...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to Hunter Biden.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
I dare you.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!You can't quote it.
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>> Hunter Biden.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>> Hunter Biden.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!You posted, I responded when I saw it.
How is your response to me different?
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>> Hunter Biden.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop >> belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.You notice it when it happens...
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.You notice it when it happens...
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 3:11:14 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
[... ]
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
Of course there is a pattern, any idiot can see it.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop >>>> belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop >>>>>> belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation."
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop >>>>>> belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
It's here:
From https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html
"People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>>>
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Nope.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Nope.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Nope.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.It's up to you to prove that they did.
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>>>>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
It's up to you to prove that they did.Nope.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
It's up to you to prove that they did.Nope.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.Yes.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:36:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Yes.It's up to you to prove that they did.Nope.LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself. >>>>>>>
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
No Fool, the ORIGINAL POST IS THE PROOF!
On 2022-03-27 6:59 p.m., TomS wrote:the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:36:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
Yes.It's up to you to prove that they did.Nope.LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself. >>>>>>>
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit.
PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
No Fool, the ORIGINAL POST IS THE PROOF!The original post has absolutely no proof that the LAPTOP belonged to
Hunter Biden, and more importantly, the article you claim has an
admission that it was contains no such admission.
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-27 6:59 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:36:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't quote it.
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
The original post has absolutely no proof that the LAPTOP belonged toYes.It's up to you to prove that they did.PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.Nope.LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself. >>>>>>>>>
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit. >>>>>>>
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
No Fool, the ORIGINAL POST IS THE PROOF!
Hunter Biden, and more importantly, the article you claim has an
admission that it was contains no such admission.
PROVE IT!
On 2022-03-27 10:10 p.m., TomS wrote:the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-27 6:59 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:36:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
You can't quote it.On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
The original post has absolutely no proof that the LAPTOP belonged toYes.It's up to you to prove that they did.PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.Nope.LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself. >>>>>>>>>
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit. >>>>>>>
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
No Fool, the ORIGINAL POST IS THE PROOF!
Hunter Biden, and more importantly, the article you claim has an
admission that it was contains no such admission.
PROVE IT!YOU have to prove they did, Sunshine.
An exact quote would do it.
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 11:35:35 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-27 10:10 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 7:19:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-27 6:59 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 9:36:02 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-26 8:04 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:15:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-25 5:13 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 10:20:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-24 9:08 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 9:11:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
You posted, I responded when I saw it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
You can't quote it.On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
YOU have to prove they did, Sunshine.The original post has absolutely no proof that the LAPTOP belonged toYes.It's up to you to prove that they did.PROVE that they DIDN'T, Fool.Nope.LOL! Watch the libtards RUN IN CIRCLES trying to DENY the obvious!! HILARIOUS!!!Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself. >>>>>>>>>>>
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
You claimed that the NYT admitted something they did not admit. >>>>>>>>>
And you can't.
Because they didn't.
:-)
No it isn't, Fool.
YOU made the claim, sunshine.
No Fool, the ORIGINAL POST IS THE PROOF!
Hunter Biden, and more importantly, the article you claim has an
admission that it was contains no such admission.
PROVE IT!
An exact quote would do it.
No BirdBrain, YOU made an assertion - PROVE IT!
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim. >>>>>
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?Really, Liarboy?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's email?
And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the impression that
all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from
or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took place after
he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions
to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or running
for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters
to make a reasoned judgment of the
Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your ownYou posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your
computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts.
I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look
at your garbage.
conduct, got it.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York
Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the
day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined
his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter
Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip
to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be
characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what
he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could
end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper
expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to
dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if
it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited
from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took
place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced
his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to
$640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on
Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a
cell together...
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters
to make a reasoned judgment of the
Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your ownYou posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your
computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts.
I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look
at your garbage.
conduct, got it.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York
Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the
day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined
his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter
Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip
to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be
characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what
he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could
end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper
expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to
dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if
it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited
from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took
place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced
his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to
$640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in onCare to make a wager about that, Sunshine?
Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a
cell together...
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:21:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters
to make a reasoned judgment of the
Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Care to make a wager about that, Sunshine?Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your ownYou posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your
computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts.
I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look
at your garbage.
conduct, got it.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York
Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the
day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined
his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter
Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip
to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be
characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what
he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could
end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper
expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to
dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if
it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited
from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took
place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced
his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to
$640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on
Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a
cell together...
Wager with a LIAR? Surely you are joking, Mr. Feinstein.
