The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was trying to
cover up, which makes the indictment null and void. Presumably, the
crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016 election. The problem is
that ALL of the count's reference dates are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that, the indictment comes AFTER the
expiration of the statute of limitations.
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime was
committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has committed prosecutorial misconduct. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was trying toYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions after
cover up, which makes the indictment null and void. Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016 election. The problem is
that ALL of the count's reference dates are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that, the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of limitations.
a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has committed prosecutorial misconduct. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdfFalsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover up other crimes, Sunshine.
But then, you haven't included the full record of the arraignment, have you?
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also a part of
the proceeding?
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I'll give you a couple of quotes:
'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently falsified
New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.'
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated a
scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress
its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral prospects. In
order to execute the unlawful scheme, the participants violated election laws and made and caused false entries in the business records of
various entities in New York. The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made
in furtherance of the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes the election...
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted offences to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000 to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A made the $130,000 payment through
a shell corporation he set up and funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign contribution and served time in prison. Further, false entries were made in New York business records to effectuate this
payment, separate and apart from the New York business records used to conceal the payment.'
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts that baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
Falsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime
was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has
committed prosecutorial misconduct.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
upother crimes, Sunshine.
Again, there IS NO probably cause in the indictment.
But then, you haven't included the full record of the arraignment,
have you?
I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also a part
of the proceeding?
AGAIN, I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I'll give you a couple of quotes:
'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently
falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct
that hid damaging information from the voting public during the
2016 presidential election.'
That IS NOT a part of the indictment. Nonetheless, this is a federal
matter, NOT a state matter. On top of that, all of this is BEYOND the
statute of limitations. You DO know what that means, don't you?
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated
a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election
by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to
suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral
prospects. In order to execute the unlawful scheme, the
participants violated election laws and made and caused false
entries in the business records of various entities in New York.
The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax
purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of
the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes the
election...
Again, NOT in the indictment, plus Bragg DOES NOT have jurisdiction.
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted offences
to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s
request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as
Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000
to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her
from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A
made the $130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and
funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer
A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign
contribution and served time in prison. Further, false entries were
made in New York business records to effectuate this payment,
separate and apart from the New York business records used to
conceal the payment.'
Ditto, Fool.
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts that
baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
How is it that I HAVE TO "school" you?
On 2023-04-04 20:05, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
The crimes listed were falsification of business records, Sunshine.
Falsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime
was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has
committed prosecutorial misconduct.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
upother crimes, Sunshine.
Again, there IS NO probably cause in the indictment.There doesn't have to be, Sunshine.
The grand jury, by returning a true bill, is stating that they have
found probable cause.
But then, you haven't included the full record of the arraignment,
have you?
I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also a part
of the proceeding?
AGAIN, I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.Not that Statement of Facts...
...or are you just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I'll give you a couple of quotes:
'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently
falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct
that hid damaging information from the voting public during the
2016 presidential election.'
That IS NOT a part of the indictment. Nonetheless, this is a federal matter, NOT a state matter. On top of that, all of this is BEYOND the statute of limitations. You DO know what that means, don't you?
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated
a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election
by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to
suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral
prospects. In order to execute the unlawful scheme, the
participants violated election laws and made and caused false
entries in the business records of various entities in New York.
The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax
purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of
the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes the
election...
Again, NOT in the indictment, plus Bragg DOES NOT have jurisdiction.
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted offences
to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s
request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as
Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000
to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her
from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A
made the $130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and
funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer
A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign
contribution and served time in prison. Further, false entries were
made in New York business records to effectuate this payment,
separate and apart from the New York business records used to
conceal the payment.'
Ditto, Fool.
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts that
baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
How is it that I HAVE TO "school" you?You haven't.
You don't know the law.
Indictments lay out the charges that the grand jury has found sufficient cause for which to indict. The indictment document itself doesn't have
to specify probable cause.
The Statement of Facts (which you ignored) makes the link to the crimes
that the falsification of business records covered up.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:08:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 20:05, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:The crimes listed were falsification of business records, Sunshine.
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
There doesn't have to be, Sunshine.Falsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime
was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has
committed prosecutorial misconduct.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
upother crimes, Sunshine.
Again, there IS NO probably cause in the indictment.
The grand jury, by returning a true bill, is stating that they have
found probable cause.
Not that Statement of Facts...
But then, you haven't included the full record of the arraignment,
have you?
I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also a part
of the proceeding?
