• 27 and counting

    From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 16 08:27:25 2024
    Impressive. I have to admit that this was a record I
    wasn’t really aware of in its magnitude.

    https://theanalyst.com/2024/07/spanish-teams-extraordinary-record-in-finals-27-wins/


    Ciao,
    Werner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 16 12:13:30 2024
    Barcelona lost the Club World Cup Final in 2006 against Internacional.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Mark on Tue Jul 16 09:54:07 2024
    On 2024-07-16 06:13, Mark wrote:
    Barcelona lost the Club World Cup Final in 2006 against Internacional.

    I assume the author discounted this (And the nations' league final in
    2021 where France beat Spain) as not being a final of a major
    competition. As has often been discussed here before, I kind of agree
    for the WCC. As for the Nations' league, I still have hopes of it
    growing in importance. It is not as if the final stages and finals are
    not being contested by the best teams, and to get there they have to do
    well over 6 games against decent opposition.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 16 17:16:52 2024
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 06:13, Mark wrote:
    Barcelona lost the Club World Cup Final in 2006 against
    Internacional.

    I assume the author discounted this (And the nations' league
    final in 2021 where France beat Spain) as not being a final of
    a major competition.

    <gasp> Don't go there!!!

    As has often been discussed here before, I kind of agree for
    the WCC.

    I've only ever come across one person who considered the WCC a
    "major" competition... but FIFA would be hoping that next year's
    revamp might increase the profile of this club competition. I
    think in time it might work out for them.

    As for the Nations' league, I still have hopes of it growing
    in importance.

    It seems like a waste of time for me and just an excuse to get
    players released from club duties by having a 'competition'
    instead of international friendlies, which funnily enough always
    used to crop up at a time when certain players at big clubs were
    <cough> injured.

    For me, there's too many international breaks...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 16 19:05:26 2024
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 10:16, Blueshirt wrote:

    For me, there's too many international breaks...

    For me there is too much club football !

    Wash your mouth out with soap!

    Club football tops international football for me. The clubs pay
    the players wages, so the club game should get priority.
    'Tournaments' like the UEFA Nations League are just distractions
    from the real thing.

    However, there does need to be less games played in a domestic
    season. In England the Football League Cup is a Mickey Mouse
    trophy in the big scheme of things and should be for U-21/U-23
    teams if the club is in European competition. The Premier League
    should be two teams less as well. And 18 team Premier League
    would take some of the pressure off fixture congestion. After
    saying that, neither is likely to happen any time soon because
    less games = less money!

    I'd send an international 'B' team to the Nations League too!
    There's not enough B team fixtures these days. So for the
    smaller games a nation's B team is the perfect bridge for
    players that are between the U-21 side and the senior squad.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Jul 16 11:19:10 2024
    On 2024-07-16 10:16, Blueshirt wrote:
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 06:13, Mark wrote:
    Barcelona lost the Club World Cup Final in 2006 against
    Internacional.

    I assume the author discounted this (And the nations' league
    final in 2021 where France beat Spain) as not being a final of
    a major competition.

    <gasp> Don't go there!!!

    As has often been discussed here before, I kind of agree for
    the WCC.

    I've only ever come across one person who considered the WCC a
    "major" competition... but FIFA would be hoping that next year's
    revamp might increase the profile of this club competition. I
    think in time it might work out for them.

    As for the Nations' league, I still have hopes of it growing
    in importance.

    It seems like a waste of time for me and just an excuse to get
    players released from club duties by having a 'competition'
    instead of international friendlies, which funnily enough always

    I kind of like the fact that UEFA has tied it in to qualification
    processes, and the promotion and relegation. It gives each team 6
    matches that are at least semi-competitive, against opposition roughly
    equal to themselves. Much more useful than friendlies.

    used to crop up at a time when certain players at big clubs were
    <cough> injured.

    For me, there's too many international breaks...

