John Durham's team just cited more evidence Clinton campaign lawyer
Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI General Counsel, in a court filing late Monday (yesterday). I will get to the filing soon.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
"Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary
Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited
anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election. In fact, he was working for the Clinton campaign and another client, prosecutors say."
Then about the text message...
"Jim - it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and
sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or
company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
On 2022-04-05 8:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
John Durham's team just cited more evidence Clinton campaign lawyer
Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI General Counsel, in a court filing late Monday (yesterday). I will get to the filing soon.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
"Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election. In fact, he was working for the Clinton campaign and another client, prosecutors say."
Then about the text message...
"Jim - it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks."How is that about Clinton?
That is literally the only thing that Durham has produced and you are
acting like it's some new revelation.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 12:20:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-05 8:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
John Durham's team just cited more evidence Clinton campaign lawyerHow is that about Clinton?
Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI General Counsel, in a court filing late >>> Monday (yesterday). I will get to the filing soon.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
"Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary
Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not >>> working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited
anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election. In fact, he was >>> working for the Clinton campaign and another client, prosecutors say."
Then about the text message...
"Jim - it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and
sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016,
according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short >>> meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or
company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
That is literally the only thing that Durham has produced and you are
acting like it's some new revelation.
REALLY? Do I REALLY have to answer that STUPID question?? I don't think so...
On 2022-04-07 10:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 12:20:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-05 8:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
John Durham's team just cited more evidence Clinton campaign lawyerHow is that about Clinton?
Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI General Counsel, in a court filing late >>> Monday (yesterday). I will get to the filing soon.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
"Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary
Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not >>> working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited
anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election. In fact, he was >>> working for the Clinton campaign and another client, prosecutors say." >>>
Then about the text message...
"Jim - it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and
sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, >>> according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short >>> meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or
company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
That is literally the only thing that Durham has produced and you are
acting like it's some new revelation.
REALLY? Do I REALLY have to answer that STUPID question?? I don't think so...You can't answer it.
Durham has nothing.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:03:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-07 10:45 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 12:20:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:You can't answer it.
On 2022-04-05 8:58 p.m., TomS wrote:
John Durham's team just cited more evidence Clinton campaign lawyerHow is that about Clinton?
Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI General Counsel, in a court filing late >>>>> Monday (yesterday). I will get to the filing soon.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
"Durham also revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary >>>>> Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not >>>>> working on behalf of any client when he delivered now-discredited
anti-Trump research in the lead-up to the 2016 election. In fact, he was >>>>> working for the Clinton campaign and another client, prosecutors say." >>>>>
Then about the text message...
"Jim - it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and
sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, >>>>> according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short >>>>> meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own - not on behalf of a client or >>>>> company - want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
That is literally the only thing that Durham has produced and you are
acting like it's some new revelation.
REALLY? Do I REALLY have to answer that STUPID question?? I don't think so...
Durham has nothing.
LOL!!! Keep telling yourself that, LOSER!!!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 485 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 130:34:21 |
| Calls: | 9,655 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,705 |
| Messages: | 6,166,483 |