I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at
140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of
freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a
cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it
back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
On 4/25/2025 8:01 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook
at 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount
of freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into
a cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought
it back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots,
and simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and
the potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate
all the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I
added carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I'd have cut the ingredients much smaller.
On 4/25/2025 8:45 AM, Ed P wrote:
On 4/25/2025 8:01 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook
at 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount
of freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into
a cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought
it back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots,
and simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and
the potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate
all the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I
added carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I'd have cut the ingredients much smaller.
Definitely cut the potatoes and carrots into smaller pieces. I can't
say I've ever had to add gelatin to a beef stew. Perhaps that is what
one does when using a pressure cooker. To my way of thinking, stew is a
long slow braise after browning the meat and adding the vegetables to
the stock.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at
140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of
freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a
cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it
back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
On 4/25/2025 8:01 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at
140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of
freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a
cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it
back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and
simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the
potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added
carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I'd have cut the ingredients much smaller.
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:15:50 -0500, BryanGSimmons
<bryangsimmons@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
Time for your pills, son.
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at >>> 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of
freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a
cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it
back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and
simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the
potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all >>> the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added
carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at >>>> 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of
freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a >>>> cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it >>>> back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and >>>> simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the >>>> potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all >>>> the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added >>>> carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 1:37:26 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at >>>>> 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of >>>>> freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a >>>>> cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it >>>>> back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and >>>>> simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the >>>>> potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all >>>>> the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added >>>>> carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker >>>> with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water.
AMAZING...!!!
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 17:33:38 +0000, gm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 1:37:26 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at >>>>>> 140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of >>>>>> freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a >>>>>> cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it >>>>>> back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and >>>>>> simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the >>>>>> potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added >>>>>> carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker >>>>> with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added. >>>>> This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of >>>>> oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The >>>>> veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water.
AMAZING...!!!
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Strange meat you have there in How wa ya, I've never seen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water. >>>
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 17:33:38 +0000, gm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 1:37:26 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow
cook at
140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of >>>>>> freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock
into a
cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I
brought it
back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, >>>>>> and
simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING,
and the
potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes
pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was
perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We
ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I
added
carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow
cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added. >>>>> This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of >>>>> oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The >>>>> veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water.
AMAZING...!!!
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
She had a plate lunch place in town. I saw her preparing food for the restaurant but I was never interested in cooking at that age. Too bad.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Strange meat you have there in How wa ya, I've never seen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in
water.
ANY blood in the water when cooking beef. I could see
someone changing the water if they want a pretty, clear
broth. But when they do that they are dumping any fat
rendered from the meat and fat means flavor.
Your auntie was probably smelling her arm pits as she dripped
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
sweat into the pot. However, pork is not dirty, but some
cooks are filthy.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Your auntie was probably smelling her arm pits as she dripped
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that. >>>My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
sweat into the pot. However, pork is not dirty, but some
cooks are filthy.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Strange meat you have there in How wa ya, I've never seen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
;DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in
water.
ANY blood in the water when cooking beef. I could see
someone changing the water if they want a pretty, clear
broth. But when they do that they are dumping any fat
rendered from the meat and fat means flavor.
Your auntie was probably smelling her arm pits as she dripped
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
sweat into the pot. However, pork is not dirty, but some
cooks are filthy.
On 2025-04-26 7:06 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Strange meat you have there in How wa ya, I've never seen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
;DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in
water.
ANY blood in the water when cooking beef. I could see
someone changing the water if they want a pretty, clear
broth. But when they do that they are dumping any fat
rendered from the meat and fat means flavor.
I don't understand the thing about ditching the stewing liquid because
of blood. Don't they bleed the carcasses before cooking? That red stuff
that comes out of cooking meat is not blood.