    For me there is too much club football ! And with the new CL format it
    will be even more, at least for the clubs involved. (Or will it ?
    appears so on the face of things, but maybe on average it won't with no drop-down to EL ? Must confess I have not studied the new format enough)

    France did reduce the size of its league, Germany has mostly been steady
    at 18 since the 60s (brief period of adaptation to reunification not
    included). England, Spain, and Italy (who did have a 16 team league for
    a long time) ought to follow suit. England could get rid of two-legged semifinals for the league cup, and probably do some minor revamps for
    the FA cup (replays now gone, I know, but what about going with the
    German system of having the lower league teams always play at home (I
    know it is not precisely that in Germany, but you get the idea).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to MHnospam@ucalgary.ca on Tue Jul 16 18:54:44 2024
    MH <MHnospam@ucalgary.ca> wrote:
    On 2024-07-16 10:16, Blueshirt wrote:
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 06:13, Mark wrote:
    Barcelona lost the Club World Cup Final in 2006 against
    Internacional.

    I assume the author discounted this (And the nations' league
    final in 2021 where France beat Spain) as not being a final of
    a major competition.

    <gasp> Don't go there!!!

    As has often been discussed here before, I kind of agree for
    the WCC.

    I've only ever come across one person who considered the WCC a
    "major" competition... but FIFA would be hoping that next year's
    revamp might increase the profile of this club competition. I
    think in time it might work out for them.

    As for the Nations' league, I still have hopes of it growing
    in importance.

    It seems like a waste of time for me and just an excuse to get
    players released from club duties by having a 'competition'
    instead of international friendlies, which funnily enough always

    I kind of like the fact that UEFA has tied it in to qualification
    processes, and the promotion and relegation. It gives each team 6
    matches that are at least semi-competitive, against opposition roughly
    equal to themselves. Much more useful than friendlies.

    I would put my money on Nations League and
    Euro qualifiers eventually merging.

    Ciao,
    Werner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Jul 16 14:38:06 2024
    On 2024-07-16 12:05, Blueshirt wrote:
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 10:16, Blueshirt wrote:

    For me, there's too many international breaks...

    For me there is too much club football !

    Wash your mouth out with soap!

    Club football tops international football for me.

    Perhaps that is because you are an avowed and long term fan of a
    particular club. I have teams I like more than others, but since I left Bielefeld, not strong attachment to any club, whereas I really care how
    Canada and Scotland perform (I know, it is not always fun, but someone
    has to do it).

    The clubs pay
    the players wages, so the club game should get priority.
    'Tournaments' like the UEFA Nations League are just distractions
    from the real thing.

    However, there does need to be less games played in a domestic
    season. In England the Football League Cup is a Mickey Mouse
    trophy in the big scheme of things


    and yet, the big teams do their utmost to win it once they get to about
    the quarter final stage. When is the last time a team not in contention
    for CL places won the darned thing ? (Answer 2013 - . City won it four
    years in a row quite recently.

    and should be for U-21/U-23
    teams if the club is in European competition. The Premier League
    should be two teams less as well. And 18 team Premier League
    would take some of the pressure off fixture congestion. After
    saying that, neither is likely to happen any time soon because
    less games = less money!

    I'd send an international 'B' team to the Nations League too!
    There's not enough B team fixtures these days. So for the
    smaller games a nation's B team is the perfect bridge for
    players that are between the U-21 side and the senior squad.

    Interesting idea, and of course that option is open to the managers of
    the bigger sides. Not sure it would make the clubs any happier, though,
    since some of the players on the fringes of the national teams could
    well be reasonably regular starters for teams like Chelsea, Arsenal,
    Bayern, Real Madrid, Barca, Atletico, Dortmund, Man United, Spurs, Man
    City, Liverpool, PSG, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 16 22:18:28 2024
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 12:05, Blueshirt wrote:
    MH wrote:

    Club football tops international football for me.

    Perhaps that is because you are an avowed and long term fan of
    a particular club.

    You think? Whatever gave you that idea? :-)

    But club v country conflicts, well the financial aspects of it
    for the clubs who pay the player's wages, is always going to
    raise its head from time to time. It's not that long ago that
    the NHL didn't let NHL players go to the [Winter] Olympics... I
    know it's been changed from next year, but some NHL players
    missed out on representing their country because their clubs,
    via Bettman & Co didn't allow it. So it will always be he who
    pays the piper calls the tune. Which is why international
    friendlies were a waste of time, and some players at big teams
    suddenly developed injuries when international friendlies came
    around mid-season... the more money the players are on at their
    clubs, the less likely the clubs will be to let them go off for
    meaningless matches. Which for me, makes perfect sense. The UEFA
    Nations League just seems to me like a format designed to limit
    these type of 'friendlies' and make the international calendar
    seem like it's full of more 'competitive' fixtures.

