Pop-Up Thingie

>>> Magnum BBS <<<
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Files
  • Log in

  1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF
  • Senile pervert Lyin' Biden's LIES about Georgia EXPOSED!

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 24 17:05:28 2022
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 24 17:16:57 2022
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander

    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 24 20:34:36 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 24 20:48:19 2022
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.

    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 24 21:59:03 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters> >>
    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Oct 24 22:25:46 2022
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters> >>>>
    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right. >>>>
    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!

    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the
    black vote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Oct 26 16:19:00 2022
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right. >>>>
    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the
    black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it FAILED!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Oct 26 16:25:06 2022
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right. >>>>>>
    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the
    restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the
    black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it FAILED!

    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it simply doesn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Oct 26 16:44:00 2022
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the
    restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the
    black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do what you claimed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Oct 26 16:52:42 2022
    On 2022-10-26 16:44, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.' >>>>>>>>
    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the
    restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the >>>> black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do what you claimed.

    I haven't failed in proving something true by pointing to something that doesn't prove it.

    That would be you, Sunshine.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Oct 26 19:49:11 2022
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:52:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:44, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander
    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about
    what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist voter-suppression law.' >>>>>>>>
    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>

    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters>

    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>

    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT, Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher without the >>>> restrictions that were imposed with the sole purpose of suppressing the >>>> black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do what you claimed.
    I haven't failed in proving something true by pointing to something that doesn't prove it.

    That would be you, Sunshine.

    :-)

    You are obviously strangling yourself in your rhetorical flip-flops. The results speak for themselves: NOBODY has been prevented from voting! If you claim otherwise, PRODUCE those people!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Oct 26 20:41:56 2022
    On 2022-10-26 19:49, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:52:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:44, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the
    repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander


    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>>>>>>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into
    lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist
    voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>


    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters> >>>>>>>>>>
    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>


    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those
    links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT,
    Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher
    without the restrictions that were imposed with the sole
    purpose of suppressing the black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it
    FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it
    simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't
    surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do
    what you claimed.
    I haven't failed in proving something true by pointing to something
    that doesn't prove it.

    That would be you, Sunshine.

    :-)

    You are obviously strangling yourself in your rhetorical flip-flops.
    The results speak for themselves: NOBODY has been prevented from
    voting! If you claim otherwise, PRODUCE those people!!

    How do you know "NOBODY" has been prevented, Sunshine?

    You're the one claiming that no one has been prevented.

    So you provide the proof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Oct 27 18:01:52 2022
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 8:42:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 19:49, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:52:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:44, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the
    repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander


    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>>>>>>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into
    lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist
    voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>


    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters> >>>>>>>>>>
    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>


    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those
    links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT,
    Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher
    without the restrictions that were imposed with the sole
    purpose of suppressing the black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it
    FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it
    simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't
    surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do
    what you claimed.
    I haven't failed in proving something true by pointing to something
    that doesn't prove it.

    That would be you, Sunshine.

    :-)

    You are obviously strangling yourself in your rhetorical flip-flops.
    The results speak for themselves: NOBODY has been prevented from
    voting! If you claim otherwise, PRODUCE those people!!
    How do you know "NOBODY" has been prevented, Sunshine?

    You're the one claiming that no one has been prevented.

    So you provide the proof.

    Hey Fool, present ANYBODY that has been prevented from voting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Thu Oct 27 18:03:41 2022
    On 2022-10-27 18:01, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 8:42:00 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 19:49, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:52:45 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:44, TomS wrote:
    On Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 4:25:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-10-26 16:19, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 21:59, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 8:48:21 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 20:34, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 5:17:05 PM UTC-7, Alan
    wrote:
    On 2022-10-24 17:05, TomS wrote:
    High early voter turnout in Georgia exposes the
    repeated lies by senile pervert Lyin' Biden:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/exposing-bidens-jim-crow-2-0-slander


    Sorry, but how does any of what is happening turn Biden's comments about >>>>>>>>>>>> what Republicans in Georgia were TRYING to do into
    lies?

    'The point was clear: This was a racist
    voter-suppression law.'

    It was and is a racist voter-suppression law.

    <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2021/04/19/georgias-voter-suppression-bill-is-an-assault-on-our-democracy/>



    <https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters> >>>>>>>>>>>>
    <https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/georgias-proposed-voting-restrictions-will-harm-black-voters-most>



    <https://www.aclu.org/news/voting-rights/georgias-new-electoral-maps-dilute-the-power-of-black-voters>

    And according to you, my merely providing those
    links proves I'm right.

    :-)

    Nope, it isn't - the high voter turnout PROVES IT,
    Fool.
    No... ...it doesn't.

    That simply isn't how this works.

    YES IT DOES!
    Nope.

    For all you know, the turnout would have been even higher
    without the restrictions that were imposed with the sole
    purpose of suppressing the black vote.

    Hardly - this was your libtards BEST argument, and it
    FAILED!
    What "failed", Sunshine?

    You've claimed that something proves something else, and it
    simply doesn't.

    You and your fellow libtards have FAILED, Fool. Which isn't
    surprising, since you KNEW these election law changes would do
    what you claimed.
    I haven't failed in proving something true by pointing to something
    that doesn't prove it.

    That would be you, Sunshine.

    :-)

    You are obviously strangling yourself in your rhetorical flip-flops.
    The results speak for themselves: NOBODY has been prevented from
    voting! If you claim otherwise, PRODUCE those people!!
    How do you know "NOBODY" has been prevented, Sunshine?

    You're the one claiming that no one has been prevented.

    So you provide the proof.

    Hey Fool, present ANYBODY that has been prevented from voting.

    Sorry, but you're the one making the claim that no one has been prevented.

    Your claim came first...

    ...and you've got nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • Who's Online

  • Recent Visitors

    • Ian Rihard Kosednar
      Mon Jun 16 20:44:01 2025
      from No via SSH
    • Guest
      Mon Jun 16 20:26:11 2025
      from No via SSH
    • Plume
      Mon Jun 16 06:46:57 2025
      from Uk via SSH
    • Centurion
      Mon Jun 16 05:18:46 2025
      from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
    • Guest
      Sun Jun 15 18:58:11 2025
      from No via SSH
    • Plume
      Sun Jun 15 15:01:03 2025
      from Uk via SSH
    • Centurion
      Sun Jun 15 09:44:59 2025
      from Berea, Ohio via Telnet
    • Deasl
      Sun Jun 15 08:43:59 2025
      from Foo, Bar via SSH
  • System Info

    Sysop: Keyop
    Location: Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
    Users: 493
    Nodes: 16 (3 / 13)
    Uptime: 03:59:26
    Calls: 9,709
    Calls today: 4
    Files: 13,740
    Messages: 6,180,939

© >>> Magnum BBS <<<, 2025