Your auntie was probably smelling her arm pits as she dripped
sweat into the pot. However, pork is not dirty, but some
cooks are filthy.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 17:33:38 +0000, gm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 1:37:26 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/25/2025 1:07 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:01:13 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
I browned the stew beef in some avocado oil, then put it to slow cook at
140F for 16 hours with a box of beef stock, and a generous amount of >>>>>>> freshly cracked black pepper. I scooped out some of the stock into a >>>>>>> cup, let that cool, then added gelatin and corn starch. I brought it >>>>>>> back to a boil, then stirred in the thickener, then added carrots, and >>>>>>> simmered for about 20 minutes. Then I added S&P, MSG and ING, and the >>>>>>> potatoes. The lid went back onto the multicooker for 15 minutes >>>>>>> pressure and slow release over about a half hour.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/2F6MhKBvBeNStDNB7
Next time I'll double the corn starch, but other that that it was >>>>>>> perfect. My wife said it was the best stew she'd ever had. We ate all
the carrots and potatoes, and there was meat and broth left, so I added >>>>>>> carrots, and it's pressure cooking right now.
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker >>>>>> with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the >>>>>> water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added. >>>>>> This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of >>>>>> oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The >>>>>> veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in water. >>>
AMAZING...!!!
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
On 2025-04-26, ItsJoanNotJoAnn <ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
78.8% of Filipinos are Catholic. When the Spanish conquered the
Philippines, Catholicism (the Spanish Inquisition, specifically)
pushed out Islam.
On 2025-04-26 7:06 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 21:52:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Strange meat you have there in How wa ya, I've never seen
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 23:15:50 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
;DUMP OUT BEEF WATER? NEVER!!!!!! Fuck clarity.
That's standard Asian practice. They don't like boiling blood in
water.
ANY blood in the water when cooking beef. I could see
someone changing the water if they want a pretty, clear
broth. But when they do that they are dumping any fat
rendered from the meat and fat means flavor.
I don't understand the thing about ditching the stewing liquid because
of blood. Don't they bleed the carcasses before cooking? That red stuff
that comes out of cooking meat is not blood.
I don't know about cooks but I was in a computer shop the other day. The
guy works fast and cheap, but he sure doesn't spend any time on
cleanliness. The shop was cluttered with junk and dusty as hell. The
owner smelled bad.... really bad. He didn't have the nicotine stained
fingers and teeth of a smoker but he had that stench of stale smoke but
that was barely detectable compared to the stink of clothing that had
not been washed in weeks. Thank goodness he solved my issues quickly so
I could get outside and get some fresh air. I had smelled body stink
like that since the days I worked with long haul truckers.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:13:16 -0000 (UTC), Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-26, ItsJoanNotJoAnn <ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
78.8% of Filipinos are Catholic. When the Spanish conquered the
Philippines, Catholicism (the Spanish Inquisition, specifically)
pushed out Islam.
You're confused. Leave out the bit between brackets and it's correct.
"The Spanish Inquisition specifically refers to a judicial institution
in Spain and its colonies that prosecuted heresy among Christians. It
wasn't really directly responsible for colonial military actions or
for suppressing Islam in the Philippines."
On 2025-04-27 5:01 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:13:16 -0000 (UTC), Cindy Hamilton
You're confused. Leave out the bit between brackets and it's correct.It also persecuted Jews in Spain.
"The Spanish Inquisition specifically refers to a judicial institution
in Spain and its colonies that prosecuted heresy among Christians. It
wasn't really directly responsible for colonial military actions or
for suppressing Islam in the Philippines."
On 2025-04-27 5:01 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:13:16 -0000 (UTC), Cindy HamiltonIt also persecuted Jews in Spain.
<chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-26, ItsJoanNotJoAnn <ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
78.8% of Filipinos are Catholic. When the Spanish conquered the
Philippines, Catholicism (the Spanish Inquisition, specifically)
pushed out Islam.
You're confused. Leave out the bit between brackets and it's correct.
"The Spanish Inquisition specifically refers to a judicial institution
in Spain and its colonies that prosecuted heresy among Christians. It
wasn't really directly responsible for colonial military actions or
for suppressing Islam in the Philippines."
On 4/26/2025 8:17 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2025-04-26 7:06 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
I don't know about cooks but I was in a computer shop the other day.
The guy works fast and cheap, but he sure doesn't spend any time on
cleanliness. The shop was cluttered with junk and dusty as hell. The
owner smelled bad.... really bad. He didn't have the nicotine stained
fingers and teeth of a smoker but he had that stench of stale smoke
but that was barely detectable compared to the stink of clothing that
had not been washed in weeks. Thank goodness he solved my issues
quickly so I could get outside and get some fresh air. I had smelled
body stink like that since the days I worked with long haul truckers.