    However, there does need to be less games played in a
    domestic season. In England the Football League Cup is a
    Mickey Mouse trophy in the big scheme of things

    and yet, the big teams do their utmost to win it once they get
    to about the quarter final stage.

    Well, as long as it suits them... Liverpool fielded a youth team
    in the Football League Cup QF a few years ago when their senior
    team went to Qatar to play in the World Club Cup... and they
    lost 5-0 to Aston Villa. So as always, the £ came first!

    I'd send an international 'B' team to the Nations League too!
    There's not enough B team fixtures these days. So for the
    smaller games a nation's B team is the perfect bridge for
    players that are between the U-21 side and the senior squad.

    Interesting idea, and of course that option is open to the
    managers of the bigger sides. Not sure it would make the
    clubs any happier, though, since some of the players on the
    fringes of the national teams could well be reasonably regular
    starters for teams like Chelsea, Arsenal, Bayern, Real Madrid,
    Barca, Atletico, Dortmund, Man United, Spurs, Man City,
    Liverpool, PSG, etc.

    I remember 'B' internationals being a thing, once upon a time...
    until Chris Sutton told Glenn Hoddle to shove it when he got
    called up for the 'B' team!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Tue Jul 16 17:14:52 2024
    On 2024-07-16 15:18, Blueshirt wrote:


    I remember 'B' internationals being a thing, once upon a time...
    until Chris Sutton told Glenn Hoddle to shove it when he got
    called up for the 'B' team!

    Sometimes they call the B team "A" just for the sake of confusion. More frequent in Rugby nowadays I think.

    But again, who would populate such a team ? For England right now,
    maybe Grealish, Alexander Arnold, Elliot, Jones, Quansah, White,
    SMith-Rowe, Rashford, .. and so on. For Germany maybe Werner,
    Henrichs, Klostermann, .... etc. all players that their teams would
    miss just as much as the regular starters for the national team -
    perhaps with more effect on the 3-6 placed teams than the top 2 in some leagues.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Werner Pichler@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Wed Jul 17 09:36:09 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 10:16, Blueshirt wrote:

    For me, there's too many international breaks...

    For me there is too much club football !

    Wash your mouth out with soap!

    Club football tops international football for me.

    Understandable from a Chelsea point of view.
    Nothing but trouble when the lads are travelling by
    themselves.

    Ciao,
    Werner

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Wed Jul 17 11:53:15 2024
    Werner Pichler wrote:

    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    Club football tops international football for me.

    Understandable from a Chelsea point of view.

    Understandable from any rational point of view... cheering on
    international players that you'd normally be hoping break their
    legs at the weekend when they are playing against your team in
    the PL never really made any sense to me!

    If they're "diving bastards" one day, they shouldn't be heroes
    another day. (It's a simple but effective POV that helps me
    sleep easy.)

    Nothing but trouble when the lads are travelling by
    themselves.

    Now, now... play nice!

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 17 12:14:44 2024
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 15:18, Blueshirt wrote:


    I remember 'B' internationals being a thing, once upon a
    time... until Chris Sutton told Glenn Hoddle to shove it
    when he got called up for the 'B' team!

    But again, who would populate such a team ? For England right
    now, maybe Grealish, Alexander Arnold, Elliot, Jones,
    Quansah, White, SMith-Rowe, Rashford, .. and so on. For
    Germany maybe Werner, Henrichs, Klostermann, .... etc. all
    players that their teams would miss just as much as the
    regular starters for the national team - perhaps with more
    effect on the 3-6 placed teams than the top 2 in some leagues.

    If we are using England as an example... of the England U21 team
    that won the UEFA U21 Championship last year (2023) quite a few
    players have not made the full transition to senior level yet,
    but are over 21 years of age...

