• Human hair

    From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 10 06:42:54 2022
    One of the few valuable papers Lasisi found is a 1973 study in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology. In it, Daniel Hrdy, of Harvard University, loosely described a methodology to quantify the shape of a hair curl, which he applied to seven
    groups of people around the world. Imperfect as it was, it was the starting point Lasisi was looking for. She built off his research, honing a methodology for fitting hair fibers to a circle to determine curvature and publishing her results in the
    American Journal of Biological Anthropology and Nature’s Scientific Reports.

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans from the sun. Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while
    providing extra protection from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal human ancestors, she says, and you can’t do that with flat hair.



    Read more about misconceptions in racial classification: “Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic”

    Sapiens.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 10 12:07:27 2022
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin
    protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans
    from the sun.

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head,
    allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you cant do that with flat hair.

    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Thu Mar 10 16:11:43 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans
    from the sun.
    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.
    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead) hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).
    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 13 15:31:49 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 7:11:44 PM UTC-5, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans
    from the sun.
    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)
    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.
    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead) hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).
    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.

    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart. In terms of
    natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."


    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 13 20:06:12 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 6:31:51 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 7:11:44 PM UTC-5, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans from the sun.
    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)
    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.
    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead) hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).
    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart. In terms of
    natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.

    No response from PC, perhaps my explanation is too "political".
    The human brain has multiples of multiples of sensory processors powered by mitochondrial batteries, theis produced heat as a result, much of which keeps the core warm, while always releasing some to the body surface which keeps the surface cool. Humans
    reduced the fur coat when adapting to sheltered dwelling, as it no longer was needed. Coiled hair allowed cooling while blocking IR.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 14 04:07:05 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 11:06:13 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 6:31:51 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 7:11:44 PM UTC-5, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans from the sun.
    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)
    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.
    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead) hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).
    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart. In terms of
    natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.
    No response from PC, perhaps my explanation is too "political".
    The human brain has multiples of multiples of sensory processors powered by mitochondrial batteries, theis produced heat as a result, much of which keeps the core warm, while always releasing some to the body surface which keeps the surface cool.
    Humans reduced the fur coat when adapting to sheltered dwelling, as it no longer was needed. Coiled hair allowed cooling while blocking IR.

    Supercomputers and data centers produce huge amounts of heat, now often liquid cooled, some approach the heat exhaust level of a nuclear fission plant.

    https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/particles/all-articles/article-detail/~/how-to-cool-supercomputers-3m-novec-liquid-immersion-cooling/?storyid=870afaa0-8c04-4442-aad7-fece0187fac0

    https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20210220/p2a/00m/0na/037000c

    In the computing room on the third floor of the building housing Fugaku, 432 racks hold over 160,000 central processing units, which generate heat when they operate. The heat density can rise to over 100 kilowatts per square meter. This is like having
    100 household electric heaters operating within a 1-meter-square space.

    To make sure the CPUs can run efficiently, they must be kept under 30 degrees Celsius, but without cooling, their temperature would rise above 100 C in a matter of seconds. To prevent this, the supercomputer is equipped with a large water-based liquid
    cooling unit. The cooling system has primary and secondary branch pipes through which water flows to remove heat from the CPUs.
    -

    Blood carries heat away from the brain, the heart pumps hot blood throughout the body. The head is not "for heat storage".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 14 17:11:43 2022
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead) hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.

    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter. I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find. Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.

    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.

    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell. The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."

    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.

    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.

    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.

    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html

    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown
    bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Mon Mar 14 18:22:41 2022
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.

    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack on our
    metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.

    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.

    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.

    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.

    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.

    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.

    N/A.

    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.

    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.

    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell. The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.

    N/A.

    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.

    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.

    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.

    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.

    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html

    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.

    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown
    bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 14 23:05:49 2022
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:22:43 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and
    blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective
    with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.
    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack on our
    metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.
    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.
    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.
    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.
    N/A.
    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.
    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the
    brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.
    N/A.
    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.
    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.
    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.
    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.
    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html
    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.
    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown
    bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/

    On bears:

    Male polar bears are twice the weight of male grizzly bears.

