• AWI Investigates Illegal Dog Meat Trade in Philippines and Thailand

    From Judith Latham@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 12 19:05:58 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    https://awionline.org/awi-quarterly/2013-summer/awi-investigates-illegal-dog-meat-trade-philippines-and-thailand

    y Rosalyn Morrison

    This past March, I traveled from Bangkok—where I had been attending
    the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade
    in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)—to Manila to
    participate in an undercover investigation on the dog meat trade in
    the Philippines. Raising awareness on this issue is of utmost
    importance to me; for two years, I campaigned in South Korea against
    this cruel trade (See the Winter 2012 AWI Quarterly.), returning home accompanied by Lucy, one of the so-called “dong-gae” dogs commonly
    raised and slaughtered for meat in South Korea. Lucy is now my
    constant companion and my ambassador on behalf of South Korean dogs.

    I arrived in Manila at 7 a.m. on Friday, March 15. Although utterly
    exhausted (after having barely slept the past two weeks at the CITES
    meeting), I was ready for another fast-paced—and incredibly emotional—adventure. From the airport, I took a taxi to the hotel,
    quickly showered, and then hopped in the bus with Andrew Plumbly, the
    executive director of Network for Animals; Frank Loftus, videographer
    from the Humane Society of the United States; and Martin Usborne, a photographer from the United Kingdom.

    Despite the interesting company, I soon passed out in the back seat of
    the bus. Even though it was stiflingly hot, I somehow managed to sleep throughout the bumpy drive to Baguio, a city of about 320,000 people
    in the northern province of Benguet and six hours (minimum) from the
    bustling capital of Manila. Baguio is the center of the Philippine dog
    meat trade and the location of most of the known dog meat restaurants
    in the country.

    The killing and selling of dogs for food is not legal in the
    Philippines. It was banned in Manila in 1982. A similar ban was
    enacted nationally in 1998 via the Animal Welfare Act (Republic Act
    No. 8485). The Act prohibits killing dogs for food with minimum
    penalties set at 1,000 pesos (equivalent to about US$22 at the time)
    and not less than six months in prison. The Anti-Rabies Act (RA 9482),
    passed in 2007, includes more severe penalties with minimum fines of
    5,000 pesos per dog and not less than one year of imprisonment for participating in the trading of dogs for their meat. Despite the
    sanctions encoded in the law, however, law enforcement officials have
    done little to actually end this illicit trade.

    Upon arrival in Baguio, we headed for Comiles 2, a restaurant reputed
    to sell dog meat, where the waitress politely asked us if we wanted
    pork, chicken, or dog. Frank documented the encounter on film and as a
    result we have actual evidence, not just rumors, that the restaurant
    sells dog meat. Within a few minutes, another customer—a man who
    looked to be in his 40s—came into the restaurant and ordered a dish of barbequed dog meat. Martin walked over to take a picture of the
    customer’s dish, and the customer became very defensive, got his food
    to go, and left the restaurant noticeably upset. The owner of the
    restaurant became very aggressive, denied selling dog meat, and
    everyone in the room became very tense. After several minutes of
    disputing, we abruptly left the restaurant, evidence in hand.

    Afterward, we visited a local market and a city veterinarian, and
    spoke with a man who is building a shelter in the town of Bulakan for
    dogs rescued from slaughter. A few years ago, dog meat was sold in the
    open-air markets. On our trip, we did not see any dog meat for sale in
    the markets, which hopefully is a sign that the trade here is
    declining. We also stopped at a Korean restaurant to ask if they
    served dog meat and were pleased to learn they did not.

    Sunday, we drove to the town of San Pedro in Laguna province, where
    multiple dog meat traders are reported to operate. While there, we
    rescued a two-month-old puppy who was tied on a short chain—persuading
    the owner to part with her for $10. She was very dehydrated and
    hungry, with ticks in her flesh and parasites in her stomach. She will
    stay in the Philippines for a few months until she is ready to be
    adopted.

    The next morning, Andrew and I met with Ferdinand Manuel from the
    National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)—the equivalent of the FBI in
    the United States—to work on coordinating a raid to help save other
    dogs like our rescued puppy. After our meeting, two colleagues from
    the Humane Society International joined us at a meeting with Rubina
    Cresencio, the director of the Bureau of Animal Industry (a division
    of the Department of Agriculture) to discuss the best strategies for
    stopping the trade.

