• RIP Officer Alex Hamzy and Sgt. Dustin Demonte

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 13 08:19:35 2022
    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Fri Oct 14 18:29:26 2022
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5

    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these weapons to
    fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Sun Oct 16 10:03:17 2022
    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these weapons to
    fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp would STILL have had his AR-15, BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 17 12:02:34 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these weapons to
    fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp would
    STILL have had his AR-15,

    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.

    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!

    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You do
    make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Mon Oct 17 21:41:28 2022
    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these weapons to
    fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp would
    STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You do
    make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS! You ADMIT you "don't know" which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time two good cops are DEAD!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 17 21:48:29 2022
    On 2022-10-17 21:41, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5


    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp
    would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago? You rather defeat yourself when your
    answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have bought any decent hunting
    rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being
    a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You
    do make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS! You ADMIT you "don't know"
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time two
    good cops are DEAD!!!



    So why isn't Canada teeming with firearms, Sunshine?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 17 21:50:38 2022
    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:48:34 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-17 21:41, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possible-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5


    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp
    would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago? You rather defeat yourself when your
    answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have bought any decent hunting
    rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being
    a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You
    do make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS! You ADMIT you "don't know"
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time two
    good cops are DEAD!!!

    So why isn't Canada teeming with firearms, Sunshine?

    LOL! 7 minutes, Fool, a near record.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Oct 18 09:53:45 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp
    would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being
    a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You
    do make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!

    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western countries
    and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally obtain "MORE
    GUNS".

    You ADMIT you "don't know"

    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes everyone who
    owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.

    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time two
    good cops are DEAD!!!

    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you demented
    old pervert, Betty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Oct 18 09:56:30 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 9:48:34 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-17 21:41, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote: >>>> TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.



    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5 >>>> >> AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp
    would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago? You rather defeat yourself when your
    answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have bought any decent
    hunting >>> rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with
    being >> a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an
    AR-15. You >> do make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS! You ADMIT you "don't
    know" which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean
    time two good cops are DEAD!!!

    So why isn't Canada teeming with firearms, Sunshine?

    LOL! 7 minutes, Fool, a near record.

    2 mins for you, Betty

    Not sure it is a record but let's call that a win for you, Betty. It's
    the closest you've come to one yet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Tue Oct 18 18:34:21 2022
    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-possibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this perp
    would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with being
    a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an AR-15. You
    do make a good case for banning all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western countries
    and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally obtain "MORE
    GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY possibility of being passed, moron.

    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes everyone who
    owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time two
    good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you demented
    old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line is that YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote chance of passage that would have PREVENTED this tragedy.

    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil servants that were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Oct 19 11:00:32 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-pos
    sibl
    e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=
    4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this
    perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so
    conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with
    being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an
    AR-15. You do make a good case for banning all semi auto
    rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western
    countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally obtain
    "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY
    possibility of being passed, moron.


    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions, do you.

    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes everyone
    who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time
    two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you
    demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line is that
    YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote chance
    of passage that would have PREVENTED this tragedy.


    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns... and that
    is why you are the root cause of these officers deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but you are
    too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.

    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil servants that
    were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.

    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you even
    imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented old
    pervert, Betty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Wed Oct 19 17:39:25 2022
    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 4:00:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after-pos
    sibl
    e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?cvid=
    4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for these
    weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this
    perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so
    conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what with
    being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he chose an
    AR-15. You do make a good case for banning all semi auto
    rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK, they
    just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western
    countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally obtain
    "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY
    possibility of being passed, moron.

    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions, do you.
    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes everyone
    who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean time
    two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you
    demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line is that
    YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote chance
    of passage that would have PREVENTED this tragedy.

    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns... and that
    is why you are the root cause of these officers deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but you are
    too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.
    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil servants that
    were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.
    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you even
    imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented old
    pervert, Betty.

    There, you proved my case - you have not presented a SINGLE LAW, or PROPOSED LAW, that would have prevented this tragedy. But you knew that going in...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Oct 20 11:55:57 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 4:00:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1
    call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after
    -pos sibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?c
    vid= 4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for
    these weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this
    perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so
    conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what
    with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he
    chose an AR-15. You do make a good case for banning all
    semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK,
    they just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western
    countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally
    obtain "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY
    possibility of being passed, moron.

    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions, do
    you.
    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes
    everyone who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean
    time two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you
    demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line is
    that YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote
    chance of passage that would have PREVENTED this tragedy.

