RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out ofthis, being the fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:this, being the fucktards they are.
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:this, being the fucktards they are.
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out of
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:of this, being the fucktards they are.
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!No, actually.
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:of this, being the fucktards they are.
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
No, actually.https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and
Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:out of this, being the fucktards they are.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel
No, actually.https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and >> Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!No.
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:of this, being the fucktards they are.
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to weasel out
No, actually.https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/Nope.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access, Copying and >> Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!No.
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
No.No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 9:15:27 PM UTC-8, Tommy wrote:Nope.
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal
Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,No.
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that
ISN'T his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that
the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that
fact?
This is from the FIRST page of HB's complaint:
"Mr. Mac Isaac Unlawfully Accessed Hunter Biden’s Personal Data"
By this statement, they ADMIT the data IS Hunter BooBoo's, although
his access WAS legal as HB AUTHORIZED Isaac to retrieve the data,
then abandoned the laptop forfeiting ownership to Isaac.
On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
No.No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.No.No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T
his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of
course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the
fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
No.No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information' >>>>>>
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means
it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T >>>> his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the
laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that
the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts.
Fact: data can be copied from one machine to another.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where they
CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter BooBoo's!! Of >>>>>>>>> course, we all KNEW that already, but this puts the
OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on the topic. No doubt
libtards here will try to weasel out of this, being the >>>>>>>>> fucktards they are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
No.No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized Access,
Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s Personal Information' >>>>>>
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's, which means >>>>> it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even YOU admitted that
(especially photos of HIM with the prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data that ISN'T >>>> his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this data,
CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU accept that the >>> laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it appear that >> the data from the target was all legitimate, he would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts.Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner originally was, because
Fact: data can be copied from one machine to another.
unless there was positive proof of a continuous chain of custody, then real data can be
deleted and faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to detect.
TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.
-hh
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Nope.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 11:08:33 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-07 21:15, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:20:27 PM UTC-8, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-02-06 22:01, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:21:12 PM UTC-8,
Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-04 21:56, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 1:27:04 AM UTC-8,
Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-02 21:18, Tommy wrote:
RIGHT! His lawyers sent a 14-page letter where
they CLAIMED the laptop in question was Hunter
BooBoo's!! Of course, we all KNEW that already,
but this puts the OFFICIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL on
the topic. No doubt libtards here will try to
weasel out of this, being the fucktards they
are.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/
Some of the information can be Hunter Biden's...No, actually.
Wrong again.
His filings explicitly state that the laptop is
NOT his.
LOL! That is EXACTLY what the filing says!!
It states that SOME of the DATA on the device was
his.
'The Government Should Investigate the Unauthorized
Access, Copying and Dissemination of Mr. Biden’s
Personal Information'
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23595947-letter-to-ns-aag-re-request-for-investigation>
Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's ownerNo.
...without the computer ever having been his.
You get that digital data can be copied, right?
:-)
By filing suit they confirmed the data IS Hunter's,
which means it MUST have come from HIS laptop - even
YOU admitted that (especially photos of HIM with the
prostitutes)!
They confirm SOME of the data is his.
That doesn't mean it can't have been comingled with data
that ISN'T his.
And it certainly doesn't mean the laptop was his...
...because (and I know this will come as a shock to
you):
DATA CAN BE COPIED.
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
be copied from one machine to another.
originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
detect.
TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.
-hh
Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
his you libtards will say NO.
The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
Mac Isaac by abandoning it).
The contents are DAMNING and will be the
object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
others that confirm the authenticity.
On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
[etc]...
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
be copied from one machine to another.
Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
detect.
TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.
Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
his you libtards will say NO.
Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
is real.
The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
Mac Isaac by abandoning it).
Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?
The contents are DAMNING and will be the
object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
others that confirm the authenticity.
Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 3:15:22 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
[etc]...
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
be copied from one machine to another.
Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
detect.
TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.
Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
his you libtards will say NO.
Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on itIt is like Tommy has never heard of planting evidence.
is real.
The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
Mac Isaac by abandoning it).
Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?Even if he does, the custody chain was still broken.
The contents are DAMNING and will be the
object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of others that confirm the authenticity.
Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.That partisan circus will try, and their base (like Tommy) will believe what they
claim (while not under oath) over what the law actually is.
-hh
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 4:03:32 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 3:15:22 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-10 21:51, Tommy wrote:It is like Tommy has never heard of planting evidence.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 3:57:58 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:28:08 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:50, Tommy wrote:
[etc]...
Hey Fool, the idiot is SUING to stop disclosure of this
data, CONFIRMING that the data IS valid. Everybody but YOU
accept that the laptop IS Hunter BooBoo's; WHEN are you
going to accept that fact?
Sorry, but your logic is flawed.
If someone was trying to plant disinformation and make it
appear that the data from the target was all legitimate, he
would:
1. Steal a copy of the data on someone's hard drive.
2. Put that copied data onto another machine.
3. Add the fake data to that real data.
Hey Fool, everybody in the UNIVERSE knows that the laptop IS
Hunter BooBoo's EXCEPT YOU! WHEN are you going to stop this
charade???
There's no charade, Sunshine. There are the facts. Fact: data can
be copied from one machine to another.
Which is why it doesn't even matter if the laptop hardware's owner
originally was, because unless there was positive proof of a
continuous chain of custody, then real data can be deleted and
faked data can be inserted, which may be difficult to impossible to
detect.
TL;DR: custody laws and procedures thereof exist for a reason.
Just as I said, even if Hunter BooBoo CONFESSES that the laptop is
his you libtards will say NO.
Even if the physical device was his, it doesn't mean all the data on it
is real.
Even if he does, the custody chain was still broken.The simple fact is that the laptop WAS his (he forfeited ownership to
Mac Isaac by abandoning it).
Got a cite for the relevant law, Sunshine?
That partisan circus will try, and their base (like Tommy) will believe what theyThe contents are DAMNING and will be the
object of INTENSE scrutiny by Congress as it shows wide spread
CRIMINAL activity by the Bidens when combined with the testimony of
others that confirm the authenticity.
Let's see if anyone can prove that anything damning was actually real first.
claim (while not under oath) over what the law actually is.
-hh
LOL! Now, tell me, just WHEN did the Dims put ANYBODY under oath about Hunter BooBoo's laptop?
Take you time...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 496 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 57:01:53 |
| Calls: | 9,760 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,742 |
| Messages: | 6,185,286 |