1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.PHOTO.DIGITAL

  • Re: iPhones are not "smartphones"

    From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Joel on Sun Apr 2 19:01:39 2023
    Joel wrote:

    I have to admit, while I would never give Adobe my money, it is
    frustrating using Paint, Paint 3D and GIMP, they just don't make it
    easy to do things that ought to be very straightforward. I can't and
    won't support Photoshop, but it might make my life easier.

    Hi Joel,

    I've tried _every_ known free screenshot editor ever suggested on the
    Windows and Linux newsgroups over the past two decades on Usenet.

    Hence, the difference between me and those iKooks you're "conversing" with,
    is I know what I'm talking about - and - to your point - I agree with your statements above about the lack of "ease of use" of those specific apps.

    But there _is_ a better app (for ease of use & for functionality) than
    those apps, at least on Windows there is... with a caveat (net.framework).

    While I don't like installing net framework any more than anyone else, if
    you want a free Windows Photoshop replacement app that it both _easy_ and
    quite functional (in terms of what you do most), you can't beat this app.
    <https://github.com/paintdotnet/release/releases> current version 5.03

    Bear in mind another caveat is Microsoft would wish that Paint.NET would go away but it won't (because it's too good) so even though Microsoft _sells_
    it on their App Store, it's still free if you know where to get it from.

    Note you can also get an older version of Photoshop for free, which we've discussed umpteen times over the years, but if you need it, I'll point you
    to the serials which are published and NOT REFUTED by Adobe (for years!).
    (caveats apply - but let's not go there until/unless you want it)
    <https://www.techspot.com/downloads/3689-adobe-photoshop-cs2.html>

    The difference between the iKooks and me is I know what I'm talking about.
    They simply lie (why should they know anything when they can just lie).
    --
    Note that Microsoft would love for you to replace Paint.NET with Pinta
    but last I checked, Pinta wasn't even close to what Paint.NET does for you.

    Paint.NET released version 4.3.11 on May 25, 2022 {https://github.com/paintdotnet/release/releases}

    Microsoft sells it for $7.99 in the Microsoft Store. {https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/paintnet/9NBHCS1LX4R0}

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Magani@21:1/5 to Joel on Tue Apr 4 17:20:54 2023
    On Wednesday, 5 April 2023 at 9:21:33 am UTC+10, Joel wrote:
    chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    --
    "Yah, right, like I'm going to spend the big bucks to get the latest >version [Photoshop] when I have a version I'm familiar with and a free >hacked and cracked key so I can install it anywhere." - "Greg Hall", >scumbag software pirate
    I sympathize with people of little means resorting to software piracy,
    lord knows it's just an inevitability, but people bragging about doing
    it here, on Usenet, tend to just be greedy. If I don't want to pay
    for software, but I have the means to, then I shouldn't use it.

    --
    Joel Crump

    At the risk of stating the blindingly obvious, while Mr Adobe's software-for-rent scheme is not my favourite method of acquiring a program, the photography package (Photoshop + Lightroom + Camera Raw) is not exactly an impost on most. Here in the
    Greater Antipodes, it's currently worth about 3 take-away coffees per month and is hardly likely to break the bank when looked at in the light of what you've already invested in camera bodies, lenses and other photographic kit. As an exercise for the
    reader, compare it to the cost of photo paper, developer, fixer and other darkroom supplies from yesteryear (yes, I'm that old, and am glad to have moved on).

    Also, on the topic of 'paint.net as a Photoshop replacement'.... really? Yes I use it to do quick and dirty stuff and it's really handy for that, but as a replacement? No thanks.

    As for GIMP, I think it's a great idea and I applaud its developer/s, but it's got a really steep learning curve. I've had a go at it on a number of occasions to see if it offered something different, but the effort to learn something completely new
    when I already have a solution that works is not something that appeals.

    Happy Easter to those who celebrate. May the Easter Bilby visit you with chocolatey goodness.

    Cheers,
    Magani

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisky-dave@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Wed Apr 5 05:48:27 2023
    On Tuesday, 4 April 2023 at 12:58:48 UTC+1, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    Glad you have a stiffy for cheap/freeware, but FFS give it a rest ....
    I'm trying to _educate_ this unfathomably ignorant Apple customer base that they're paying through the nose for what _intelligent_ people don't. <https://img.yumpu.com/6936343/1/500x640/standouts-the-beat-within.jpg>

    It's really not about freeware when you keep in mind that Apple is
    brilliant at separating the clueless Apple customer base from their money.

    I've not needed to be parted from my money after buying Apple but I have about 92 PC's in my lab
    and we''ve had to part with lots of money from office and hardware and software support.
    I'm still using an 11 year old iMac the 4 year old PCs in the lab are suffering from burn-in screens adn we've had about 4 fail since xmas
    and a few more might need replacing shortly.


    You can't make those ungodly profits off of an intelligent customer base.\

    Yes you can by giving them what you want.
    Same with Gucci handbags, rolex watches, Porsche cars and many other profitable companies .
    Why do people wear gold on their fingers when a plastic ring in much cheaper, or even splash out on a curtain ring.


    Apple profits alone, tell you how unfathomably clueless the Apple customer is, although the fact Apple customers are gullible is proven when you look
    at how Apple advertises a release by how many emoji they managed to writge
    in six months (basically three emoji a month is Apple's coding output).

    I'd hardly call emoji's coding.


    This unfathamably ignorant customer base extends to Apple's hardware, where we saw in this thread NOBODY who owned the M1 knew a single thing about it.

    I doubt you could prove that, but then again the average PC user needs to buy anti-virus software to keep them safe, becaus ethey know so little
    about their computer is it ?


    Nobody.
    Not even one child-like Apple poster understood a single thing of the M1.

    They shouldn't need to.
    I bet very few people that take airline flights know much about the enginbes that power modern jet aircraft/

    I bet you can't tell us how the universe was created.
    I bet yuo don't even know the processes in your body that converts foor to energy and shit.
    But you certainly know how to talk shit.



    When you look at how successful Apple is without spending anything on R&D,

    They spend a lot on R&D they designed their own processors like the M1 series. They don;t use standard packing creates like most PC users do.


    it tells you how shockingly stupid the Apple customer base is.

    Not as stupid as those that by a PC and get viruses from porn sites.


    I mean, yellow iPhones? WTF? That's the biggest hardware change Apple could come up with after a year of desperation with the iPhone 14?

    Better than samsung faking moon photos to make their phones take 'better ' pictures.

    you only have to update equipment when your designs and technology are too old for a customer to want to buy.

    Few people would buy a new car every month or even every year.

    Some people doget their cars painted or wrapped but whay ?




    You have to be kidding, right?



    You'd be hard pressed to find a customer base more shockingly ignorant than the Apple customer base - which is easily shown by the Usenet ng sample
    here.

    Go over to one of the PC users groups and you'll find much more stupidity and clueless ness.


    So, yeah.

    I'm trying to _educate_ this unfathomably ignorant Apple customer base that they're paying through the nose for what _intelligent_ people don't.

    I don;t need a penis extention like a sports car or a rolex watch.

    <https://img.yumpu.com/6936343/1/500x640/standouts-the-beat-within.jpg>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)