This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-
Twenty seems like too many.
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-
Biden has classified documents scattered everywhere.
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take overthe search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden has
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Wrote in message:the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden has
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Biden abandoned classified documents and had others scattered
around Hunter's house and garage.
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden has
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Biden abandoned classified documents and had others scattered
around Hunter's house and garage.
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote: > > Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: > >> On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings thetotal now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Wrote in message:>> On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stopcharacterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-
Biden has classified documents scattered everywhere.
Let us know when it gets to even half of the number of classified
documents that Trump deliberately took with him when he left office.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 20:10:20 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:
Tommy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:
This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/
Biden has classified documents scattered everywhere.
Let us know when it gets to even half of the number of classified
documents that Trump deliberately took with him when he left office.
Let us know when it became to okay to leave classified documents
laying around your garage.
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden has
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden has
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take over
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been >> returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been >>>>> returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they? >> Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>>>>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been >>>>> returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret - Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>>>>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been >>>>> returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret - Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> > Biden
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to take
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>>>>>>>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been >>>>>>>> returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>>>>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret - Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret - Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out of a SCIF with docs
that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
-hh
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh
wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8,
Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy
<soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This
brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the
libtards are going to stop characterizing the
scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI
going to take over the search of ALL of senile
pervert Lyin' Biden's
residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb>
Biden has classified documents scatteredeverywhere.Let us know when it gets to even
half of the number of classified documents that
Trump deliberately took with him when he left
office.
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his
attorney's were negotiating with the archivists
on the others. They were all secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed
everything had been returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT
Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the
White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of
Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how
senile pervert Lyin' Biden got the top secret documents out
of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top
Secret - Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed
removal of TS (not TS-SCI) material from a SCIF (SCI Facility).
Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it
has been broadly reported that Trump had documents up to TS &
TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of
cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy
appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification
level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were
physically removed from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't
get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not
only has this also not been documented, it also shows that
Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how
one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really
is and their rules of operation. This is kind of surprising,
since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance.
Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled
documents can only be accessed inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is
wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought
into or out of a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier'
discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both
use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents
outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal' office
spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE
QUESTION!!
that Biden walked out of a SCIF with docs that you need to
substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - it is up
to senile pervert Lyin' Biden explain HOW he came in possession of
top secret documents. ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as
myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were >>>>>>>>>>>> negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret - >>>>>> Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out of a SCIF with docs
that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims? Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers?
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported that Trump had
documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just
what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to
provide cites which clearly state *what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed from a SCIF,
presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he walked out of a SCIF. Not only has
this also not been documented, it also shows that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example
as to how one can "walk out" without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation. This is kind of
surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working for Battelle with his claims that he
had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast rule that controlled documents can only be accessed
inside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of
a SCIF (and Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently both use,
and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF, including in the likes of 'normal'
office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!). Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out of a SCIF with docs
that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!! >>>
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims? Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump.
So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!! >>>
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a securityDespite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which in
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going to
Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inNope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked outSo Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!! >>>>>>
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims? >>>> Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated >>>> with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection
violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going
Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inSo Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection >>>> violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:43:06 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI
Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inSo Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one. >>>>>>>>
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection >>>> violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be kept in a SCIF.
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:43:06 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=b0e770677bbd4dbb81eeda39dc16f0eb> >
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message:
On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI going
No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inNope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked outSo Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF.
What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one.
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!! >>>>>>>>
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - …
Oh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection >>>>>> violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be kept in a SCIF.
On 2023-02-01 20:35, Tommy wrote:going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:43:06 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI
YES you do!No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inOh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF. >>>>>>>>>>>
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one. >>>>>>>>>>
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - … >>>>>>
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection >>>>>> violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security
clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be kept in a SCIF.I don't need to, Sunshine.
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but which are
not top secret?
