https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/
Nikon reportedly joins Canon in ending development on high-end DSLR cameras
Smaller, lighter mirrorless cameras have mostly caught up to DSLR image quality.
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality or lens selection of DSLR cameras,
and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
But
newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings
and their electronic viewfinders lagged behindThey still do.
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
and their electronic viewfinders lagged behindThey still do.
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
And EVFs can do things which OVFs can't do.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/(snip)>
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality or lens selection of DSLR cameras, and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide. But newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings while retaining their smaller sizes and lighter weights. Mirrorless cameras also usually offer superior video quality, which is useful for people who need their cameras to multitask.
On 7/12/2022 11:44 PM, NewsKrawler wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/(snip)>
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality orWhat is often overlooked is that EVFs serve a different purpose than
lens
selection of DSLR cameras, and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
But
newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings while
retaining their smaller sizes and lighter weights. Mirrorless cameras
also
usually offer superior video quality, which is useful for people who need
their cameras to multitask.
optical viewfinders. Going back to professional video cameras in the
'70s, the EVFs showed color balance, overexposure, and other qualities
of the "sensor", which were tubes. The same is true of the EVFs in
mirrorless cameras, with the better quality cameras showing more useful information. So, while lag is important for some uses such as shooting high-speed events, it does not always result in the best image quality.
One big problem with OVFs is that what you see is not necessarily what
you get.
Am 13.07.2022 um 20:55 schrieb Neil:
On 7/12/2022 11:44 PM, NewsKrawler wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/(snip)>
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality orWhat is often overlooked is that EVFs serve a different purpose than
lens
selection of DSLR cameras, and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind >>> the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
But
newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings while >>> retaining their smaller sizes and lighter weights. Mirrorless cameras
also
usually offer superior video quality, which is useful for people who need >>> their cameras to multitask.
optical viewfinders. Going back to professional video cameras in the
'70s, the EVFs showed color balance, overexposure, and other qualities
of the "sensor", which were tubes. The same is true of the EVFs in
mirrorless cameras, with the better quality cameras showing more useful
information. So, while lag is important for some uses such as shooting
high-speed events, it does not always result in the best image quality.
One big problem with OVFs is that what you see is not necessarily what
you get.
In article <PGCzK.433821$AS_9.165477@fx12.ams1>, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@yahoo.com> wrote:
and their electronic viewfinders lagged behindThey still do.
the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide.
And EVFs can do things which OVFs can't do.
and ovfs can do things that evfs cannot, zero lag being one of the most important.
On 2022-07-13, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 13.07.2022 um 20:55 schrieb Neil:
On 7/12/2022 11:44 PM, NewsKrawler wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/(snip)>
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality or >>>> lensWhat is often overlooked is that EVFs serve a different purpose than
selection of DSLR cameras, and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind >>>> the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide. >>>> But
newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings while >>>> retaining their smaller sizes and lighter weights. Mirrorless cameras
also
usually offer superior video quality, which is useful for people who need >>>> their cameras to multitask.
optical viewfinders. Going back to professional video cameras in the
'70s, the EVFs showed color balance, overexposure, and other qualities
of the "sensor", which were tubes. The same is true of the EVFs in
mirrorless cameras, with the better quality cameras showing more useful
information. So, while lag is important for some uses such as shooting
high-speed events, it does not always result in the best image quality.
One big problem with OVFs is that what you see is not necessarily what
you get.
Lots of photographers edit their photographs so it's not so important
unless you do everything in-camera. For those who do everything
in-camera, understanding exposure, camera settings and using the right techniques to deal with difficult exposure don't change. It's just less convenient.
With an OVF you might blow the highlights without even realising it.
Nothing you can fix in post.
Am 14.07.2022 um 12:28 schrieb Incubus:
On 2022-07-13, Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 13.07.2022 um 20:55 schrieb Neil:
On 7/12/2022 11:44 PM, NewsKrawler wrote:One big problem with OVFs is that what you see is not necessarily what
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/nikon-will-reportedly-join-canon-in-ending-development-on-high-end-dslr-cameras/(snip)>
Early mirrorless cameras generally couldn't match the image quality or >>>>> lensWhat is often overlooked is that EVFs serve a different purpose than
selection of DSLR cameras, and their electronic viewfinders lagged behind >>>>> the real-time previews that a DSLR's optical viewfinder could provide. >>>>> But
newer mirrorless cameras have largely addressed those shortcomings while >>>>> retaining their smaller sizes and lighter weights. Mirrorless cameras >>>>> also
usually offer superior video quality, which is useful for people who need >>>>> their cameras to multitask.
optical viewfinders. Going back to professional video cameras in the
'70s, the EVFs showed color balance, overexposure, and other qualities >>>> of the "sensor", which were tubes. The same is true of the EVFs in
mirrorless cameras, with the better quality cameras showing more useful >>>> information. So, while lag is important for some uses such as shooting >>>> high-speed events, it does not always result in the best image quality. >>>
you get.
Lots of photographers edit their photographs so it's not so important
unless you do everything in-camera. For those who do everything
in-camera, understanding exposure, camera settings and using the right
techniques to deal with difficult exposure don't change. It's just less
convenient.
With an OVF you might blow the highlights without even realising it.
Nothing you can fix in post.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 00:06:03 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,566 |