Can't they smell themselves?
enclosed space with someone who has intense B.O. I used to work with a
temp who had horrible B.O. The company hired two temps and the other
poor guy had to share a cubicle with this dude. Our supervisor had to
have a talk with him. He claimed to have a medical condition which
caused him to perspire more than most people. Maybe yes, maybe no; the
funk was unbearable. There were other issues, though; he was
chronically late, always with some lame excuse. The company wound up
hiring the other temp full time and told the agency not to send the
other guy back.
On 4/27/2025 8:38 AM, Graham wrote:
On 2025-04-27 5:01 a.m., Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:13:16 -0000 (UTC), Cindy HamiltonIt also persecuted Jews in Spain.
<chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-26, ItsJoanNotJoAnn <ItsJoanNotJoAnn@webtv.net> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:05:32 +0000, Bruce wrote:
Honestly, I thought the number would be much, much higher.
6% of Filipinos are Muslims.
78.8% of Filipinos are Catholic. When the Spanish conquered the
Philippines, Catholicism (the Spanish Inquisition, specifically)
pushed out Islam.
You're confused. Leave out the bit between brackets and it's correct.
"The Spanish Inquisition specifically refers to a judicial institution
in Spain and its colonies that prosecuted heresy among Christians. It
wasn't really directly responsible for colonial military actions or
for suppressing Islam in the Philippines."
The Catholic church persecuted everyone who didn't adhere to their
doctrine.
Jill
The natives are restless tonight. rfc is in a bad mood. I predict that
there will be no joy in rfcville. The mighty Trump has struck out.
On 4/27/2025 9:37 AM, Jill McQuown wrote:
The Catholic church persecuted everyone who didn't adhere to their
doctrine.
Jill
Of course. The Catholic religion is the true and correct religion. I
know that is correct because the nuns told us that and they are never
wrong.
On 2025-04-27 10:23 a.m., Ed P wrote:
On 4/27/2025 9:37 AM, Jill McQuown wrote:
The Catholic church persecuted everyone who didn't adhere to their
doctrine.
Jill
Of course. The Catholic religion is the true and correct religion. I
know that is correct because the nuns told us that and they are never
wrong.
Who would know better than a nun? My friend when to Catholic school and
was taught sex ed by a nun. They were told that if a girl hold's a boy's penis for more than 5 seconds she can get pregnant. I can't disagree completely because if a teenage girl holds a teenage boys penis for more
than five seconds it is quite likely to end up somewhere else and then pregnancy could ensue. Maybe she gets off on a technicality?
I've cooked stew in a slow cooker. It was just chuck in the slow cooker
with water to begin with. It was cooked for an hour or so, then the
water was dumped out, the meat was rinsed, and clean water was added.
This was done for clarity. The beef was cooked until done. A roux, of
oil and flour, was made in a frying pan and added to the cooker. The
veggies were added next. That's all, folks.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/gTPvQWwHDoNmanVX8
Part of my extended family are descendants of them. My niece's husband
has a Spanish Jewish ancestry and his ancestors back home had converted
to Catholicism. The Inquisition started shortly after the marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella and their marriage united their two kingdoms gave
them the power need to defeat the Moors. I guess the Jews became their targets after they ran out of Moors.
Spanish Catholicism was not very tolerant of heretics. It was the same religious fervor that led Spain to attempt to invade Britain and return
it to Catholicism. That didn't work out so well for them.
for 5 days or more. They drank a lot of coffee and smoked a lot of
cigarettes and slept in their trucks. They probably never showered or
brushed their teeth. They had a combination of stenches, dental decay
breath, coffee breath, tobacco breath, BO, rancid clothing and diesel
fuel.
They weren't all like that. Some of them were very clean. They deserve credit, but those dirty ones leave a hell of an impression.
Yep, she had it right.
We never had sex education, aside from the schoolyard.
My first GF educated me. She was a virgin, but she damned well knew
what she wanted, and I was an excellent pupil.
All boys high school, junior year, we had a lay teacher for English.One day, when class was going to start, he said "close the doors"
we got some stories about the problems VD can cause and how toprevent it. A few more real life stories was probably the best
education about life in 12 years of school.
