1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.PHOTO.DIGITAL

  • Media lies about Florida storm

    From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 10 18:23:23 2022
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RichA on Fri Nov 11 20:42:32 2022
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.


    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to geoff on Fri Nov 11 19:32:31 2022
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RichA on Sun Nov 13 12:59:57 2022
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony Cooper@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 12 20:11:06 2022
    On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:59:57 +1300, geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org>
    wrote:

    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment >appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    As a Central Florida resident I was quite interested in RichA's
    explanation that the two hurricanes that I just experienced were not
    real.

    I am now quite impressed that CBS and the other television networks in
    the area went to such great pains to convince viewers they were real. Evidently, they created a panoramic greenscreen and projected CGImages
    of the storm's damage just outside my window. I was actually
    convinced that the flooding, downed trees, and building damage around
    me was real. They even co-opted the power company into turning off my
    power for several days during Ian, and one day during Nicole.

    RichA is now the Alex Jones of rec.photo.digital.




    --

    Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

    I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to geoff on Sat Nov 12 17:40:06 2022
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 19:00:04 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.
    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    It barely met the criteria for a hurricane. Just because cretins decide to build palatial homes on the sand at the edge of beaches and it gets washed away doesn't mean it's catastrophic. Any more than dunces who build houses in the middle of forests
    then burn prove that a fire is in any way out of the norm. If the people in Florida had built homes on the surf-side like they do say in Galveston (on deeply sunken stilts), this might have been avoided except in the worst case.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to Tony Cooper on Sat Nov 12 17:41:50 2022
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 20:11:14 UTC-5, Tony Cooper wrote:
    On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:59:57 +1300, geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org>
    wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly >infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment >appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff
    As a Central Florida resident I was quite interested in RichA's
    explanation that the two hurricanes that I just experienced were not
    real.

    I didn't SAY the previous one wasn't a hurricane, but when they broadcast the images
    and talked about it, the present storm had barely even begun. It was misrepresentation to
    imply the images were in real-time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony Cooper@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 13 00:49:00 2022
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:40:06 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 19:00:04 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.
    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment
    appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    It barely met the criteria for a hurricane. Just because cretins decide to build palatial homes on the sand at the edge of beaches and it gets washed away doesn't mean it's catastrophic. Any more than dunces who build houses in the middle of forests
    then burn prove that a fire is in any way out of the norm. If the people in Florida had built homes on the surf-side like they do say in Galveston (on deeply sunken stilts), this might have been avoided except in the worst case.

    There was damage from Ian and Nicole in the beachside areas, but most
    of the damage was in the inland areas. Even in the coastal cities
    like Ft Myers, the significent damage wasn't to beachside homes. The
    flooding following Ian was all inland.




    --

    Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

    I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony Cooper@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 13 00:39:56 2022
    On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:41:50 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 20:11:14 UTC-5, Tony Cooper wrote:
    On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:59:57 +1300, geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org>
    wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment
    appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff
    As a Central Florida resident I was quite interested in RichA's
    explanation that the two hurricanes that I just experienced were not
    real.

    I didn't SAY the previous one wasn't a hurricane, but when they broadcast the images
    and talked about it, the present storm had barely even begun. It was misrepresentation to
    imply the images were in real-time.


    I don't know what footage you viewed, or how it was presented, but
    Nicole passed through Orlando just over a month after Ian hit us. The
    area had not yet recovered from Ian. The flood waters have not
    completely subsided, the storm debris has not been completely removed,
    and the destroyed or partially destroyed buildings have not been
    rebuilt. There are still roads that are unpassable because sections
    have been washed out from the flooding.

    One of the problems Nicole presented was the possibility of high winds
    picking up the storm debris from Ian and the increased damage from
    flying debris.

    If your local CBS provider presented images of hurricane destruction,
    the images would have been scenes of hurricane Ian after-effects that
    are still present in some parts of Florida. That's real-time
    coverage.

    --

    Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida

    I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RichA on Mon Nov 14 01:24:03 2022
    On 13/11/2022 2:40 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 19:00:04 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and
    forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.
    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment
    appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    It barely met the criteria for a hurricane. Just because cretins decide to build palatial homes on the sand at the edge of beaches and it gets washed away doesn't mean it's catastrophic. Any more than dunces who build houses in the middle of forests
    then burn prove that a fire is in any way out of the norm. If the people in Florida had built homes on the surf-side like they do say in Galveston (on deeply sunken stilts), this might have been avoided except in the worst case.

    Oh, so clearly you are a meterologist, and know a lot more about the
    criteria than the supposed meteroligists that spread this conspiracy.

