So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs >>>> and airways already rebreathe air...
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>>>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>>>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. >>>> Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" >>>> very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, >>>> you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right? >>>>
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of
doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored
by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or
research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on
COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each
county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and
October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the
counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He
further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through
a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in >> one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory >> tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even
the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an
effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any
disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.'
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs >> and airways already rebreathe air...
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. >> Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" >> very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, >> you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right? >>
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of
doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored
by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and
October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through
a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even
the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.'
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs >>>> and airways already rebreathe air...
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>>>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>>>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>> the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right? >>>>
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of
doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored
by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or >> research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on
COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each >> county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and
October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through >> a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even >> the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an >> effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.'
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
And that's your admission of defeat...
...right on schedule!
:-)
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:enough, we need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win many!
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 4:56:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And that's your admission of defeat...
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs >>>>>> and airways already rebreathe air...
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>>>>>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>>>>>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>>>> the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. >>>>>> Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" >>>>>> very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, >>>>>> you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right? >>>>>>
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of
doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored >>>> by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or >>>> research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on
COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each >>>> county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and
October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >>>> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >>>> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through >>>> a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even >>>> the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an >>>> effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >>>> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.'
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
...right on schedule!
:-)
What a dick - boosters are a waste of time and money; the virus has long ago mutated to the point they are worthless.
On 2022-07-18 21:15, TomS wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 4:56:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And that's your admission of defeat...
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of >>>>>>> compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same >>>>>>> liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further >>>>>>> destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>>>> the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the >>>>>> additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of >>>> doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored >>>> by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or
research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on >>>> COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each
county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and >>>> October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >>>> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >>>> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through
a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even
the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an
effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >>>> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.' >>>>
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
...right on schedule!
:-)
What a dick - boosters are a waste of time and money; the virus has long ago mutated to the point they are worthless.And your qualifications to make that determination are...
...what, exactly?
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:enough, we need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win many!
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs >> and airways already rebreathe air...
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of
compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same
liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it.
These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are
done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts
their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your
own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further
destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying.
No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care
so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to
the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation. >> Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the
additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose
and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think" >> very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean, >> you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right? >>
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are you?
:-)
On 2022-07-18 21:15, TomS wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 4:56:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And that's your admission of defeat...
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of >>>>>>> compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same >>>>>>> liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further >>>>>>> destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>>>> the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the >>>>>> additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of >>>> doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored >>>> by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or
research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on >>>> COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each
county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and >>>> October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >>>> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >>>> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through
a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even
the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an
effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >>>> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.' >>>>
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
...right on schedule!
:-)
What a dick - boosters are a waste of time and money; the virus has long ago mutated to the point they are worthless.And your qualifications to make that determination are...
...what, exactly?
On 2022-07-18 21:15, TomS wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 4:56:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And that's your admission of defeat...
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of >>>>>>> compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same >>>>>>> liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries,
when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further >>>>>>> destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years.
Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>>>> the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the >>>>>> additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of >>>> doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored >>>> by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or
research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on >>>> COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each
county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and >>>> October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >>>> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >>>> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through
a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even
the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an
effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >>>> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.' >>>>
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
...right on schedule!
:-)
What a dick - boosters are a waste of time and money; the virus has long ago mutated to the point they are worthless.And your qualifications to make that determination are...
...what, exactly?
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level
of compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or
spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to
the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your
immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for
the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around
a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win
many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause
ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:42:56 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 21:15, TomS wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 4:56:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And your qualifications to make that determination are...
On 2022-07-18 16:54, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:41:35 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:And that's your admission of defeat...
On 2022-07-18 14:04, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nothing to say about this one?