I wonder what the girls got. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0zEX8h17eA Probably only just say no before the wedding night. That shit is so stupid. Having sex is the most enjoyable thing, and every year you wait
to start is one year you'll never get back at the end of your life.
Dave Smith wrote:
...
for 5 days or more. They drank a lot of coffee and smoked a lot of
cigarettes and slept in their trucks. They probably never showered or
brushed their teeth. They had a combination of stenches, dental decay
breath, coffee breath, tobacco breath, BO, rancid clothing and diesel
fuel.
dragon breath. nasty stuff.
They weren't all like that. Some of them were very clean. They deserve
credit, but those dirty ones leave a hell of an impression.
BO or worse I can handle, but my own body reacts poorly to
some scents used in a lot of perfumes/colognes - which made
working with the public a challenge at times.
There's a genre of porn that has been around for
many decades where nuns are sexually active.
More recently, there is Mormon porn,
On 2025-04-28, BryanGSimmons wrote:
There's a genre of porn that has been around for
many decades where nuns are sexually active.
More recently, there is Mormon porn,
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
Mike Duffy wrote:
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
I have never eaten or even nibbled a live hampster,
gerbil, guinea pig, mouse, shrew, vole or any other
small defenceless mammal...
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
"Your eyes are windows..."
--
GM
--
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:43:45 +0000, gm wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
"Your eyes are windows..."
--
GM
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eztb8fQuscA
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:43:45 +0000, gm wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
"Your eyes are windows..."
--
GM
--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eztb8fQuscA
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
Do yoose have feral swine running all around like them chickens...???
GM
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:40:44 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Agree. But gamy pork?? Nonsense and pork is not 'dirty.'
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>>in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of >>>that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is >>>always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:40:44 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
rfc is just so ignorant about how people around the world cook - and
proud of it too. That's so strange. Yoose gets the last word.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ7Ohmr5BD0&t=175s
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:40:44 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Agree. But gamy pork?? Nonsense and pork is not 'dirty.'
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
On 2025-04-28 3:14 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
Maybe it is just a weird thing about the way they cook there. Some
people have strange ideas about cooking meat. Some people wash their
meat before cooking it. We had one whacko here who used to cook all the meat as soon as she got home from the store and then froze it.
On 2025-04-28 3:14 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
Maybe it is just a weird thing about the way they cook there. Some
people have strange ideas about cooking meat. Some people wash their
meat before cooking it. We had one whacko here who used to cook all the
meat as soon as she got home from the store and then froze it.
On 2025-04-28 3:14 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig
in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
Maybe it is just a weird thing about the way they cook there. Some
people have strange ideas about cooking meat. Some people wash their
meat before cooking it. We had one whacko here who used to cook all the
meat as soon as she got home from the store and then froze it.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:18:51 +0000, Dave Smith wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:14 p.m., dsi1 wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
Maybe it is just a weird thing about the way they cook there. Some
people have strange ideas about cooking meat. Some people wash their
meat before cooking it. We had one whacko here who used to cook all the
meat as soon as she got home from the store and then froze it.
Sounds like she's Chinese.
Sounds like she's Chinese.
On 2025-04-28, gm wrote:
Mike Duffy wrote:
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
I have never eaten or even nibbled a live hampster,
gerbil, guinea pig, mouse, shrew, vole or any other
small defenceless mammal...
Greg, please check your meds for contaminants.
I suggest mercury, lead, thallium, selenium, cadmium & tin.
(Those elements have common isotopes that have the same spin
quanta as phosphorous, whose spin coherence is used by the
quantum processes that give rise to conscious perception. )
dsi1 wrote:
Sounds like she's Chinese.
THE DONALD is a - cleain' HOUSE, David... BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA...!!!
Trump administration revokes 4,000 visas for students with criminal
records for assault, robbery: ‘Breaking the law with no consequences’
https://nypost.com/2025/04/28/us-news/trump-admin-revokes-4k-visas-for-students-with-criminal-records/
"The Trump administration has revoked the visas of 4,000 foreign
students in its first 100 days — the bulk of which have committed crimes
in the US including arson, assault and robbery, The Post has learned...
More than 90% of the rogue students who saw their visas nixed had
committed crimes such as arson, wildlife and human trafficking, child endangerment, domestic abuse, DUI and robbery, a senior State Department source told The Post Monday. More than 500 of them had assault raps...