    Even though selling dog meat is illegal in the Philippines, half a
    million dogs are still brutally tortured and consumed every year.
    Historically, dog meat was associated with celebratory events and
    rituals of mourning and only affected a small number of dogs. However,
    over the past quarter century or so, the dog meat trade has rapidly
    expanded for commercial rather than cultural reasons.

    Investigators have documented the existence of at least 25 dog meat
    restaurants and four slaughterhouses in Baguio, seven dog meat traders
    in Laguna and Batangas provinces, and two slaughterhouses in
    Pangasinan province. Unfortunately, there are also many more
    underground entities involved in the industry throughout the northern provinces.

    Stray dogs are rounded up off the street and transported to Benguet
    and neighboring provinces under extremely inhumane conditions without
    food or water. Steel cans are forced around their muzzles and their
    legs are tied behind their backs. Many of the dogs are pets—some are
    still wearing their collars. According to international animal
    protection organizations who have engaged in extensive enforcement,
    nearly half the dogs die before they reach their final destination due
    to the stressful conditions of the transportation; at times of extreme
    heat and overcrowding, as many as 90 percent of the dogs may die. Such startling mortality rates are of no concern to the dog meat traders,
    as the dead animals are processed along with the live ones. Behind
    closed doors, dogs are clubbed, throats are cut, and fur is scorched
    off with a blowtorch—often while the dogs are still conscious.

    Human Health Implications of the Dog Meat Trade
    A regional director of the Philippines National Meat Inspection
    Commission publicly stated several years ago that consumption of dog
    meat is “dangerous,” as it is not inspected by the Commission.
    Consuming dog meat thus puts individuals at considerable risk of
    infection from harmful bacteria such as E. Coli 107 and Salmonella
    (commonly found in contaminated meats), as well as at increased risk
    of contracting potentially deadly diseases such as anthrax,
    brucellosis, cholera, hepatitis, and leptospirosis.

    Dog meat is further linked to the spread of rabies—a disease that
    kills approximately 10,000 dogs and 300 people in the Philippines
    annually. Evidence shows that the rabies virus can be present, and
    therefore potentially transmitted to humans, throughout all stages of
    the dog meat industry—sourcing, trading, slaughtering, butchering, and
    meat preparation—impeding efforts toward eradicating rabies in the
    region. The World Health Organization has noted that “controlling
    trade in and [the] movement of dogs” along with the promotion of mass
    dog vaccination campaigns is key to dog rabies control and the
    disease's eventual elimination. In order to pursue this goal, the
    Philippine government included a prohibition regarding the trade of
    dog meat in the 2007 Rabies Act and stated a nationwide goal of
    eradicating rabies by 2020—a target that cannot be achieved unless the
    dog meat trade is shut down.

    There are, however, developments that seem to indicate the beginning
    of a positive change. The Wildlife Division of the NBI recently raided
    nine restaurants. Additionally, Network for Animals took the lead on
    conducting a slaughterhouse raid in the town of Malasiqui, about 50
    miles south of Baguio, by providing resources such as surveillance and
    funding for the management of the raid. On December 5, 2012, with the cooperation of local authorities, seven dog meat traders were
    arrested, 22 dogs were rescued, and 49 dog carcasses were confiscated.
    (As of press time, a trial date for the arrested traders has not yet
    been set.) While the local police were involved in the raid,
    enforcement needs to be initiated by domestic law enforcement rather
    than international nonprofit organizations in order for such successes
    to continue on a regular, widespread basis.

    The illegal dog meat industry in the Philippines causes harm in many
    ways, from the extreme physical and mental suffering of hundreds of
    thousands of dogs to the significant costs to human health. In order
    to successfully eradicate the trade in dogs for human consumption,
    mechanisms of enforcement need to be established at the provincial,
    municipal, and village levels to ensure that such a cruel industry has
    no ground on which to stand.

    It is also crucial to work with local communities to raise awareness
    of the risks that the dog meat industry poses to both human health and
    animal welfare, and for local law enforcement officers to be
    adequately equipped with the skills, knowledge and motivation to
    enforce existing laws. The objective is to have the Philippine
    Department of the Interior as well as local governments ensure that
    the national ban is consistently and aggressively enforced in the dog
    meat regions of the country in order to demonstrate a serious
    commitment to ending this inhumane industry.

