Forum: >>> Magnum BBS <<<

Dark
Log in

Username Password

Twitter violates photographer rights

From RichA@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 30 16:47:34 2021

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Bill W@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 30 18:54:55 2021

On Nov 30, 2021, RichA wrote
(in article<eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>):

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

Which right does that violate? They are not stopping anyone from taking
photos in public places, like one state tried to do, and might have actually done. I don’t think I agree with their policy, but I don’t see any rights violation.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From nospam@21:1/5 to RichA on Tue Nov 30 20:36:25 2021

In article <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From RichA@21:1/5 to nospam on Wed Dec 1 06:22:59 2021

On Tuesday, 30 November 2021 at 20:36:32 UTC-5, nospam wrote:

In article <eb3623d2-4330-43a7...@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other, non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From nospam@21:1/5 to RichA on Wed Dec 1 09:37:52 2021

In article <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other, non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
do not want to carry violates *their* rights.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Incubus@21:1/5 to nospam on Thu Dec 2 09:50:36 2021

On 2021-12-01, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

In article <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other,
non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
do not want to carry violates *their* rights.

It's a bit more complicated than that. Twitter and Facebook say they
are carriers but behave like publishers when it suits them. The two
roles have very different legal responsibilities.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From Incubus@21:1/5 to RichA on Thu Dec 2 09:42:45 2021

On 2021-12-01, RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

"Let's unpack what that means".

I really hate the way that woke Leftists speak these days.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From nospam@21:1/5 to u9536612@gmail.com on Thu Dec 2 08:03:01 2021

In article <slrnsqh5nc.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>, Incubus <u9536612@gmail.com> wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other,
non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
do not want to carry violates *their* rights.

It's a bit more complicated than that.

no, it's not. it's actually quite simple.

Twitter and Facebook say they
are carriers but behave like publishers when it suits them.

they do not say they are carriers, nor does that even matter.

The two
roles have very different legal responsibilities.

myth.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From RichA@21:1/5 to RichA on Mon Dec 6 18:07:16 2021

On Tuesday, 30 November 2021 at 19:47:38 UTC-5, RichA wrote:

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

Twitter's Marxist censor policy backfires on them, horribly:

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-59547353

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Who's Online
Recent Visitors
- Plume
  Sun Sep 14 09:34:52 2025
  from Uk via Raw
- Gretchiie
  Sun Sep 14 06:07:30 2025
  from Derry, Nh via Telnet
- Thlc
  Sat Sep 13 17:11:34 2025
  from Rognac, France via Telnet
- Thlc
  Sat Sep 13 17:04:03 2025
  from Rognac, France via Telnet
- Thlc
  Sat Sep 13 16:32:19 2025
  from Rognac, France via SSH
- Thlc
  Sat Sep 13 15:41:11 2025
  from Rognac, France via SSH
- Thlc
  Sat Sep 13 07:56:03 2025
  from Rognac, France via SSH
- Gretchiie
  Sat Sep 13 07:22:10 2025
  from Derry, Nh via Telnet

System Info

Sysop:	Keyop
Location:	Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
Users:	546
Nodes:	16 (2 / 14)
Uptime:	01:42:22
Calls:	10,385
Calls today:	2
Files:	14,057
Messages:	6,416,579