Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
Alan Baker lies, or is grossly incompetent
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
On 2022-04-06 7:33 p.m., -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hhWhat do you want to bet that Tom somehow never sees this reply?
:-)
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
On 2022-04-06 7:33 p.m., -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hhWhat do you want to bet that Tom somehow never sees this reply?
:-)
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
Not for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
That's strange. Nothing has changed. Did you look from the FB search or a search engine? On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:38:46 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-06 7:33 p.m., -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postWhat do you want to bet that Tom somehow never sees this reply?
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >>>> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
:-)
Well, here I am, you lose the bet. Since it did not work for you here is the link I found using Edge/Bing:
https://www.facebook.com/tom.elam.56
I logged out of FB and opened the link in Chrome/Google and Safari/Yahoo. It worked in all.
Here are my FB privacy settings. What's so private about my FB account?
Who can send you friend requests? Friends of friends
Who can see your friends list? Public
Who can look you up using the email address you provided? Everyone
Who can look you up using the phone number you provided? Everyone
Do you want search engines outside of Facebook to link to your profile? Yes
Now, we see each other's FB. Can't wait to see what you dig up and post here.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:38:46 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-06 7:33 p.m., -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postWhat do you want to bet that Tom somehow never sees this reply?
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >>>> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
:-)
I also searched "Tom Elam Facebook" and found this:
Tom Elam - facebook.com https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
Found my wayward Timber with a little help from ESC voltage telemetry. Landed itself in a farm field with a missing prop and spinner. No other damage. I …
Click on my name and it brings up my FB page.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nothing has changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FB
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot
portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance.
BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
-hh
On 2022-04-06 8:37 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:38:46 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-06 7:33 p.m., -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:What do you want to bet that Tom somehow never sees this reply?
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >>>> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
-hh
:-)
I also searched "Tom Elam Facebook" and found this:
Tom Elam - facebook.com https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
Found my wayward Timber with a little help from ESC voltage telemetry. Landed itself in a farm field with a missing prop and spinner. No other damage. I …
Click on my name and it brings up my FB page.Sorry, but you still haven't provided the search results URL.
Why is that, Liarboy? Could it be because you're lying about the entire thing?
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance.
BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FB account when I Googled for my account.Maybe for you, but probably not for others.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse AlanIt’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
-hhWell it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he afraid of anyway?
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard >>>>>>> to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot
portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance.
BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan >>> claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide >>> open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to >> eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he afraid of anyway?
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. >>>>>> But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot >>>> portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since >>>> that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. >>>> BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he afraid of anyway?You've missed the point.
If it is as innocuous as YOU claim to post something because it's "out there"...
...then there's no need for reciprocity.
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 8:34:18 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:That is me on a local RC club site …
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which,
actually, you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies,
right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search
engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first
page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they
subsequently click on, which gets built into the search
algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't
lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged inMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
my FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others
here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does
not excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB
pages hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with
the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission
to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>
You've missed the point.
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it
has to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages
(100 hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work
for anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in
FB's search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the
scope of sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
If it is as innocuous as YOU claim to post something because it's
"out there"...
...then there's no need for reciprocity.
Alan why are you so sensitive to you own words that you have taken no measures to protect from anyone on Facebook? Are you not proud of
what’s on the site? If you now feel it’s not appropriate just take
the words off or change them.
If you want to access my Facebook site go right ahead. I also have a
YouTube channel with 13 videos. Added a new one today in fact. But
that’s about it. My company Website is deleted as is my LinkIn site.
Never been on Twitter, InstaGram, Pinterest, TikTok, Snapchat, etc.
but feel free to go snooping around. That will at least keep you off
Usenet for a few hours. There are a few entries on a Honda hybrid
owners site you might stumble across. See if you are good enough to
find those.
Post away here what you find, but make sure you can supply links to
my stuff, not a different Tom Elam. Remember, I have your home
address and phone number too.
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made
hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find
something in plain sight?
That's me at the top of the list. YMMV. Not much I can do about that.
This is just another one of their lying tricks - the Lyin' Asshole
did it when he CLAIMED that he couldn't find my publications with
Google Scholar.