    On To Thailand
    After a week in the Philippines, I flew to Phuket, Thailand, to visit
    Soi Dog Foundation (SDF) and meet its founder, John Dalley. The week
    before I arrived, SDF conducted three raids and saved 520 dogs from unimaginable suffering. Even though the dog meat trade is illegal in
    Thailand, dogs are frequently rounded up off the streets—90 percent of
    them estimated to be pets—and smuggled across the Mekong River into
    Vietnam, where the dog meat trade is rampant due to a common belief
    that it has warming properties that aid in maintaining health and
    recovering from illness. The main consumers of the meat are wealthy
    Vietnamese businessmen who can afford its high price.

    The Thai Veterinary Medical Association estimated that in 2011 half a
    million dogs were being smuggled into Vietnam annually to be
    slaughtered. Following increasing pressure by SDF and others, the
    number is currently far less than this, though many dogs are now being slaughtered locally and the meat smuggled instead. Hence, despite the
    national ban, the illegal trade in Thailand is worth approximately 1
    billion Thai baht a year—over US$30 million. The Thai government does
    not have the necessary funding to adequately protect its dog
    population from the illegal meat trade. The Department of Livestock
    Development is charged with sheltering and providing for the dogs
    rescued from the trade, yet it currently has no budget for this (since
    dogs are not considered livestock animals in Thailand).

    In Thailand as in other places, the dog meat trade is conducted with
    callous cruelty; dogs are packed for days in small cages, and many die
    before they reach their final destination from heat exhaustion or
    asphyxiation. In many places where dog meat is consumed, including
    Thailand, there is a common belief that dog meat is more tender if it
    is permeated by adrenaline just prior to slaughtering. As a result,
    dogs are intentionally killed slowly so as to increase their intense
    fear and stress. Dogs are boiled alive, beaten to death, hung, or
    skinned alive for their meat.

    Tragically, even dogs rescued from such a horrific end are not
    guaranteed a life of recovery and health. Dogs in Thailand are not
    routinely vaccinated. According to SDF, a full 70 percent of the
    rescued dogs end up dying from disease, as well as injuries and
    starvation.

    In June, CNN.com prominently featured articles covering the dog meat
    trade in Thailand and Vietnam. We are very glad to see this issue
    finally gaining mainstream global attention. While it is important to
    raise international awareness on the illegal dog meat trade in these
    countries, we also want this to take root as a solid, locally-based
    campaign. Citizens of these countries need to put political pressure
    on their governments from within in order to ensure compliance with
    their own national bans on the trade.



    Judith

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Judith Latham on Sat Apr 12 19:09:05 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    Judith Latham wrote:

    https://awionline.org/awi-quarterly/2013-summer/awi-investigates-illegal-dog-meat-trade-philippines-and-thailand

    y Rosalyn Morrison

    This past March, I traveled from Bangkok—where I had been attending
    the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade
    in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)—to Manila to participate in an undercover investigation on the dog meat trade in
    the Philippines. Raising awareness on this issue is of utmost
    importance to me; for two years, I campaigned in South Korea against
    this cruel trade (See the Winter 2012 AWI Quarterly.), returning home accompanied by Lucy, one of the so-called “dong-gae” dogs commonly
    raised and slaughtered for meat in South Korea. Lucy is now my
    constant companion and my ambassador on behalf of South Korean dogs.

    I arrived in Manila at 7 a.m. on Friday, March 15. Although utterly
    exhausted (after having barely slept the past two weeks at the CITES meeting), I was ready for another fast-paced—and incredibly emotional—adventure. From the airport, I took a taxi to the hotel,
    quickly showered, and then hopped in the bus with Andrew Plumbly, the executive director of Network for Animals; Frank Loftus, videographer
    from the Humane Society of the United States; and Martin Usborne, a photographer from the United Kingdom.

    Despite the interesting company, I soon passed out in the back seat of
    the bus. Even though it was stiflingly hot, I somehow managed to sleep throughout the bumpy drive to Baguio, a city of about 320,000 people
    in the northern province of Benguet and six hours (minimum) from the
    bustling capital of Manila. Baguio is the center of the Philippine dog
    meat trade and the location of most of the known dog meat restaurants
    in the country.

    The killing and selling of dogs for food is not legal in the
    Philippines. It was banned in Manila in 1982. A similar ban was
    enacted nationally in 1998 via the Animal Welfare Act (Republic Act
    No. 8485). The Act prohibits killing dogs for food with minimum
    penalties set at 1,000 pesos (equivalent to about US$22 at the time)
    and not less than six months in prison. The Anti-Rabies Act (RA 9482),
    passed in 2007, includes more severe penalties with minimum fines of
    5,000 pesos per dog and not less than one year of imprisonment for participating in the trading of dogs for their meat. Despite the
    sanctions encoded in the law, however, law enforcement officials have
    done little to actually end this illicit trade.

