I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why
you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they
worth the effort?
Frank Rosenbaum wrote in news:9c072416-d704-4bdd-aa7f-b0fa3710ee73@googlegroups.com:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why
you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they
worth the effort?
When I don't free-run the trains, I use a switch list for my small N scale layout. I decided on it since I genreally run solo. With a switch list I
can take as much time as I want before moving a car. If you plan on having more than one operator, waybills often work better since things are often timing dependent (have to pick up a car before others can be dropped onto
the siding.)
--
Dale M. Arends
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
At Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Frank Rosenbaum <frankrosenbaum4@gmail.com> wrote:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
The Model Railroad System (https://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem) includes a program called "Freight Car Forwarder". This program uses a database (in flat text files) that represent your railroad, its yards and industries, trains, and cars, and generates switch lists that will get the proper cars to the proper places on the proper trains. (It actually simulate a
run shift.) You run the program and then print out the switch lists it generates. You can carry the switch list with you as you operate the train around the layout. Also included are switch lists [yard lists?] for the yard master(s) to put together trains at the source yards, so the trains can be made up properly, with the cars in the proper order and blocking. The computer
does all of the "mindless" work, so you can do the "fun" part running trains and switching cars along the way.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux, MS-Windows, and MacOSX heller@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 3:32:14 PM UTC-5, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Frank Rosenbaum <frankrosenbaum4=@gmail.com> wrote:
=20use
=20
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you=
eone over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?=20
The Model Railroad System (https://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem) includes a program called "Freight Car Forwarder". This program uses a database (in flat text files) that represent your railroad, its yards and industries, trains, and cars, and generates switch lists that will get th=
proper cars to the proper places on the proper trains. (It actually simul=ate a
run shift.) You run the program and then print out the switch lists it generates. You can carry the switch list with you as you operate the trai=n
around the layout. Also included are switch lists [yard lists?] for the y=ard
master(s) to put together trains at the source yards, so the trains can b=e
made up properly, with the cars in the proper order and blocking. The com=puter
does all of the "mindless" work, so you can do the "fun" part running tra=ins
and switching cars along the way.5364
=20
=20=20
--=20
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-=
Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux, MS-Windows, and MacOSX heller@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
Thank you for your reply. I am currently using Easy Model Railroad Inventor= y. I have found that making a switch list is done manually, one car at a ti= me. Does the Model Railroad System have that limitation? I can export all t= he data to an excel file. Can MRS Import that? Does it also have the abilit= y to print waybills?
Again, thanks for the reply.
Frank
FAR Seas Connecting Railroad
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:54:08 PM UTC-5, Dale Arends wrote:
Frank Rosenbaum wrote in
news:9c072416-d704-4bdd-aa7f-b0fa3710ee73@googlegroups.com:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate
your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all,
and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive.
Are they worth the effort?
When I don't free-run the trains, I use a switch list for my small N
scale layout. I decided on it since I genreally run solo. With a
switch list I can take as much time as I want before moving a car. If
you plan on having more than one operator, waybills often work better
since things are often timing dependent (have to pick up a car before
others can be dropped onto the siding.)
--
Dale M. Arends
Thank you Dale, for the quick response. How many industries do you
have? My HO railroad is around the walls in a full footprint basement
so it is fairly large. I have the ability to keep 7 operators busy,
even though I am alone.
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:35:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Rosenbaum wrote:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your ra=ilroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use o= ne over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effor= t?
Ok. I've downloaded the Model Railroad System for Win32 zip complete. I eve= n installed it, I think. I am a technological nincompoop. There was no Icon=
on my desktop, It did not offer to open the program, and I could not find = a .exe file to launch the program.=20
What do I do?
Please be very specific
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:35:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Rosenbaum wrote:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your ra=ilroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use o= ne over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effor= t?
Well, I got a response when I went to the bin folder.Is there a single file=
that will run the whole program?
I have opened several of the files, but everything is grayed out and would not respond. When I opened FCFmain the only function I could do was open. N=
othing else worked. I just tried to open a library and got Error: _40d09307= _p_fcfSupport_System{Error readi...=20
Here is the Log report:
_40d09307_p_FCFSupport__System {Error reading C:\mrrsystem-2.1.44\bin\libtt= classes.dll -- short file (TrainsFile)!}
_40d09307_p_FCFSupport__System {Error reading C:\mrrsystem-2.1.44\bin\libtt= classes.dll -- short file (TrainsFile)!}
while executing
"System TheSystem [file nativename "$fileName"] [MakeSeed]"
(procedure "LoadSystem" line 11)
invoked from within
"LoadSystem"
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open invoke "
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open instate !disabled { .main.topf.tb0.open invoke } "
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open instate pressed { .main.topf.tb0.open state !pressed; = .main.topf.tb0.open instate !disabled { .main.topf.tb0.open invoke } } "
(command bound to event)
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:35:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Rosenbaum wrote:readi...
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
Well, I got a response when I went to the bin folder.Is there a single file that will run the whole program?
I have opened several of the files, but everything is grayed out and would not respond. When I opened FCFmain the only function I could do was open. Nothing else worked. I just tried to open a library and got Error: _40d09307_p_fcfSupport_System{Error
Here is the Log report:
_40d09307_p_FCFSupport__System {Error reading C:\mrrsystem-2.1.44\bin\libttclasses.dll -- short file (TrainsFile)!}
_40d09307_p_FCFSupport__System {Error reading C:\mrrsystem-2.1.44\bin\libttclasses.dll -- short file (TrainsFile)!}
while executing
"System TheSystem [file nativename "$fileName"] [MakeSeed]"
(procedure "LoadSystem" line 11)
invoked from within
"LoadSystem"
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open invoke "
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open instate !disabled { .main.topf.tb0.open invoke } "
invoked from within
".main.topf.tb0.open instate pressed { .main.topf.tb0.open state !pressed; .main.topf.tb0.open instate !disabled { .main.topf.tb0.open invoke } } "
(command bound to event)
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:35:18 PM UTC-5, Frank Rosenbaum wrote:
I am setting up operations and would like to know, if you operate your railroad using switch lists or waybills, or nothing at all, and why you use one over the other. Both seem very labor intensive. Are they worth the effort?
I am now trying to find someway to uninstall the program, and cannot find
any way to do so. In Windows - settings - Apps/uninstall, the program does not show up so I can't choose it.
What do I do?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 162:39:05 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,502 |