    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns... and
    that is why you are the root cause of these officers deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but you
    are too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.
    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil servants
    that were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.
    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you even
    imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented old
    pervert, Betty.

    There, you proved my case - you have not presented a SINGLE LAW, or
    PROPOSED LAW, that would have prevented this tragedy. But you knew
    that going in...

    You clearly don't understand what proof means.
    I have demonstrated why you are the reason these officers died.
    I have not and would not pretend to come up with a law that would pass
    in an idiocracy like yours.

    The fact is that if, like so many other countries, you did not have all
    the guns and had sensible gun control hundreds of police officers would
    not have been shot and thousands of people would not be shot.

    ...but be honest even seeing that as an endpoint you don't have the intelligence to be willing to even consider going down that route.

    Americans simply do not have the mentality to be trusted with gun
    ownership.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Fri Oct 21 19:55:15 2022
    On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:56:00 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 4:00:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake 9-1-1
    call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-after
    -pos sibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12UtYN?c
    vid= 4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for
    these weapons to fall into the hands of criminals, no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month this
    perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so
    conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what
    with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason he
    chose an AR-15. You do make a good case for banning all
    semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T WORK,
    they just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most western countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally
    obtain "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY possibility of being passed, moron.

    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions, do
    you.
    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes
    everyone who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG. Mean
    time two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see, you
    demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line is
    that YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote chance of passage that would have PREVENTED this tragedy.

    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns... and
    that is why you are the root cause of these officers deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but you
    are too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.
    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil servants
    that were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.
    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you even
    imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented old pervert, Betty.

    There, you proved my case - you have not presented a SINGLE LAW, or PROPOSED LAW, that would have prevented this tragedy. But you knew
    that going in...
    You clearly don't understand what proof means.
    I have demonstrated why you are the reason these officers died.
    I have not and would not pretend to come up with a law that would pass
    in an idiocracy like yours.

    The fact is that if, like so many other countries, you did not have all
    the guns and had sensible gun control hundreds of police officers would
    not have been shot and thousands of people would not be shot.

    ...but be honest even seeing that as an endpoint you don't have the intelligence to be willing to even consider going down that route.

    Americans simply do not have the mentality to be trusted with gun
    ownership.

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Oct 22 10:53:12 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:56:00 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 4:00:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7,
    Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake
    9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-a
    fter -pos sibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12Ut
    YN?c vid= 4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for
    these weapons to fall into the hands of criminals,
    no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month
    this perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME
    thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what
    with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason
    he chose an AR-15. You do make a good case for banning
    all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T
    WORK, they just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most
    western countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally
    obtain "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY possibility of being passed, moron.

    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions,
    do you.
    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes
    everyone who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG.
    Mean time two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see,
    you demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line
    is that YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most
    remote chance of passage that would have PREVENTED this
    tragedy.

    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns...
    and that is why you are the root cause of these officers
    deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but
    you are too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.
    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil
    servants that were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.
    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you
    even imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their
    murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented
    old pervert, Betty.

    There, you proved my case - you have not presented a SINGLE LAW,
    or PROPOSED LAW, that would have prevented this tragedy. But you
    knew that going in...
    You clearly don't understand what proof means.
    I have demonstrated why you are the reason these officers died.
    I have not and would not pretend to come up with a law that would
    pass in an idiocracy like yours.

    The fact is that if, like so many other countries, you did not have
    all the guns and had sensible gun control hundreds of police
    officers would not have been shot and thousands of people would not
    be shot.

    ...but be honest even seeing that as an endpoint you don't have the intelligence to be willing to even consider going down that route.

    Americans simply do not have the mentality to be trusted with gun ownership.

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!


    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What specific
    claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Sat Oct 22 10:52:46 2022
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:56:00 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 4:00:35 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 2:53:48 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Monday, October 17, 2022 at 5:02:36 AM UTC-7, Bigbird
    wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, October 14, 2022 at 11:29:28 AM UTC-7,
    Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    They were murdered in an ambush using a fake
    9-1-1 call.


    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/2-officers-killed-a
    fter -pos sibl e-phony-911-call-and-ambush-with-ar-15-sources/ar-AA12Ut
    YN?c vid= 4312 e0d1d56343d5b0dbbc65126587a5
    AR-15 again.

    I guess you feel really bad for making so easy for
    these weapons to fall into the hands of criminals,
    no?