The thousands of students, most of whom hail from Asia and the Middle
East, were swiftly notified that the State Department had stripped them
of their status in the US...
Some have already departed on their own while others will soon be
rounded up by immigration agents as part of Trump’s mass deportation agenda..."
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:15:34 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Sounds like she's Chinese.
Chinese people are wackos? This newsgroup is becoming more and more
racist!
You obviously don't know a thing about the Chinese.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvKvlB5qPOg
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:30:54 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:15:34 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Sounds like she's Chinese.
Chinese people are wackos? This newsgroup is becoming more and more
racist!
You obviously don't know a thing about the Chinese.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvKvlB5qPOg
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:17:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:30:54 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:15:34 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Sounds like she's Chinese.
Chinese people are wackos? This newsgroup is becoming more and more
racist!
You obviously don't know a thing about the Chinese.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvKvlB5qPOg
My knowledge of Chinese people, or lack thereof, is irrelevant. I
strongly and formally protest against qualifying any cultural or
ethnic group as wackos.
https://i.postimg.cc/GhPPCfj8/trump-xiping.jpg
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:45:14 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:17:14 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:30:54 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:15:34 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Sounds like she's Chinese.
Chinese people are wackos? This newsgroup is becoming more and more
racist!
You obviously don't know a thing about the Chinese.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvKvlB5qPOg
My knowledge of Chinese people, or lack thereof, is irrelevant. I
strongly and formally protest against qualifying any cultural or
ethnic group as wackos.
https://i.postimg.cc/GhPPCfj8/trump-xiping.jpg
Right on brother! Chinese lives matter!
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
She had a plate lunch place in town. I saw her preparing food for the restaurant but I was never interested in cooking at that age. Too bad.
Assuming that you are not averse to porn,
you should go to one of the free sites like
xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon.
Some cuties in the genre, like Lily Rader.
The females are always submissive, and there
are a lot of "garments" employed.
On 4/28/2025 12:20 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2025-04-28, BryanGSimmons wrote:Assuming that you are not averse to porn, you should go to one of the
There's a genre of porn that has been around for
many decades where nuns are sexually active.
More recently, there is Mormon porn,
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
free sites like xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon. Some cuties
in the genre, like Lily Rader. The females are always submissive, and
there are a lot of "garments" employed. One doesn't need to be a Mormon
to appreciate the pretty women.
On 2025-04-30, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Assuming that you are not averse to porn,
you should go to one of the free sites like
xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon.
Some cuties in the genre, like Lily Rader.
Okay. Thanks, I probably wouid not be looking
in porn sites otherwise. I am not against porn
if there is always 'informed consent' exercized
and no children, animals, or corpses depicted.
I do not userstand the appeal in *any* movie or
TV for that matter to be too graphic with
wanton violence or graphic injuries.
Plus I cannot fathom wanting to watch anything
going into any butt (male or female), oral,
multiple and / or serial partners,
or even two women together, not that I've
watched enough porn to see all those things.
On 2025-04-30, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Assuming that you are not averse to porn,
you should go to one of the free sites like
xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon.
Some cuties in the genre, like Lily Rader.
Okay. Thanks, I probably wouid not be looking
in porn sites otherwise. I am not against porn
if there is always 'informed consent' exercized
and no children, animals, or corpses depicted.
Whatever do you mean 'garments'.
dsi1 wrote:
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
She had a plate lunch place in town. I saw her preparing food for the
restaurant but I was never interested in cooking at that age. Too bad.
Portuguese is...
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:54:11 +0000, Mike Duffy wrote:
Whatever do you mean 'garments'.
I don't know what the women wear but Mormon men will typically wear "the >garment" to signify that they have gone on a mission. This would be like
a rite of passage similar to a Aussie walkabout.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:17:17 +0000, gm wrote:
dsi1 wrote:
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that.
My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat.
She had a plate lunch place in town. I saw her preparing food for the
restaurant but I was never interested in cooking at that age. Too bad.
Portuguese is...
.. a beautiful language. You got that right.
On 4/28/2025 3:52 PM, ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:40:44 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:14:51 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:Agree. But gamy pork?? Nonsense and pork is not 'dirty.'
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 0:12:59 +0000, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Skimming is OK. Discarding the water is just stupid.