:-)
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:46:24 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=
On 2023-02-01 20:35, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:43:06 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI
YES you do!No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inOh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one. >>>>>>>>>>>>
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - … >>>>>>>>
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection >>>>>>>> violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security >>>>>>> clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be kept in a SCIF. >> I don't need to, Sunshine.
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but which are
not top secret?
DUH!
On 2023-02-01 22:08, Tommy wrote:going to take over the search of ALL of senile pervert Lyin' Biden's residencies????https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/more-classified-documents-found-at-biden-s-wilmington-home-white-house-counsel-says/ar-AA16lkZs?cvid=
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:46:24 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 20:35, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 11:43:06 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-30 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 6:07:12 PM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 10:57:36 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-29 19:16, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:48:47 PM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 4:35:13 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:27:52 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:01:40 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 10:46:39 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-25 17:43, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 2:42:44 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 1:01:15 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 22:49, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2023 at 10:38:58 PM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-01-16 20:30, Moderate wrote:
Alan <nuh...@nope.com> Wrote in message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-16 19:14, Moderate wrote:> Tommy <soar2...@yahoo.com> Wrote in message:>> This brings the total now to TWENTY! When are the libtards are going to stop characterizing the scandal as "just a few"??? And, WHEN is the FBI
No. I really don't.YES you do!I don't need to, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every refresher training course, which inOh, so does that mean that you’re hereby rescinding all of your claims?What is your evidence that any of what he had fell under "Top Secret -So Trump's attorney's took those documents from the White House, did they?
Trump had returned thousands of documents and his attorney's were
negotiating with the archivists on the others. They were all
secure.
Trump's attorney signed a statement that claimed everything had been
returned.
There was no "negotiating".
Trump's attorneys may have screwed up, but NOT Trump. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Waiting now for Moderate & Tommy to produce the video of Joe Biden slinging storage boxes.
-hh
And I am waiting for the Lyin' Asshole to explain how senile pervert Lyin' Biden
got the top secret documents out of the Senate SCIF. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information"?
Well, Tommy didn't quite make that claim. He merely claimed removal of TS (not TS-SCI)
material from a SCIF (SCI Facility). Problem with Tommy's claim is at least threefold:
The first is the classification level that is being claimed: it has been broadly reported
that Trump had documents up to TS & TS-SCI, but I've not noticed disclosures or
photos (e.g. of cover pages) on just what Biden reportedly had, so Tommy appears
to be making a false equivalency here: he needs to provide cites which clearly state
*what* classification level(s) were reported. Strike one. >>>>>>>>>>>>
The second is that Tommy's also claiming that documents were physically removed
from a SCIF, presumably because he didn't get a pat-down or something when he
walked out of a SCIF. Not only has this also not been documented, it also shows
that Tommy is forgetting Hillary's spillage as an example as to how one can "walk out"
without hardcopy papers. Strike two.
Finally, Tommy is his ignorance as to just what a SCIF really is and their rules of operation.
This is kind of surprising, since they didn't exist by name when he first started working
for Battelle with his claims that he had a clearance. Currently, it is just not a hard & fast
rule that controlled documents can only be accessedinside a SCIF. Likewise, it is wrong
to imply that controlled comments can never be brought into or out of a SCIF (and
Tommy forgot the 'courier' discussion already). The facts are that one can presently
both use, and securely store, some levels of controlled documents outside of a SCIF,
including in the likes of 'normal' office spaces without violating regulations (BTDT!).
Strike three.
-hh
LOL! I noticed that you fucking libtards DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION!!
Nope. What I did was to point out all of the holes in your claim that Biden walked out
of a SCIF with docs that you need to substantiate before there's a question to be answered.
Good luck!
Hey Lyin' Asshole, it isn't up to me to substantiate shit - … >>>>>>>>
Because you’ve not substantiated them, cupcake.
ANYONE who held a security clearance, such as myself, understands that. Obviously, you haven't.