AGAIN, I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
...or are you just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
You haven't.
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I'll give you a couple of quotes:
'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently
falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct
that hid damaging information from the voting public during the
2016 presidential election.'
That IS NOT a part of the indictment. Nonetheless, this is a federal
matter, NOT a state matter. On top of that, all of this is BEYOND the
statute of limitations. You DO know what that means, don't you?
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated
a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election
by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to
suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral
prospects. In order to execute the unlawful scheme, the
participants violated election laws and made and caused false
entries in the business records of various entities in New York.
The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax
purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of
the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes the
election...
Again, NOT in the indictment, plus Bragg DOES NOT have jurisdiction.
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted offences
to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s
request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as
Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000
to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her
from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A
made the $130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and
funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer
A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign
contribution and served time in prison. Further, false entries were
made in New York business records to effectuate this payment,
separate and apart from the New York business records used to
conceal the payment.'
Ditto, Fool.
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts that
baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
How is it that I HAVE TO "school" you?
You don't know the law.
Actually, I DO know the law - you obviously DON'T.
Indictments lay out the charges that the grand jury has found sufficient
cause for which to indict. The indictment document itself doesn't have
to specify probable cause.
The Statement of Facts (which you ignored) makes the link to the crimes
that the falsification of business records covered up.
You have INVENTED facts that AREN'T in evidence. Bragg has NO CASE, which should be summarily DISMISSED. But given the nature of the Kangaroo Courts in NY it may actually go to trial.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was trying to
cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
He listed 34; of course you are that stupid.
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 8:32:53 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:He listed 34; of course you are that stupid.
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg
DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
And you, being the IDIOT you are, didn't read a SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
On 2023-04-04 22:31, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:08:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 20:05, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:The crimes listed were falsification of business records, Sunshine.
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump was tryingYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit actions
to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void.
Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016
election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference dates
are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top of that,
the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the statute of
limitations.
after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that Bragg >>> DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in the
indictment, should you bother to read it.
There doesn't have to be, Sunshine.Falsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover >>>> upother crimes, Sunshine.
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a crime
was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by Bragg, who has
committed prosecutorial misconduct.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
Again, there IS NO probably cause in the indictment.
The grand jury, by returning a true bill, is stating that they have
found probable cause.
Not that Statement of Facts...
But then, you haven't included the full record of the arraignment,
have you?
I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also a part
of the proceeding?
AGAIN, I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
...or are you just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
You haven't.
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I'll give you a couple of quotes:
'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently
falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct
that hid damaging information from the voting public during the
2016 presidential election.'
That IS NOT a part of the indictment. Nonetheless, this is a federal
matter, NOT a state matter. On top of that, all of this is BEYOND the >>> statute of limitations. You DO know what that means, don't you?
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated
a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election
by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to
suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral
prospects. In order to execute the unlawful scheme, the
participants violated election laws and made and caused false
entries in the business records of various entities in New York.
The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax
purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of
the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes the
election...
Again, NOT in the indictment, plus Bragg DOES NOT have jurisdiction.
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted offences
to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s
request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as
Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000 >>>> to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her >>>> from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A
made the $130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and >>>> funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer >>>> A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign
contribution and served time in prison. Further, false entries were >>>> made in New York business records to effectuate this payment,
separate and apart from the New York business records used to
conceal the payment.'
Ditto, Fool.
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts that
baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
How is it that I HAVE TO "school" you?
You don't know the law.
Actually, I DO know the law - you obviously DON'T.
Indictments lay out the charges that the grand jury has found sufficient >> cause for which to indict. The indictment document itself doesn't have
to specify probable cause.
The Statement of Facts (which you ignored) makes the link to the crimes >> that the falsification of business records covered up.
You have INVENTED facts that AREN'T in evidence. Bragg has NO CASE, which should be summarily DISMISSED. But given the nature of the Kangaroo Courts in NY it may actually go to trial.I haven't invented anything, Sunshine.
I pointed you to a document you want to pretend doesn't exist.
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:35:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Falsifying business records is a crime whether or not it is to cover
On 2023-04-04 22:31, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 10:08:17 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 20:05, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:The crimes listed were falsification of business records,
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump wasYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit
trying to cover up, which makes the indictment null and
void. Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence
the 2016 election. The problem is that ALL of the count's
reference dates are in 2017, months AFTER the election
was over! On top of that, the indictment comes AFTER the
expiration of the statute of limitations.
actions after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was
that Bragg DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That
is in the indictment, should you bother to read it.
