https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the future holds.
Don't like it, move to Canada!
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the future holds.
Don't like it, move to Canada!'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of supporting
police departments throughout the country and fostering a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave our police alone. Let
them do their job. Give them back their RESPECT. They know what to do.
We have to allow them to do it,” Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to do
nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s
policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk policies
in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering
a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our
police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave
our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,”
Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to
do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s
policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken
from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun,
you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals- trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what
the future holds.
Don't like it, move to Canada!'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of supporting
police departments throughout the country and fostering a culture
that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our police back
their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave our police
alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their RESPECT. They
know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,” Trump’s plan
said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to do
nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s
policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken
from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
future holds.
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering
a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our
police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave
our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,”
Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to
do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s
policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken
from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun,
you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law.
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 7:38:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
future holds.
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering
a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our
police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave
our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,”
Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to
do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law.
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s
policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken
from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun,
you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
And you know that how?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the future holds.
Don't like it, move to Canada!
Great ideas by Trump
On 2022-07-30 19:59, TomS wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 7:38:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
future holds.
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering
a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our
police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave
our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,”
Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to
do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law.
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s >>>> policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken
from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, >>>> you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
And you know that how?Because I actually know what "stop and frisk" was as a policy.
If a police officer actually SEES someone breaking the law, they don't
NEED the "stop and frisk" policy, because they can legitimately detain and/or arrest someone if they've seen a crime being committed.
Stop and frisk was used to stop people who actually had NOT been seen committing a crime. The standard for "Terry stops" (as they were known
due to the USSC case that allowed them) was "reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity".
So...
...as usual...
...you haven't the faintest CLUE what you're talking about.
:-)
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:26:08 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-30 19:59, TomS wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 7:38:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Because I actually know what "stop and frisk" was as a policy.
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:And you know that how?
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
future holds.
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering >>>>>> a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our
police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave >>>>>> our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,”
Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to
do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law. >>>
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s >>>>>> policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk
policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken >>>>>> from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, >>>>>> you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when
cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of
them is not "unreasonable."
If a police officer actually SEES someone breaking the law, they don't
NEED the "stop and frisk" policy, because they can legitimately detain
and/or arrest someone if they've seen a crime being committed.
Stop and frisk was used to stop people who actually had NOT been seen
committing a crime. The standard for "Terry stops" (as they were known
due to the USSC case that allowed them) was "reasonable suspicion of
involvement in criminal activity".
So...
...as usual...
...you haven't the faintest CLUE what you're talking about.
:-)
CONGRATULATIONS! You posted the standard all by yourself: "reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity".
Local cops are VERY familiar with the activities of the local hoods.
On 2022-08-04 17:27, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:26:08 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-07-30 19:59, TomS wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 7:38:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Because I actually know what "stop and frisk" was as a policy.
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:And you know that how?
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the >>>> future holds.
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering >>>>>> a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our >>>>>> police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave >>>>>> our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,” >>>>>> Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to >>>>>> do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law. >>>
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s >>>>>> policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk >>>>>> policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken >>>>>> from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, >>>>>> you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when >>>>> cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of >>>>> them is not "unreasonable."
If a police officer actually SEES someone breaking the law, they don't
NEED the "stop and frisk" policy, because they can legitimately detain
and/or arrest someone if they've seen a crime being committed.
Stop and frisk was used to stop people who actually had NOT been seen
committing a crime. The standard for "Terry stops" (as they were known
due to the USSC case that allowed them) was "reasonable suspicion of
involvement in criminal activity".
So...
...as usual...
...you haven't the faintest CLUE what you're talking about.
:-)
CONGRATULATIONS! You posted the standard all by yourself: "reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity".The "reasonable suspicion" standard only applies if there suspicion of a SPECIFIC crime that has either happened recently or is about to happen.
Local cops are VERY familiar with the activities of the local hoods.
It cannot be based on "I know he's a hood and has done crimes in the past".
On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 12:08:47 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-04 17:27, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 10:26:08 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:The "reasonable suspicion" standard only applies if there suspicion of a
On 2022-07-30 19:59, TomS wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 7:38:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Because I actually know what "stop and frisk" was as a policy.
On 2022-07-29 17:46, TomS wrote:And you know that how?
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 8:22:32 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Enjoy the last few months, you progressive cretins. This is what the >>>>>> future holds.
On 2022-07-27 14:54, Irving S wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/27/42-policy-proposals-trump-outlined-at-america-first-summit-in-dc/
'The prepared remarks first emphasized the importance of
Don't like it, move to Canada!
supporting police departments throughout the country and fostering >>>>>>>> a culture that respects law enforcement. “We have to give our >>>>>>>> police back their authority, resources, power, and prestige. Leave >>>>>>>> our police alone. Let them do their job. Give them back their
RESPECT. They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it,” >>>>>>>> Trump’s plan said. '
We have to "allow them" to assemble about 300 police officers to >>>>>>>> do nothing while an active shooter is killing children?
Is that what he means?
Nothing Trump said even remotely comes close to this, Fool.
"They know what to do. We have to allow them to do it"
"stop and frisk" has nothing to do with seeing anyone breaking the law. >>>>>
'On top of giving officers the tools they need to succeed, Trump’s >>>>>>>> policy proposal called for the restitution of “stop-and-frisk >>>>>>>> policies in cities,” adding that it is imperative guns are taken >>>>>>>> from criminals. “If you are a convicted felon and you have a gun, >>>>>>>> you’re off the streets,” the proposal asserts. '
So no 4th Amendment protections. Got it.
The Fourth Amendment protects against "unreasonable" searches; when >>>>>>> cops see the same perps breaking the law day after day a search of >>>>>>> them is not "unreasonable."
If a police officer actually SEES someone breaking the law, they don't >>>> NEED the "stop and frisk" policy, because they can legitimately detain >>>> and/or arrest someone if they've seen a crime being committed.
Stop and frisk was used to stop people who actually had NOT been seen
committing a crime. The standard for "Terry stops" (as they were known >>>> due to the USSC case that allowed them) was "reasonable suspicion of
involvement in criminal activity".
So...
...as usual...
...you haven't the faintest CLUE what you're talking about.
:-)
CONGRATULATIONS! You posted the standard all by yourself: "reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity".
Local cops are VERY familiar with the activities of the local hoods.
SPECIFIC crime that has either happened recently or is about to happen.
It cannot be based on "I know he's a hood and has done crimes in the past".
Hey Fool, provide links proving that (each agency will have its own rules).
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 489 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 28:57:18 |
| Calls: | 9,665 |
| Files: | 13,716 |
| Messages: | 6,168,701 |