• KAZAM! Hunter BooBoo ADMITS the laptop is HIS!!!!

    From Tommy@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 2 21:18:49 2023
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of this,
    being the fucktards they are. https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Fri Feb 3 01:27:01 2023
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of
    this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Feb 4 21:56:53 2023
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of
    this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sat Feb 4 22:21:09 2023
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of
    this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!

    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>

    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Feb 6 22:01:40 2023
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
    of this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>

    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Feb 6 22:20:23 2023
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
    of this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and
    Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>

    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!

    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Tommy on Tue Feb 7 21:22:39 2023
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 9:15:27 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel
    out of this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and >> Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>

    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.
    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?

    This is from the FIRST page of HB's complaint:

    "Mr. Mac Isaac Unlawfully Accessed Hunter Biden’s Personal Data"

    By this statement, they ADMIT the data IS Hunter BooBoo's, although his access WAS legal as HB AUTHORIZED Isaac to retrieve the data, then abandoned the laptop forfeiting ownership to Isaac.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Feb 7 21:15:26 2023
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
    of this, being the fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and >> Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>

    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Tue Feb 7 23:08:30 2023
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
    course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
    fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
    it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
    his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
    laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
    the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Tue Feb 7 23:06:51 2023
    On 2023-02-07 21:22, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 9:15:27 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
    course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
    fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal
    Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
    it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that
    ISN'T his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.
    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that
    the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that
    fact?

    This is from the FIRST page of HB's complaint:

    "Mr. Mac Isaac Unlawfully Accessed Hunter Biden’s Personal Data"

    By this statement, they ADMIT the data IS Hunter BooBoo's, although
    his access WAS legal as HB AUTHORIZED Isaac to retrieve the data,
    then abandoned the laptop forfeiting ownership to Isaac.


    Nope. It admits that SOME of the data is Hunter Biden's.

    You're really bad at basic grammar and logic, Sunshine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Feb 9 22:50:06 2023
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
    course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
    fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
    it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
    his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
    the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Fri Feb 10 01:28:05 2023
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
    course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
    fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
    it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
    his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
    laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
    the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts.

    Fact: data can be copied from one machine to another.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Feb 10 03:57:56 2023
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
    course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
    fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information' >>>>>>
    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
    it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T >>>> his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
    laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
    the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts.
    Fact: data can be copied from one machine to another.

    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner originally was, because
    unless there was positive proof of a continuous chain of custody, then real data can be
    deleted and faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri Feb 10 21:51:13 2023
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
    CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of >>>>>>>>> course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
    OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
    libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the >>>>>>>>> fucktards they are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/


    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
    Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information' >>>>>>
    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>



    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means >>>>> it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
    (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T >>>> his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
    CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the >>> laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that >> the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts.
    Fact: data can be copied from one machine to another.
    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner originally was, because
    unless there was positive proof of a continuous chain of custody, then real data can be
    deleted and faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.

    -hh

    Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is his you libtards will say NO.

    The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to Mac Isaac by abandoning it). The contents are DAMNING and will be the object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with
    the testimony of others that confirm the authenticity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sat Feb 11 00:15:19 2023
    On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8,
    Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
    RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where
    they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter
    BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already,
    but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on
    the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to
    weasel out of this, being the fucktards they
    are.
    https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/




    Nope.

    Wrong again.

    His filings explicitly state that the laptop is
    NOT his.

    LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
    No, actually.

    It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was
    his.

    'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized
    Access, Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s
    Personal Information'

    <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>





    Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...

    ...without the computer ever having been his.

    You get that digital data can be copied, right?

    :-)

    By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's,
    which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even
    YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the
    prostitutes)!
    No.

    They confirm SOME of the data is his.

    That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data
    that ISN'T his.

    And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...

    ...because (and I know this will come as a shock to
    you):

    DATA CAN BE COPIED.

    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
    data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
    accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
    going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
    appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
    would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
    Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
    charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
    be copied from one machine to another.
    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
    originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
    continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
    faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
    detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.

    -hh

    Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
    his you libtards will say NO.

    Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
    is real.


    The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
    Mac Isaac by abandoning it).

    Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?

    The contents are DAMNING and will be the
    object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
    CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
    others that confirm the authenticity.

    Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Feb 11 04:03:30 2023
    On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 3:15:22 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    [etc]...
    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
    data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
    accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
    going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
    appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
    would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
    Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
    charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
    be copied from one machine to another.

    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
    originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
    continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
    faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
    detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.


    Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
    his you libtards will say NO.

    Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
    is real.

    It is like Tommy has never heard of planting evidence.

    The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
    Mac Isaac by abandoning it).

    Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?

    Even if he does, the custody chain was still broken.

    The contents are DAMNING and will be the
    object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
    CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
    others that confirm the authenticity.

    Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.

    That partisan circus will try, and their base (like Tommy) will believe what they
    claim (while not under oath) over what the law actually is.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat Feb 11 21:57:59 2023
    On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 4:03:32 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 3:15:22 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    [etc]...
    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
    data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
    accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
    going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
    appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
    would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
    Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
    charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
    be copied from one machine to another.

    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
    originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
    continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
    faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
    detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.


    Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
    his you libtards will say NO.

    Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
    is real.
    It is like Tommy has never heard of planting evidence.
    The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
    Mac Isaac by abandoning it).

    Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?
    Even if he does, the custody chain was still broken.
    The contents are DAMNING and will be the
    object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
    CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of others that confirm the authenticity.

    Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.
    That partisan circus will try, and their base (like Tommy) will believe what they
    claim (while not under oath) over what the law actually is.

    -hh

    LOL! Now, tell me, just WHEN did the Dims put ANYBODY under oath about Hunter BooBoo's laptop?

    Take you time...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sat Feb 11 22:10:37 2023
    On 2023-02-11 21:57, Tommy wrote:
    On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 4:03:32 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 3:15:22 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
    On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
    [etc]...
    Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
    data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
    accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
    going to accept that fact?

    Sorry, but your logic is flawed.

    If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
    appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
    would:

    1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.

    2. Put that copied data onto another machine.

    3. Add the fake data to that real data.

    Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
    Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
    charade???

    There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
    be copied from one machine to another.

    Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
    originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
    continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
    faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
    detect.

    TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.


    Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
    his you libtards will say NO.

    Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
    is real.
    It is like Tommy has never heard of planting evidence.
    The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
    Mac Isaac by abandoning it).

    Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?
    Even if he does, the custody chain was still broken.
    The contents are DAMNING and will be the
    object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
    CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
    others that confirm the authenticity.

    Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.
    That partisan circus will try, and their base (like Tommy) will believe what they
    claim (while not under oath) over what the law actually is.

    -hh

    LOL! Now, tell me, just WHEN did the Dims put ANYBODY under oath about Hunter BooBoo's laptop?

    Take you time...

    Why should they have, Sunshine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)