XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

On 20 Jan 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:OSiGJ.136338$Gco3.95548@fx01.iad:

On 1/20/2022 11:36 AM, Yak wrote:

On 1/20/22 2:31 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

On 1/20/2022 11:21 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:sscb2c$b1k$1@dont-email.me:

On 1/20/22 1:43 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:ssbs4f$k6l$1@dont-email.me:

On 1/20/22 9:20 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

David Hartung <david@Hotmail.com> wrote in
news:BKCdnQvm9_qI3XT8nZ2dnUU7-InNnZ2d@giganews.com:

https://www.westernjournal.com/hidden-page-403-infrastructure-l >>>>>>>>> aw-m anda te-government-backdoor-kill-switch-cars/

[...]
Buried on page 403 of the legislation, the provision requires >>>>>>>>> “advance drunk and impaired driving prevention technology” >>>>>>>>> to be built into all new cars.

This technology will be able to “passively monitor the
performance” of all drivers, suggesting this system will be >>>>>>>>> on at all times.

If the data indicate the driver is “impaired,” the system >>>>>>>>> will “prevent or limit motor vehicle operation,” according >>>>>>>>> to the legislation. [...]

Not good.

      A technology that can reduce DWI traffic deaths
is not good?

      Traffic fatalities, gun fatalities, Covid deaths,
you seem to support all of them.

      Not a very "pro-life" position, Pastor.........

It's a privacy disaster. So yeah, it's not good.

      Show us the violation of privacy.

The lack of control over one's property by being forced by the
govt

     Kinda like seat belts.

And brakes and headlights and windshield wipers.

Poor comparison

100% apt comparison.

Nope.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)