My guess is that pork used to be a gamy, dirty, meat. Maybe eating a pig >>>> in the past was scary. Boiling and then dumping the water gets rid of
that funky porky taste. It makes perfect sense to me. Clean pork is
always a good thing.
It's nonsense. She's just a confused Muslim.
The pork we buy is young, and corn fed. An old feral boar can be nasty.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:31:25 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:17:17 +0000, gm wrote:
dsi1 wrote:
To be sure, most Americans would never think to do something like that. >>>> My auntie taught me that practice. She said that pork was a dirty meat. >>>> She had a plate lunch place in town. I saw her preparing food for the
restaurant but I was never interested in cooking at that age. Too bad.
Portuguese is...
.. a beautiful language. You got that right.
You only say that because you like malasadas.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:56 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:31:25 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:17:17 +0000, gm wrote:
Portuguese is...
.. a beautiful language. You got that right.
You only say that because you like malasadas.
Don't forget Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage, Portuguese bean >soup, Portuguese tarts, ukuleles, Carne de vinha d'alhos i.e., vinh
d'alos.
https://onohawaiianrecipes.com/recipes/vinha-dalhos/
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:23:55 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:01:56 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:31:25 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:17:17 +0000, gm wrote:
Portuguese is...
.. a beautiful language. You got that right.
You only say that because you like malasadas.
Don't forget Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage, Portuguese bean >>soup, Portuguese tarts, ukuleles, Carne de vinha d'alhos i.e., vinh
d'alos.
https://onohawaiianrecipes.com/recipes/vinha-dalhos/
So a Hawaiian could live of Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage
and Portuguese bean soup, marry a Portuguese tart and make a living as
a ukulele player.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:10:27 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:23:55 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Don't forget Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage, Portuguese bean >>>soup, Portuguese tarts, ukuleles, Carne de vinha d'alhos i.e., vinh >>>d'alos.
https://onohawaiianrecipes.com/recipes/vinha-dalhos/
So a Hawaiian could live of Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage
and Portuguese bean soup, marry a Portuguese tart and make a living as
a ukulele player.
Silly boy, you can love a Portuguese tart but you can't marry a
Portuguese tart. It's my brother's favorite food. Portugal/Lisbon is my >brother's favorite European city and pasteis de nata is his favorite
food there. Pasteis de nata is the national food of the country - the >Portuguese love the tarts too. I love the tarts but I eat them by way of >China. One of these days, I hope to eat one in Portugal. That would be >something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA4LEjxZ7io
OK, we know from previous posts that anything anal is a no go.
Do you feel that way about oral sex too,
The worst "childish" SF was anything but low budget, Star Wars.
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
On Thu, 1 May 2025 01:56:43 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:10:27 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:23:55 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Don't forget Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage, Portuguese bean >>>>soup, Portuguese tarts, ukuleles, Carne de vinha d'alhos i.e., vinh >>>>d'alos.
https://onohawaiianrecipes.com/recipes/vinha-dalhos/
So a Hawaiian could live of Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage
and Portuguese bean soup, marry a Portuguese tart and make a living as
a ukulele player.
Silly boy, you can love a Portuguese tart but you can't marry a
Portuguese tart. It's my brother's favorite food. Portugal/Lisbon is my >>brother's favorite European city and pasteis de nata is his favorite
food there. Pasteis de nata is the national food of the country - the >>Portuguese love the tarts too. I love the tarts but I eat them by way of >>China. One of these days, I hope to eat one in Portugal. That would be >>something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA4LEjxZ7io
I've been to Lisbon once, around 1977. What I remember best with
regard to food, is a joint where we had beer and percebes (goose
barnacles) in the middle of the night. We didn't try the tarts :)
On Thu, 1 May 2025 2:25:28 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2025 01:56:43 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:10:27 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:23:55 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Don't forget Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage, Portuguese bean >>>>>soup, Portuguese tarts, ukuleles, Carne de vinha d'alhos i.e., vinh >>>>>d'alos.
https://onohawaiianrecipes.com/recipes/vinha-dalhos/
So a Hawaiian could live of Portuguese sweet bread, Portuguese sausage >>>> and Portuguese bean soup, marry a Portuguese tart and make a living as >>>> a ukulele player.
