong enough.

    Going the other way, a 32-hole hub with a 36-hole rim seems much
    more fraught. The rim seems more fragile than the hub and the
    unsupported spans appear more troublesome.

    Still, folks do ride with broken spokes and the wheels don't
    instantly collapse.

    It's looks as if rim stiffness (and hence weight) is the
    limiting factor. Less clear is how overbuilt hubs might be.
    I'm thinking about commuter-grade, not racing components.

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska


    Yes, it's possible but probably a game not worth the candle.

    Your spoke lengths are all over the place which can be
    frustrating. IMHO rims are not expensive enough for that
    sort of suffering. YMMV

    https://unicyclist.com/t/wheel-building-36h-hub-with-32h-rim/127356/2




    I agree completely. You can figure out which spokes to leave off at the four points of the compass but rims or hubs are far too chezp to take the chance of a wheel going out of whack in the middle of nowhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)