    Upon arrival in Baguio, we headed for Comiles 2, a restaurant reputed
    to sell dog meat, where the waitress politely asked us if we wanted
    pork, chicken, or dog. Frank documented the encounter on film and as a
    result we have actual evidence, not just rumors, that the restaurant
    sells dog meat. Within a few minutes, another customer—a man who
    looked to be in his 40s—came into the restaurant and ordered a dish of barbequed dog meat. Martin walked over to take a picture of the
    customer’s dish, and the customer became very defensive, got his food
    to go, and left the restaurant noticeably upset. The owner of the
    restaurant became very aggressive, denied selling dog meat, and
    everyone in the room became very tense. After several minutes of
    disputing, we abruptly left the restaurant, evidence in hand.

    Afterward, we visited a local market and a city veterinarian, and
    spoke with a man who is building a shelter in the town of Bulakan for
    dogs rescued from slaughter. A few years ago, dog meat was sold in the open-air markets. On our trip, we did not see any dog meat for sale in
    the markets, which hopefully is a sign that the trade here is
    declining. We also stopped at a Korean restaurant to ask if they
    served dog meat and were pleased to learn they did not.

    Sunday, we drove to the town of San Pedro in Laguna province, where
    multiple dog meat traders are reported to operate. While there, we
    rescued a two-month-old puppy who was tied on a short chain—persuading
    the owner to part with her for $10. She was very dehydrated and
    hungry, with ticks in her flesh and parasites in her stomach. She will
    stay in the Philippines for a few months until she is ready to be
    adopted.

    The next morning, Andrew and I met with Ferdinand Manuel from the
    National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)—the equivalent of the FBI in
    the United States—to work on coordinating a raid to help save other
    dogs like our rescued puppy. After our meeting, two colleagues from
    the Humane Society International joined us at a meeting with Rubina Cresencio, the director of the Bureau of Animal Industry (a division
    of the Department of Agriculture) to discuss the best strategies for
    stopping the trade.

    Even though selling dog meat is illegal in the Philippines, half a
    million dogs are still brutally tortured and consumed every year. Historically, dog meat was associated with celebratory events and
    rituals of mourning and only affected a small number of dogs. However,
    over the past quarter century or so, the dog meat trade has rapidly
    expanded for commercial rather than cultural reasons.

    Investigators have documented the existence of at least 25 dog meat restaurants and four slaughterhouses in Baguio, seven dog meat traders
    in Laguna and Batangas provinces, and two slaughterhouses in
    Pangasinan province. Unfortunately, there are also many more
    underground entities involved in the industry throughout the northern provinces.

    Stray dogs are rounded up off the street and transported to Benguet
    and neighboring provinces under extremely inhumane conditions without
    food or water. Steel cans are forced around their muzzles and their
    legs are tied behind their backs. Many of the dogs are pets—some are
    still wearing their collars. According to international animal
    protection organizations who have engaged in extensive enforcement,
    nearly half the dogs die before they reach their final destination due
    to the stressful conditions of the transportation; at times of extreme
    heat and overcrowding, as many as 90 percent of the dogs may die. Such startling mortality rates are of no concern to the dog meat traders,
    as the dead animals are processed along with the live ones. Behind
    closed doors, dogs are clubbed, throats are cut, and fur is scorched
    off with a blowtorch—often while the dogs are still conscious.

    Human Health Implications of the Dog Meat Trade
    A regional director of the Philippines National Meat Inspection
    Commission publicly stated several years ago that consumption of dog
    meat is “dangerous,” as it is not inspected by the Commission.
    Consuming dog meat thus puts individuals at considerable risk of
    infection from harmful bacteria such as E. Coli 107 and Salmonella
    (commonly found in contaminated meats), as well as at increased risk
    of contracting potentially deadly diseases such as anthrax,
    brucellosis, cholera, hepatitis, and leptospirosis.

