On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transport and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.And why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons?
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower slightly the price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic prices for US
consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still the world market
and even if the US increase in production shaves a few points off of
the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of oil, Russia is still making more money today than they were in 2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other mechanism, so explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be 'hurt', as per your claim.
-hh
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 4:05:51 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transport and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.And why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons?
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower slightly the price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic prices for US
consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still the world market
and even if the US increase in production shaves a few points off of
the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of oil, Russia is still making more money today than they were in 2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other mechanism, so
explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be 'hurt', as per your claim.
So, do you think that importing 538,000 barrels of oil PER DAY from Russia is a GOOD IDEA?
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 8:43:03 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 4:05:51 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transport and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.And why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons?
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower slightly the
price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic prices for US consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still the world market and even if the US increase in production shaves a few points off of
the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of oil, Russia is still making
more money today than they were in 2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other mechanism, so
explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be 'hurt', as per your claim.
So, do you think that importing 538,000 barrels of oil PER DAY from Russia is a GOOD IDEA?Gosh, sounds like a classical “make or buy” business decision, doesn’t it?
So remind me again how all of this is hurting Russia? After all, that is your claim.
Be sure to articulate how an eventual change in domestic prices 4 years from now (because one doesn’t develop a new oil field overnight) have any bearing
on inflicting pain on Russia in 2022 or even 2023.
-hh
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 6:32:47 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 8:43:03 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 4:05:51 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, sounds like a classical “make or buy” business decision, doesn’t it?
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transport and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.And why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons? >>>>>
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower slightly the >>>> price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic prices for US
consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still the world market
and even if the US increase in production shaves a few points off of
the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of oil, Russia is still making >>>> more money today than they were in 2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other mechanism, so
explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be 'hurt', as per your claim.
So, do you think that importing 538,000 barrels of oil PER DAY from Russia is a GOOD IDEA?
So remind me again how all of this is hurting Russia? After all, that is your claim.
Be sure to articulate how an eventual change in domestic prices 4 years from >> now (because one doesn’t develop a new oil field overnight) have any bearing
on inflicting pain on Russia in 2022 or even 2023.
-hh
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLION DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
On 2022-02-28 7:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 6:32:47 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 8:43:03 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 4:05:51 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Gosh, sounds like a classical “make or buy” business decision, doesn’t it?
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote: >>>>>>> ...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transport and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.
And why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons? >>>>>
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower slightly the
price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic prices for US
consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still the world market >>>> and even if the US increase in production shaves a few points off of >>>> the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of oil, Russia is still making
more money today than they were in 2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other mechanism, so
explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be 'hurt', as per your claim.
So, do you think that importing 538,000 barrels of oil PER DAY from Russia is a GOOD IDEA?
So remind me again how all of this is hurting Russia? After all, that is your claim.
Be sure to articulate how an eventual change in domestic prices 4 years from
now (because one doesn’t develop a new oil field overnight) have any bearing
on inflicting pain on Russia in 2022 or even 2023.
-hh
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLION DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
So we'll add basic arithmetic to the things you don't understand.
Oil is currently $92/barrel.
538,000 barrels of oil at that price is a little less than 50 MILLION.
So you were only wrong by three orders of magnitude.
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLION DOLLARS
A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 4:05:51 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 9:53:48 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:20:58 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:02:52 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
...which is to open up and mandate the drilling, transportAnd why would that hurt Russia, Tommy?
and refining of ALL of our oil reserves.
Don’t you know that they don’t need oil because they have tons?
LOL! Are you SERIOUS???
Just trying to figure out your claim, Tommy.
For example, producing more oil domestically will just lower
slightly the price at the pump for US consumers. Lower domestic
prices for US consumers doesn't hurt Russia, because there's still
the world market and even if the US increase in production shaves a
few points off of the +25% increase in the price of a barrel of
oil, Russia is still making more money today than they were in
2021.
So if you're not being batshit crazy, you must mean some other
mechanism, so explain the mechanism for how Russia is going to be
'hurt', as per your claim.
-hh
So, do you think that importing 538,000 barrels of oil PER DAY from
Russia is a GOOD IDEA?
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLION DOLLARSYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLION DOLLARSYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 12:11:04 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLIONYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 12:11:04 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLIONYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing ridiculed.
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 12:11:04 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLIONYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKINGLOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing ridiculed.
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 12:11:04 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLIONYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing ridiculed.I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
-hh
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil,
and sending them billions of dollars in the process.
On Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 11:23:53 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 12:11:04 PM UTC-8, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
I'll take that as a YES: we should send Russia FIFTY BILLIONYou want to send imports... "thru the XLpipeline"... "and MORE"
DOLLARS A DAY vs sending that - and MORE - thru the XL
pipeline.
"MORE and MORE of our imports come from overseas" GWB
Betty is GWBush aicm5ukp
Next he'll be asking "how many is a Brazillion"
Numeracy eludes the demented old fool.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKINGLOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
bing ridiculed.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
I do understand that you CAN'T SPELL!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build
the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that
same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sendingAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare!
them billions of dollars in the process.
-hh
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the
price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil
that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build
the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that
same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sendingAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare!
them billions of dollars in the process.
-hhHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the
price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil
that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build
the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that
same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sendingAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare!
them billions of dollars in the process.
The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.-hhHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
-hh
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:Hey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing >>>>>>> ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the >>>>>> price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK! >>>>>>
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil >>>>>> that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build
the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that
same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:Hey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird wrote: >>>>>>> TomS wrote:
...
Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to the US affect the
price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil
that's already flowing to market will somehow magically double if we build
the Keystone XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to get that
same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil production is being strangled
by a lack of drilling leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 such leases
already approved & sold that today are in the hands of oil corporations for them
to go drill on ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, increasing the
amount of idle inventory through more leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.As he correctly pointed out:
You refused to answer first.
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird
wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for
your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and
how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to
the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant
to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market
will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone
XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to
get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling
leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000
such leases already approved & sold that today are in
the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on
... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow,
increasing the amount of idle inventory through more
leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import
Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the
process.
affect the price of UK healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And,
NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird
wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for
your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and
how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to
the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant
to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market
will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone
XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to
get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling
leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000
such leases already approved & sold that today are in
the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on
... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow,
increasing the amount of idle inventory through more
leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import
Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the
process.
affect the price of UK healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And,You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird
wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for
your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and
how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to
the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant
to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market
will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone
XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to
get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling
leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000
such leases already approved & sold that today are in
the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on
... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow,
increasing the amount of idle inventory through more
leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import
Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the
process.
affect the price of UK healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And,
NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for
your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and
how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to
the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant >>>>>>>>>> to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market
will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone
XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to
get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling
leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000
such leases already approved & sold that today are in
the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on
... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow,
increasing the amount of idle inventory through more
leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import
Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the
process.
affect the price of UK healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And,
NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that idiot Fauci who said he is science!!You said:
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for >>>>>>>>>>>> your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and >>>>>>>>>>> how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to >>>>>>>>>> the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant >>>>>>>>>> to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market >>>>>>>>>> will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone >>>>>>>>>> XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to >>>>>>>>>> get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling
leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000
such leases already approved & sold that today are in >>>>>>>>>> the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on >>>>>>>>>> ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, >>>>>>>>>> increasing the amount of idle inventory through more
leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import >>>>>>>>> Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the >>>>>>>>> process.
affect the price of UK healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And,
NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that idiot Fauci who said he is science!!You said:
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to market.
As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow gap [between]
WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason to exist was merely
to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase total volume, to increase profit margins
(for the Koch family).
-hh
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSThe above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
wrote:Hey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hhAs soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US >>>>>>>> affect the price of UK healthcare!
wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for >>>>>>>>>>>> your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and >>>>>>>>>>> how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to >>>>>>>>>> the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant >>>>>>>>>> to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that
Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market >>>>>>>>>> will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone >>>>>>>>>> XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to >>>>>>>>>> get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil
production is being strangled by a lack of drilling >>>>>>>>>> leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 >>>>>>>>>> such leases already approved & sold that today are in >>>>>>>>>> the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on >>>>>>>>>> ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, >>>>>>>>>> increasing the amount of idle inventory through more >>>>>>>>>> leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import >>>>>>>>> Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the >>>>>>>>> process.
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And, >>> NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly
asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that idiot Fauci who said he is science!!You said:
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to market.
As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow gap [between]
WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason to exist was merely
to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase total volume, to increase profit margins
(for the Koch family).