    So, the likes of Harvey Elliot, Emile Smith-Rowe, Curtis Jones,
    Levi Colwell, Anthony Gordon, Cameron Archer (etc.) would be
    candidates for this [theoretical] international 'B' team. Along
    with other senior squad players that didn't get much pitch time
    in Germany... or get called up in the first place, like some of
    the players you mentioned. That would be what I would consider a
    'B' team as being for, the bridge between U21 and senior
    levels... and the UEFA Nations League would be perfect for that
    sort of team, which coincidently in England's case is "League B"!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MH@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Wed Jul 17 20:07:27 2024
    On 2024-07-17 05:14, Blueshirt wrote:
    MH wrote:

    On 2024-07-16 15:18, Blueshirt wrote:


    I remember 'B' internationals being a thing, once upon a
    time... until Chris Sutton told Glenn Hoddle to shove it
    when he got called up for the 'B' team!

    But again, who would populate such a team ? For England right
    now, maybe Grealish, Alexander Arnold, Elliot, Jones,
    Quansah, White, SMith-Rowe, Rashford, .. and so on. For
    Germany maybe Werner, Henrichs, Klostermann, .... etc. all
    players that their teams would miss just as much as the
    regular starters for the national team - perhaps with more
    effect on the 3-6 placed teams than the top 2 in some leagues.

    If we are using England as an example... of the England U21 team
    that won the UEFA U21 Championship last year (2023) quite a few
    players have not made the full transition to senior level yet,
    but are over 21 years of age...

    So, the likes of Harvey Elliot, Emile Smith-Rowe, Curtis Jones,
    Levi Colwell, Anthony Gordon, Cameron Archer (etc.) would be
    candidates for this [theoretical] international 'B' team. Along
    with other senior squad players that didn't get much pitch time
    in Germany... or get called up in the first place, like some of
    the players you mentioned. That would be what I would consider a
    'B' team as being for, the bridge between U21 and senior
    levels... and the UEFA Nations League would be perfect for that
    sort of team, which coincidently in England's case is "League B"!

    But the fact that the teams will be griping about the players being away
    on international duty won't change. Newcastle would miss Gordon as much
    as Arsenal would Saka.

    But yeah, in League B, England's new manager can be much more
    experimental and get away with it.





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Thu Jul 18 22:34:34 2024
    Werner Pichler wrote:

    On 17.07.2024 12:53, Blueshirt wrote:

    Understandable from any rational point of view... cheering on
    international players that you'd normally be hoping break
    their legs at the weekend when they are playing against your
    team in the PL never really made any sense to me!

    If they're "diving bastards" one day, they shouldn't be
    heroes another day. (It's a simple but effective POV that
    helps me sleep easy.)

    But as unsavoury as the Enzo Fernández affair is, don't you
    think it also shows how international competitions fulfill a
    certain almost atavistic need, at least for some players? It's
    hard to imagine that he would have let loose (and bared his
    prejudices) nearly as much in a scenario where he wins a trophy
    with Chelsea (as far-fetched as that sounds :P)

    Unsavoury is the word, and maybe there has been a bit of an
    over-reaction to it in the media too. (Their song about the
    Malvinas didn't seem to carry much traction in the UK media.)
    But I'm sure atavistic behaviour does go on behind the scenes
    with all national teams, in every sport. Every country has
    international rivals. So I suppose it is better to sing songs
    about your 'enemies' than go to war with them!

    On a basic level I think it's better the video of that song is
    out there for all the world to see so that the players involved
    can be educated that it's not the way to carry-on just because
    your are enthusiastically celebrating a major cup win... that
    wasn't even against France! (I'm sure the same song was sung
    after the World Cup Final in 2022, which was against France, but
    nobody was stupid enough to live stream it!)

    I'm not sure what sort of greeting Enzo is going to get when he
    teams up with his French comrades in a week or two either, but
    he signed an eight and a half year deal at Chelsea so it's not
    like he's going anywhere any time soon... so being jingoistic
    with your national team-mates is one thing, but your bread and
    butter is earned at your club with multi-national players around
    you, so a reasonable IQ level is required.

