There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon over
Nikon. The answer is the 42nd edition of the Digital Photographer
Magazine. I had been terrible disappointed in the Olympus Evolt E-300
both regarding noise, colors and quality of the lenses that came with
it. On p. 94 and onward there's a shootout between the D2X and 1Ds and
too me it was totally clear that the Canon was the way to go. Especially regarding the rendering of chlorophyll. So far I've not seen a reason to change my mind.
In article <dd8f9mF60b6U1@mid.individual.net>, android <here@there.was> wrote:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon over Nikon. The answer is the 42nd edition of the Digital Photographer
Magazine. I had been terrible disappointed in the Olympus Evolt E-300
both regarding noise, colors and quality of the lenses that came with
it. On p. 94 and onward there's a shootout between the D2X and 1Ds and
too me it was totally clear that the Canon was the way to go. Especially regarding the rendering of chlorophyll. So far I've not seen a reason to change my mind.
you're relying on a 10 year old article to justify your choice???
the nikon d3 changed the landscape and canon has never caught up.
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon over
Nikon.
On 12/14/2015 1:15 PM, android wrote:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Mail to the site? Really? As in letters on paper? Well, I guess it
is Usenet after all, so it's certainly possible that a post from 2004
just made it here. The failure to auto-correct "alot" is another sign pointing to an ancient post.
That particular article gave the $8000 Canon 1Ds Mark II a score of
9.8 and the $5000 Nikon D2x a score of 9.1, arguably making the Nikon
the better value. But if the differences pointed out in that article
led you to drop the extra 3 grand for the Canon, that's cool too.
hope this belated response finds you well and still shooting Canon
rather than chasing from brand to brand.
I also hope that your fans keep that card and letter coming in!Since you insist: ----------------^^^^----------------------
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon
over Nikon.
In article <dd8f9mF60b6U1@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer Canon
over Nikon.
What site?
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer
Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a part of human
language and interaction. It's not to be used on children that are
so young that they yet have to learn how to read though. I also
know that you're not a child...
In article <dd9u1iFhfdnU1@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why I prefer
Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a part of human
language and interaction. It's not to be used on children that are
so young that they yet have to learn how to read though. I also
know that you're not a child...
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why
I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a part of human
language and interaction. It's not to be used on children that
are so young that they yet have to learn how to read though. I
also know that you're not a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
Thanks for proving my point.
In article <dda1fnFi163U1@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking why
I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a part of human
language and interaction. It's not to be used on children that
are so young that they yet have to learn how to read though. I
also know that you're not a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
Thanks for proving my point.
Your point must have been that you have no idea what you're talking about, as usual. Nothing new there.
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking
why I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a
part of human language and interaction. It's not to be used
on children that are so young that they yet have to learn
how to read though. I also know that you're not a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
android:
Thanks for proving my point.
Sandman:
Your point must have been that you have no idea what you're
talking about, as usual. Nothing new there.
That that's business as usual is your lack of savoir faire. Anyone
who's interested what pissing you of can read the original post.
In article <dda5giFjaaqU1@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site asking
why I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a
part of human language and interaction. It's not to be used
on children that are so young that they yet have to learn
how to read though. I also know that you're not a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
android:
Thanks for proving my point.
Sandman:
Your point must have been that you have no idea what you're
talking about, as usual. Nothing new there.
That that's business as usual is your lack of savoir faire. Anyone
who's interested what pissing you of can read the original post.
This constant trolling of yours - what do you get out of it? I mean, what is the end goal? Just personal enjoyment, or is it some form of expression as a result of a perceived anonymity where you're not accountable for your actions?
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site
asking why I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a
part of human language and interaction. It's not to be
used on children that are so young that they yet have
to learn how to read though. I also know that you're not
a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
android:
Thanks for proving my point.
Sandman:
Your point must have been that you have no idea what
you're talking about, as usual. Nothing new there.
android:
That that's business as usual is your lack of savoir faire.
Anyone who's interested what pissing you of can read the
original post.
Sandman:
This constant trolling of yours - what do you get out of it? I
mean, what is the end goal? Just personal enjoyment, or is it
some form of expression as a result of a perceived anonymity
where you're not accountable for your actions?
Channeling GB? I can be found.
In article <dda679FjaaqU2@mid.individual.net>, android wrote:--
android:
There has been alot of mail to the site
asking why I prefer Canon over Nikon.
Sandman:
What site?
android:
Sarcasm is lost on you, I know that but it is a
part of human language and interaction. It's not to be
used on children that are so young that they yet have
to learn how to read though. I also know that you're not
a child...
Sandman:
So you don't know what site? Just say so.
android:
Thanks for proving my point.
Sandman:
Your point must have been that you have no idea what
you're talking about, as usual. Nothing new there.
android:
That that's business as usual is your lack of savoir faire.
Anyone who's interested what pissing you of can read the
original post.
Sandman:
This constant trolling of yours - what do you get out of it? I
mean, what is the end goal? Just personal enjoyment, or is it
some form of expression as a result of a perceived anonymity
where you're not accountable for your actions?
Channeling GB? I can be found.
See what I mean?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 12:29:28 |
| Calls: | 10,389 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,878 |
| Posted today: | 1 |