I've been using Eternal September as my Usenet provider out of sheer
inertia. It's clearly dying, though, becoming more like Eternal Wait. Sometimes it takes several tries to load a message.
I've had no problems at all with Eternal September.
But I am using a*very* obscure reader.
On 11/7/2023 9:18 AM, Rafe Culpin wrote:
I've had no problems at all with Eternal September.
But I am using a*very* obscure reader.
I'm using Thunderbird.
--Lee
In article <5atlkidednam3dmps...@4ax.com>,I use Groups.google.com/g/rec.music.filk for this group only usenet group I still visit.
Arthur T. <art...@munged.invalid> wrote:
And, as my headers show, I access Usenet via Forte Agent. I shudderDitto.
at the idea of a Web interface.
I'm still using trn 4.0. I've found that it's installable
in Windows Subsystem for Linux. I *love* its kill file
feature, though I don't use it all that much. And it's
pure text; I defy anything short of The Blight to infect
my computer through that.
--
Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston
I changed the
server I'm using on Eternal September to news.eternal-september.org
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 57:38:44 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,451 |
Posted today: | 1 |