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance knows that it’s controlled
documents come in different ratings, some of which are commonly associated
with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common security inspection
violations found on the handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held a security >>>>>>> clearance keeps equating "classified" with "top secret".
:-)
some institutions has been an annually recurring requirement for over a decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS classified, idiot. >>>> No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be kept in a SCIF.
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but which are >> not top secret?
DUH!So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
No. I really don't.YES you do!I don't need to, Sunshine.No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance
knows that it’s controlled documents come in
different ratings, some of which are commonly
associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common
security inspection violations found on the
handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held
a security clearance keeps equating "classified" with
"top secret". :-)
refresher training course, which in some institutions
has been an annually recurring requirement for over a
decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS
classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a
SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be
kept in a SCIF.
So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but
which are not top secret?
DUH!
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
ALL classified documents MUST be viewed in a SCIF. So, ANY classified documents that senile pervert Lyin' Biden acquired WHILE a senator
were illegally possessed.
Is that specific enough, Fool?
On 2023-02-01 22:55, Tommy wrote:
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance >>>>>>>>>> knows that it’s controlled documents come in
different ratings, some of which are commonly
associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common
security inspection violations found on the
handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held
a security clearance keeps equating "classified" with
"top secret". :-)
Despite how that is covered in detail in every
refresher training course, which in some institutions
has been an annually recurring requirement for over a
decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS
classified, idiot.
No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a
SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be
kept in a SCIF.
I don't need to, Sunshine.
YES you do!
No. I really don't.
So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but
which are not top secret?
DUH!
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
ALL classified documents MUST be viewed in a SCIF. So, ANY classified documents that senile pervert Lyin' Biden acquired WHILE a senator
were illegally possessed.
Is that specific enough, Fool?
It's specific enough to show you're completely ignorant of the rules, Sunshine.
This took literally SECONDS to find:
'Although all classified documents can be viewed in a SCIF, it is not required that documents in the least restrictive classification
categories be viewed in those facilities. The facilities are used
typically for materials categorized as “top secret/sensitive
compartmented information.”
Classified documents below the top levels typically are stored, retained
and viewed in classified spaces that are not SCIFs, said Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who works on national security cases. These classified spaces do not have the same security guidelines as SCIFs, he said, though they are more restrictive than normal workspaces.
The only information that must be protected in a SCIF is classified information derived from intelligence sources and methods, said Steven Aftergood, former director of the Federation of American Scientists
Project on Government Secrecy.
So, there is a broad swath of “classified documents” that is not required to be brought to a SCIF in the first place.'
<https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/scif-skiff-classified-documents-removal-biden-trump-pence/>
'Fitzpatrick said, “Classified documents can never be taken out of a (sensitive compartmented information facility), ever.”
This is exaggerated. SCIFs must be used when documents with the highest-level classifications have to be reviewed. But even the most
highly classified documents can be taken out of a SCIF, as long as
specific precautions are taken that ensure similar levels of security.
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 22:55, Tommy wrote:
“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance >>>>>>>>>> knows that it’s controlled documents come in
different ratings, some of which are commonly
associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common
security inspection violations found on the
handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held
a security clearance keeps equating "classified" with
"top secret". :-)
Despite how that is covered in detail in every
refresher training course, which in some institutions
has been an annually recurring requirement for over a
decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS
classified, idiot.
No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a
SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be
kept in a SCIF.
I don't need to, Sunshine.
YES you do!
No. I really don't.
So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but
which are not top secret?
DUH!
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
ALL classified documents MUST be viewed in a SCIF. So, ANY classified documents that senile pervert Lyin' Biden acquired WHILE a senator
were illegally possessed.
Is that specific enough, Fool?
It's specific enough to show you're completely ignorant of the rules, Sunshine.
This took literally SECONDS to find:
'Although all classified documents can be viewed in a SCIF, it is not required that documents in the least restrictive classification
categories be viewed in those facilities. The facilities are used typically for materials categorized as “top secret/sensitive compartmented information.”
