• The game with the (wifes) father!

    From D@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 23 00:12:24 2025
    Dear rgcm:ers,

    Regular readers of my posts know that I play my wifes father 2-3 times per year, and today was such a day.

    Neither of us had played much since our last match, so both were out of practice.

    But since I've specialized on the Colle-Zukertort for a while, I thought
    that I'd simply just try and play it as much as I could remember.

    To my great surprise, once I started to play, the main ideas and moves
    came back to me easily, and there was a calm and logical progression, with
    the end game in mind of a strong king side attack, or possibly a greek
    gift with a rook lift.

    After 2 hours this was the position, white to move:

    https://lichess.org/analysis/r1b4r/1p4k1/n3p1pq/p2pPp2/3P1n2/1PPB1N2/P6P/R1B2QRK_w_Q_-_0_1?color=white

    Sadly we then had to finish to go to a restaurant, so a draw I guess. I
    made one mistake allowing a queen infiltration, but the queen was by
    herself, so I was able to somewhat repair it.

    My subjective feeling was that the game was close, and that the deciding
    factor would be who would make the first mistake, following by a quick
    collapse of the position.

    I was very surprised to note that the computer thought I (white) was ahead
    by +4!

    I do know I postponed an attack too long, and my 2 contemplated moves
    where rook to g2 or g3. The idea was to try and squeeze the queen, or to
    get my knight out of the way so I could attack the queen with my bishop,
    or a sneaky idea about trying to get my knight to check the king and
    somehow try and get the queen with the bishop (that one was a couple of
    moves ahead).

    So great game, I only made one mistake allowing the queen through my
    defences, saved in (somewhat) and I felt in control the whole time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Mackenzie@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sun Mar 23 16:53:38 2025
    D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
    Dear rgcm:ers,

    Regular readers of my posts know that I play my wifes father 2-3 times per year, and today was such a day.

    Neither of us had played much since our last match, so both were out of practice.

    But since I've specialized on the Colle-Zukertort for a while, I thought
    that I'd simply just try and play it as much as I could remember.

    To my great surprise, once I started to play, the main ideas and moves
    came back to me easily, and there was a calm and logical progression, with the end game in mind of a strong king side attack, or possibly a greek
    gift with a rook lift.

    After 2 hours this was the position, white to move:

    https://lichess.org/analysis/r1b4r/1p4k1/n3p1pq/p2pPp2/3P1n2/1PPB1N2/P6P/R1B2QRK_w_Q_-_0_1?color=white

    Sadly we then had to finish to go to a restaurant, so a draw I guess. I
    made one mistake allowing a queen infiltration, but the queen was by
    herself, so I was able to somewhat repair it.

    My subjective feeling was that the game was close, and that the deciding factor would be who would make the first mistake, following by a quick collapse of the position.

    I was very surprised to note that the computer thought I (white) was ahead
    by +4!

    White is indeed ahead by a long way in that position. Black is
    effectively a piece down, having forgotten to develop his QB. White's
    QB, although on its original square is very active indeed, and has the
    option of going to a3, as part of a direct attack on the black king,
    possibly. Also, black's knight on a6 is totally out of play, too.

    White's best move in this position might be the quiet Bc2, preventing
    black possibly exchanging his knight for it. The threat is then Rg5
    forcing ... Nh5, followed by Nh4. How is black going to protect his
    pawn on g6?

    White can then calmly play Bd2 followed by massing his major pieces on
    the g file. All black can do to protect g6 is (slowly) bring his bishop
    to e8. But that leaves the pawn on f5 badly protected, with the
    possible threat of Bxf5 ef5; Nxf5+ forking the king and queen. That's
    assuming white wouldn't do even better to fork black's queen and king
    with Rxg6+ Qxg6; Nxg6, leaving the g file open for white's queen and
    remaining rook.

    I think that position is a clear win for white. It's a pity you didn't
    have time for an extra five moves or so.

    I do know I postponed an attack too long, and my 2 contemplated moves
    where rook to g2 or g3. The idea was to try and squeeze the queen, or to
    get my knight out of the way so I could attack the queen with my bishop,
    or a sneaky idea about trying to get my knight to check the king and
    somehow try and get the queen with the bishop (that one was a couple of
    moves ahead).

    So great game, I only made one mistake allowing the queen through my defences, saved in (somewhat) and I felt in control the whole time.

    --
    Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Alan Mackenzie on Sun Mar 23 22:18:33 2025
    On Sun, 23 Mar 2025, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

    D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
    Dear rgcm:ers,

    Regular readers of my posts know that I play my wifes father 2-3 times per >> year, and today was such a day.

    Neither of us had played much since our last match, so both were out of
    practice.

    But since I've specialized on the Colle-Zukertort for a while, I thought
    that I'd simply just try and play it as much as I could remember.

    To my great surprise, once I started to play, the main ideas and moves
    came back to me easily, and there was a calm and logical progression, with >> the end game in mind of a strong king side attack, or possibly a greek
    gift with a rook lift.