    Short faced bears are extinct except the Andes SPECTACLED BEAR, which is the only South American bear, and is the world’s last short-faced bear, and which builds tree nests.

    The name “spectacled” comes from the lighter markings around their eyes that look like glasses.

    📍Location: The spectacled bear is the world’s last short-faced bear and the only bear native to South America. This vulnerable species of 13,000 to 18,000 remaining bears are found in the cloud forests of the Andes from Argentina to Ecuador.

    📏 Size: They are mid-sized, weighing 175 to 275 pounds, and standing 47 to 79 inches tall.

    👀 Features: The name “spectacled” comes from the lighter markings around their eyes that sometimes look like glasses. They spend most of their time in trees where they build nest platforms, sleep and jealously guard precious fruit and carcasses.

    🌱 Diet: Spectacled bears are mostly herbivores with a diet consisting of mostly cactus, bromeliad, palm hearts, and fruit, but they will opportunistically eat mammals like rabbits and tapirs.

    😱 Dangerous? Living in remote mountains, these shy bears may be the least dangerous of all bear species.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 15 11:55:00 2022
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:22:43 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and
    blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective
    with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.
    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack on our
    metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.
    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.
    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.
    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.
    N/A.
    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.
    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around 5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the
    brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.
    N/A.
    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.
    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.
    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.
    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.
    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html
    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.
    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown
    bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/

    Warm blooded fauna increased specialized neuron density
    https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2022/03/neuron-counts-reveal-brain-complexity.html?m=1
    See graph.

    Mitochondria aren't mentioned but obviously are key to faster better cognition processing. Overheating must be avoided, thus the advantage of coil-hair scalp/brain covering lofted above melanin-rich skin in tropical climes, as well as shelters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 16 10:00:22 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 9:42:56 AM UTC-5, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    One of the few valuable papers Lasisi found is a 1973 study in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology. In it, Daniel Hrdy, of Harvard University, loosely described a methodology to quantify the shape of a hair curl, which he applied to seven
    groups of people around the world. Imperfect as it was, it was the starting point Lasisi was looking for. She built off his research, honing a methodology for fitting hair fibers to a circle to determine curvature and publishing her results in the
    American Journal of Biological Anthropology and Nature’s Scientific Reports.

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans from the sun. Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat]
    while providing extra protection from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal human ancestors, she says, and you can’t do that with flat hair.

    Read more about misconceptions in racial classification: “Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic”

    Sapiens.org
    -

    https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2022/03/new-study-sheds-light-on-early-human.html

    Specifically, the researchers aimed to assess the impacts of climate, body size and color vision on hair evolution.

    The researchers found:

    - Sifaka lemurs, which are native to Madagascar, have denser hair in dry, open environments. The researchers believe that, like early humans, the lemurs' hair helps protect against the strong rays of the sun.

    - Lemurs in colder regions are more likely to have dark hair. This is the first evidence in mammals for a classic pattern in nature called Bogert's Rule, which states that dark colors could aid with thermoregulation as they help absorb heat from the sun'
    s rays.

    - Red hair in lemurs is associated with enhanced color vision. According to the researchers, populations that can see a larger range of colors are more likely to have patches of red hair.

    - Multiple evolutionary pressures may act on one trait and the strength of their influence may vary between species.

    "Human hair evolution remains a mystery, largely because hair does not fossilize," Elizabeth Tapanes, lead author on the paper and a postdoctoral scholar at the University of San Diego, California, said. (Tapanes conducted the study while a doctoral
    student at GW.) "The lemurs we studied exhibit an upright posture like humans and live in a variety of ecosystems like early humans, so our results provide a unique window into human hair evolution."