On 2022-04-03 9:53 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:21:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters
to make a reasoned judgment of the
Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Care to make a wager about that, Sunshine?Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own >>>>>>>>>>>> conduct, got it.You posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your
computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts.
I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look
at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York
Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the
day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined >>>>>>> his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter
Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip
to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in
the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be
characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what >>>>>>> he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could >>>>>>> end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper
expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to
dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if
it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited >>>> from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took
place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced >>>> his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to
$640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on
Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a
cell together...
Wager with a LIAR? Surely you are joking, Mr. Feinstein.I knew you'd punk.
It's who you are, Sunshine.
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 9:55:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-03 9:53 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:21:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I knew you'd punk.
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters
to make a reasoned judgment of the
Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Care to make a wager about that, Sunshine?Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conduct, got it.You posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your
computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts.
I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look
at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the
day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined >>>>>>>>> his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter
Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip
to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in >>>>>>>>> the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be
characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what >>>>>>>>> he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could >>>>>>>>> end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper
expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to
dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if >>>>>>> it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited >>>>>> from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took
place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced >>>>>> his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to >>>>>> $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on
Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a >>>>> cell together...
Wager with a LIAR? Surely you are joking, Mr. Feinstein.
It's who you are, Sunshine.
You don't know shit, Fool.
On 2022-04-04 9:56 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 9:55:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-03 9:53 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:21:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I knew you'd punk.
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make a reasoned judgment of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Care to make a wager about that, Sunshine?Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conduct, got it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You posted, I responded when I saw it.
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined >>>>>>>>> his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter >>>>>>>>> Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip >>>>>>>>> to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in >>>>>>>>> the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be >>>>>>>>> characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what >>>>>>>>> he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could >>>>>>>>> end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper >>>>>>>>> expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote." >>>>>>>>>
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to >>>>>>> dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if >>>>>>> it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's >>>>>> email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the >>>>>> impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited >>>>>> from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took >>>>>> place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced >>>>>> his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or >>>>>> running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to >>>>>> $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on >>>>> Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a >>>>> cell together...
Wager with a LIAR? Surely you are joking, Mr. Feinstein.
It's who you are, Sunshine.
You don't know shit, Fool.I know you've produced absolutely no quotes that anyone has admitted the laptop in question actually belongs to Hunter Biden.
On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 10:13:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-04 9:56 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 9:55:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I know you've produced absolutely no quotes that anyone has admitted the
On 2022-04-03 9:53 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:21:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I knew you'd punk.
On 2022-04-02 12:23 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 9:38:09 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...although FAR TOO LATE for voters >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make a reasoned judgment of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lyin' Biden crime family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Care to make a wager about that, Sunshine?Hey Fool, you sound like a CORNED RAT! The Feds are closing in on >>>>>>> Hunter BooBoo, with Lyin' Biden close behind. Maybe they can share a >>>>>>> cell together...Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to >>>>>>>>>>>> quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...You notice it when it happens...Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day or night.And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conduct, got it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You posted, I responded when I saw it.
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop: >>>>>>>>>>>
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined >>>>>>>>>>> his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter >>>>>>>>>>> Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip >>>>>>>>>>> to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in >>>>>>>>>>> the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be >>>>>>>>>>> characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what >>>>>>>>>>> he will say and do is out of our hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could >>>>>>>>>>> end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper >>>>>>>>>>> expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote." >>>>>>>>>>>
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to >>>>>>>>> dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if >>>>>>>>> it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's >>>>>>>> email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the >>>>>>>> impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited >>>>>>>> from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took >>>>>>>> place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced >>>>>>>> his intentions to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or >>>>>>>> running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to >>>>>>>> $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration >>>>>>>
Wager with a LIAR? Surely you are joking, Mr. Feinstein.
It's who you are, Sunshine.
You don't know shit, Fool.
laptop in question actually belongs to Hunter Biden.
LOL! Keep up the charade, Fool!!!
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?Really, Liarboy?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's email?
And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the impression that
all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from
or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took place after
he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions
to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or running
for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 12:38:09 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the >>>>>> NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it. >>>>>>>>>>
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's email?
And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the impression that
all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from
or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took place after
he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions
to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or running
for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to $640 MILLION
while actually working in the Trump administration
Deflection. And now the Washington Post has independently verified that the emails are real and Biden's.
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 12:38:09 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?Really, Liarboy?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's email?