I never said that they did.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, TomS wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM UTC-5, TomSAs he correctly pointed out:
The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.wrote:Hey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>> wrote:As soon as you explain how Russian oil imports to the US >>>>>>>> affect the price of UK healthcare!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM UTC-5, Bigbird >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for >>>>>>>>>>>> your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)! >>>>>>>>>>>LOL, you are too demented to even comprehend why and >>>>>>>>>>> how you are bing ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian oil imports to >>>>>>>>>> the US affect the price of Tea in Chin....oops, I meant >>>>>>>>>> to say, price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to claim that >>>>>>>>>> Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's already flowing to market >>>>>>>>>> will somehow magically double if we build the Keystone >>>>>>>>>> XL bypass line to give the producers a cheaper way to >>>>>>>>>> get that same oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that domestic oil >>>>>>>>>> production is being strangled by a lack of drilling >>>>>>>>>> leases ... even though there's currently over 7,000 >>>>>>>>>> such leases already approved & sold that today are in >>>>>>>>>> the hands of oil corporations for them to go drill on >>>>>>>>>> ... but are currently still sitting idle. But somehow, >>>>>>>>>> increasing the amount of idle inventory through more >>>>>>>>>> leases will cut gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD IDEA to import >>>>>>>>> Russian oil, and sending them billions of dollars in the >>>>>>>>> process.
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the Fool. And, >>> NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the question which I clearly >>> asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that idiot Fauci who said he is science!!You said:
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian oil imports
to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow gap [between]
WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason to exist was merely
to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase total volume, to increase profit margins
(for the Koch family).
I never said that they did.Yeah, you did:
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)! "
There's no question mark, so it is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make when
you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what have led to high oil prices,
rather than it being newfound capital discipline of oil companies after they went through
multiple years of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the Saudis to cut OPEC
oil production back in April 2020, specifically to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You said:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, AlanYou're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hhAs he correctly pointed out:
wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5,
TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8,The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
-hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AMAs soon as you explain how Russian oil
UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM
UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports"
are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of
Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to
claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's
already flowing to market will somehow
magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same
oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that
domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases
... even though there's currently over
7,000 such leases already approved & sold
that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ...
but are currently still sitting idle. But
somehow, increasing the amount of idle
inventory through more leases will cut
gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD
IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
imports to the US affect the price of UK
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE
QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the
Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that
idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst
summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
Yeah, you did:that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to
market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow
gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason
to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase
total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post
still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it
is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make
when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what
have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital
discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years
of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the
Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically
to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But
that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,
why are you demanding a reference?).
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,
why are you demanding a reference?).
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada >>>> that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You said:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, AlanYou're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hhAs he correctly pointed out:
wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5,
TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8,The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
-hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AMAs soon as you explain how Russian oil
UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM
UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports"
are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of
Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to
claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's
already flowing to market will somehow
magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same
oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that
domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases
... even though there's currently over
7,000 such leases already approved & sold
that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ...
but are currently still sitting idle. But
somehow, increasing the amount of idle
inventory through more leases will cut
gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD
IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
imports to the US affect the price of UK
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE
QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the
Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that
idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst
summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
Yeah, you did:market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow
gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason
to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase
total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post
still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it
is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make
when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what
have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital
discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years
of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the
Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically
to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. ButThere are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.
that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military support - sources'
why are you demanding a reference?).
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the
kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led
to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House.
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so
he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source
who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.'
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada >>>>>> that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:You said:
On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, AlanYou're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hhAs he correctly pointed out:
wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5,
TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8,The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
-hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AMAs soon as you explain how Russian oil
UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM
UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports"
are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of
Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to
claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's
already flowing to market will somehow
magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same
oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that
domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases
... even though there's currently over
7,000 such leases already approved & sold
that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ...
but are currently still sitting idle. But
somehow, increasing the amount of idle
inventory through more leases will cut
gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD
IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
imports to the US affect the price of UK
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE
QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the
Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that
idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst
summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929>
There are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.Yeah, you did:market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow
gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason
to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase
total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post
still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it
is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make
when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what
have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital
discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years
of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the
Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically
to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But
that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,
why are you demanding a reference?).
support - sources'
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop
lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the
kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been
previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led
to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the
coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House.
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the
announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so
taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so
he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source
who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.'
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
Hey Fool, do you REALLY believe that bullshit? If so I have a bridge I want to sell you. First, HOW MANY leases existed LAST YEAR? Second, tell me what the difference is between a LEASE and a PERMIT.
On 2022-03-10 7:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada >>>>>> that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:You said:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, AlanYou're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5,
TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8,The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
-hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AMAs soon as you explain how Russian oil
UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM
UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports"
are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to
claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's
already flowing to market will somehow
magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same
oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that
domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases
... even though there's currently over
7,000 such leases already approved & sold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ...
but are currently still sitting idle. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, increasing the amount of idle
inventory through more leases will cut
gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD
IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
imports to the US affect the price of UK
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE
QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the >>>>>>>>>> Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that
idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst
summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929> >>>>>>
There are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.Yeah, you did:market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow
gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason
to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase >>>>>> total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post
still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it
is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make
when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what
have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital
discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years
of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the
Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically
to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But
that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military >> support - sources'
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,
why are you demanding a reference?).