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24508

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 25 09:02:33 2022
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 2:55:01 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:22:43 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead) epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and
    blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective
    with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.
    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack on
    our metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.
    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.
    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.
    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.
    N/A.
    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.
    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around
    5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the
    brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.
    N/A.
    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.
    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.
    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.
    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.
    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html
    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.
    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/
    Warm blooded fauna increased specialized neuron density https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2022/03/neuron-counts-reveal-brain-complexity.html?m=1
    See graph.

    Mitochondria aren't mentioned but obviously are key to faster better cognition processing. Overheating must be avoided, thus the advantage of coil-hair scalp/brain covering lofted above melanin-rich skin in tropical climes, as well as shelters.
    -
    Mitochondria
    Jean Gibbons at Quora:

    How do you move energy through your body?

    ATP is formed at the mitochondria and functions as the “energy currency” within the body. Energy is found “stored” in the bonding of a third phosphate group to the molecule. Energy is contained within each and every bond, but the energy in the
    bonding of the third phosphate is available in a controlled fashion. ATP = Adenine TriPhosphate molecule

    The products of digestion: amino acids, glucose, fats, etc. all contain potential energy. As these chemicals are metabolized, the energy contained within is captured within a molecule of ATP.

    As the blood flows throughout the body, the energy is made available throughout as well

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 25 09:19:58 2022
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 12:16:53 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 12:02:35 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 2:55:01 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:22:43 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead)
    epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and
    blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective
    with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.
    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack
    on our metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.
    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.
    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.
    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.
    N/A.
    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.
    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around
    5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the
    brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.
    N/A.
    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.
    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.
    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.
    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.
    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html
    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.
    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown
    bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/
    Warm blooded fauna increased specialized neuron density https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2022/03/neuron-counts-reveal-brain-complexity.html?m=1
    See graph.

    Mitochondria aren't mentioned but obviously are key to faster better cognition processing. Overheating must be avoided, thus the advantage of coil-hair scalp/brain covering lofted above melanin-rich skin in tropical climes, as well as shelters.
    -
    Mitochondria
    Jean Gibbons at Quora:

    How do you move energy through your body?

    ATP is formed at the mitochondria and functions as the “energy currency” within the body. Energy is found “stored” in the bonding of a third phosphate group to the molecule. Energy is contained within each and every bond, but the energy in
    the bonding of the third phosphate is available in a controlled fashion. ATP = Adenine TriPhosphate molecule

    The products of digestion: amino acids, glucose, fats, etc. all contain potential energy. As these chemicals are metabolized, the energy contained within is captured within a molecule of ATP.

    As the blood flows throughout the body, the energy is made available throughout as well
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/01/040114075853.htm

    Circadian rhythm & brown fat

    How circadian rhythms underlie energy production in the 'good form of fat' September 9, 2019 by Delthia Ricks, Medical Xpress
    Brown adipose tissue in a woman shown in a PET/CT exam. Credit: Public Domain

    Circadian rhythms orchestrate a vast number of life's processes through the activity of a 24-hour internal clock: hormone flow, blood pressure, sleep and wake cycles, and even the timing of hibernation among marmots and bears, are controlled by a
    biological timepiece.

    At the University of Pennsylvania, a team of scientists has been exploring the circadian clock and its relationship to brown adipose tissue, the so-called "good" form of fat. The team has uncovered the molecular underpinnings that explain how this type
    of fat has a chronobiological—circadian—role in the activity of brown fat, a dynamic type of tissue that provides energy through a heat-generating process called thermogenesis.

    In humans brown fat is associated with being lean. In mice, rats and hibernating species, it's often linked with survival.

    Reporting in a recent issue of PNAS, Marine Adlanmerinia, Mitchell Lazar and a team of scientists at UPenn's Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, examined the circadian nature of brown adipose fat tissue (BAT) in mice that were exposed to an
    exceptionally cold temperature for several days.

    "Regulation of body temperature in response to cold environments is controlled by thermogenic brown adipose tissue, particularly in rodents, although it is increasingly clear that humans have functional brown adipocytes," reported Adlanmerinia and her
    team.