Classified documents below the top levels typically are stored, retained and viewed in classified spaces that are not SCIFs, said Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who works on national security cases. These classified spaces do not have the same security guidelines as SCIFs, he said, though they are more restrictive than normal workspaces.
The only information that must be protected in a SCIF is classified information derived from intelligence sources and methods, said Steven Aftergood, former director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy.
So, there is a broad swath of “classified documents” that is not required to be brought to a SCIF in the first place.'
<https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/scif-skiff-classified-documents-removal-biden-trump-pence/>Thanks for finding a cite; Tommy had already been clued in that he was wrong.
'Fitzpatrick said, “Classified documents can never be taken out of a (sensitive compartmented information facility), ever.”
This is exaggerated. SCIFs must be used when documents with the highest-level classifications have to be reviewed. But even the most highly classified documents can be taken out of a SCIF, as long as specific precautions are taken that ensure similar levels of security.
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
-hh
On 2023-02-01 22:55, Tommy wrote:
No. I really don't.YES you do!I don't need to, Sunshine.No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance >>>>>>>>>> knows that it’s controlled documents come in
different ratings, some of which are commonly
associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common
security inspection violations found on the
handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held
a security clearance keeps equating "classified" with
"top secret". :-)
refresher training course, which in some institutions
has been an annually recurring requirement for over a
decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS
classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a
SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be
kept in a SCIF.
So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but
which are not top secret?
DUH!
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
ALL classified documents MUST be viewed in a SCIF. So, ANY classified documents that senile pervert Lyin' Biden acquired WHILE a senator
were illegally possessed.
Is that specific enough, Fool?It's specific enough to show you're completely ignorant of the rules, Sunshine.
This took literally SECONDS to find:
'Although all classified documents can be viewed in a SCIF, it is not required that documents in the least restrictive classification
categories be viewed in those facilities. The facilities are used
typically for materials categorized as “top secret/sensitive
compartmented information.”
Classified documents below the top levels typically are stored, retained
and viewed in classified spaces that are not SCIFs, said Bradley Moss, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who works on national security cases. These classified spaces do not have the same security guidelines as SCIFs, he said, though they are more restrictive than normal workspaces.
The only information that must be protected in a SCIF is classified information derived from intelligence sources and methods, said Steven Aftergood, former director of the Federation of American Scientists
Project on Government Secrecy.
So, there is a broad swath of “classified documents” that is not required to be brought to a SCIF in the first place.'
<https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/scif-skiff-classified-documents-removal-biden-trump-pence/>
'Fitzpatrick said, “Classified documents can never be taken out of a (sensitive compartmented information facility), ever.”
This is exaggerated. SCIFs must be used when documents with the highest-level classifications have to be reviewed. But even the most
highly classified documents can be taken out of a SCIF, as long as
specific precautions are taken that ensure similar levels of security.
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 12:39:52 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-01 22:55, Tommy wrote:
It's specific enough to show you're completely ignorant of the rules,No. I really don't.YES you do!I don't need to, Sunshine.No one was saying it isn't, Sunshine.Despite how that is covered in detail in every“ANYONE” who’s actually held a security clearance >>>>>>>>>>>> knows that it’s controlled documents come in
different ratings, some of which are commonly
associated with specific colors on their covers.
And a quick Tommy quiz: what are two most common
security inspection violations found on the
handling of covers?
It's interesting that someone who claims to have held
a security clearance keeps equating "classified" with
"top secret". :-)
refresher training course, which in some institutions
has been an annually recurring requirement for over a
decade.
-hh
More lies out of the Lyin' Asshole! Top Secret IS
classified, idiot.
But "classified" is not always "Top Secret".
You understand that, right?
Nor do all "Top Secret" documents need to be kept in a
SCIF.
You knew that, right?
DUH! Explain to me, please, exactly WHAT documents must be
kept in a SCIF.