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level of >>>>>>>>> compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that our lungs
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the same >>>>>>>>> liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or spread it. >>>>>>>>> These are the same liars that deny all the side affects and injuries, >>>>>>>>> when each day we hear more and more to the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the boosters are >>>>>>>>> done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as endemic. No one trusts >>>>>>>>> their "science" is is BS. Free country, feel free to rebreathe your >>>>>>>>> own germs with a worthless paper mask, and feel free to further >>>>>>>>> destroy your immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. >>>>>>>>> Go for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of lying. >>>>>>>>> No profit motives here, the only motive is public health, they care >>>>>>>>> so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's did, marching the Jews to >>>>>>>>> the "shower houses".
and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal exhalation.
Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify the >>>>>>>> additional volume of air that is retained between your mouth and nose >>>>>>>> and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
:-)
Sorry, but I specifically ask for you to explain it.
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm using "think"
very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your immune system"? I mean,
you're college-educated (or so you claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
It is black and white here. Being a college dropout, it might be beyond your comprehension, but give it a try. The mask is garbage, and folks that wear them are imbeciles.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
So we'll just take that as read that you're not actually capable of >>>>>> doing so.
So I'm sure you'll be unable to understand the expression:
"Correlation is not causation."
'The second study, published in Medicine in February 2022, is authored >>>>>> by Zacharias Foegen, who didn’t list any affiliation to a university or
research center. This study evaluated the effect of mask mandates on >>>>>> COVID-19 fatality rates in the U.S. state of Kansas—which allowed each >>>>>> county to implement or opt out of mask mandates—between August and >>>>>> October 2020.
Foegen concluded that mask mandates caused about 50% more deaths in the >>>>>> counties that implemented their use compared to those that didn’t. He >>>>>> further hypothesized that face masks caused more severe COVID-19 through >>>>>> a mechanism that he called “the Foegen effect”, by which “breathing in
one’s own virions” causes them to spread “deeper into the respiratory
tract”. But he offered no evidence demonstrating the existence or even >>>>>> the plausibility of this mechanism. Indeed, Foegen conceded that such an >>>>>> effect has never been demonstrated in the scientific literature for any >>>>>> disease. So at this stage, this is a purely speculative supposition.' >>>>>>
<https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/scientific-evidence-shows-mask-wearing-effective-at-limiting-community-transmission-claims-face-masks-increase-mortality-based-on-flawed-correlation-studies/>
"purely speculative supposition" is not science.
dude, your combover is epic. That is not speculative, that is not science. A picture says it all.
...right on schedule!
:-)
What a dick - boosters are a waste of time and money; the virus has long ago mutated to the point they are worthless.
...what, exactly?
And your qualifications to dispute?
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level
of compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or
spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to
the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your
immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause
ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.LOL
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level
of compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or
spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to
the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your
immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for
the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around
a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win
many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publicationBecause "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause
ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level
of compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or
spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to
the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your
immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for
the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around
a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win
many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause
ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:LOL
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level >>>>>>>>> of compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or >>>>>>>>> spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to >>>>>>>>> the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your >>>>>>>> immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>>>
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause >>>>> ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
Count the money...
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward heBeing college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level
of compliance with mandates and social distancing.
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or
spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to
the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your
immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause
ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.LOL
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:LOL
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level >>>>>>>>> of compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the
same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or >>>>>>>>> spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side
affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to >>>>>>>>> the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your
immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go
for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of
lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's
did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal
exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25
ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify
the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your >>>>>>>> immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect
nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we
need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>>>
argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and
B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause >>>>> ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not
least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce
and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic
to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made it up? LOL!
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.
Be happy to provide the exact source...
On 2022-07-19 14:23, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:LOL
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed"
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational >>>>>> argument...
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level >>>>>>>>> of compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that >>>>>>>> our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the >>>>>>>>> same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or >>>>>>>>> spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side >>>>>>>>> affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to >>>>>>>>> the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your >>>>>>>>> immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go >>>>>>>>> for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of >>>>>>>>> lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public
health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's >>>>>>>>> did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal >>>>>>>> exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 >>>>>>>> ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify >>>>>>>> the additional volume of air that is retained between your
mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm
using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your >>>>>>>> immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you
claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect >>>>>>> nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we >>>>>>> need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>>>
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are
you?