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries >> (OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop
lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the
kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been
previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led >> to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the >> coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House. >>
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the
announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so >> taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so
he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source >> who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.'
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
Hey Fool, do you REALLY believe that bullshit? If so I have a bridge I want to sell you. First, HOW MANY leases existed LAST YEAR? Second, tell me what the difference is between a LEASE and a PERMIT.There are 9,000 places where US oil companies have permits to drill... ...and they're not.
As for the alleged "bullshit":
<https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/trump-warned-saudis-to-cut-oil-supply-or-lose-us-military-support-report/>
You love the New York Post most of the time don't you?
On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-10 7:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:There are 9,000 places where US oil companies have permits to drill...
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada >>>>>>>> that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to >>>>>>>> market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow >>>>>>>> gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:You said:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, AlanYou're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
wrote:
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5,
TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8,The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
-hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AMAs soon as you explain how Russian oil
UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports"
are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing
ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian
oil imports to the US affect the price of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to
claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's
already flowing to market will somehow
magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that
domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases
... even though there's currently over
7,000 such leases already approved & sold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but are currently still sitting idle. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, increasing the amount of idle
inventory through more leases will cut
gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD
IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending
them billions of dollars in the process.
imports to the US affect the price of UK
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE
QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the >>>>>>>>>>>> Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that
idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
golfing.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian >>>>>>>> oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst
summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929> >>>>>>>>
There are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.Yeah, you did:
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason
to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase >>>>>>>> total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post >>>>>> still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING >>>>>> HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it >>>>>> is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make
when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what
have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital >>>>>> discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years >>>>>> of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the
Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically >>>>>> to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But >>>>> that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military >>>> support - sources'
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool,
why are you demanding a reference?).
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin
Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries >>>> (OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop
lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the
kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been
previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led >>>> to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the >>>> coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House. >>>>
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the
announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so >>>> taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so >>>> he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source >>>> who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.' >>>>
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
Hey Fool, do you REALLY believe that bullshit? If so I have a bridge I want to sell you. First, HOW MANY leases existed LAST YEAR? Second, tell me what the difference is between a LEASE and a PERMIT.
...and they're not.
As for the alleged "bullshit":
<https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/trump-warned-saudis-to-cut-oil-supply-or-lose-us-military-support-report/>
You love the New York Post most of the time don't you?
Hey Fool, you DIDN'T answer the question.
On 2022-03-13 9:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-10 7:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:There are 9,000 places where US oil companies have permits to drill...
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going >>>>>>>> golfing.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:You said:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PMHey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, -hh wrote:imports to the US affect the price of UK
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are paying for your FUCKING
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!
LOL, you are too demented to even
comprehend why and how you are bing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil imports to the US affect the price of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say,
price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already flowing to market will somehow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... even though there's currently over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7,000 such leases already approved & sold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but are currently still sitting idle. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, increasing the amount of idle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inventory through more leases will cut >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them billions of dollars in the process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As soon as you explain how Russian oil
healthcare!
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the >>>>>>>>>>>> Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the
question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't
answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that >>>>>>>>>> idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian >>>>>>>> oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst >>>>>>>> summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929> >>>>>>>>
There are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.Yeah, you did:that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to >>>>>>>> market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow >>>>>>>> gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture."
Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason >>>>>>>> to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase >>>>>>>> total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post >>>>>> still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING >>>>>> HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it >>>>>> is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make >>>>>> when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what >>>>>> have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital >>>>>> discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years >>>>>> of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the >>>>>> Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically >>>>>> to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But >>>>> that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military >>>> support - sources'
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool, >>>>> why are you demanding a reference?).
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin >>>> Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop >>>> lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the >>>> kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been >>>> previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led >>>> to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the
coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House.
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the
announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so >>>> taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so >>>> he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source >>>> who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.' >>>>
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
Hey Fool, do you REALLY believe that bullshit? If so I have a bridge I want to sell you. First, HOW MANY leases existed LAST YEAR? Second, tell me what the difference is between a LEASE and a PERMIT.
...and they're not.
As for the alleged "bullshit":
<https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/trump-warned-saudis-to-cut-oil-supply-or-lose-us-military-support-report/>
You love the New York Post most of the time don't you?
