Real-World Amateur Radio
///////////////////////////////////////////
Change: can the RSGB adapt?
Posted: 16 Feb 2022 07:47 AM PST https://mw1cfnradio.blogspot.com/2022/02/change-can-rsgb-adapt.html
Although it's hardly high-profile at the moment, there's an on-going discussion about the RSGB over on Twitter.
For the most part, it's well-mannered, with only the occasional mindless defender of the society throwing that old cliche around: 'it's easy to
snipe from the sidelines'.
What I get from Twitter is that younger operators, who may or may not be
RSGB members, don't have such a 'Leave/Remain' polarity about them that
older members often seem to, spurred-on by fixity of mind that comes
with old age for many.
Does the RSGB have a future? In short: not in its current guise. It
doesn't seem to understand - and I hope it isn't because it doesn't care
- that we are no longer in the '£10 passage' days of Empire, where you
could literally have your passage to colonise other countries paid for
by the government. When you got there, work applenty awaited in order
to stamp Britain's presence through development on any land unfortunate enough to see it land there.
If that's too esoteric for you, let's look at how the environment for
younger people has changed over recent decades, and how these impact on
their ability to enjoy radio:
(1) Good, well-paid jobs are much more difficult to find than they used
to be. We are no longer rebuilding Britain after a world war, and all
the mass-employment opportunities that brings. Real-terms salaries have stagnated since the financial crash of 2010, and remain below the 2008
peak. A cost-of-living crisis threatens immediately to make things a lot worse.
(2) Housing is in a total state of crisis. Most people now retired will
have seen house price-to-earnings ratio hover around the 3:1 level
during their working lives. Today, it is around 10:1. Mortgages are no
longer given away like sweets, and the loan-to-value available is often
much lower than historically was the case. Even saving for a deposit,
which is around £27,000 for a 10% downpayment on an average UK home now, seems almost insurmountable for many.
This can have both a positive and negative effect effect on ham radio.
If you can't afford a home, then you might decide to spend your income
on a good /p or /m set-up, or set-one up in your parents' home (the
median age of first-time buyers is now 34 years in the UK - it was only
28 years in 2007, and 23 years in 1960). Alternatively, you may well not bother with radio at all, being perceived as something to do when you're settled in your own home and/or later in life.
(3) Planning environment. Neighbours have always loved to complain. But today, they can do so anonymously (so far as the person complained about
is concerned) and quickly, via e-mail, to their local council.
Intolerance of difference is on the rise, and people's access to large gardens that can actually accommodate antennas is lower than it used to
be. Whilst neighbours have every right to influence the decision-making process about someone who wants to install an antenna of any note, the reality is that this, coupled to ignorance of technical matters amongst planning staff, makes gaining permission far too difficult and prone to pub-talk prejudice. At the moment, anything over 76cm is not permitted without consent.
(4) RFI. This has increased dramatically in recent years and, coupled to
a regulator with little interest in pursuingmatters, means we either
have to put up with bands spoiled by solar PV, car chargers, USB
chargers, plasma TVs, etc, or else just go /p or /m.
Now, if you buy a smart phone, or a TV, or a commercial radio receiver,
you plug it in and expect it to work with no funny lines across the
screen, or interference on the channel you're listening to. And that is exactly what we generally get. As mass consumers, we wouldn't tolerate spending that much money and not getting perfect performance.
Not so with amateur radio. If you spend a typical £1300 on a transceiver
you can expect to be blighted by RFI that you can do absolutely nothing about. Install anything other than the most stealthy of wires, and you
can expect a visit from your local planning department.
So my basic argument for the future of a truly representative RSGB is
that it should, indeed must, start confronting these harsh realities.
It can't change the economy, but it can chane planning laws and RFI
control.
The median age of those at Board level in the society is now 70 years.
We can guess, probably not too wildly amiss, that they will tend to be
quite well-off, and have a nice house, some in places where antennas can
be erected without much trouble. The problem is that without diversity,
you can come to believe that everyone else is living like this, and has
the same opportunities. But they don't. Clinging on to this belief can
then translate into elitism - something that amateur radio has always suffered from, but must ditch.
OK, so I ramble on again! Some of these things you may not agree with,
or not see as very relevant to amateur radio. But I think you may agree
that the days of getting a job, buying a house, cutting the grass on a weekend and twiddling with your radio from time to time just isn't the experience for an increasing number of people these days. We must change
and adapt to people's reality, or the hobby will die even sooner than we expected.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 54:29:07 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,416 |
Posted today: | 1 |