:-)
From a respected publication
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and >>>>> B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause >>>>> ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not >>>>> least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce >>>>> and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic >>>>> to the human body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made it up? LOL!Nope. I don't think that at all.,
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.What was the name of this journal?
Be happy to provide the exact source...
If that were true, you'd already have done so.
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 5:49:40 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 14:23, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Nope. I don't think that at all.,
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:LOL
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed" >>>>>>>
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational >>>>>>>> argument...
On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level >>>>>>>>>>> of compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that >>>>>>>>>> our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the >>>>>>>>>>> same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or >>>>>>>>>>> spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side >>>>>>>>>>> affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to >>>>>>>>>>> the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the
boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as
endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free
country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a
worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your >>>>>>>>>>> immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go >>>>>>>>>>> for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of >>>>>>>>>>> lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public >>>>>>>>>>> health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's >>>>>>>>>>> did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal >>>>>>>>>> exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 >>>>>>>>>> ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify >>>>>>>>>> the additional volume of air that is retained between your >>>>>>>>>> mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm >>>>>>>>>> using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your >>>>>>>>>> immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you >>>>>>>>>> claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect >>>>>>>>> nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>>>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>>>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we >>>>>>>>> need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>>>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>>>>>
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are >>>>>>>> you?
:-)
From a respected publication
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and >>>>>>> B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause >>>>>>> ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not >>>>>>> least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce >>>>>>> and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic >>>>>>> to the human body."It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made it up? LOL!
What was the name of this journal?
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.
Be happy to provide the exact source...
If that were true, you'd already have done so.
You silly old troll. I am waiting for that video.
On 2022-07-21 11:40, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 5:49:40 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-19 14:23, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 2:00:38 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:What was the name of this journal?
On 2022-07-19 10:51, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:LOL
On 2022-07-19 01:55, Irving S wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 12:41:16 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:Because "respected publications" use the phrase "multiply-jabbed" >>>>>>>
On 2022-07-18 14:28, Irving S wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2022 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-07-18 11:38, Irving S wrote:Dude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a rational >>>>>>>> argument...
So the dick says he is so disappointed that going forward he >>>>>>>>>>> anticipates fewer vaxes, less masks, and a general low level >>>>>>>>>>> of compliance with mandates and social distancing.Being college-educated (or so you claim), you do realize that >>>>>>>>>> our lungs and airways already rebreathe air...
My friends, this means people are waking up. These are the >>>>>>>>>>> same liars that said take the jab, you will NOT get Covid or >>>>>>>>>>> spread it. These are the same liars that deny all the side >>>>>>>>>>> affects and injuries, when each day we hear more and more to >>>>>>>>>>> the contrary.
Except for a few retard sheep, the masks are done, the >>>>>>>>>>> boosters are done, the whole thing is done. Treat it as >>>>>>>>>>> endemic. No one trusts their "science" is is BS. Free >>>>>>>>>>> country, feel free to rebreathe your own germs with a >>>>>>>>>>> worthless paper mask, and feel free to further destroy your >>>>>>>>>>> immune system with the forth or fifth shot in two years. Go >>>>>>>>>>> for it, they always tell the truth , they are incapable of >>>>>>>>>>> lying. No profit motives here, the only motive is public >>>>>>>>>>> health, they care so much. Yea, they care, like the Nazi's >>>>>>>>>>> did, marching the Jews to the "shower houses".
...right?
'Residual Volume(RV)
It is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximal >>>>>>>>>> exhalation. Normal adult value is averaged at 1200ml(20‐25 >>>>>>>>>> ml/kg)'
<https://www.physio-pedia.com/Lung_Volumes>
So, as a college-educated (or so you claim), can you quantify >>>>>>>>>> the additional volume of air that is retained between your >>>>>>>>>> mouth and nose and a face mask?
