Op vrijdag 3 maart 2023 om 13:49:43 UTC+1 schreef Pandora:Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations ( as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrients
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
I just sent this to Dr Hagen:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna, butabundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book >https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
With best wishes --marc verhaegen
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations ( as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrientsHomo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
I just sent this to Dr Hagen:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors, I just read your paper "Homo medicus". >Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book >https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
With best wishes --marc verhaegen
You're an incredible hypocrite.
You should have told them what you said here earlier about their
paper: "How can self-declared 'scientists" remain so stupid stupid stupid???"
Kudu runner:Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations ( as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrients
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
I just sent this to Dr Hagen:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors, I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc. >> >Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new bookNote that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
With best wishes --marc verhaegen
You're an incredible hypocrite.
You should have told them what you said here earlier about their
paper: "How can self-declared 'scientists" remain so stupid stupid
stupid???"
My little, little boy: the self-declared 'scientist' = you... :-DDD
Stephen Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations ( as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specificHomo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
I just sent this to Dr Hagen:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors, I just read your paper "Homo medicus". >> >Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
With best wishes --marc verhaegen
You're an incredible hypocrite.
You should have told them what you said here earlier about their
paper: "How can self-declared 'scientists" remain so stupid stupid
stupid???"
My little, little boy: the self-declared 'scientist' = you... :-DDD
Hypocrite and liar, see your own message here: https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
It's obvious that you said it with regard to Hagen et al.
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
Kudu runner:Stephen Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations ( as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
I just sent this to Dr Hagen:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors, I just read your paper "Homo medicus". >> >> >Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr
savanna, but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
With best wishes --marc verhaegen
You're an incredible hypocrite.
You should have told them what you said here earlier about their
paper: "How can self-declared 'scientists" remain so stupid stupid
stupid???"
My little, little boy: the self-declared 'scientist' = you... :-DDD
Hypocrite and liar, see your own message here:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
It's obvious that you said it with regard to Hagen et al.
:-DDD You're an incredible child.
When I meet an opponent (congress, meeting or so), even you..., I'm not going to fight (I'm a polite guy...),
but altough I would certainly not use these words speaking with him (or sending him an email), I'll try to convice him that his ideas are stupid stupid stupid.
Kudu runner:Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations (as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrients in
That's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say
it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is
pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
behind their back???
:-DDD
Grow up, little child:
the endurance running nonsense = the most ridiculous fantasy:
this is what I sent:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna, butabundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book >https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
That's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say
it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations (as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrients inThat's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say
it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is
pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
behind their back???
:-DDD
Grow up, little child:
the endurance running nonsense = the most ridiculous fantasy:
this is what I sent:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book >https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
And this is what you said behind their back: "How can self-declared 'scientists' remain so stupid stupid stupid???" https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
Also notice how many times you use :-DDD in that message, which
symbolizes nothing but ridicule and contempt.
Besides, nowhere in their paper do Hagen et al refer to endurance
running or persistance hunting. You criticize them for something they
do not even suggest. It's your obsession, as if that were only means
of hunting.
because no one else is
pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
Kudu runner:Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations (as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specific nutrients in
That's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say
it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is
pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
behind their back???
:-DDD
Grow up, little child:
the endurance running nonsense = the most ridiculous fantasy:
this is what I sent:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr Stephen
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc. >> >Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new bookNote that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Kudu runner:
And this is what you said behind their back: "How can self-declared
'scientists' remain so stupid stupid stupid???"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
Also notice how many times you use :-DDD in that message, which
symbolizes nothing but ridicule and contempt.
:-DDD Yes, what else, my little boy??
Only incredible fools believe that our flat feet, poor olfaction, naked skin, fat belly,
external nose, heavy bones, long femoral necks etc.etc. evolved to hunt...
Stephen Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations (as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specificThat's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say >> >> it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is >> >> pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
behind their back??? :-DDD
Grow up, little child: the endurance running nonsense = the most ridiculous fantasy:
this is what I sent:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr
but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in savanna,
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
And this is what you said behind their back: "How can self-declared
'scientists' remain so stupid stupid stupid???"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
Also notice how many times you use :-DDD in that message, which
symbolizes nothing but ridicule and contempt.
:-DDD Yes, what else, my little boy??
One has to wonder why you have to be such an asshole about it all the
time. It's probably out of frustration, because you wish, but can't,
force a 'paradigm' shift.
Only incredible fools believe that our flat feet, poor olfaction, naked skin, fat belly,
external nose, heavy bones, long femoral necks etc.etc. evolved to hunt...