    After 2 hours this was the position, white to move:

    https://lichess.org/analysis/r1b4r/1p4k1/n3p1pq/p2pPp2/3P1n2/1PPB1N2/P6P/R1B2QRK_w_Q_-_0_1?color=white

    Sadly we then had to finish to go to a restaurant, so a draw I guess. I
    made one mistake allowing a queen infiltration, but the queen was by
    herself, so I was able to somewhat repair it.

    My subjective feeling was that the game was close, and that the deciding
    factor would be who would make the first mistake, following by a quick
    collapse of the position.

    I was very surprised to note that the computer thought I (white) was ahead >> by +4!

    White is indeed ahead by a long way in that position. Black is
    effectively a piece down, having forgotten to develop his QB. White's
    QB, although on its original square is very active indeed, and has the
    option of going to a3, as part of a direct attack on the black king, possibly. Also, black's knight on a6 is totally out of play, too.

    True, this was good for me, since it is one less piece to worry about, since all
    the focus is on the other side of the board. He did try to use the knight on a6 to invade earlier in the game, but I repelled it, while at the same time advancing my c pawn, and then the focus shifted to the king side and the black knight was somehow forgotten.

    White's best move in this position might be the quiet Bc2, preventing
    black possibly exchanging his knight for it. The threat is then Rg5

    I was actually hoping the black knight would take my bishop so I could take the queen, but he is way too experinced for such a blunder. ;)

    forcing ... Nh5, followed by Nh4. How is black going to protect his
    pawn on g6?

    White can then calmly play Bd2 followed by massing his major pieces on
    the g file. All black can do to protect g6 is (slowly) bring his bishop
    to e8. But that leaves the pawn on f5 badly protected, with the
    possible threat of Bxf5 ef5; Nxf5+ forking the king and queen. That's assuming white wouldn't do even better to fork black's queen and king
    with Rxg6+ Qxg6; Nxg6, leaving the g file open for white's queen and remaining rook.

    I think that position is a clear win for white. It's a pity you didn't
    have time for an extra five moves or so.

    Yes, we both felt the same way. Sadly the last 3-4 moves were not top notch since 2 x wifes were jumping up and down shouting that we'd be late for the restaurant. ;)

    I do know I postponed an attack too long, and my 2 contemplated moves
    where rook to g2 or g3. The idea was to try and squeeze the queen, or to
    get my knight out of the way so I could attack the queen with my bishop,
    or a sneaky idea about trying to get my knight to check the king and
    somehow try and get the queen with the bishop (that one was a couple of
    moves ahead).

    So great game, I only made one mistake allowing the queen through my
    defences, saved in (somewhat) and I felt in control the whole time.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Sun Mar 23 22:21:08 2025
    On Sun, 23 Mar 2025, William Hyde wrote:

    D wrote:
    Dear rgcm:ers,

    Regular readers of my posts know that I play my wifes father 2-3 times per >> year, and today was such a day.

    Neither of us had played much since our last match, so both were out of
    practice.

    But since I've specialized on the Colle-Zukertort for a while, I thought
    that I'd simply just try and play it as much as I could remember.

    To my great surprise, once I started to play, the main ideas and moves came >> back to me easily, and there was a calm and logical progression, with the
    end game in mind of a strong king side attack, or possibly a greek gift
    with a rook lift.

    After 2 hours this was the position, white to move:

    https://lichess.org/analysis/r1b4r/1p4k1/n3p1pq/p2pPp2/3P1n2/1PPB1N2/P6P/R1B2QRK_w_Q_-_0_1?color=white

    Sadly we then had to finish to go to a restaurant, so a draw I guess. I
    made one mistake allowing a queen infiltration, but the queen was by
    herself, so I was able to somewhat repair it.

    My subjective feeling was that the game was close, and that the deciding
    factor would be who would make the first mistake, following by a quick
    collapse of the position.

    I was very surprised to note that the computer thought I (white) was ahead >> by +4!


    This is a win. My first thought was Nh4, which does indeed win, but the computer tells me that Qf2 is better.

    Black's kingside is very weak - look at the weak g pawn, the weak g5 and f6 squares - he is undeveloped, and his attack on
    h2 is easily dealt with.

    Yes... it is fascinating how the game looks much different after a nights sleep, than after 2 hours of playing. ;)

    At first I immediately thought I was smoked when the queen and rook
    aligned, but then I quickly realized that, as you say, there was no
    danger.

    Thank you very much for your input!

    Another thing that was quite fun is that I did get some use out of the
    Emanuel Lasker book I read a while ago. I also tried to be more conscious
    this game of my piece heuristic. By moving a piece, will I increase its
    reach or mobility or control of square? Or will I weaken any other piece?

    Just those two questions, in combination with me having spent quite a few
    hours with a book on the Colle-Zukertort was more than good enough to
    avoid serious mistakes.

    William Hyde


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)