So you can't even play that straight, Sunshine?
Yes or no only, please:
Do you agree that there are documents that are classified, but
which are not top secret?
DUH!
Yes or no:
Do you agree that not all top secret documents must be in a SCIF?
ALL classified documents MUST be viewed in a SCIF. So, ANY classified
documents that senile pervert Lyin' Biden acquired WHILE a senator
were illegally possessed.
Is that specific enough, Fool?
Sunshine.
This took literally SECONDS to find:
'Although all classified documents can be viewed in a SCIF, it is not
required that documents in the least restrictive classification
categories be viewed in those facilities. The facilities are used
typically for materials categorized as “top secret/sensitive
compartmented information.”
Classified documents below the top levels typically are stored, retained
and viewed in classified spaces that are not SCIFs, said Bradley Moss, a
Washington, D.C., lawyer who works on national security cases. These
classified spaces do not have the same security guidelines as SCIFs, he
said, though they are more restrictive than normal workspaces.
The only information that must be protected in a SCIF is classified
information derived from intelligence sources and methods, said Steven
Aftergood, former director of the Federation of American Scientists
Project on Government Secrecy.
So, there is a broad swath of “classified documents” that is not
required to be brought to a SCIF in the first place.'
<https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/scif-skiff-classified-documents-removal-biden-trump-pence/>
'Fitzpatrick said, “Classified documents can never be taken out of a
(sensitive compartmented information facility), ever.”
This is exaggerated. SCIFs must be used when documents with the
highest-level classifications have to be reviewed. But even the most
highly classified documents can be taken out of a SCIF, as long as
specific precautions are taken that ensure similar levels of security.
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of
classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
So, Einstein, tell me: WHAT were the classification of the documents that they found on the MANY Lyin' Biden locations? I eagerly await your response.
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
-hh
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of
classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many otherAnd where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
places that he has forgotten about.
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
-hh
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of >>>>>>> classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh.
:-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most >>>>>> common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many otherAnd where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
places that he has forgotten about.
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
-hh
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
On 2023-02-09 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> ...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of >>>>>>> classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh. >>>>>>> :-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
And where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
Circular argument, Sunshine.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 6:39:05 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:25:28 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of >>>>>>>>>> classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh. >>>>>>>>>> :-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
And where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
Circular argument, Sunshine.
Particularly since the DoJ was *requested* to be present *just in case* anything was found.
And as what was found was, as stated above, *zero* Classified marked documents.
For Trump, neither Trump Tower in NYC, nor Bedminster, NJ have been thus searched. You feeling lucky?
In the meantime, it gets even more amazing over in Trump land: bunch of digital classified,
purportedly transferred by USB thumb drive…on a non-Federal person.
Because even the DoD locked out USB over a decade ago on both SIPR & non-SIPR hardware.
This proof of spillage pretty much means every IT device in the entire organization needs to
be checked/scanned, to a level higher than “but her emails!” because of what’s already been
discovered on this vector.
-hh
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:25:28 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>> ...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of
classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.'
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh. >>>>>>> :-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
And where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
Circular argument, Sunshine.
Particularly since the DoJ was *requested* to be present *just in case* anything was found.
And as what was found was, as stated above, *zero* Classified marked documents.
For Trump, neither Trump Tower in NYC, nor Bedminster, NJ have been thus searched. You feeling lucky?
On 2023-02-10 18:35, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 6:39:05 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:25:28 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of
classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.' >>>>>>>>>>
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh. >>>>>>>>>> :-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
And where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
Circular argument, Sunshine.
Particularly since the DoJ was *requested* to be present *just in case* anything was found.
And as what was found was, as stated above, *zero* Classified marked documents.
For Trump, neither Trump Tower in NYC, nor Bedminster, NJ have been thus searched. You feeling lucky?
In the meantime, it gets even more amazing over in Trump land: bunch of digital classified,
purportedly transferred by USB thumb drive…on a non-Federal person.
