"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictmentSince he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on
story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also
rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks
and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial
indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise"
TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a
weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even
the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based
on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective.
We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and
right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o
doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign
promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial
indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise"
TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a
weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even
the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based
on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective.
We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and
right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o
doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign
promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial
indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise"
TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a
weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even
the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based
on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective.
We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and
right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o
doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictmentSince he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved. No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o doubt
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial
indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise"
TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a
weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even
the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective.
We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and
right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.Got a cite for that?
And an expert on WHAT?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. >>> It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" hisYou get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o
doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign
promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Got a cite for that?
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise"
TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a
weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even
the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective.
We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and
right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. >>>>> It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" hisYou get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o
doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign >>>>> promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Got a cite for that?
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow >>>> magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. >>>>> It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" hisYou get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign >>>>> promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:16:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Got a cite for that?
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead.
Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow >>>>>> magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>>>>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous
failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. >>>>>>> It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his >>>>>>> payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign >>>>>>> promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
Hey Fool, the potential charges are WELL KNOWN to anyone with a grade school education. I guess that leaves you OUT!
On 2023-04-03 18:12, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:16:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Got a cite for that?
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. >>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"! >>>>>>>>>
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow >>>>>> magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>>>>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous >>>>>>>> failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his >>>>>>> payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign >>>>>>> promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
Hey Fool, the potential charges are WELL KNOWN to anyone with a grade school education. I guess that leaves you OUT!There's been lots of speculation...
...but without knowing the actual charges...
...AND the evidence to support them...
...Dershowitz...
...(and you)..
...don't know shit.
BTW, where is your source that Dershowitz is an expert on campaign
finance law?
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 7:15:54 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-03 18:12, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:16:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's been lots of speculation...
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Got a cite for that?
On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. >>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"! >>>>>>>>>>>
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow >>>>>>>> magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based >>>>>>>>>> on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous >>>>>>>>>> failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes. >>>>>>>>> It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his >>>>>>>>> payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>>>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign >>>>>>>>> promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
Hey Fool, the potential charges are WELL KNOWN to anyone with a grade school education. I guess that leaves you OUT!
...but without knowing the actual charges...
...AND the evidence to support them...
...Dershowitz...
...(and you)..
...don't know shit.
BTW, where is your source that Dershowitz is an expert on campaign
finance law?
But YOU apparently DO!
On 2023-04-03 20:09, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 7:15:54 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-03 18:12, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:16:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's been lots of speculation...
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:Got a cite for that?
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. >>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"! >>>>>>>>>>>
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based
on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous >>>>>>>>>> failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his >>>>>>>>> payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>>>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign
promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
Hey Fool, the potential charges are WELL KNOWN to anyone with a grade school education. I guess that leaves you OUT!
...but without knowing the actual charges...
...AND the evidence to support them...
...Dershowitz...
...(and you)..
...don't know shit.
BTW, where is your source that Dershowitz is an expert on campaign
finance law?
But YOU apparently DO!I know that Dershowitz can't know it's a "weak case"...
...without knowing either the charges...
...or the evidence supporting them.
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 9:32:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-03 20:09, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 7:15:54 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I know that Dershowitz can't know it's a "weak case"...
On 2023-04-03 18:12, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:16:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's been lots of speculation...
On 2023-04-02 21:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 7:50:29 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:His reputation isn't at issue, Sunshine.
On 2023-03-31 19:37, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 6:37:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-03-31 18:10, Tommy wrote:Got a cite for that?
On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 6:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-03-30 17:56, Tommy wrote:Since he cannot possibly have seen the evidence...
"This is "the worst, weakest, most abusive case of prosecutorial >>>>>>>>>>>>> indiscretion," Dershowitz said on the "Just the News, No Noise" >>>>>>>>>>>>> TV show. "In my 60 years of practicing law, I have never seen a >>>>>>>>>>>>> weaker case.""
This indictment already has catapulted Trump into the lead. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, most Dims don't want Lyin' Biden to run again. Even >>>>>>>>>>>>> the libtards here can't come out and say "Biden is my guy"! >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/liberal-legal-professor-who-voted-biden-says-trump-indictment
Without knowing what laws Trump has been indicted under, you somehow >>>>>>>>>> magically know Dershowitz is an expert?
...how exactly can he render an opinion?
"Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based
on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. >>>>>>>>>>>> We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous >>>>>>>>>>>> failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and >>>>>>>>>>>> right-wing propaganda."
<https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/>
Dershowitz is an EXPERT on the law involved.
I don't "magically" know that Dershowitz is an expert - he IS an acknowledged expert, Foot.
And an expert on WHAT?
But you agree he was found guilty correctly, right?
No doubt he will have specific comments about the "case" Bragg makes.You get that Cohen was prosecuted and found GUILTY for the same acts, right?
It sounds like he is going to say that Trump "misclassified" his >>>>>>>>>>> payment to Cohen, which is a clerical error, at best. What is w/o >>>>>>>>>>> doubt is this is a political prosecution to fulfill Bragg's campaign
promise. This is an obvious case of abuse of power.
Cohen is an ADMITTED LIAR, which tells you ALL you need to know about the criminal, Fool.
You are a certified FUCKING IDIOT if you don't know about Dershowitz's reputation. Assuming that you are a FUCKING IDIOT, then google "Alan Dershowitz."
Dershowitz...
...hasn't...
...seen...
...the...
...CHARGES.
Much less the evidence for those charges.
Hey Fool, the potential charges are WELL KNOWN to anyone with a grade school education. I guess that leaves you OUT!
...but without knowing the actual charges...
...AND the evidence to support them...
...Dershowitz...
...(and you)..
...don't know shit.
BTW, where is your source that Dershowitz is an expert on campaign
finance law?
But YOU apparently DO!
...without knowing either the charges...
...or the evidence supporting them.
And I know that you CAN'T KNOW!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 493 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 190:56:24 |
| Calls: | 9,707 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,740 |
| Messages: | 6,180,050 |