    Fuckwit.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From geoff@21:1/5 to RichA on Mon Nov 14 01:21:40 2022
    On 13/11/2022 2:41 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 20:11:14 UTC-5, Tony Cooper wrote:
    On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 12:59:57 +1300, geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org>
    wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by >>>>> Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and >>>>> forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.

    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly
    infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment >>> appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff
    As a Central Florida resident I was quite interested in RichA's
    explanation that the two hurricanes that I just experienced were not
    real.

    I didn't SAY the previous one wasn't a hurricane, but when they broadcast the images
    and talked about it, the present storm had barely even begun. It was misrepresentation to
    imply the images were in real-time.



    Nobody suggested that. You suggested that THIS ONE wasn't. Or implied it.

    Supposed to be real-time ? Bullshit. Do you know what real-time is ?!!!

    Of the same hurricane, maybe was, maybe not, but not out of context: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/12/us/volusia-county-homes-hurricane-nicole/index.html

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RichA@21:1/5 to geoff on Mon Nov 14 18:45:39 2022
    On Sunday, 13 November 2022 at 07:24:11 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 13/11/2022 2:40 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 19:00:04 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by >>>> Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and >>>> forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.
    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly >> infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment >> appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    It barely met the criteria for a hurricane. Just because cretins decide to build palatial homes on the sand at the edge of beaches and it gets washed away doesn't mean it's catastrophic. Any more than dunces who build houses in the middle of forests
    then burn prove that a fire is in any way out of the norm. If the people in Florida had built homes on the surf-side like they do say in Galveston (on deeply sunken stilts), this might have been avoided except in the worst case.
    Oh, so clearly you are a meterologist, and know a lot more about the criteria than the supposed meteroligists that spread this conspiracy.

    Fuckwit.

    geoff\

    Climate people claim storms are worse and point to more extensive damage and costs in areas compared to when hurricanes hit 30-40 years ago. Now, what they LEAVE OUT is that populations increased (in the one case) three TIMES in that time period,
    leading to greater housing densities. Couple that with the fact costs borne by insurance companies are much higher today owing to laws preventing them from claiming "acts of God" and not paying out. So, what appears to be "more damage" is in reality
    because of population increases and payouts and the storms in actuality are no worse than half a century ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Incubus@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Nov 15 11:08:01 2022
    On 2022-11-15, RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sunday, 13 November 2022 at 07:24:11 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 13/11/2022 2:40 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Saturday, 12 November 2022 at 19:00:04 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 12/11/2022 4:32 pm, RichA wrote:
    On Friday, 11 November 2022 at 02:42:41 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
    On 11/11/2022 3:23 pm, RichA wrote:
    I say storm because this thing is not like the last hurricane. But, CBS showed (supposedly) scenes from the storm at present. I thought they looked odd. Turns out, they were recycled from the previous (real) hurricane.
    Those actually weren't real either. It was all computer-generated by
    Hillary's undercover team, to make people worry about the weather and >> >>>> forget about the baby-banquet that is going on.

    geoff

    I wouldn't even be surprised, even though it's a jest. Fakery has reached the point where it's almost impossible to tell it from reality.
    Should make it clear when an image or footage is 'library'.

    But it's hardly the end of the world to use it, and does not implicitly >> >> infer that there this hurricane was not real, which is what your comment >> >> appears to infer. Or are you a meteorologist ?

    geoff

    It barely met the criteria for a hurricane. Just because cretins decide to build palatial homes on the sand at the edge of beaches and it gets washed away doesn't mean it's catastrophic. Any more than dunces who build houses in the middle of forests
    then burn prove that a fire is in any way out of the norm. If the people in Florida had built homes on the surf-side like they do say in Galveston (on deeply sunken stilts), this might have been avoided except in the worst case.
    Oh, so clearly you are a meterologist, and know a lot more about the
    criteria than the supposed meteroligists that spread this conspiracy.

    Fuckwit.

    geoff\

    Climate people claim storms are worse and point to more extensive damage and costs in areas compared to when hurricanes hit 30-40 years ago. Now, what they LEAVE OUT is that populations increased (in the one case) three TIMES in that time period,
    leading to greater housing densities. Couple that with the fact costs borne by insurance companies are much higher today owing to laws preventing them from claiming "acts of God" and not paying out. So, what appears to be "more damage" is in reality
    because of population increases and payouts and the storms in actuality are no worse than half a century ago.

    In the UK, they reported that record temperatures had been experienced
    this summer. What the MSM didn't report on was that the thermometers
    used were located next to airport runways whereas they were previously
    in more rural areas...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)