TomS wrote:
This is just another one of their lying tricks - the Lyin' AssholeOh dear, Betty, you really need to have a clue about what you are
did it when he CLAIMED that he couldn't find my publications with
Google Scholar.
responding to before opening your fat, stupid mouth.
It has been demonstrated that the OP's post was at fault... and he has accepted that.. and there you are opening your fat mouth claiming otherwise...
...and as an habitual liar you have zero credibility and your comments
are extreme hypocrisy.
You truly are just a demented old fart, Betty Boo Hoo!
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 11:34:31 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
This is just another one of their lying tricks - the Lyin' AssholeOh dear, Betty, you really need to have a clue about what you are
did it when he CLAIMED that he couldn't find my publications with
Google Scholar.
responding to before opening your fat, stupid mouth.
It has been demonstrated that the OP's post was at fault... and he has
accepted that.. and there you are opening your fat mouth claiming
otherwise...
...and as an habitual liar you have zero credibility and your comments
are extreme hypocrisy.
You truly are just a demented old fart, Betty Boo Hoo!
--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!
Hey Andy, you are more incoherent than usual. Off your meds, are you?
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually,
you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine
to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page
of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently
click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that
specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead
back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in myMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not
excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages
hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has
to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100
hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for
anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of
sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've
made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to
find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before.
But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom
Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically
remember their users and what links they subsequently click on,
which gets built into the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys)
but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
-hh
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse
Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find.
It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post
own content on FB?
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site explaining how and where I found
an aircraft that flew away after it lost the prop. You can also get
to my FB homepage from there.
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 2:56:52 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. >>>>>>> But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot
portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since
that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. >>>>> BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan >>>> claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide >>>> open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone.
Because tracking cookies, etc.
If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better.
That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
One would think so, but doing it now:
<https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=tom%20elam%20carmel%20indiana>
Top returns are:
People:
Indiana Tom
Lives in Martigues
Tom Indiana
Lives in Flint, Michigan
Antina Tom
Lives in Tortuguitas
Pages:
Tom Elam 174
Page · Athlete · 21 like this
Groups:
Carmel Senior Secondary School, Port Blair
Public group · 1.9K members
Indiana Jones Spoiler Group
Public group · 1.2K members
Indiana Jones: Fan Team
Public group · 729 members
That's a "nope"; screenshot saved, if requested.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal.
Nor have I.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" post
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!Not for me it isn’t.
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FB account when I Googled for my account.Maybe for you, but probably not for others.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse AlanIt’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone.
If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better.
That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal.
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 11:34:31 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
This is just another one of their lying tricks - the Lyin'Oh dear, Betty, you really need to have a clue about what you are responding to before opening your fat, stupid mouth.
Asshole did it when he CLAIMED that he couldn't find my
publications with Google Scholar.
It has been demonstrated that the OP's post was at fault... and he
has accepted that.. and there you are opening your fat mouth
claiming otherwise...
...and as an habitual liar you have zero credibility and your
comments are extreme hypocrisy.
You truly are just a demented old fart, Betty Boo Hoo!
Hey
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually,
you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine
to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page
of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently
click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that
specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead
back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in myMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not
excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages
hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has >> to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100
hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB'sAnd still no apology for calling me a liar.
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of
sites to search. :)
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's heThis isn't about me, Liarboy.
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out
there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
On 2022-04-11 10:32 a.m., -hh wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 2:56:52 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. >>>>>>> But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot >>>>> portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since >>>>> that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. >>>>> BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone.
Because tracking cookies, etc.
If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better.
That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
One would think so, but doing it now:
<https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=tom%20elam%20carmel%20indiana>
Top returns are:
People:
Indiana Tom
Lives in Martigues
Tom Indiana
Lives in Flint, Michigan
Antina Tom
Lives in Tortuguitas
Pages:
Tom Elam 174
Page · Athlete · 21 like this
Groups:
Carmel Senior Secondary School, Port Blair
Public group · 1.9K members
Indiana Jones Spoiler Group
Public group · 1.2K members
Indiana Jones: Fan Team
Public group · 729 members
That's a "nope"; screenshot saved, if requested.I can confirm that.
