In Message-ID:<vvdaia$38n31$
1@dont-email.me>,
Gary McGath <
garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
Another curious rule: "Further, we ask that people not presume to speak
for groups of which they are not members." What does "speaking for"
mean?
"We prefer to be called..." is okay, but "They prefer to be
called..." is not, especially after someone uses a term that the
group is sometimes known by. I'm sure I can could come up with other
examples.
You made other good points. And I notice that the Seattle Worldcon
takes one to heart: "Actions which may constitute harassment include
but are not limited to: [...] Attempts to weaponize this code of
conduct".
--
Arthur T.
Last one out, turn off the lights.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)