Because even the DoD locked out USB over a decade ago on both SIPR & non-SIPR hardware.
This proof of spillage pretty much means every IT device in the entire organization needs to
be checked/scanned, to a level higher than “but her emails!” because of what’s already been
discovered on this vector.
And our Sunshine needs to stand with his "they must be classified pretty higly because the brought in the FBI"...
...in relation to the search of Mike Pence's home:
<https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-searching-mike-pences-home-classified-documents-rcna70112>
'The adviser, Devin O'Malley, said "the Department of Justice completed
a thorough and unrestricted search of five hours and removed one
document with classified markings and six additional pages without such markings that were not discovered in the initial review by the vice president’s counsel.”'
Didn't Tom make a big deal about how Biden's counsel weren't cleared for classified material, too?
:-)
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 9:58:01 PM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-10 18:35, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 6:39:05 AM UTC-5, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 4:25:28 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-09 22:56, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 12:30:11 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 3:06:46 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 8:40:35 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 12:43:05 AM UTC-5, Tommy wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:19:37 AM UTC-8, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:39:52 AM UTC-5, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> ...
In addition, it’s not required that documents with lower levels of
classifications be viewed in a SCIF in the first place.' >>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks, Sunshine!
Showing you up for your ignorance is always good for a laugh. >>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
Sounds like we'll also never hear Tommy try to guess what the two most
common security inspection violations found on the handling of covers are.
The same goes for you, Lyin' Asshole.
Translation: cursing Tommy is finally starting to realize that even if he once did
have a clue, he's now at least a decade out of touch.
FWIW, the funniest part about some of this is that anyone who actually knows the regs
saw an example of what invariably was probably one of these most common violations
within the redacted FBI photo released of Trump's classified document haul.
The bottom line with you libtards is that senile pervert Lyin' Biden's butt is in a sling and your
pathetic diversionary tactics won't change that ...
Diversionary? Nah: those who have professionally worked with Classified & controlled doc's
know how easy spillage can occur -- its mostly the dishonest and loony loons who lack the real
world experience who believe that its only like what they see in spy movies (pass the microfilm!).
... - the fucker took top secret classified documents home and who knows how many other
places that he has forgotten about.
And where has it ever been authoritatively published *what* the classification level allegedly was?
FYI, the Rehoboth search found *zero* Classified marked documents. Want to try Bedminster next?
It was classified enough to bring in the FBI.
Circular argument, Sunshine.
Particularly since the DoJ was *requested* to be present *just in case* anything was found.
And as what was found was, as stated above, *zero* Classified marked documents.
For Trump, neither Trump Tower in NYC, nor Bedminster, NJ have been thus searched. You feeling lucky?
In the meantime, it gets even more amazing over in Trump land: bunch of digital classified,
purportedly transferred by USB thumb drive…on a non-Federal person.
Because even the DoD locked out USB over a decade ago on both SIPR & non-SIPR hardware.
This proof of spillage pretty much means every IT device in the entire organization needs to
be checked/scanned, to a level higher than “but her emails!” because of what’s already been
discovered on this vector.
And our Sunshine needs to stand with his "they must be classified pretty
higly because the brought in the FBI"...
...in relation to the search of Mike Pence's home:
<https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-searching-mike-pences-home-classified-documents-rcna70112>
'The adviser, Devin O'Malley, said "the Department of Justice completed
a thorough and unrestricted search of five hours and removed one
document with classified markings and six additional pages without such
markings that were not discovered in the initial review by the vice
president’s counsel.”'
Didn't Tom make a big deal about how Biden's counsel weren't cleared for
classified material, too?
:-)
Next thing you know, we’ll learn that Trump’s classified USB laptop “aide” had
spent time in Russia in July & August of 2019…
…but that’s somehow not a smoking gun of espionage or of treason.
-hh
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:15:12 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,058 |
| Messages: | 6,416,634 |