    Among humans and other mammals, BAT is one of two types of fat; the other is white adipose tissue, or WAT. In humans, WAT, the type of fat associated with big rumps and beer bellies, fuels a global obesity epidemic. BAT, on the other hand, is not as
    common among people as it is in other species, particularly rodents. In people, BAT diminishes with age.

    Babies have a high distribution of BAT compared with adults, and infants do not shiver when they are cold. They depend, instead, on thermogenesis, heat production from brown fat to keep them warm. The act of shivering in adults—shivering thermogenesis
    increases body heat.

    In humans, BAT is usually found in the nape of the neck and guarding vital organs, such as the kidneys. Although adults have a lower distribution of BAT than babies, people who are obese have even less BAT than those who are lean. It is theorized by some
    experts who study BAT that brown fat may help maintain leaness. By comparison, a range of studies over the years has shown that mice with ample BAT reserves are protected from obesity.

    In the UPenn research, mice were subjected for to a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius, or 39.2 degrees Fahrenheit, for a week. The team showed how circadian-driven fat synthesis in brown adipose tissue maintained a healthy body temperature in the test
    mice.

    Adlanmerinia and colleagues also identified genes controlling de novo lipogenesis, brown fat formation that was triggered anew to protect the animals from chronic cold during the experiment. The scientists noted "high-amplitude circadian rhythms in
    thermogenic BAT."

    "We demonstrate that chronic cold temperature causes new circadian rhythms of de novo lipogenesis in brown adipose tissue," Adlanmerinia and the team wrote in the journal.

    BAT differs from white fat not only because it responds to cold temperatures, but because it is also chock-full of mitochondria, the energy-production powerhouses of cells. The bean-shaped mitochondria cells, which have two membranes, also have a high
    concentration of thermogenin, a heat-generating protein, in the second membrane.

    Experiments similar to the UPenn research have shown that when BAT increases in mice and other rodents, the animals are better-armed to withstand cold.


    More information: Marine Adlanmerini et al. Circadian lipid synthesis in brown fat maintains murine body temperature during chronic cold, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909883116

    Journal information: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    © 2019 Science X Network

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 25 09:16:51 2022
    On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 12:02:35 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 2:55:01 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:22:43 PM UTC-4, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 8:11:44 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 13 March 2022 at 22:31:51 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair? If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)

    Melanin in skin: stops ultraviolet light penetration beyond the (dead)
    epidermis layer.

    Melanin in hair: stops infrared light (heat) penetration at the (coiled dead)
    hair layer, which reduces the temperature of the head (including brain and
    blood vessels).

    Homo's large brain has large heat production, sweating depends on evaporation, in perpetually hot humid climates sweating is more effective
    with tightly coiled but lofty hair than with damp flat hair clinging to the scalp.
    Your scenario implies that sweating was
    a routine everyday matter.
    All primates sweat. Humans sweat at 3 levels: incipiently, during sleep (hot or cold) while body is inactive, lightly while body is active but not strenuously so, and heavily while active strenuously so. Fever is our body's reaction to an attack on
    our metabolism, fight-or-flight is our body's reaction to a perceived attack on our body, both use sweating defensively.
    I do not see
    it that way. The hominins would have
    needed a good supply of water, and that's
    often hard to find.
    Like modern humans, archaic hominins lived near (but not in) shallow freshwater.
    Sweating was IMO
    primarily for emergencies -- such as when
    they got into fights, or suffered fevers.
    That is heavy sweating, a comparatively rare occurrence, and a poor way to cool since it excretes faster than it evaporates, unlike incipient and light sweating. Dripping sweat is both inefficient and ineffective, and leads to dehydration.
    Those who could lose heat by sweating
    survived better than those who couldn't
    -- maybe their reserves had run out.
    N/A.
    So, under my scenario, the 'tightly coiled
    hair' would have had little significance
    as regards sweating. It could not have
    evolved for that purpose.
    Under extreme sweating, scalp hair is irrelevant, fluid sweat pours off anyway.
    Gareth Morgan:
    "In plain English, body heat is generated by mitochondria. Normal cells have
    between 2 and a couple of thousand mitochondria. Heart cells have around
    5,000 but brain cells have an estimated two million mitochondria per cell.
    The brain is a colossally effective furnace. This is important because the heart
    is the most vulnerable organ in the human body to cold. The blood from the
    brain, which comes out much hotter than it goes in, goes directly to the heart.
    In terms of natural selection this is very much the difference between rapid
    death from hypothermic heart failure and a chilly dip."
    Thanks for this. I've tried to look into it, but
    it seems to be an field of active research
    with relatively few answers at present.
    (E.g. I'd like to know if other species brains
    had the same proportion of mitochondria.)

