1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.BOATS

  • The Secret Serviuce

    From gfretwell@aol.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 20 23:34:10 2022
    This is the first time in my lifetime and maybe since Lincoln that the
    Secret Service has been called to testify against a protectee. In the
    past, through JFK's philandering, Nixon's misadventures, Clinton's
    problems and all of the presidential family scandals, the Secret
    Service has always said they had nothing to say about a protectee's
    activity.
    It does make some degree of sense if their job is to be a
    non-intrusive bodyguard that the protectee has to tolerate everywhere
    they go.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mr Robot@21:1/5 to gfretwell@aol.com on Thu Jul 21 15:28:43 2022
    On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:34:10 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com wrote:

    This is the first time in my lifetime and maybe since Lincoln that the
    Secret Service has been called to testify against a protectee. In the
    past, through JFK's philandering, Nixon's misadventures, Clinton's
    problems and all of the presidential family scandals, the Secret
    Service has always said they had nothing to say about a protectee's
    activity.
    It does make some degree of sense if their job is to be a
    non-intrusive bodyguard that the protectee has to tolerate everywhere
    they go.

    Their job isn't to lie. They have a long history of doing that. How
    are they serving the nation by covering up for Trump?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)