    If an assault weapons ban had been passed last month
    this perp would STILL have had his AR-15,
    What about ten years ago?
    You rather defeat yourself when your answers are so conditional.
    BirdBrain. And if didn't, he could have
    bought any decent hunting rifle and done the SAME
    thing!
    I wouldn't know about that and you are unreliable, what
    with being a pathological liar,...but there is a reason
    he chose an AR-15. You do make a good case for banning
    all semi auto rifles.

    Hey BirdBrain, you ignore the obvious - gun bans DON'T
    WORK, they just encourage people to buy MORE GUNS!
    Well, there's the stupidest thing I will hear all day.

    The US have multiple more guns, per capita, that most
    western countries and a death and injury are to match.

    A gun ban by definition does not permit people to legally
    obtain "MORE GUNS".

    None that have EVER been passed in the US, or would have ANY possibility of being passed, moron.

    You have no clue how you just undermined your own assertions,
    do you.
    You ADMIT you "don't know"
    ..what guns assholes and potential murders (which includes everyone who owns a gun) are permitted to buy in the US.
    which is the MOST truthful thing you have said on RSG.
    Mean time two good cops are DEAD!!!
    ...because the assailant had easy access to a gun.

    Your fault.

    Keep humiliating yourself. It's what I come here to see,
    you demented old pervert, Betty.

    No, you fucking IDIOT, but need I say more? The bottom line
    is that YOU CAN'T come up with any law that has even the most remote chance of passage that would have PREVENTED this
    tragedy.

    No-one can because people like you want easy access to guns...
    and that is why you are the root cause of these officers
    deaths.

    That is exactly what I have always been explaining to you but
    you are too pig thick to get your stupid fat head around.
    What you SHOULD do is honor the memories of the civil
    servants that were acting to make FOOLS like you safe.
    That is not why you make these posts. It's repugnant that you
    even imply as much. You put the gun in the hands of their
    murder.

    Take your transparent crocodile tears and do one, you demented
    old pervert, Betty.

    There, you proved my case - you have not presented a SINGLE LAW,
    or PROPOSED LAW, that would have prevented this tragedy. But you
    knew that going in...
    You clearly don't understand what proof means.
    I have demonstrated why you are the reason these officers died.
    I have not and would not pretend to come up with a law that would
    pass in an idiocracy like yours.

    The fact is that if, like so many other countries, you did not have
    all the guns and had sensible gun control hundreds of police
    officers would not have been shot and thousands of people would not
    be shot.

    ...but be honest even seeing that as an endpoint you don't have the intelligence to be willing to even consider going down that route.

    Americans simply do not have the mentality to be trusted with gun ownership.

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What specific
    claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Oct 22 21:01:41 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!


    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    Proof you are pathological.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to TomS on Sun Oct 23 06:26:11 2022
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 1:52:47 PM UTC-4, TomS wrote:
    ..
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    A: how many Richland, WA retirees have moved to CT? /s

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Sun Oct 23 21:39:01 2022
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 24 11:18:15 2022
    On 2022-10-23 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?

    Why is that in any way relevant?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 24 21:16:18 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 11:18:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-23 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Why is that in any way relevant?

    WHY do you ask?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 24 22:24:01 2022
    On 2022-10-24 21:16, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 11:18:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-23 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Why is that in any way relevant?

    WHY do you ask?

    Because I'd like you to answer.

    I'm not expecting you to so so...

    ...because you're a pussy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 24 22:47:55 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:24:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:16, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 11:18:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-23 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote: >>>>>>>
    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Why is that in any way relevant?

    WHY do you ask?
    Because I'd like you to answer.

    I'm not expecting you to so so...

    ...because you're a pussy.

    Hey Fool, because I would LIKE TO KNOW!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Oct 25 06:59:36 2022
    On 2022-10-24 22:47, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:24:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:16, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 11:18:18 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-23 21:39, TomS wrote:
    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    On Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 3:53:14 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    No, you didn't think... and yes I have plenty of proof. What
    specific claim of mine would you like some proof of?

    Just as I thought - you HAVE NO PROOF!

    I just proved you are a demented old fart, again.
    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Proof you are pathological.

    WHERE do you live, BirdBrain?
    Why is that in any way relevant?

    WHY do you ask?
    Because I'd like you to answer.

    I'm not expecting you to so so...

    ...because you're a pussy.

    Hey Fool, because I would LIKE TO KNOW!!!!

    That isn't the question I asked, Sunshine.

    Why is it RELEVANT?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)