    However, in outline, it supports my argument
    that large brains could have acted as a 'heat
    resource' for a species where individuals
    found themselves in cold water (perhaps, on
    average, less than once in a lifetime) and
    where the larger-brained had better chances
    of survival.
    N/A.
    Note that I'm changing my terminology from
    'heat store/heat reserve' to 'heat resource'.
    Those individuals who could mobilise the
    sugars in their bloodstream and in various
    organs (probably converting some fats) and
    generate heat in their brains (held out of the
    water) would be able to keep their hearts
    going for longer. The larger brains would
    be like having a larger engine in a vehicle.
    Of course, the fuel will always run out in
    the end, but this is an emergency and those
    who can keep their hearts warmer more
    effectively and for longer, will do better.
    N/A.
    Unlike many taxa, humans defend themselves best when grouped defensively, and worse when not, this is shared with chimps.
    Elephants also have huge brains -- much
    larger than is apparently fitting for their
    body size. They are great swimmers --
    often in estuaries and cold ocean water.
    While their size provides some protection,
    the cold will get to them in long-distance
    swims. Their large brains may well function
    in the same way as I'm proposing for
    hominins.
    N/A. Note that elephants do not eat seafood.
    The brains of Polar bears (498 g) are more
    than double the size of those of Grizzlies
    (234 g) -- probably the result of their having
    to swim long distances in very cold water. https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html
    Polar bears are much larger than grizzly bears, and are fully covered in fur.
    Polar bears evolved from brown bears relatively
    recenltly:

    " . . Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears
    in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. . . " https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/arctic-bears-how-grizzlies-evolved-into-polar-bears/777/
    Warm blooded fauna increased specialized neuron density https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2022/03/neuron-counts-reveal-brain-complexity.html?m=1
    See graph.

    Mitochondria aren't mentioned but obviously are key to faster better cognition processing. Overheating must be avoided, thus the advantage of coil-hair scalp/brain covering lofted above melanin-rich skin in tropical climes, as well as shelters.
    -
    Mitochondria
    Jean Gibbons at Quora:

    How do you move energy through your body?

    ATP is formed at the mitochondria and functions as the “energy currency” within the body. Energy is found “stored” in the bonding of a third phosphate group to the molecule. Energy is contained within each and every bond, but the energy in the
    bonding of the third phosphate is available in a controlled fashion. ATP = Adenine TriPhosphate molecule

    The products of digestion: amino acids, glucose, fats, etc. all contain potential energy. As these chemicals are metabolized, the energy contained within is captured within a molecule of ATP.

    As the blood flows throughout the body, the energy is made available throughout as well

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/01/040114075853.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 16 06:38:12 2022
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head,
    allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.

    I've just heard a short radio interview with Simon
    Wooley.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Woolley,_Baron_Woolley_of_Woodford

    Today programme 16/04/2022 at 1:43:25 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0016gvm

    He and his brother were adopted by a white
    couple who had no idea how to cut or trim
    their (Afro) hair. Eventually they found barbers
    who knew what to do.

    Take a look at some videos of barbers working
    on Afro hair. This is one:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv4R09k9EN8

    The sheer quantity of natural uncut Afro
    hair -- which is what our ancestors evolved
    to possess -- is staggering. It certainly did
    not allow for easy sweating. In fact, we can
    say that, with such hair, no level of sweating
    would produce the slightest cooling effect on
    the scalp.