Silly boy, you can love a Portuguese tart but you can't marry a >>>Portuguese tart. It's my brother's favorite food. Portugal/Lisbon is my >>>brother's favorite European city and pasteis de nata is his favorite
food there. Pasteis de nata is the national food of the country - the >>>Portuguese love the tarts too. I love the tarts but I eat them by way of >>>China. One of these days, I hope to eat one in Portugal. That would be >>>something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA4LEjxZ7io
I've been to Lisbon once, around 1977. What I remember best with
regard to food, is a joint where we had beer and percebes (goose
barnacles) in the middle of the night. We didn't try the tarts :)
Goose barnacles is quite an unpleasant name for a food. I'd probably eat
some Patagonian sea scallops but certainly not goose barnacles.
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
On 5/1/2025 12:52 AM, Bruce wrote:
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
I don't see myself hooking up with a group that tells me what underwear
I need. "Here's your panties, be sure not to masturbate"
BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/28/2025 12:20 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2025-04-28, BryanGSimmons wrote:Assuming that you are not averse to porn, you should go to one of the
There's a genre of porn that has been around for
many decades where nuns are sexually active.
More recently, there is Mormon porn,
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
free sites like xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon. Some cuties
in the genre, like Lily Rader. The females are always submissive, and
there are a lot of "garments" employed. One doesn't need to be a Mormon
to appreciate the pretty women.
Mormon guys can be pretty cute... behind that "pious" and clean - cut
facade they can be real REAL sexy, hehe...!!!
Silly boy, you can love a Portuguese tart but you can't marry a
Portuguese tart. It's my brother's favorite food. Portugal/Lisbon is my brother's favorite European city and pasteis de nata is his favorite
food there. Pasteis de nata is the national food of the country - the Portuguese love the tarts too. I love the tarts but I eat them by way of China. One of these days, I hope to eat one in Portugal. That would be something.
I was going to post about my experiences with "Portuguese tarts",
previous to marriage, but my wife won't let me. Go Nevada!
On 5/1/2025 1:54 PM, dsi1 wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2025 12:31:59 +0000, Ed P wrote:
On 5/1/2025 12:52 AM, Bruce wrote:
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
I don't see myself hooking up with a group that tells me what underwear
I need.  "Here's your panties, be sure not to masturbate"
Evidently, Mormon women can wear the garment too. They can wear bras but
that would be worn over the garment - that's not a nice look. I don't
know if they wear panties. I don't really want to know about that.
I want to know. I want *carnal knowledge* of women's bodies. In nice
ways, of course, but all five senses. One of the beauties of
heterosexuality is the appreciation of the dimorphism of characteristics.
gm wrote on 4/30/2025 9:24 AM:
BryanGSimmons wrote:
On 4/28/2025 12:20 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
On 2025-04-28, BryanGSimmons wrote:Assuming that you are not averse to porn, you should go to one of the
There's a genre of porn that has been around for
many decades where nuns are sexually active.
More recently, there is Mormon porn,
What is 'Mormon porn'? Is it where
one woman has a bunch of husbands?
free sites like xvideos dot com and search the term Mormon. Some cuties >>> in the genre, like Lily Rader. The females are always submissive, and
there are a lot of "garments" employed. One doesn't need to be a Mormon >>> to appreciate the pretty women.
Mormon guys can be pretty cute... behind that "pious" and clean - cut
facade they can be real REAL sexy, hehe...!!!
How many mormon diks have you eaten? I'll bet Popeye ate 10 times more
(or at least buttfucked them)
They're almost as good as catholic pussy, right?
Sorry, Greg, but I don't think they have homosexual Mormon porn.
On Thu, 1 May 2025 4:52:29 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the
church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options
for the faithful.
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
On Thu, 1 May 2025 4:52:29 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the
church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options
for the faithful. Now the women can wear the latest fashions from the
90's!
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DJ-LHFTTcVV/
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:56:37 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2025 4:52:29 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On 01 May 2025 03:25:02 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-05-01, BryanGSimmons wrote:
Mormon underwear. It's a real thing.
I looked it up after reading something incomprehensible
posted by the secondary David.
Thanks again. I would never have found out about it otherwise.
It's wonderful that you found a use for Bryan: he taught you about
Mormon underwear!
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the
church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options >>for the faithful. Now the women can wear the latest fashions from the
90's!
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DJ-LHFTTcVV/
That's great. Also, those clothes are so tight they make you talk very
fast!