    Dog meat is further linked to the spread of rabies—a disease that
    kills approximately 10,000 dogs and 300 people in the Philippines
    annually. Evidence shows that the rabies virus can be present, and
    therefore potentially transmitted to humans, throughout all stages of
    the dog meat industry—sourcing, trading, slaughtering, butchering, and
    meat preparation—impeding efforts toward eradicating rabies in the
    region. The World Health Organization has noted that “controlling
    trade in and [the] movement of dogs” along with the promotion of mass
    dog vaccination campaigns is key to dog rabies control and the
    disease's eventual elimination. In order to pursue this goal, the
    Philippine government included a prohibition regarding the trade of
    dog meat in the 2007 Rabies Act and stated a nationwide goal of
    eradicating rabies by 2020—a target that cannot be achieved unless the
    dog meat trade is shut down.

    There are, however, developments that seem to indicate the beginning
    of a positive change. The Wildlife Division of the NBI recently raided
    nine restaurants. Additionally, Network for Animals took the lead on conducting a slaughterhouse raid in the town of Malasiqui, about 50
    miles south of Baguio, by providing resources such as surveillance and funding for the management of the raid. On December 5, 2012, with the cooperation of local authorities, seven dog meat traders were
    arrested, 22 dogs were rescued, and 49 dog carcasses were confiscated.
    (As of press time, a trial date for the arrested traders has not yet
    been set.) While the local police were involved in the raid,
    enforcement needs to be initiated by domestic law enforcement rather
    than international nonprofit organizations in order for such successes
    to continue on a regular, widespread basis.

    The illegal dog meat industry in the Philippines causes harm in many
    ways, from the extreme physical and mental suffering of hundreds of
    thousands of dogs to the significant costs to human health. In order
    to successfully eradicate the trade in dogs for human consumption,
    mechanisms of enforcement need to be established at the provincial, municipal, and village levels to ensure that such a cruel industry has
    no ground on which to stand.

    It is also crucial to work with local communities to raise awareness
    of the risks that the dog meat industry poses to both human health and
    animal welfare, and for local law enforcement officers to be
    adequately equipped with the skills, knowledge and motivation to
    enforce existing laws. The objective is to have the Philippine
    Department of the Interior as well as local governments ensure that
    the national ban is consistently and aggressively enforced in the dog
    meat regions of the country in order to demonstrate a serious
    commitment to ending this inhumane industry.

    On To Thailand
    After a week in the Philippines, I flew to Phuket, Thailand, to visit
    Soi Dog Foundation (SDF) and meet its founder, John Dalley. The week
    before I arrived, SDF conducted three raids and saved 520 dogs from unimaginable suffering. Even though the dog meat trade is illegal in Thailand, dogs are frequently rounded up off the streets—90 percent of
    them estimated to be pets—and smuggled across the Mekong River into
    Vietnam, where the dog meat trade is rampant due to a common belief
    that it has warming properties that aid in maintaining health and
    recovering from illness. The main consumers of the meat are wealthy Vietnamese businessmen who can afford its high price.

    The Thai Veterinary Medical Association estimated that in 2011 half a
    million dogs were being smuggled into Vietnam annually to be
    slaughtered. Following increasing pressure by SDF and others, the
    number is currently far less than this, though many dogs are now being slaughtered locally and the meat smuggled instead. Hence, despite the national ban, the illegal trade in Thailand is worth approximately 1
    billion Thai baht a year—over US$30 million. The Thai government does
    not have the necessary funding to adequately protect its dog
    population from the illegal meat trade. The Department of Livestock Development is charged with sheltering and providing for the dogs
    rescued from the trade, yet it currently has no budget for this (since
    dogs are not considered livestock animals in Thailand).

    In Thailand as in other places, the dog meat trade is conducted with
    callous cruelty; dogs are packed for days in small cages, and many die
    before they reach their final destination from heat exhaustion or asphyxiation. In many places where dog meat is consumed, including
    Thailand, there is a common belief that dog meat is more tender if it
    is permeated by adrenaline just prior to slaughtering. As a result,
    dogs are intentionally killed slowly so as to increase their intense
    fear and stress. Dogs are boiled alive, beaten to death, hung, or
    skinned alive for their meat.

    Tragically, even dogs rescued from such a horrific end are not
    guaranteed a life of recovery and health. Dogs in Thailand are not
    routinely vaccinated. According to SDF, a full 70 percent of the
    rescued dogs end up dying from disease, as well as injuries and
    starvation.

    In June, CNN.com prominently featured articles covering the dog meat
    trade in Thailand and Vietnam. We are very glad to see this issue
    finally gaining mainstream global attention. While it is important to
    raise international awareness on the illegal dog meat trade in these countries, we also want this to take root as a solid, locally-based
    campaign. Citizens of these countries need to put political pressure
    on their governments from within in order to ensure compliance with
    their own national bans on the trade.