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head,
    allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.

    Given that the rest of the body was naked,
    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair was there to protect scalp skin
    from UV rays from the sun.

    So what was it for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 16 06:52:10 2022
    Op donderdag 10 maart 2022 om 15:42:56 UTC+1 schreef DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves:

    Lasisi 1973 Am.J.phys.Anthrop.: Daniel Hrdy loosely described a methodology to quantify the shape of a hair curl, which he applied to 7 groups of people around the world: the starting point Lasisi was looking for.
    She built off his research, honing a methodology for fitting hair fibers to a circle to determine curvature (Am.J.biol.Anthrop., Scient.Rep.).
    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how (melanated skin protects against UV) tightly curled hairs also protect humans from the sun.
    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection from solar radiation.
    That was important for our newly bipedal human ancestors, she says, and you can’t do that with flat hair.

    Possibly correct for H.sapiens, but not for earlier Homo: google "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo PPT" + illustrations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Sat Apr 16 10:57:43 2022
    On Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 3:07:28 PM UTC-5, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Jablonski says Lasisi’s work suggests how, just as melanated skin protects against UV rays, tightly curled hairs also protect humans
    from the sun.
    So what's the need for that extremely
    expensive hair?

    All mammals have hair, so not particularly expensive.
    Already answered.

    If melanated naked skin
    protects against UV rays, why have that
    extraordinary hair? ('Extraordinary' in
    that no other mammal has anything
    like it.)
    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.

    Note: "Flat hair" here refers to scalp hair (Asian) that lies flat on the scalp, but whose strands are actually circular in cross-section; while coiled hair (Afro) cannot lie flat on the scalp (unless forced by a hat) but whose strands are flat in cross-
    section, caucasian hair is midway between them.



    Can't do what . . exactly? There's no
    problem with sweating elsewhere on
    the body.

    What's the need for that dense, tightly-
    curled hair?

    Don't pretend you have an answer
    when all you can present is verbiage.
    That's deceptive politics, not science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Sat Apr 16 11:32:10 2022
    On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 9:38:13 AM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Thursday 10 March 2022 at 14:42:56 UTC, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    I've just heard a short radio interview with Simon
    Wooley.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Woolley,_Baron_Woolley_of_Woodford

    Today programme 16/04/2022 at 1:43:25 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0016gvm

    He and his brother were adopted by a white
    couple who had no idea how to cut or trim
    their (Afro) hair. Eventually they found barbers
    who knew what to do.

    Take a look at some videos of barbers working
    on Afro hair. This is one:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv4R09k9EN8

    The man appears to have mixed black and white bio heritage, akin to Melanesian, Mulatto, Semitic etc. hair, not as tightly coiled as modern Sub-Saharan people's hair.

    The sheer quantity of natural uncut Afro
    hair -- which is what our ancestors evolved
    to possess -- is staggering.

    Our (Euro-caucasian) ancestors did not have tightly coiled hair, but probably wavy coarse hair, closer to chimp hair. Neanderthals and Denisovans probably had straighter hair.
    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is probably related to tropical terrestrial proto-agriculture/herding in more open environments where direct sun was a selective force, than in the ancestral forest environment. Rainforestpygmies and Kalahari bushmen have coiled
    hair, but in tufts rather than continuous pelage that the Bantu people have.

    It certainly did
    not allow for easy sweating. In fact, we can
    say that, with such hair, no level of sweating
    would produce the slightest cooling effect on
    the scalp.

    That is obviously false. Blondes with wavy hair have many more strands per scalp than Blacks with tightly coiled hair. Coils block UV while allowing airflow along the scalp, straight hair blocks much less UV, unless shorn, good in temperate and polar
    climates.

    Tight curls create lofted, airy ventilation structures for the head, allowing it to breathe [sweat] while providing extra protection
    from solar radiation. That was important for our newly bipedal
    human ancestors, she says, and you can t do that with flat hair.
    Given that the rest of the body was naked,

    Black people have tightly coiled body hair, so tight-coiling preceded body hair reduction.