I can even confirm that if I search for "tom elam", then limit the
search to "People" and then specify "Carmel, Indiana" as the city, the search result is "We didn't find any results".
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal.
Nor have I.Are you sure that matters to Tom?
He seems to feel as long as something is "out there" it's fair game.
He just won't agree that that should be the rule about his own information.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 9:34:30 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:And still no apology for calling me a liar.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually,
you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine
to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page
of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently
click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that
specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead
back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in myMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not
excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages
hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has >>>> to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100
hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for
anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of
sites to search. :)
This isn't about me, Liarboy.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out
there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
That would be because you ARE a liar.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 10:43:57 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-11 10:32 a.m., -hh wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 2:56:52 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:I can confirm that.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. >>>>>>>>> But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot >>>>>>> portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since >>>>>>> that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. >>>>>>> BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link >>>>>>
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits) >>>>> when I did that specific Google search.
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone.
Because tracking cookies, etc.
If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better.
That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
One would think so, but doing it now:
<https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=tom%20elam%20carmel%20indiana>
Top returns are:
People:
Indiana Tom
Lives in Martigues
Tom Indiana
Lives in Flint, Michigan
Antina Tom
Lives in Tortuguitas
Pages:
Tom Elam 174
Page · Athlete · 21 like this
Groups:
Carmel Senior Secondary School, Port Blair
Public group · 1.9K members
Indiana Jones Spoiler Group
Public group · 1.2K members
Indiana Jones: Fan Team
Public group · 729 members
That's a "nope"; screenshot saved, if requested.
I can even confirm that if I search for "tom elam", then limit the
search to "People" and then specify "Carmel, Indiana" as the city, the
search result is "We didn't find any results".
Are you sure that matters to Tom?
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal.
Nor have I.
He seems to feel as long as something is "out there" it's fair game.
He just won't agree that that should be the rule about his own information.
Gee, the Fool knows how to use google after all!!!!
On 2022-04-11 1:12 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 9:34:30 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:And still no apology for calling me a liar.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually,
you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine
to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page
of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently >>>>>> click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that
specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead
back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in myMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not
excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages
hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has
to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100
hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for >>> anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of
sites to search. :)
This isn't about me, Liarboy.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out
there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
That would be because you ARE a liar.Really? What lie have I told?
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:39:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-11 1:12 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 9:34:30 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Really? What lie have I told?
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:And still no apology for calling me a liar.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually,
you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine
to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page
before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page
of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently >>>>>>>> click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that
specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead >>>>>>>> back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in myMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
FB account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not
excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages
hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to
respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this
link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has
to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100
hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for >>>>> anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of >>>>> sites to search. :)
This isn't about me, Liarboy.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out
there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
That would be because you ARE a liar.
Review my past posts, Fool.
On 2022-04-11 10:32 a.m., -hh wrote:
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 2:56:52 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4, thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right?
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page before. >>>>>>> But no luck this time, at least on the first page of Tom Elam’s. >>>>>>>
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines typically remember
their users and what links they subsequently click on, which gets built into
the search algorithm for that specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a headshot >>>>> portrait of you that was on some industry thing (turkeys) but since >>>>> that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my FBMaybe for you, but probably not for others.
account when I Googled for my account.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your clearance. >>>>> BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here.
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not excuse Alan
claiming that I did something to make my FB pages hard to find. It's wide
open. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has to
eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 hits)
when I did that specific Google search.
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for anyone.
Because tracking cookies, etc.
If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's search box it should work better.
That somewhat narrows the scope of sites to search. :)
One would think so, but doing it now:
<https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=tom%20elam%20carmel%20indiana>
Top returns are:
People:
Indiana Tom
Lives in Martigues
Tom Indiana
Lives in Flint, Michigan
Antina Tom
Lives in Tortuguitas
Pages:
Tom Elam 174
Page · Athlete · 21 like this
Groups:
Carmel Senior Secondary School, Port Blair
Public group · 1.9K members
Indiana Jones Spoiler Group
Public group · 1.2K members
Indiana Jones: Fan Team
Public group · 729 members
That's a "nope"; screenshot saved, if requested.
