Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
-- https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
-- https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
On 2022-06-01 12:20 p.m., Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
-- https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.And his trial was all over this newsgroup...
...but you didn't make the same remarks about that, did you?
:-)
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not GuiltyLOL! This has been all over the news.
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
-- https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.Is that Betty I hear crying?
--
Bozo bin
Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
George R (transgender nymshifter)
Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
Enjoy!
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
Is that Betty I hear crying?LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.
--
Bozo bin
Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
George R (transgender nymshifter)
Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
Enjoy!
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied, but so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.Is that Betty I hear crying?
--No, he WASN'T "found innocent."
Bozo bin
Amos P (transgender nymshifter)
Jerry C. (same attention seeking nymshifter)
Michael P. (transgender nymshifter)
Felicity (transgender nymshifter)
George R (transgender nymshifter)
Irving S (transgender nymshifter)
Enjoy!
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hi llary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.Is that Betty I hear crying?
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied, but
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robber
tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the bank
wasn't harmed would get the response it deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE
GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror whose
WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce bowser
wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hi llary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Lol. I was right. Hilarious.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied, butNo it wasn't.
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robber
tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE
GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror whosehe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized that
WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of those judges
he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:Lol. I was right. Hilarious.
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty NY1
News - May 26, 2022 --
Is that Betty I hear crying?LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied,
but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robberhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the
bank wasn't harmed would get the response it deserves: FUCK NO,
YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror
whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of those
judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS will love
reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was EXACTLY
what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting as a
private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial was
riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the "DC Swamp"
- here as an excellent article that explains the depth of the
corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022
--
https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-o
f-hi llary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Lol. I was right. Hilarious.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied,No it wasn't.
but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robber
tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the
bank wasn't harmed would get the response it deserves: FUCK NO,
YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a jurorhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized that
whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of those
judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS will love
reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was EXACTLY
what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting as a
private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial was
riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the "DC Swamp"
- here as an excellent article that explains the depth of the
corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:Lol. I was right. Hilarious.
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty NY1
News - May 26, 2022 --
Is that Betty I hear crying?LOL! This has been all over the news.
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I lied,
but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bank robberhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a defense that the
bank wasn't harmed would get the response it deserves: FUCK NO,
YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a juror
whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of those
judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS will love
reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was EXACTLYFrom "spectatorworld"?
what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting as a
private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial was
riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the "DC Swamp"
- here as an excellent article that explains the depth of the
corrupton: https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:45:31 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:LOL! This has been all over the news.
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022 --
From "spectatorworld"?Lol. I was right. Hilarious.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I
lied, but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bankhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a
defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a
juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of
those judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS
will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was
EXACTLY what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting
as a private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial
was riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the
"DC Swamp" - here as an excellent article that explains the depth
of the corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that
capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! Found "not guilty" by a bunch of HARD-CORE DIMS!!! Did you even
bother to read the article? Probably not, so here is an excerpt:
He not only seated three donors to Clinton, he seated another who
donated to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. AOC may not have been a friend
of Hillary’s but she was even more staunchly opposed to Trump. All
four of those potential jurors should have been excluded.
On 2022-06-05 12:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:45:31 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:LOL! This has been all over the news.
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022 --
From "spectatorworld"?Lol. I was right. Hilarious.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I
lied, but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bankhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a
defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a
juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of
those judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS
will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was
EXACTLY what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting
as a private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial
was riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the
"DC Swamp" - here as an excellent article that explains the depth
of the corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that
capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! Found "not guilty" by a bunch of HARD-CORE DIMS!!! Did you even bother to read the article? Probably not, so here is an excerpt:
He not only seated three donors to Clinton, he seated another whoAnd the prosecution had the opportunity to ask they be excluded.
donated to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. AOC may not have been a friend
of Hillary’s but she was even more staunchly opposed to Trump. All
four of those potential jurors should have been excluded.
Did they ask?
How many Trump/Republican donors were empanelled? Do you know or even care? E
And you DO know that jury verdicts are unanimous, right? https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_jun06
The result of this wasn't a hung jury. It was a verdict of not guilty,
so all the jurors voted that.
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:00:16 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-05 12:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:45:31 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:LOL! This has been all over the news.
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022 --
From "spectatorworld"?Lol. I was right. Hilarious.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I
lied, but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bankhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a
defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a
juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of
those judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS
will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was
EXACTLY what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting
as a private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial
was riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the
"DC Swamp" - here as an excellent article that explains the depth
of the corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
And the prosecution had the opportunity to ask they be excluded.
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that
capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! Found "not guilty" by a bunch of HARD-CORE DIMS!!! Did you even
bother to read the article? Probably not, so here is an excerpt:
He not only seated three donors to Clinton, he seated another who
donated to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. AOC may not have been a friend
of Hillary’s but she was even more staunchly opposed to Trump. All
four of those potential jurors should have been excluded.