Hey Fool, you DIDN'T answer the question.I don't know.
Do you disagree that there are 9000 places where US oil companies
already have permission to drill that they are not using?
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 10:00:27 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-13 9:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:I don't know.
On 2022-03-10 7:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:There are 9,000 places where US oil companies have permits to drill... >>>> ...and they're not.
On 2022-03-07 8:42 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:56:00 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:The TL;DR is that there's just not a huge tank of crude oil up in Canada >>>>>>>>>> that's just waiting for pipeline capacity to get it shipped to >>>>>>>>>> market. As one of the commenters noted: "Keystone would narrow >>>>>>>>>> gap [between] WCS & WTI but not radically change picture." >>>>>>>>>>
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 12:51:14 AM UTC-5, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:53:31 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 1:12:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-06 9:32 a.m., TomS wrote:
Free clue to Tommy: it was Irving who claimed they were going >>>>>>>>>> golfing.On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 12:52:08 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-05 11:45 p.m., TomS wrote:You said:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 11:43:59 PM UTC-8, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:You're more confused than usual, Sunshine.
On 2022-03-05 11:39 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 5, 2022 at 4:33:14 AM UTC-8, -hh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:As he correctly pointed out:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:31:25 PM UTC-5, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 5:42:18 AM UTC-8, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:The above quoted text shows otherwise, 🤡. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 9:30:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-5, TomS wrote:Hey Lyin' Asshole, I asked first.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:59:12 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-8, -hh wrote:imports to the US affect the price of UK >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> healthcare!
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 2:23:53 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-5, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
... Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are paying for your FUCKINGLOL, you are too demented to even
HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
comprehend why and how you are bing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ridiculed.
I'm certainly curious as to how Russian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil imports to the US affect the price of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tea in Chin....oops, I meant to say, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> price of healthcare in UK!
In the meantime, Tommy's also trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that Canadian Tar Sand Oil that's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already flowing to market will somehow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magically double if we build the
Keystone XL bypass line to give the
producers a cheaper way to get that same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oil to market.
Next up will probably be a claim that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> domestic oil production is being
strangled by a lack of drilling leases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... even though there's currently over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7,000 such leases already approved & sold >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that today are in the hands of oil
corporations for them to go drill on ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but are currently still sitting idle. But >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somehow, increasing the amount of idle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inventory through more leases will cut >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gasoline prices next week! /s
I wonder how you think that it is a GOOD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDEA to import Russian oil, and sending >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them billions of dollars in the process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As soon as you explain how Russian oil
-hh
-hh
Note that the Lyin' Asshole won't answer a SIMPLE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUESTION.
You refused to answer first.
I thought you were fucking golfing - another lie by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fool. And, NO, the Lyin' Asshole didn't answer the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> question which I clearly asked.
I never said I was golf this weekend.
And you were asked a question first which you didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer.
I didn't say you were golf! You've been listening to that >>>>>>>>>>>> idiot Fauci who said he is science!!
"I thought you were fucking golfing".
And I never said I was.
Meantime, you've still not explained your claim of how Russian >>>>>>>>>> oil imports to the US affect the price of UK healthcare.
Oh, and to circle back to Keystone XL, here's a good analyst >>>>>>>>>> summary on it:
<https://twitter.com/cm_energyintel/status/1500513782598012929> >>>>>>>>>>
There are 9 THOUSAND drilling permits sitting idle, Sunshine.Yeah, you did:Which is precisely what you've already been told: XL's reason >>>>>>>>>> to exist was merely to be able to ship it cheaper, not increase >>>>>>>>>> total volume, to increase profit margins (for the Koch
family).
I never said that they did.
Your statement, which is still quoted at the very top of this post >>>>>>>> still: "Hey Birdbrain, those "imports" are paying for your FUCKING >>>>>>>> HEALTHCARE, idiot (what a WASTE)!" There's no question mark, so it >>>>>>>> is a declaration from you, not a question.
So how about it, Tommy: just what point were you trying to make >>>>>>>> when you wrote the above?
FYI, it is quite dumb to claim that excess regulations are what >>>>>>>> have led to high oil prices, rather than it being newfound capital >>>>>>>> discipline of oil companies after they went through multiple years >>>>>>>> of producing too much oil at low prices...ie, "higher profit
margins are good".
Naturally, this was also enabled by Trump when he arm-twisted the >>>>>>>> Saudis to cut OPEC oil production back in April 2020, specifically >>>>>>>> to help out oil producers like Putin.