I can confirm that.
I can even confirm that if I search for "tom elam", then limit the
search to "People" and then specify "Carmel, Indiana" as the city, the search result is "We didn't find any results".
On 2022-04-11 8:14 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:39:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-11 1:12 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 9:34:30 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Really? What lie have I told?
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:And still no apology for calling me a liar.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, >>>>>>>>>>> you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right? >>>>>>>>>>>
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine >>>>>>>>>>> to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page >>>>>>>>>> before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page >>>>>>>>>> of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently >>>>>>>> click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that >>>>>>>> specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a
headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead >>>>>>>> back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my >>>>>>>>> FB account when I Googled for my account.Maybe for you, but probably not for others.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your
clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here. >>>>>>>>
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not >>>>>>> excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages >>>>>>> hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact >>>>>>> that I seldom post own content on FB?
Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to >>>>>>> respond in kind.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this >>>>>>> link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has
to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 >>>>>> hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for >>>>> anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of >>>>> sites to search. :)
This isn't about me, Liarboy.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out >>>> there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
That would be because you ARE a liar.
Review my past posts, Fool.It's not my job to prove your claims, Sunshine.
If you can't support your claim, then your claim fails.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 8:30:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-11 8:14 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 4:39:19 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:It's not my job to prove your claims, Sunshine.
On 2022-04-11 1:12 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 9:34:30 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Really? What lie have I told?
On 2022-04-08 11:56 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:39:31 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:And still no apology for calling me a liar.
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 11:04:25 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 6:20:52 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:It’s still potentially a needle in the haystack. See below. >>>>>>>>>
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 11:28:02 PM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 10:33:05 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 9:10:30 AM UTC-4,
thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
Baker quote from the "GD he is ugly" postNot for me it isn’t.
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, >>>>>>>>>>>>> you've made hard to find)..."
Search Google with "thomas elam facebook"
My Facebook is literally the second hit!
You do realize that websites set browser cookies, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
So, which is it? Liar or can't even use a search engine >>>>>>>>>>>>> to find something in plain sight?
I did a FB search too…and I know I’ve found your page >>>>>>>>>>>> before. But no luck this time, at least on the first page >>>>>>>>>>>> of Tom Elam’s.
Let me know if you want a screenshot to document.
That's strange.
Nah, not strange at all: Google & similar search engines
typically remember their users and what links they subsequently >>>>>>>>>> click on, which gets built into the search algorithm for that >>>>>>>>>> specific user.
Nothing has changed.
From Google's perspective, the user changed.
Did you look from the FB search or a search engine?Both, plus on Google I also searched using images. Found a >>>>>>>>>> headshot portrait of you that was on some industry thing
(turkeys) but since that wasn't posted on FB, it wouldn't lead >>>>>>>>>> back to FB.
On my end it may have had to do with me being logged in my >>>>>>>>>>> FB account when I Googled for my account.Maybe for you, but probably not for others.
Anyway, I posted the link.Doesn't answer Alan's question for which he requested your >>>>>>>>>> clearance. BTW, I do not consent to be doxxed by others here. >>>>>>>>>>
Accepted, all Google searches are not equal. It still does not >>>>>>>>> excuse Alan claiming that I did something to make my FB pages >>>>>>>>> hard to find. It's wide open. Maybe it has to do with the fact >>>>>>>>> that I seldom post own content on FB?
Yes I did answer Alan. It's OK as long as I have permission to >>>>>>>>> respond in kind.Sorry, that’s not unconstrained.
If you search Google for tom elam facebook you will find this >>>>>>>>> link
https://www.facebook.com/blacksheeprcmodelers/posts/4900650183321501 >>>>>>>>>
That is me on a local RC club site …
I’m sure thst if I keep on clicking on ‘next page’ on Google it has
to eventually come up, but it wasn’t on the first 10 pages (100 >>>>>>>> hits) when I did that specific Google search.
-hh
Well it was when I did it. My bad for assuming that it would work for >>>>>>> anyone. If you try to finding "tom elam carmel indiana" in FB's
search box it should work better. That somewhat narrows the scope of >>>>>>> sites to search. :)
This isn't about me, Liarboy.