Did they ask?
Oh, YES!
How many Trump/Republican donors were empanelled? Do you know or even care? E
NONE.
And you DO know that jury verdicts are unanimous, right? https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_jun06
LOL! Do YOU know that not all verdicts require a unanimous vote.
The result of this wasn't a hung jury. It was a verdict of not guilty,
so all the jurors voted that.
Putting on an unfair trial, which this was, invalidates the verdict from that trial. Unfortunately, only the defense can request a new trial for this reason.
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:00:16 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-05 12:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:45:31 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hi llary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end >>>>>>>>
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving S
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022 --
acting >>> as a private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." TheLol. I was right. Hilarious.LOL! This has been all over the news.
Is that Betty I hear crying?
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I
lied, but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bankhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a
defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a
juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of
those judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS
will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was
EXACTLY what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was
entire trial >>> was riddled with the bias and corruption that
Trump called the >>> "DC Swamp" - here as an excellent article that explains the depth >>> of the corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
From "spectatorworld"?
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that
capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! Found "not guilty" by a bunch of HARD-CORE DIMS!!! Did you
even bother to read the article? Probably not, so here is an
excerpt:
He not only seated three donors to Clinton, he seated another whoAnd the prosecution had the opportunity to ask they be excluded.
donated to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. AOC may not have been a
friend of Hillary’s but she was even more staunchly opposed to
Trump. All four of those potential jurors should have been
excluded.
Did they ask?
Oh, YES!
How many Trump/Republican donors were empanelled? Do you know or
even care? E
NONE.
And you DO know that jury verdicts are unanimous, right?
LOL! Do YOU know that not all verdicts require a unanimous vote.
The result of this wasn't a hung jury. It was a verdict of not
guilty, so all the jurors voted that.
Putting on an unfair trial, which this was, invalidates the verdict
from that trial. Unfortunately, only the defense can request a new
trial for this reason.
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:00:16 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
And you DO know that jury verdicts are unanimous, right? https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_jun06
LOL! Do YOU know that not all verdicts require a unanimous vote.
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 3:00:16 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-06-05 12:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 10:45:31 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:LOL! This has been all over the news.
On 2022-06-05 10:42 a.m., TomS wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 1:57:03 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
TomS wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 2:00:13 PM UTC-7, Bigbird
wrote:
bruce bowser wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 3:20:07 PM UTC-4, Irving Shttps://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2022/05/26/trial-of-hillary-clinton-lawyer-accused-of-lying-to-fbi-nears-end
wrote:
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:53:15 AM UTC-4, bruce
bowser wrote:
Jury finds Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann Not Guilty
NY1 News - May 26, 2022 --
From "spectatorworld"?Lol. I was right. Hilarious.Is that Betty I hear crying?
Get ready to hear a lot more.
No it wasn't.
No, he WASN'T "found innocent." In fact, his defense was "I
lied, but
You've been caught lying again, Betty.
so what, it didn't affect the FBI at all." Now, if a bankhe "told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized
robber tries to rob a bank, but leaves empty handed, a
defense that the bank wasn't harmed would get the response it
deserves: FUCK NO, YOU'RE GUILTY!"
Really, what did you expect from a jury that included a
juror whose WIFE was a BIG DONOR of Shrillary?
that with their unanimous verdict today."
I also note Trump's response claiming or admitting many of
those judges he put in place are partisan and corrupt. SCOTUS
will love reading that.
“Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are
highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.”
Bowser Wowser titled this thread "Clinton lawyer" which was
EXACTLY what the trial was about - Sussmann claimed he was acting
as a private citizen, NOT as a "Clinton lawyer." The entire trial
was riddled with the bias and corruption that Trump called the
"DC Swamp" - here as an excellent article that explains the depth
of the corrupton:
https://spectatorworld.com/topic/stench-from-the-sussmann-verdict/
Really, Sunshine?
But the trial was about whether or not he was acting in that
capacity...
...WHEN HE INFORMED THE FBI OF SOMETHING SUSPICIOUS.
And he wasn't found guilty, was he?
In your country the the saying is:
"[what] until proven guilty", Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! Found "not guilty" by a bunch of HARD-CORE DIMS!!! Did you even bother to read the article? Probably not, so here is an excerpt:
He not only seated three donors to Clinton, he seated another who donated to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. AOC may not have been a friendAnd the prosecution had the opportunity to ask they be excluded.
of Hillary’s but she was even more staunchly opposed to Trump. All four of those potential jurors should have been excluded.
Did they ask?Oh, YES!
How many Trump/Republican donors were empanelled? Do you know or even care? E
NONE.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 26:04:07 |
| Calls: | 9,829 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 13,761 |
| Messages: | 6,192,123 |