    It's a bit similar in hockey - the NHL might willfully ignore
    it, but the fact remains that David Pastrňák has been
    celebrated as a national hero in his home country this year
    way more than if he had won the Stanley Cup with the Bruins,
    and it was obvious how much he enjoyed it.

    Bettman will NEVER acknowledge - or contemplate even - that the
    IIHF World Championship is bigger than the Stanley Cup!
    (Pastrňák was just on holiday in Czechia!) But I wonder what the
    player himself would prefer to win given the choice? The Czech
    fans probably don't give a hoot about the Stanley Cup anyway as
    North America is so far away... a bit like me preferring to see
    Enzo Fernández win the UEFA Champions League [with Chelsea] than
    the Copa America with Argentina, but an Argentinian in Buenos
    Aires would feel the exact opposite.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Silver Skull@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Jul 19 14:17:56 2024
    On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:34:34 +0000, Blueshirt wrote:

    Werner Pichler wrote:


    It's a bit similar in hockey - the NHL might willfully ignore
    it, but the fact remains that David Pastrňák has been
    celebrated as a national hero in his home country this year
    way more than if he had won the Stanley Cup with the Bruins,
    and it was obvious how much he enjoyed it.

    Bettman will NEVER acknowledge - or contemplate even - that the
    IIHF World Championship is bigger than the Stanley Cup!
    (Pastrňák was just on holiday in Czechia!) But I wonder what the
    player himself would prefer to win given the choice? The Czech
    fans probably don't give a hoot about the Stanley Cup anyway as
    North America is so far away... a bit like me preferring to see
    Enzo Fernández win the UEFA Champions League [with Chelsea] than
    the Copa America with Argentina, but an Argentinian in Buenos
    Aires would feel the exact opposite.

    You too !

    rec.sport.hockey is this way ------>

    Let us try and keep Usenet groups alive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Silver Skull@21:1/5 to Werner Pichler on Fri Jul 19 14:15:14 2024
    On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:33:04 +0000, Werner Pichler wrote:

    It's a bit similar in hockey - the NHL might willfully ignore it, but
    the fact remains that David Pastrňák has been celebrated as a national
    hero in his home country this year way more than if he had won the
    Stanley Cup with the Bruins, and it was obvious how much he enjoyed it.

    rec.sport.hockey is this way ----->

    Not the stuff they play on those wide rinks in Europe with adverts
    everywhere though, proper Hockey as in Ligue Nationale de Hockey ! VBG

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Silver Skull on Fri Jul 19 21:09:33 2024
    Silver Skull wrote:

    On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:34:34 +0000, Blueshirt wrote:

    Werner Pichler wrote:


    It's a bit similar in hockey - the NHL might willfully
    ignore it, but the fact remains that David Pastrňák has
    been celebrated as a national hero in his home country
    this year way more than if he had won the Stanley Cup with
    the Bruins, and it was obvious how much he enjoyed it.

    Bettman will NEVER acknowledge - or contemplate even - that
    the IIHF World Championship is bigger than the Stanley Cup!
    (Pastrňák was just on holiday in Czechia!) But I wonder what
    the player himself would prefer to win given the choice? The
    Czech fans probably don't give a hoot about the Stanley Cup
    anyway as North America is so far away... a bit like me
    preferring to see Enzo Fernández win the UEFA Champions
    League [with Chelsea] than the Copa America with Argentina,
    but an Argentinian in Buenos Aires would feel the exact
    opposite.

    You too !

    rec.sport.hockey is this way ------>

    Let us try and keep Usenet groups alive.

    Assuming you are not just trolling, I am well aware where
    rec.sports.hockey is as it's a newsgroup that I actually
    subscribe too... Unfortunately it sits at the bottom of my
    subscribed groups list in my newsreader as it gets very little
    traffic... apart from a crazy Canadian Druid and our own Mr
    Yadallee from Edmonton, who pipes up whenever the Oilers go on a
    run in the play-offs. Apart from that, it's a reasonably dead
    group for most of the year.

    However, Usenet cannot exist in a void so if you want to discuss
    the NHL (AHL/ECHL/DEL/KHL etc.) start a discussion there and see
    who joins in... although it's the off-season at the moment so
    don't be expecting miracles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)