And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took place after he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions
to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump administration
Deflection. And now the Washington Post has independently verified that the emails are real and Biden's.
On 2022-04-06 6:03 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 12:38:09 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:It's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you to quote where the
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You notice it when it happens...
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:And yet, you don't apply the same rules to your own conduct, got it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:You posted, I responded when I saw it.
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS wrote:You can't quote it.
...although FAR TOO LATE for voters to make a reasoned judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime family:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
Hunter Biden.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by the Fool!Just when I happened to look in.
But then your reply to me was just as "hair-trigger", right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS before I look at your garbage.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New York Times that the laptop
belonged to Hunter Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your pattern of responses, Fool.
NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the
Really, Liarboy?Which doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptop itself.
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it's not Biden's? Even if it's not Biden's does it matter?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's email?
And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the impression that >> all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from >> or knew details about the transactions with CEFC, which took place after >> he had left the vice presidency and before he announced his intentions
to run for the White House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or running >> for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up to $640 MILLION >> while actually working in the Trump administration
Deflection. And now the Washington Post has independently verified that the emails are real and Biden's.It has verified that SOME of the emails are Biden's, or ALL of them?
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 7:56:01 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Quote the New York Times admitting that the laptop actually belonged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hunter Biden.
On 2022-04-06 6:03 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 12:38:09 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-31 6:14 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 12:11:18 PM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-23 5:59 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2022 at 12:29:22 AM UTC-4, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-20 12:11 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-03-19 5:33 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 3:32:11 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 3:21 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 at 1:11:26 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-19 12:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:53:36 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:31 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at
9:26:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-17 9:21 p.m., TomS
wrote:
...although FAR TOO LATE for
voters to make a reasoned
judgment of the Lyin' Biden crime
family:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/17/the-times-finally-admits-hunter-bidens-laptop-is-real/
If these emails are authentic how did they get on the MacBook if it'sWhich doesn't authenticate ALL the emails OR the laptopIt's been almost exactly 72 hours since I asked you toYou notice it when it happens...And yet, you don't apply the same rules to yourYou posted, I responded when I saw it.You can't quote it.
I dare you.
Fuck you, too!
Got that.
Note the hair-trigger response by theJust when I happened to look in.
Fool!
But then your reply to me was just as
"hair-trigger", right?
:-)
Wrong - I posted, you jumped on it and I
responded. Simple, to everybody BUT a
Fool!
How is your response to me different?
Hey Fool, it shows that you are chained to
your computer waiting to POUNCE on any of our
posts. I, on the other hand, may go DAYS
before I look at your garbage.
own conduct, got it.
Meanwhile, there is no admission from the New
York Times that the laptop belonged to Hunter
Biden.
Same rules, Fool: we all notice how you are just
EAGERLY WAITING for someone to post, ANYTIME of
the day or night.
...and ignore it when it doesn't.
But you ignore it when you do it.
:-)
Meanwhile, you still can't produce anything to
substantiate your claim.
Gee, it's been 18 hours. Irving and I BOTH see your
pattern of responses, Fool.
quote where the NYTimes said the LAPTOP was real...
...and you still haven't been able to.
And the NYT goes on to quote emails from the Biden
laptop:
"In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden
outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the
email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming
announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden
— who is referred to in the email as “my guy,” but not by
name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and
thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our
hands.”
"The announcement “could be a really good thing or it
could end up creating too great an expectation. We need
to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter
Biden wrote."
"Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian
capital, about a week after the email."
and more quotes after this.
itself.
Now the Washington Post was authenticated the emails related
to dealings with a Chinese energy company.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
It has verified that SOME of the emails are Biden's, or ALL ofReally, Liarboy?
You can't imagine where a bad actor could have hacked someone's
email? And wouldn't that be a perfect opportunity to create the
impression that all of the emails found were genuine?
As for the "charges":
'The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally
benefited from or knew details about the transactions with
CEFC, which took place after he had left the vice presidency
and before he announced his intentions to run for the White
House in 2020.'
So what illegality was involved here?
But if Hunter Biden made a few million while Biden wasn't VP or
running for office, you must be livid that Ivanka Trump made up
to $640 MILLION while actually working in the Trump
administration
Deflection. And now the Washington Post has independently
verified that the emails are real and Biden's.
them?
These congenital LIARS are doing what LITTLE diversion they have
available to them: cast whatever MINUTE doubt that exists. They are
the pathetic minions of the far left, as is Lyin' Biden who they put
in power because they had nothing else to offer.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 02:34:02 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,755 |