XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
"Adam A. Wanderer" <
adamawander2004@yahoo.com> wrote:
David Hartung <david_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote in news:0vudnQ7dZN92m3XFnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 04/07/2017 03:41 PM, Adam A. Wanderer wrote:
David Hartung <david_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:9uqdnbHoUO37NnrFnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 04/07/2017 09:29 AM, Adam A. Wanderer wrote:
David Hartung <david_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:a8GdnZgOWOYoBHrFnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com:
On 04/07/2017 08:46 AM, Adam A. Wanderer wrote:
David Hartung <david_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:lridnVTfQ9bdCHrFnZ2dnUU7-dPNnZ2d@giganews.com:
This is an interview with the author of a study on cohabitation >>>>>>>> and its impact on kids. The study made some interesting
discoveries, discoveries which will not set well with our
"liberal" friends. Here is the report on the study:
<snip> Christian lies, propaganda, and disinformation, why repost? >>>>>>> </snip>
Do you have anything else besides religious and conservative
internet rags? An actual source of reliable news and information >>>>>>> would help. Otherwise, we're interested in your "Christian" and
conservative bull shit, why again???
1. Yes, Christianity today is a conservative Christian publication, >>>>>> which means that it is at least as credible as any left wing secular >>>>>> publication.
2. The fact that the interview is in a religious publication is why >>>>>> I included a link to the study itself, or did you not see that?
3. If you question what is in the article, you have the source
material handy.
And I'm interested in the "study" of a Christian, conservative freak, >>>>> why again???
So you reject the work of a scientist because he happens to be a
Christian?
If he's publishing in those internet rags, he's no scientist.
My suspicion is that you lack the knowledge to make that a credible
statement.
My knowledge is greater than your's
LOL. That says it all, Adam. :)
--
This message is encrypted with TardBlock® which is special software that prevents retards from reading or responding to posts. Can you read this
and respond? If not, then you must be retarded, because TardBlock® blocks
only retards. Everybody else can read it and respond to it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)