It should be easy for you, right?
:-)
And while you're at it, can you explain why you think (I'm >>>>>>>>>> using "think" very loosely here) a vaccine would "destroy your >>>>>>>>>> immune system"? I mean, you're college-educated (or so you >>>>>>>>>> claim), so it should be easy, right?
:-)
Of course in your world everything here is BS . I would expect >>>>>>>>> nothing different from you! Be sure to get your place in line for >>>>>>>>> the next round of boosters. You funny old man, we need you around >>>>>>>>> a long time. Hundreds of thousands of posts is not enough, we >>>>>>>>> need millions. Plus, all the waces to be won, I know you will win >>>>>>>>> many!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/death-by-vaccine/ >>>>>>>>
...but then, you're not actually interested in "rational", are >>>>>>>> you?
:-)
From a respected publication
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed their T-cells and >>>>>>> B-cells. The non-neutralizing antibodies multiple jabs produce cause >>>>>>> ADE, which facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but not >>>>>>> least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes the body to produce >>>>>>> and the lipid nanoparticles encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic >>>>>>> to the human body."It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made it up? LOL! >> Nope. I don't think that at all.,
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.
Be happy to provide the exact source...
If that were true, you'd already have done so.
You silly old troll. I am waiting for that video.You're making excuses...
...as always.
You're making excuses...Nope. I don't think that at all.,LOLBecause "respected publications" use the phraseDude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a
rational argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in
"rational", are you?
:-)
From a respected publication
"multiply-jabbed"
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed
their T-cells and B-cells. The non-neutralizing
antibodies multiple jabs produce cause ADE, which
facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but
not least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes
the body to produce and the lipid nanoparticles
encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic to the human
body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made
it up? LOL!
What was the name of this journal?
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She
works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.
Be happy to provide the exact source...
If that were true, you'd already have done so.
You silly old troll. I am waiting for that video.
...as always.
Silly old man, WHATEVER!!!! No one cares what some aging troll with
a very obvious combover thinks. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!! WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL! You are hilarious dude. Great work, as predictable as the sun
will rise, and as well trained as a barking seal. Bet Chris was
proud!
On 2022-07-21 12:00, Irving S wrote:
You're making excuses...Nope. I don't think that at all.,LOLBecause "respected publications" use the phraseDude... ...pick a rational source if you want to have a >>>>>>>>>> rational argument...
...but then, you're not actually interested in
"rational", are you?
:-)
From a respected publication
"multiply-jabbed"
It was "Moderate" who would post a link...
"The multiply-jabbed have irremediably suppressed
their T-cells and B-cells. The non-neutralizing
antibodies multiple jabs produce cause ADE, which
facilitates infection with Covid-19. And, last but
not least, both the spike proteins the mRNA causes
the body to produce and the lipid nanoparticles
encasing the mRNA are exceedingly toxic to the human
body."
...or a quote...
...but never both.
What's your "respected publication"?
Why are you (obviously) afraid to say?
I will tell you what Grandpa.
You lose... ...again.
What's your "respected publication", hmmm?
What is most hilarious is that you think I wrote this? Made
it up? LOL!
What was the name of this journal?
No, it was in a medical journal that my daughter gave me. She
works in a local ER, and the staff was passing it around.
Be happy to provide the exact source...
If that were true, you'd already have done so.
You silly old troll. I am waiting for that video.
...as always.
Silly old man, WHATEVER!!!! No one cares what some aging troll with
a very obvious combover thinks. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!! WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL! You are hilarious dude. Great work, as predictable as the sunWow... ...7 minutes.
will rise, and as well trained as a barking seal. Bet Chris was
proud!
'Oh, and kudos to you old man for responding so quick I log on, and
you are there like a flash. Good to know you are always out there
lurking, like a bad rash that never seems to go away.'
:-)
But now that you've proven that when you have an actual source, you will provide it, we all know you've got nothing here.
:-)
Now, did my reply take long enough?
:-)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 04:03:29 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,779 |