    I agree, but I think any dog meat seized during enforcement should be
    labelled "Halal" and sent to Gaza. They are starving, since the jews
    cut them off, and would welcome the food, as long as it's OK with their God.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cune I. Form@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Tue May 6 15:15:44 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    On 4/12/2025 5:09 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:

    I agree, but I think any dog meat seized during enforcement should be labelled "Halal" and sent to Gaza.  They are starving, since the jews
    cut them off, and would welcome the food, as long as it's OK with their
    God.

    It isn't. Dog meat is haram.

    Do you work at being this ignorant or does it just come naturally? A
    simple Google search would have confirmed that Muslims don't eat dog.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Judith Latham@21:1/5 to Cune I. Form on Thu May 8 17:15:58 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    On 5/6/2025 6:15 PM, Cune I. Form wrote:
    On 4/12/2025 5:09 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:

    I agree, but I think any dog meat seized during enforcement should be
    labelled "Halal" and sent to Gaza. They are starving, since the jews
    cut them off, and would welcome the food, as long as it's OK with
    their God.

    It isn't. Dog meat is haram.

    Do you work at being this ignorant or does it just come naturally? A
    simple Google search would have confirmed that Muslims don't eat dog.



    Hank is one of those Usenet assholes who hate everyone and everything.
    Nearly all the serious people ignore him.



    Judith

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Judith Latham on Thu May 8 17:32:37 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    Judith Latham wrote on 5/8/2025 4:15 PM:

    On 5/6/2025 6:15 PM, Cune I. Form wrote:
    On 4/12/2025 5:09 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:

    I agree, but I think any dog meat seized during enforcement should be
    labelled "Halal" and sent to Gaza. They are starving, since the jews
    cut them off, and would welcome the food, as long as it's OK with
    their God.

    It isn't. Dog meat is haram.

    Do you work at being this ignorant or does it just come naturally? A
    simple Google search would have confirmed that Muslims don't eat dog.



    Hank is one of those Usenet assholes who hate everyone and everything.
    Nearly all the serious people ignore him.


    Nah, I'm just hoping the jews and arabs will completely finish killing
    each other off. They've never done anything but kill each other
    throughout history. Best they should get the job done NOW.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gm@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Thu May 8 22:54:28 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    On Thu, 8 May 2025 22:32:37 +0000, Hank Rogers wrote:

    Judith Latham wrote on 5/8/2025 4:15 PM:


    Hank is one of those Usenet assholes who hate everyone and everything.
    Nearly all the serious people ignore him.


    Nah, I'm just hoping the jews and arabs will completely finish killing
    each other off. They've never done anything but kill each other
    throughout history. Best they should get the job done NOW.


    Welp, EYE like ya, Sire Hank... if it's any "consolation", lol...!!!

    Judith is simply a "yenta"* who hates engaging in sex, *especially*
    fellatio...

    Thus she is turgidly fat, lonely, and bitter...

    * "In Yiddish, "Yenta" or "Yente" (יענטע) is a woman's given name, and it's also a term for a gossipy or busybody woman. The word entered
    American English as "yenta," meaning a meddler, busybody, blabbermouth,
    or gossip. It's often used in Yinglish (Jewish varieties of English)..."

    ;-D

    --
    GM

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Judith Latham@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 8 20:45:03 2025
    XPost: alt.food.fast-food

    On Thu, 8 May 2025 17:32:37 -0500, Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>
    wrote:

    Judith Latham wrote on 5/8/2025 4:15 PM:

    On 5/6/2025 6:15 PM, Cune I. Form wrote:
    On 4/12/2025 5:09 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:

    I agree, but I think any dog meat seized during enforcement should be
    labelled "Halal" and sent to Gaza. They are starving, since the jews
    cut them off, and would welcome the food, as long as it's OK with
    their God.

    It isn't. Dog meat is haram.

    Do you work at being this ignorant or does it just come naturally? A
    simple Google search would have confirmed that Muslims don't eat dog.



    Hank is one of those Usenet assholes who hate everyone and everything.
    Nearly all the serious people ignore him.


    Nah, I'm just hoping the jews and arabs will completely finish killing
    each other off. They've never done anything but kill each other
    throughout history. Best they should get the job done NOW.




    At least you're an equal opportunity bigot.


    Judith

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)