Sunshine.
This indictment FAILS to show ANY probable cause that a
crime was committed and thus is an ABUSE OF POWER by
Bragg, who has committed prosecutorial misconduct.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/DonaldJTrumpIndictment040423.pdf
I'll give you a couple of quotes:There doesn't have to be, Sunshine.upother crimes, Sunshine.
Again, there IS NO probably cause in the indictment.
The grand jury, by returning a true bill, is stating that they
have found probable cause.
Not that Statement of Facts...
But then, you haven't included the full record of the
arraignment, have you?
I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
Any reason you omitted the Statement of Facts that was also
a part of the proceeding?
AGAIN, I have included EVERYTHING that Bragg provided, Fool.
...or are you just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794/donald-trump-statement-of-facts.pdf>
I haven't invented anything, Sunshine.You haven't.'1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and
fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal
criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the
voting public during the 2016 presidential election.'
That IS NOT a part of the indictment. Nonetheless, this is a
federal matter, NOT a state matter. On top of that, all of
this is BEYOND the statute of limitations. You DO know what
that means, don't you?
Notice how 2016 appears in the first paragraph? Let's go
on:
'2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant
orchestrated a scheme with others to influence the 2016
presidential election by identifying and purchasing
negative information about him to suppress its publication
and benefit the Defendant’s electoral prospects. In order
to execute the unlawful scheme, the participants violated
election laws and made and caused false entries in the
business records of various entities in New York. The
participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for
tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in
furtherance of the scheme.'
Notice how that both identifies a time period that precedes
the election...
Again, NOT in the indictment, plus Bragg DOES NOT have
jurisdiction.
...and the crime for which raised the level of indicted
offences to felonies?
Shall I go on?
'3. One component of this scheme was that, at the
Defendant’s request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump
Organization as Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”),
covertly paid $130,000 to an adult film actress shortly
before the election to prevent her from publicizing a
sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A made the
$130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and
funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal,
and Lawyer A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal
campaign contribution and served time in prison. Further,
false entries were made in New York business records to
effectuate this payment, separate and apart from the New
York business records used to conceal the payment.'
Ditto, Fool.
I'll let you read the rest on your own...
..but please come back if there are any words or concepts
that baffle you.
How is it you always get schooled by me on these things?
How is it that I HAVE TO "school" you?
You don't know the law.
Actually, I DO know the law - you obviously DON'T.
Indictments lay out the charges that the grand jury has found
sufficient cause for which to indict. The indictment document
itself doesn't have to specify probable cause.
The Statement of Facts (which you ignored) makes the link to
the crimes that the falsification of business records covered
up.
You have INVENTED facts that AREN'T in evidence. Bragg has NO
CASE, which should be summarily DISMISSED. But given the nature
of the Kangaroo Courts in NY it may actually go to trial.
I pointed you to a document you want to pretend doesn't exist.
Legal minds far greater than yours say there is NO CASE here. NONE.
ZIPPO. NADA. NULL. Bragg is trying something BEYOND the Statute of Limitations and BEYOND his jurisdiction - this is a TRAVESTY!
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 8:32:53 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump wasYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit
trying to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void. Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016 election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference
dates are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top
of that, the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the
statute of limitations.
actions after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that
Bragg DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in
the indictment, should you bother to read it.
He listed 34; of course you are that stupid.
And you, being the IDIOT you are, didn't read a SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 8:32:53 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:45:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-04 17:12, Tommy wrote:
The indictment FAILS to list the crime(s) that Trump wasYou're not seriously trying to argue that you can't commit
trying to cover up, which makes the indictment null and void. Presumably, the crime(s) is an attempt to influence the 2016 election. The problem is that ALL of the count's reference
dates are in 2017, months AFTER the election was over! On top
of that, the indictment comes AFTER the expiration of the
statute of limitations.
actions after a crime in order to cover up that crime...
...are you?
Please tell me you're not that stupid.
LOL! Are you REALLY that dumb? I guess so. What I said was that
Bragg DID NOT list ANY crimes that Trump committed. That is in
the indictment, should you bother to read it.
He listed 34; of course you are that stupid.
And you, being the IDIOT you are, didn't read a SINGLE ONE OF THEM!I think the IDIOT here is the one who didn't comprehend that every indictment refer to specific crime... else they would not be
indictments; fool.
Have you forgotten what you wrote already?
You do easily confuse yourself nowadays; I wonder what causes that. :-)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 166:21:07 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,528 |