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 6:16:53 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:56:37 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the >>>church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options >>>for the faithful. Now the women can wear the latest fashions from the >>>90's!
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DJ-LHFTTcVV/
That's great. Also, those clothes are so tight they make you talk very
fast!
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk
fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to
wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's
religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:46:57 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 6:16:53 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:56:37 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the >>>>church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options >>>>for the faithful. Now the women can wear the latest fashions from the >>>>90's!
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DJ-LHFTTcVV/
That's great. Also, those clothes are so tight they make you talk very
fast!
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk
fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to
wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's >>religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:46:57 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 6:16:53 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:56:37 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Wonderful news! There are some new garments being phased in by the >>>>church. These have abbreviated sleeves which expand the wardrobe options >>>>for the faithful. Now the women can wear the latest fashions from the >>>>90's!
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DJ-LHFTTcVV/
That's great. Also, those clothes are so tight they make you talk very
fast!
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk
fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to
wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's >>religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:07:07 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:46:57 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk
fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to >>>wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's >>>religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
It's because of man's ability to wonder about his place in the universe
and the knowledge that he's going to one day die. It's about the
creation in his mind, of a vision of time and space and the absolute
terror of it. Mankind has a very particular set of skills that can
result in an existential crisis that requires a religion to placate it.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 18:08:10 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:07:07 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:46:57 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk
fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to >>>> wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's
religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
It's because of man's ability to wonder about his place in the universe
and the knowledge that he's going to one day die. It's about the
creation in his mind, of a vision of time and space and the absolute
terror of it. Mankind has a very particular set of skills that can
result in an existential crisis that requires a religion to placate it.
Yes, but I wish it wouldn't lead to organised religion. Keep it
personal. Don't group up over it.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 18:08:10 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:07:07 +0000, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 09:46:57 +0000, dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) wrote:
Mormons don't wear tight clothes. It's the kids - they like to talk >>>>fast. Old folks talk too slow for them. The new garments allow them to >>>>wear sleeveless dresses and shirts. It's really kind of sad. That's >>>>religion for you.
https://www.instagram.com/andreafausett/reel/DHUJhxRTZzc/
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
It's because of man's ability to wonder about his place in the universe
and the knowledge that he's going to one day die. It's about the
creation in his mind, of a vision of time and space and the absolute
terror of it. Mankind has a very particular set of skills that can
result in an existential crisis that requires a religion to placate it.
Yes, but I wish it wouldn't lead to organised religion. Keep it
personal. Don't group up over it.
On 2025-06-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
What about disorganized religion? I think it was you that pigeonholed me
as a solopsist. When I go, you all go.
The only thing that shakes my faith is "Why would I create you?".
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
It's because of man's ability to wonder about his place in the universe
and the knowledge that he's going to one day die. It's about the
creation in his mind, of a vision of time and space and the absolute
terror of it. Mankind has a very particular set of skills that can
result in an existential crisis that requires a religion to placate it.
One day, machines will probably create a religion of their own.
Hopefully, it doesn't include the killing of all humans.
On 2025-06-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
What about disorganized religion?
I think it was you that pigeonholed me
as a solopsist. When I go, you all go.
The only thing that shakes my faith is
"Why would I create you?".
On 2025-06-02, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2025-06-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
What about disorganized religion?
I think it was you that pigeonholed me
as a solopsist. When I go, you all go.
The only thing that shakes my faith is
"Why would I create you?".
Why do you think the Lord created Satan?
It is Bruce's satanic cross-product to bear.
He needs to oppose good with evil by rotating
POV by pi/2 to oppose in any & all dimensions
and directions.
Yet you always seem to come out with the short end of the stick, Master.
On 02 Jun 2025 23:20:45 GMT, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
On 2025-06-02, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
On 2025-06-01, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I think organised religion's a mental illness.
What about disorganized religion?
I think it was you that pigeonholed me
as a solopsist. When I go, you all go.
The only thing that shakes my faith is
"Why would I create you?".
Why do you think the Lord created Satan?
It is Bruce's satanic cross-product to bear.
He needs to oppose good with evil by rotating
POV by pi/2 to oppose in any & all dimensions
and directions.
Wow, I've always underestimated myself.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 21:54:18 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,988 |
