On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:“Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become catastrophic
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring said.
That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from UC Davis, and
he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees >> are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man could "allow"
them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:“Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become catastrophic
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring said.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insuranceThat's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from UC Davis, and
he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man could "allow"
them to do anything?
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring said.Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become catastrophic
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:said. “Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring
I did deal with facts, Sunshine:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from UC Davis, and >>>> he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees
are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man could "allow" >>>> them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on forests
and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:said. “Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring
That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from UC Davis, and >> he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees
are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man could "allow" >> them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on forests
and forest fires.
:-)
On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:said. “Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree density that is around 5 times greater than what is historically normal,” Ring
I did deal with facts, Sunshine:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from UC Davis, and
he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees
are competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man could "allow" >>>> them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on forests >> and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.I did.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing know-nothing.
That's a fact.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the
last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree
density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed
California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are
competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This
stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from
UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become
overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and
soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man
could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on
forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have
exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the
last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree
density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are
competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This
stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from
UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become
overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and
soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man
could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on
forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical.
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the
last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree
density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are
competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This
stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical.I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from
UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become
overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and
soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man
could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on
forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have
exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
You can't come up with any facts that CONTRADICT what he wrote, can you?
On 2023-09-24 17:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the >>>>>>>>> last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree >>>>>>>>> density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are
competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This
stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical.I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from >>>>>>>> UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become
overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and
soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man
could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on >>>>>> forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have
exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
You can't come up with any facts that CONTRADICT what he wrote, can you?You can show that anything he wrote is fact.
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:41:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can show that anything he wrote is fact.
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center".
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the >>>>>>>>>>> last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree >>>>>>>>>>> density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are
competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This
stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical.I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:
'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from >>>>>>>>>> UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become
overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and
soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man
could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on >>>>>>>> forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have >>>>> exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
You can't come up with any facts that CONTRADICT what he wrote, can you?
You CAN'T show ANY reference that CONTRADICTS what Ring wrote. YOU made this claim: BACK IT UP!!!!!
On 2023-09-25 18:55, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:41:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:You can't come up with any facts that CONTRADICT what he wrote, can you? >> You can show that anything he wrote is fact.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center". >>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the >>>>>>>>>>> last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree >>>>>>>>>>> density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are >>>>>>>>>>> competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This >>>>>>>>>>> stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical. >>>I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from >>>>>>>>>> UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/> >>>>>>>>>>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become >>>>>>>>>> overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and >>>>>>>>>> soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man >>>>>>>>>> could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on >>>>>>>> forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have >>>>> exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
You CAN'T show ANY reference that CONTRADICTS what Ring wrote. YOU made this claim: BACK IT UP!!!!!You can't show any reference that corroborates what he wrote.
The onus was on him to prove what he said.
Otherwise, he's just another tired and tedious right-wing shill.
Do you know who funds the "California Policy Center"?
:-)
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 9:29:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-25 18:55, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:41:33 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't show any reference that corroborates what he wrote.
On 2023-09-24 17:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 5:17:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-09-24 17:08, Tommy wrote:You can't come up with any facts that CONTRADICT what he wrote, can you? >>>> You can show that anything he wrote is fact.
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 11:30:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-09-23 23:28, Tommy wrote:That's a quote from Edward Ring of "California Policy Center". >>>>>>>>>>>>
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:59:05 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:44, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, September 23, 2023 at 10:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-09-23 22:06, Tommy wrote:
“Due to fire suppression, combined with the
near-elimination of California timber harvesting over the >>>>>>>>>>>>> last 30 years, California’s forests have developed a tree >>>>>>>>>>>>> density that is around 5 times greater than what is
historically normal,” Ring said. “Because we’ve allowed >>>>>>>>>>>>> California’s forests to become overcrowded, trees are >>>>>>>>>>>>> competing for light, rainfall, and soil nutrients. This >>>>>>>>>>>>> stress leaves the trees dried out and provides a
tremendous amount of fuel for what can often become
catastrophic fires.”
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/insurers-flee-newsom-signs-executive-order-save-property-insurance
And you presented the assertions of an unqualified right-wing radical. >>>>>I did.I did deal with facts, Sunshine:'Ring’s undergraduate degree is in Political Science from >>>>>>>>>>>> UC Davis, and he has an MBA in Finance from USC'
<https://californiapolicycenter.org/people/edward-ring/> >>>>>>>>>>>>
So why is his opinion about the subject of any value?
'Because we’ve allowed California’s forests to become >>>>>>>>>>>> overcrowded, trees are competing for light, rainfall, and >>>>>>>>>>>> soil nutrients'
Does he even know that forests were there long before man >>>>>>>>>>>> could "allow" them to do anything?
Why don't you deal with FACTS, Fool?
Fact: You went to a highly biased website.
Fact: They quoted a highly biased and unqualified non-expert on >>>>>>>>>> forests and forest fires.
:-)
No you didn't - produce some facts that dispute what is
presented. You can't because EVERYTHING he wrote is TRUE.
You presented the unqualified opinions of a right-wing
know-nothing.
That's a fact.
No, you presented an ad hominem attack with ZERO FACTS. And you have >>>>>>> exactly ZERO credentials to challenge Ed Ring.
You CAN'T show ANY reference that CONTRADICTS what Ring wrote. YOU made this claim: BACK IT UP!!!!!
The onus was on him to prove what he said.
Otherwise, he's just another tired and tedious right-wing shill.
Do you know who funds the "California Policy Center"?
:-)
Hey idiot, it is YOU that can't provide ANY contradictory evidence - I DARE YOU!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 164:18:37 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,518 |