Apparently Alan has not consented to reciprocal. Why? What's he
afraid of anyway?
This is about you wanting one set of rules for yourself ("if it's out >>>>>> there, I'm free to post it")...
...but not wanting that rule to apply to you.
That would be because you ARE a liar.
Review my past posts, Fool.
If you can't support your claim, then your claim fails.
Nor is it my job to prove your LIES, Fool!
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-07 8:18 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 12:28:17 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And if I search Facebook for "Alan Baker", my profile is at the top of
On 2022-04-06 8:37 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
Click on my name and it brings up my FB page.Sorry, but you still haven't provided the search results URL.
Why is that, Liarboy? Could it be because you're lying about the
entire thing?
No Alan, here is a search result I see from "tom elam facebook":
"Elam Tom Profiles | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/public/Elam-Tom View the profiles of people
named Elam Tom. Join Facebook to connect with Elam Tom and others you
may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and.."
Note that the link will show public FB results for the given search
phrase.
When I click on this next link I see results that you can also see on
by clicking on this uploaded screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11fL32HpUcI6nGhuCPylq52PE-Z7yiTxO/view?usp=sharing
That's me at the top of the list. YMMV. Not much I can do about
that.
the list.
Do you suppose that Facebook's search system takes into account WHO is
doing the search?
And I find it interesting that you omitted the URL at the top of your
screenshot.
Why was that exactly?
Have you apologized for claiming that I lied? No.
So, my FB account is not hidden, it's there for you to find and look
over at your leisure. If you can't find it that's your problem.
So please apologize for falsely claiming that I have made my FB
presence hard to find and that I presented a false search result.
Did I ever actually claim that you had done anything to make your
profile hard to find? No.
Liar. In the GD he is ugly thread in response to me you said:
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
But then again, out of over 300,000 posts you probably can't keep your facts straight. What else are you lying about?
On 2022-04-12 4:38 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
Did I ever actually claim that you had done anything to make your
profile hard to find? No.
Liar. In the GD he is ugly thread in response to me you said:
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made
hard to find)..."
So I'll apologize for calling you a liar.
Now... ...will you do the same?
Of course not.
Because you're a dick.
On 2022-04-12 4:38 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:51 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-07 8:18 a.m., Tom Elam wrote:
On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 12:28:17 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And if I search Facebook for "Alan Baker", my profile is at the top of
On 2022-04-06 8:37 p.m., Tom Elam wrote:
Click on my name and it brings up my FB page.Sorry, but you still haven't provided the search results URL.
Why is that, Liarboy? Could it be because you're lying about the
entire thing?
No Alan, here is a search result I see from "tom elam facebook":
"Elam Tom Profiles | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/public/Elam-Tom View the profiles of people
named Elam Tom. Join Facebook to connect with Elam Tom and others you
may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and.."
Note that the link will show public FB results for the given search
phrase.
When I click on this next link I see results that you can also see on
by clicking on this uploaded screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11fL32HpUcI6nGhuCPylq52PE-Z7yiTxO/view?usp=sharing
That's me at the top of the list. YMMV. Not much I can do about
that.
the list.
Do you suppose that Facebook's search system takes into account WHO is
doing the search?
And I find it interesting that you omitted the URL at the top of your
screenshot.
Why was that exactly?
Have you apologized for claiming that I lied? No.
So, my FB account is not hidden, it's there for you to find and look
over at your leisure. If you can't find it that's your problem.
So please apologize for falsely claiming that I have made my FB
presence hard to find and that I presented a false search result.
Did I ever actually claim that you had done anything to make your
profile hard to find? No.
Liar. In the GD he is ugly thread in response to me you said:
"And if I were to find your Facebook (which, actually, you've made hard
to find)..."
But then again, out of over 300,000 posts you probably can't keep your facts straight. What else are you lying about?So I'll apologize for calling you a liar.
Now... ...will you do the same?
Of course not.
Because you're a dick.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 489 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 39:16:44 |
| Calls: | 9,669 |
| Files: | 13,716 |
| Messages: | 6,169,624 |