-hh
LOL! Yes, regulations add cost to businesses - this is Econ 101. But >>>>>>> that is NOT all that Lyin' Biden did.
'Special Report: Trump told Saudi: Cut oil supply or lose U.S. military >>>>>> support - sources'
And, NO, Trump didn't "arm-twist the Saudis" to do anything (Fool, >>>>>>> why are you demanding a reference?).
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUSKBN22C1V4>
'In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin >>>>>> Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries >>>>>> (OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop >>>>>> lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the >>>>>> kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The threat to upend a 75-year strategic alliance, which has not been >>>>>> previously reported, was central to the U.S. pressure campaign that led >>>>>> to a landmark global deal to slash oil supply as demand collapsed in the >>>>>> coronavirus pandemic - scoring a diplomatic victory for the White House. >>>>>>
Trump delivered the message to the crown prince 10 days before the >>>>>> announcement of production cuts. The kingdom’s de facto leader was so >>>>>> taken aback by the threat that he ordered his aides out of the room so >>>>>> he could continue the discussion in private, according to a U.S. source >>>>>> who was briefed on the discussion by senior administration officials.' >>>>>>
Aren't you tired of losing yet.
Hey Fool, do you REALLY believe that bullshit? If so I have a bridge I want to sell you. First, HOW MANY leases existed LAST YEAR? Second, tell me what the difference is between a LEASE and a PERMIT.
As for the alleged "bullshit":
<https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/trump-warned-saudis-to-cut-oil-supply-or-lose-us-military-support-report/>
You love the New York Post most of the time don't you?
Hey Fool, you DIDN'T answer the question.
Do you disagree that there are 9000 places where US oil companies
already have permission to drill that they are not using?
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE and a PERMIT.
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It
demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE and a
PERMIT.
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It
demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual
liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not identical,
but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means that
when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be more than
9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh? /s
-hh
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not identical,
but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means that
when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be more than
9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh? /s
-hh
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:53:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It
demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be
interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual
liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not identical,
but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means that
when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be more than
9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh? /s
-hh
...and, NO, a LEASE IS NOT a PERMIT, Asshole - even a 5th grader would know that.
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:53:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will
be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an
habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not
identical, but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means
that when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be
more than 9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh?
/s
-hh
...and, NO, a LEASE IS NOT a PERMIT, Asshole - even a 5th grader
would know that.
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an
habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.
Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not
identical, but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means that
when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be more than
9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh? /s
-hh
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:53:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will
be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an
habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not
identical, but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means
that when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be
more than 9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh?
/s
-hh
...and, NO, a LEASE IS NOT a PERMIT, Asshole - even a 5th graderThe American Petroleum Institute both accept the numbers above as
would know that.
factual and make no distinction.
You are left pants down holding your dick in in your hand... 3 fingers redundant.
You truly have been shown to be a dishonest demented old fart, Betty.
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 11:07:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:53:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE!
It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between
a LEASE and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it
will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with
his "a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not identical, but why would this distinction attempt matter at
all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting
process without first having obtained the land lease for said
permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it
means that when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must
already be more than 9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ...
eh? /s
-hh
...and, NO, a LEASE IS NOT a PERMIT, Asshole - even a 5th graderThe American Petroleum Institute both accept the numbers above as
would know that.
factual and make no distinction.
You are left pants down holding your dick in in your hand... 3
fingers redundant.
You truly have been shown to be a dishonest demented old fart,
Betty.
That's your IDEA about NEW MATERIAL? You know what they say about
liars like you - you ARE doing what you ACUSE others of doing!!!!!!
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:53:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:50:48 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
LOL! You SAID that they have 9000 permits - this is FALSE! It demonstrates that you don't know the difference between a LEASE
and a PERMIT.
LOL, yes he SAID that because it's TRUE.
The American Petroleum Institute agree it is factual so it will be interesting to see you support your LIE.
Silly me... you rarely support anything... because you are an habitual liar.
You are simply a dishonest, stinky old fart, Betty.Seems like Tommy's trying to introduce a Red Herring here, with his
"a lease isn't a permit" bit. Because of course they're not identical,
but why would this distinction attempt matter at all?
Because no corporation would ever go through the Permitting process
without first having obtained the land lease for said permit.
Thus, because one must always have land for the permit, it means that
when there's 9000+ approved permits, there must already be more than
9000 land leases already in place too.
This is basic Set Theory from 5th Grade that Tommy forgot ... eh? /s
...and, NO, a LEASE IS NOT a PERMIT, Asshole - even a 5th grader would know that.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 24:51:30 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,015 |