    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair

    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.

    was there to protect scalp skin
    from UV rays from the sun.

    It protects against tropical-year-round sun UV.


    So what was it for?
    So??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 04:50:59 2022
    On Saturday 16 April 2022 at 19:32:11 UTC+1, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Black people have tightly coiled body hair, so tight-coiling preceded body hair reduction.
    . .
    When and why do you see "body hair
    reduction'?
    . .
    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair
    . .
    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair'. I can't. I suspect
    that you won't be able to either. In other
    words, you're imagining something that
    does not exist.
    . .
    It protects against tropical-year-round sun UV.
    . .
    Why does the scalp need that protection
    when the rest of the body doesn't?
    . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Sun Apr 17 06:21:03 2022
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 7:51:00 AM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Saturday 16 April 2022 at 19:32:11 UTC+1, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Black people have tightly coiled body hair, so tight-coiling preceded body hair reduction.

    Amend: the curling of body hair began before Hs body hair greatly reduced, but at a very slow rate of change until proto-agriculture, and both are still under selection. Body hair/fur reduction first began with the change from fully exposed arboreal
    branch/tree-fork sleeping (OWM, gibbons) to partly exposed arboreal bowl nesting (great apes) and increased in the change from arboreal bowl nesting to non-exposed terrestrial dome dwelling (Homo) while under forest canopy. Note that body hair reduction (
    and concomitant scalp hair lengthening) was mainly a nocturnal/inactivity selection trait, mostly connected to prone/supine posture relative to enclosure; while body & scalp hair curling was mainly a diurnal/activity selection trait mostly connected to
    upright orthograde posture relative to exposure to sunlight and convective air currents. A parallel condition today is in mature people, hair loss is independent of hair graying but both can occur simultaneously or sequentially, a redhead balding or a
    gray head with full scalp hair. In humans two distinct forces, night sleep exposure/enclosure, sun skin exposure/enclosure, produced today's hair traits.


    . .
    When and why do you see "body hair
    reduction'?
    . .
    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair
    . .
    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair'. I can't. I suspect
    that you won't be able to either. In other
    words, you're imagining something that
    does not exist.

    Typical black people without European admixture have tightly coiled hair. People with only 20% African recent heritage have loosely coiled hair.


    . .
    It protects against tropical-year-round sun UV.
    . .
    Why does the scalp need that protection
    when the rest of the body doesn't?
    . .

    The scalp receives the maximum exposure in an obligate orthograde biped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 09:31:40 2022
    The scalp receives the maximum exposure in an obligate orthograde biped.

    :-DDD You haven't seen my baldness.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 10:29:02 2022
    On Sunday 17 April 2022 at 14:21:04 UTC+1, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Black people have tightly coiled body hair, so tight-coiling preceded body hair reduction.
    . .
    Amend: the curling of body hair began before Hs body hair greatly reduced, but at a very
    slow rate of change until proto-agriculture, and both are still under selection. Body hair/fur
    reduction first began with the change from fully exposed arboreal branch/tree-fork sleeping
    (OWM, gibbons) to partly exposed arboreal bowl nesting (great apes) and increased in the
    change from arboreal bowl nesting to non-exposed terrestrial dome dwelling (Homo) while
    under forest canopy. Note that body hair reduction (and concomitant scalp hair lengthening)
    was mainly a nocturnal/inactivity selection trait, mostly connected to prone/supine posture
    relative to enclosure; while body & scalp hair curling was mainly a diurnal/activity selection
    trait mostly connected to upright orthograde posture relative to exposure to sunlight and
    convective air currents. A parallel condition today is in mature people, hair loss is
    independent of hair graying but both can occur simultaneously or sequentially, a redhead
    balding or a gray head with full scalp hair. In humans two distinct forces, night sleep
    exposure/enclosure, sun skin exposure/enclosure, produced today's hair traits.
    . .
    All far too speculative for me
    . .
    When and why do you see "body hair
    reduction'?
    . .
    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair
    . .
    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair'. I can't. I suspect
    that you won't be able to either. In other
    words, you're imagining something that
    does not exist.
    . .
    Typical black people without European admixture have tightly coiled hair.
    . .
    Where is the image that I requested?
    . .
    People with only 20% African recent heritage have loosely coiled hair.
    . .
    It is generally accepted that our ancestors
    were African -- and presumably had normal
    Afro hair.
    . .
    It protects against tropical-year-round sun UV.
    . .
    Why does the scalp need that protection
    when the rest of the body doesn't?
    . .
    The scalp receives the maximum exposure in an obligate orthograde biped.
    . .
    Not an adequate answer for the enormous
    difference in hair cover.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Apr 17 18:03:47 2022
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 12:31:41 PM UTC-4, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    The scalp receives the maximum exposure in an obligate orthograde biped.
    :-DDD You haven't seen my baldness.

