On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal.
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just
admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree,
show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal.
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just
admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree,
show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimySo...
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The
Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023'
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:49:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
So...You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal.
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just
admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree,
show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon >> Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first
substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The
Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023'
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
That "deal" is as DEAD AS A DOORNAIL, Fool. You are, apparently, the ONLY one who didn't get the memo.
On 2023-08-21 18:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:49:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
So...You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal.
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just >>>>>> admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree,
show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon
Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first
substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The
Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023'
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
That "deal" is as DEAD AS A DOORNAIL, Fool. You are, apparently, the ONLY one who didn't get the memo.I never said it wasn't, Sunshine.
What I pointed out was that:
"The Defendant chose to plead not guilty"
:-)
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 7:46:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:49:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I never said it wasn't, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
So...You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal.
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just >>>>>>>> admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree,
show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon
Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first
substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The
Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023'
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
That "deal" is as DEAD AS A DOORNAIL, Fool. You are, apparently, the ONLY one who didn't get the memo.
What I pointed out was that:
"The Defendant chose to plead not guilty"
:-)
Which is it, was the deal ACCEPTED or REJECTED, Fool?
On 2023-09-06 20:16, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 7:46:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:49:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I never said it wasn't, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
So...You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just >>>>>>>> admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree, >>>>>>> show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon
Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first >>>> substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The
Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023' >>>>
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
That "deal" is as DEAD AS A DOORNAIL, Fool. You are, apparently, the ONLY one who didn't get the memo.
What I pointed out was that:
"The Defendant chose to plead not guilty"
:-)
Which is it, was the deal ACCEPTED or REJECTED, Fool?The deal was rejected...
...by the defendant.
You claim it was rejected by the judge. And you're wrong.
Why can't you be man enough to just admit that, Sunshine?
:-)
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 7:37:53 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-06 20:16, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 7:46:09 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:The deal was rejected...
On 2023-08-21 18:35, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:49:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I never said it wasn't, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-10 10:48, Tommy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:07:28 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-09 23:00, Tommy wrote:There's the court transcript, Sunshine.
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23888608/transcript-of-july-26-2023-hearing.pdf>
So...You claim it was rejected...You claimed the deal was rejected by the judge.And yet you cannot produce the quote.Sorry, Sunshine.
Quote the part where the judge rejects the deal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Where does it say she is going to accept the
agreement?
But you claim she "REJECTED" the agreement.
So produce the quote.
She did - as presented.
Got it.
Was this fucked up plea deal accepted, YES OR NO?
Learn from your earlier mistake about "file:///" links and just >>>>>>>>>> admit you were wrong.
Hey Bozo, the deal WAS rejected by the judge. If you disagree, >>>>>>>>> show me where the deal was ACCEPTED by the judge.
...so YOU show the quote.
You can't...can you, Sunshine?
-)
Oh, go fuck yourself! It WAS rejected and BooBoo and his slimy
lawyers KNOW IT!! One even said the deal was RIPPED UP!!!
...if the judge is the one who "rejected" the deal...
...why did the government write this:
'First, the Government did not “renege” on the “previously agreed-upon
Plea Agreement,” as the Defendant inaccurately asserts in the first >>>>>> substantive sentence of his response. ECF 33, Def. Resp. at 1. The >>>>>> Defendant chose to plead not guilty at the hearing on July 26, 2023' >>>>>>
<https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82801/gov.uscourts.ded.82801.39.0_1.pdf>
Can you explain, Sunshine...
...or have you just run away for good?
:-)
That "deal" is as DEAD AS A DOORNAIL, Fool. You are, apparently, the ONLY one who didn't get the memo.
What I pointed out was that:
"The Defendant chose to plead not guilty"
:-)
Which is it, was the deal ACCEPTED or REJECTED, Fool?
...by the defendant.
You claim it was rejected by the judge. And you're wrong.
Why can't you be man enough to just admit that, Sunshine?
:-)
FINALLY, you agree that the deal was REJECTED!!! HALELUJAH!!!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 04:23:43 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,058 |
| Messages: | 6,416,622 |