Stephen Munro (google e.g. "Joordens Munro"), the island colonizations (as far as Flores) the intercontinental coastal and waterside dispersals (Java, SE.Asia, Africa, Europe...), the brain enlargement since H.erectus (cf. DHA & other brain-specificThat's why you're a hypocrite, because you don't have the guts to say >> >> >> it in their face how you really think about them. Instead you do it
behind their back.
The only self-declared 'scientist' here is you, because no one else is >> >> >> pretending to be an anthropologist without a proper degree.
behind their back??? :-DDD
Grow up, little child: the endurance running nonsense = the most ridiculous fantasy:
this is what I sent:
Dear Dr Hagen & all co-authors,
I just read your paper "Homo medicus".
Very interesting thinking pharmacologically: meat-eating is indeed often not so healthy.
However, although this probably doesn't change your interpretations, transitions to more meat-eating were not 2.6 Ma, but late-Pleistocene.
In fact, medical, comparative, archeological and other evidence shows a transition to eating more aquatic foods 2.6 Ma, possibly even earlier. See e.g. stone tool use and shellfish consumption, and especially the shell engravings found by Dr
savanna, but abundant waterside), human fur loss and development of SC fat-layers, etc.Note that the "endurance running" idea (Pleistocene antelope hunting) is a far-fatched and physiologically impossible fantasy, see e.g. human olfactory atrophy (even worse than in other primates), human sweating (water & salts are scarce in
Google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo" or my new book
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
And this is what you said behind their back: "How can self-declared
'scientists' remain so stupid stupid stupid???"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/q6RXqefqa3Q
Also notice how many times you use :-DDD in that message, which
symbolizes nothing but ridicule and contempt.
:-DDD Yes, what else, my little boy??
One has to wonder why you have to be such an asshole about it all the
time. It's probably out of frustration, because you wish, but can't,
force a 'paradigm' shift.
Yes, it's frustrating that self-declared "scientists"
How many students are enlisted at your Study Center Anthropology?
Is it a formally recognized academic institution?
How many students are enlisted at your Study Center Anthropology?
How many students are enlisted at your Study Center Anthropology?
How many students are enlisted at your Study Center Anthropology?
And how many students follow your antelope nonsense, my little child?
Is it a formally recognized academic institution?
The only kudu runners' argument:
How many students are enlisted at your Study Center Anthropology?
Is it a formally recognized academic institution?
:-DDD
I'm trying to establish your credibility here.
The idea of endurance running and its possible relation to persistence hunting is not mine.
I'm trying to establish your credibility here.
You accuse other people of being self-declared "scientists", and now
I'm trying to figure out what part of you is not self-declared.
I'm trying to establish your credibility here.
Establish your own credibility, my little boy!
I don't pretend to be an anthropologist at Mailbox University.
Homo medicus: The transition to meat eating increased pathogen
pressure and the use of pharmacological plants in Homo
Abstract
The human lineage transitioned to a more carnivorous niche 2.6 mya
I don't pretend to be an anthropologist at Mailbox University.
Yes, you haven't said 1 sensible word so far.
https://es.linkedin.com/posts/kathelijne-bonne-980b946_waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-activity-7034085381423702016-TM1b
I don't pretend to be an anthropologist at Mailbox University.
https://es.linkedin.com/posts/kathelijne-bonne-980b946_waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-activity-7034085381423702016-TM1b"But recently I was contacted by Dr Marc Verhaegen: his findings on
human evolution from comparative biology opened my eyes and gave me
new, totally unexpected views: Early humans couldn't survive at all on
the savannah, instead, they developed our most remarkable traits (bipedalism, loss of fur, big brain...) by adapting to a life near the water."
I don't pretend to be an anthropologist at Mailbox University.
"But recently I was contacted by Dr. Marc Verhaegen: his findings on
human evolution from comparative biology opened my eyes and gave me
new, totally unexpected views: Early humans couldn't survive at all on
the savannah, instead, they developed our most remarkable traits
(bipedalism, loss of fur, big brain, ...) by adapting to a life near
the #water."
Seems like you've got a disciple.
I don't pretend to be an anthropologist at Mailbox University.
Yes, you haven't said 1 sensible word so far. >https://es.linkedin.com/posts/kathelijne-bonne-980b946_waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-activity-7034085381423702016-TM1b
"But recently I was contacted by Dr. Marc Verhaegen: his findings on
human evolution from comparative biology opened my eyes and gave me
new, totally unexpected views: Early humans couldn't survive at all on
the savannah, instead, they developed our most remarkable traits
(bipedalism, loss of fur, big brain, ...) by adapting to a life near
the #water."
Seems like you've got a disciple.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 493 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 169:06:42 |
| Calls: | 9,703 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,735 |
| Messages: | 6,178,282 |