    A few days ago I shaved my scalp, completely bald, to prepare for hot humid summer here in Miami; now just my long white beard remains. I'll never go bald naturally, though my hairline has receded 1"/2.5cm since my youth.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to Paul Crowley on Sun Apr 17 17:54:38 2022
    On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 1:29:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Crowley wrote:
    On Sunday 17 April 2022 at 14:21:04 UTC+1, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Black people have tightly coiled body hair, so tight-coiling preceded body hair reduction.
    . .
    Amend: the curling of body hair began before Hs body hair greatly reduced, but at a very
    slow rate of change until proto-agriculture, and both are still under selection. Body hair/fur
    reduction first began with the change from fully exposed arboreal branch/tree-fork sleeping
    (OWM, gibbons) to partly exposed arboreal bowl nesting (great apes) and increased in the
    change from arboreal bowl nesting to non-exposed terrestrial dome dwelling (Homo) while
    under forest canopy. Note that body hair reduction (and concomitant scalp hair lengthening)
    was mainly a nocturnal/inactivity selection trait, mostly connected to prone/supine posture
    relative to enclosure; while body & scalp hair curling was mainly a diurnal/activity selection
    trait mostly connected to upright orthograde posture relative to exposure to sunlight and
    convective air currents. A parallel condition today is in mature people, hair loss is
    independent of hair graying but both can occur simultaneously or sequentially, a redhead
    balding or a gray head with full scalp hair. In humans two distinct forces, night sleep
    exposure/enclosure, sun skin exposure/enclosure, produced today's hair traits.
    . .
    All far too speculative for me
    . .
    When and why do you see "body hair
    reduction'?
    . .
    it also makes no sense to claim that such
    dense hair
    . .
    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair'. I can't. I suspect
    that you won't be able to either. In other
    words, you're imagining something that
    does not exist.
    . .
    Typical black people without European admixture have tightly coiled hair.
    . .
    Where is the image that I requested?
    . .
    People with only 20% African recent heritage have loosely coiled hair.
    . .
    It is generally accepted that our ancestors
    were African -- and presumably had normal
    Afro hair.
    . .
    It protects against tropical-year-round sun UV.
    . .
    Why does the scalp need that protection
    when the rest of the body doesn't?
    . .
    The scalp receives the maximum exposure in an obligate orthograde biped.
    . .
    Not an adequate answer for the enormous
    difference in hair cover.
    PC falling back on his usual poli crap.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Crowley@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 18 04:24:22 2022
    On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 1:54:39 AM UTC+1, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    Tightly-coiled Afro hair is not "dense" hair.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair'. I can't. I suspect
    that you won't be able to either. In other
    words, you're imagining something that
    does not exist.
    . .
    Typical black people without European admixture have tightly coiled hair. >> . .
    Where is the image that I requested?
    . .
    Sub-Saharan Africa has a population
    approaching one billion.
    . .
    Please find an image of natural fully-grown
    'tightly-coiled Afro hair' -- OR admit that it
    does not exist.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)