• Re: 600,000+ people judge Best Smartphone Camera - 2022

    From RichA@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Sat Dec 24 00:48:45 2022
    On Thursday, 22 December 2022 at 12:29:51 UTC-5, Alan Browne wrote:
    Video explains the test and ranking method clearly.

    Cameras are not named - photos have an id.

    Subjective (vote on best looking photo - not pixel peeking).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQdjmGimh04&ab_channel=MarquesBrownlee


    They all suck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to RichA on Sat Dec 24 11:39:47 2022
    On 2022-12-24 03:48, RichA wrote:
    On Thursday, 22 December 2022 at 12:29:51 UTC-5, Alan Browne wrote:
    Video explains the test and ranking method clearly.

    Cameras are not named - photos have an id.

    Subjective (vote on best looking photo - not pixel peeking).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQdjmGimh04&ab_channel=MarquesBrownlee


    They all suck.

    Actually they don't. Considering the portability and rapid usability,
    the majority are very good indeed.

    And as Yousuf Karsh used to say:

    "Better the camera you have with you than the camera you don't."

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)