• Re: Arizona court won't halt homosexual pedophile sex suits naming Boy

    From FFP@21:1/5 to RichA forger asshole on Tue May 17 23:08:50 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: az.general

    In article <XnsAC4D77E02B5D6446@46.165.242.91>
    RichA forger asshole <rander3127@gmail.com> wrote:

    Policial correctness has taken over the country

    Arizona victims of long-ago child sex abuse can proceed with
    lawsuits against groups like the Boy Scouts of America following
    a decision by the state Supreme Court that rejected claims that
    a 2019 state law extending victims' right to sue was
    unconstitutional.

    Arizona is among many states that have reacted to child sex
    abuse in recent years by allowing victims of even decades-old
    abuse to sue groups that didn't protect them from predators.
    That has led to lawsuits against the Roman Catholic Church,
    Scouts and others.

    The high court without comment last week rejected appeals by Big
    Brothers Big Sisters of America and its affiliates in central
    and southern Arizona of lower court rulings that found the 2019
    law extending the statute of limitations was constitutional.

    The rulings appear to be the first to directly address whether
    the Arizona law is legal, according to an attorney who
    represents victims in the two cases the high court considered.

    Those lawsuits allege that the group that connects youth called
    'Littles" with adult mentors known as “Bigs” did not properly
    oversee the Bigs. The cases involved two men who abused boys,
    one in 1983 and one in the 1970s, Phoenix attorney Robert Pastor
    said Thursday. The men are not defendants.

    Child USA, a national group that pushes for so-called “revival”
    laws that allow old cases to be pursued in court, urged the high
    court to uphold the trial court rulings. It noted Arizona was
    among more than 30 states enacting legislation since 2002
    allowing such lawsuits, most in recent years.

    “A ruling against (the law's) revival window would have negative
    ramifications for all the child sexual abuse survivors
    throughout Arizona who are embracing the window in pursuit of
    long overdue justice,” the group's filing said.

    The Utah Supreme Court in 2020 threw out its revival law, but
    other states have upheld them, including the Connecticut Supreme
    Court in 2015 in a case involving a Roman Catholic priest.

    Arizona's high court considered appeals from decisions by two
    Maricopa County Superior Court judges who rejected Big Brothers
    Big Sisters' arguments that the Legislature violated its due
    process rights by extending the statute of limitations.

    The judges said in rulings issued last year that courts have
    long held that changing a statute of limitation is within the
    rights of legislatures.

    “The Revival Law does not violate the due process clauses of
    either Arizona’s Constitution or the United States
    Constitution,” Judge Randall Warner wrote in his ruling. A
    second judge made a similar decision.

    The lawsuits were put on hold while the group appealed, but now
    can proceed.

    Big Brothers Big Sisters of America spokeswoman Dvon Williams
    said the group does not comment on litigation. The CEO of the
    Southern Arizona chapter, Marie Logan, declined to comment on
    the suits, and calls and emails to the affiliate in Phoenix were
    not immediately returned.

    Arizona's 2019 law provided a one-time window for victims of
    long-ago child sex abuse to sue beyond the existing two-year
    statute of limitations that began once they turned 18. That
    window closed at the end of 2020. It also created a much longer
    time for more recent victims to sue after they turn 18, allowing
    lawsuits to be filed up to age 30.

    The lawmaker who pushed the law said he was pleased with the
    court rulings.

    “I never had any concerns that it wasn’t constitutional,” said
    Republican state Sen. Paul Boyer, whose insistence on the law
    held up the state budget in 2019. “I would have loved the window
    to have been open longer and I would have loved to have it
    higher than age 30, but it was a compromise.”

    Pastor, the attorney who represents the two unidentified men
    suing over abuse by their “Bigs,” said he'll now be able to find
    out how much Big Brothers Big Sisters knew about child predators
    who he says used their organization to groom and victimize
    children.

    He said groups like Big Brothers Big Sisters provide vitally
    needed support for children, but must be vigilant about keeping
    predators from using them to find victims.

    “What we know as litigators advocating for survivors is that
    perpetrators will seek out volunteer opportunities in these
    organizations, because perpetrators need access to children,"
    Pastor said.

    In addition to the cases Pastor is pursuing against Big Brothers
    Big Sisters, lawsuits have been filed in Arizona against the Boy
    Scouts of America, the Roman Catholic Church, the state
    Department of Child Safety and schools and universities, he said.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)