• Ashmole tabard oddity

    From Basil D@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 19 20:01:13 2018
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for the
    Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard: https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/

    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern!

    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or was
    there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of England &
    France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first possiblity most
    likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but I'm no antiquarian. So,
    I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least, informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 3ARwun@21:1/5 to Basil D on Thu Apr 19 21:43:28 2018
    On Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 10:01:14 PM UTC-5, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for the
    Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard: https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/

    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern!

    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or was
    there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of England &
    France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first possiblity most
    likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but I'm no antiquarian. So,
    I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least, informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    perhaps it's not an issue of the banner modern or ancient, but the arms royal looking like france modern, even in times before the banner changed to france modern as in https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fr_mon.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Howarth@21:1/5 to Basil D on Sun Apr 22 00:27:29 2018
    On Friday, 20 April 2018 04:01:14 UTC+1, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for the
    Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard: https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/

    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern!

    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or was
    there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of England &
    France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first possiblity most
    likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but I'm no antiquarian. So,
    I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least, informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    Have a look at illustrations of other old tabards, e.g. at the V&A museum, or the 16-c. illuminated manuscript of Thomas Hawley, Clarenceux (Peter Gwynn-Jones, The Art of Heraldry (1998) p 37). These show the full royal arms of the time displayed on the
    body of the tabard, but the sleeves are decorated with individual quarters, either on their own, or arranged to fit the sleeves’ shape rather than the heraldic rules.

    Peter Howarth

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Howarth@21:1/5 to Peter Howarth on Sun Apr 22 01:17:22 2018
    On Sunday, 22 April 2018 08:27:31 UTC+1, Peter Howarth wrote:
    On Friday, 20 April 2018 04:01:14 UTC+1, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for the
    Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard: https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/

    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern!

    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or was
    there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of England &
    France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first possiblity most
    likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but I'm no antiquarian. So,
    I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least, informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    Have a look at illustrations of other old tabards, e.g. at the V&A museum, or the 16-c. illuminated manuscript of Thomas Hawley, Clarenceux (Peter Gwynn-Jones, The Art of Heraldry (1998) p 37). These show the full royal arms of the time displayed on
    the body of the tabard, but the sleeves are decorated with individual quarters, either on their own, or arranged to fit the sleeves’ shape rather than the heraldic rules.

    Peter Howarth

    Having looked further, and in particular at Sir Anthony Wagner's Heralds and Ancestors (1978), I take back (most of) my previous post. Thomas Hawley, Clarenceux, who appears twice in Gwynn-Jones's book, is the only example I can find where the sleeves
    don't match exactly the body of the tabard. Since all of Wagner's examples do what we expect, I suggest that the painting of Ashmole got it wrong. Quite often, the artist paid to paint the portrait only bothered with the face and hands, leaving the
    clothes and background to be finished by an apprentice.

    Peter Howarth

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Basil D@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 23 18:09:44 2018
    On 4/19/2018 9:43 PM, 3ARwun wrote:
    On Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 10:01:14 PM UTC-5, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for
    the Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard:
    https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/



    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern! >>
    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or
    was there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of
    England & France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first
    possiblity most likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but
    I'm no antiquarian. So, I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least,
    informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    perhaps it's not an issue of the banner modern or ancient, but the arms royal looking
    like france modern, even in times before the banner changed to france modern as in
    https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fr_mon.html

    Um, no. The problem with the cited painting is that the first grand quarter has England
    and France Modern quartered, which is the expected and (I've always read) correct
    arrangement, but the fourth grand quarter has them per fess, which I've never seen
    anywhere else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Basil D@21:1/5 to Peter Howarth on Mon Apr 23 18:16:53 2018
    On 4/22/2018 1:17 AM, Peter Howarth wrote:
    On Sunday, 22 April 2018 08:27:31 UTC+1, Peter Howarth wrote:
    On Friday, 20 April 2018 04:01:14 UTC+1, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most
    for the Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard:
    https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/



    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern! >>>
    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer.
    Or was there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of
    England & France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first
    possiblity most likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but
    I'm no antiquarian. So, I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least,
    informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    Have a look at illustrations of other old tabards, e.g. at the V&A museum, or the
    16-c. illuminated manuscript of Thomas Hawley, Clarenceux (Peter Gwynn-Jones, The Art
    of Heraldry (1998) p 37). These show the full royal arms of the time displayed on
    the body of the tabard, but the sleeves are decorated with individual quarters,
    either on their own, or arranged to fit the sleeves’ shape rather than the heraldic
    rules.

    Peter Howarth

    Having looked further, and in particular at Sir Anthony Wagner's Heralds and Ancestors
    (1978), I take back (most of) my previous post. Thomas Hawley, Clarenceux, who appears
    twice in Gwynn-Jones's book, is the only example I can find where the sleeves don't
    match exactly the body of the tabard. Since all of Wagner's examples do what we
    expect, I suggest that the painting of Ashmole got it wrong. Quite often, the artist
    paid to paint the portrait only bothered with the face and hands, leaving the clothes
    and background to be finished by an apprentice.

    Peter Howarth

    I suspect you are correct, and Cornelius Neve, or (more likely) one of his underlings,
    goofed. Interestingly, the front of the tabard is so shadowed on the wearer's left, that I
    can't be sure if *that* fourth grand quarter is quarterly or per fess.

    Odd, all the way around. :-/


    ~BasilD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 3ARwun@21:1/5 to Basil D on Mon Apr 23 21:50:51 2018
    On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 8:09:47 PM UTC-5, Basil D wrote:
    On 4/19/2018 9:43 PM, 3ARwun wrote:
    On Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 10:01:14 PM UTC-5, Basil D wrote:
    Elias Ashmole was Windsor Herald from 1660-1675, though he's better known to most for
    the Ashmolean Museum. I found a painting of him in his tabard:
    https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/shop/images/ashmole-elias-windsor-herald-1660-1675/



    (There are larger copies, but that's the only one in color I have found)

    Note the fourth quarter of the sleeve: Per fess England and France Modern! >>
    Does anyone know if this is an error by the artist, or by the tailor/embroiderer. Or
    was there a time when Great Britain's coat of arms had different arrangements of
    England & France in the first and fourth quarters? Frankly, I think the first
    possiblity most likely, the second not impossible, and the third preposterous, but
    I'm no antiquarian. So, I turn to you all, in hopes of an answer---or at least,
    informed speculation. ;-)

    Thank you for your time.

    perhaps it's not an issue of the banner modern or ancient, but the arms royal looking
    like france modern, even in times before the banner changed to france modern as in
    https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fr_mon.html

    Um, no. The problem with the cited painting is that the first grand quarter has England
    and France Modern quartered, which is the expected and (I've always read) correct
    arrangement, but the fourth grand quarter has them per fess, which I've never seen
    anywhere else.

    perhaps I mistook your question? I thought your 'issue" was with the tabard showing France modern isntead of France ancient in the time period...but it appears your issue was more about WHERE, not whether france modern was displayed?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Basil D@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 26 15:04:39 2018
    On 4/23/2018 9:50 PM, 3ARwun wrote:
    {snip}
    perhaps I mistook your question? I thought your 'issue" was with the tabard showing
    France modern isntead of France ancient in the time period...but it appears your issue
    was more about WHERE, not whether france modern was displayed?

    Yes, that's it. The "per fess" arrangement was what astonished me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)