2000 meters above sea level. https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
2000 meters above sea level. https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
2000 meters above sea level. https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
Op vrijdag 13 oktober 2023 om 18:39:37 UTC+2 schreef littor...@gmail.com:
2000 meters above sea level. https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
???
- never heard of rivers??
- was this Ethiopican jaw erectus?? habilis? australopith
- do you understand the words "suggest"?? "no clear consensus"??
Still no answer from the kudu runners: these idiots see everywhere "human ancestors": they even think they descend from Gorilla afarensis... :-DDD
• “Incisal dental microwear in A.afarensis is most similar to that observed in Gorilla”. Ryan & Johanson 1989.suture and well onto an uninflated glabella; and extremely convex inferolateral margins of the orbits such as found in some gorillas”. Walker cs 1986.
• The composite skull reconstructed mostly from A.L.333 spms “looked very much like a small female gorilla”. Johanson & Edey 1981:351.
• “Other primitive [advanced gorilla-like! MV] features found in KNM-WT 17000, but not know or much discussed for A.afarensis, are: very small cranial capacity; low posterior profile of the calvaria; nasals extended far above the frontomaxillar
• As for the maximum parietal breadth and the biauriculare in O.H.5 & KNM-ER 406 “the robust australopithecines have values near the Gorilla mean: both the pongids and the robust australopithecines have highly pneumatized bases”. Kennedy 1991.pongids evolved separately [? MV] in the australopithecines parallel [? MV] with the great apes. The features of KNM-WT 17000, therefore, are not as ‘primitive’ as they look. The robust Australopithecus did not evolve from a big-toothed pongid
• In O.H.5, “the curious and characteristic features of the Paranthropus skull... parallel some of those of the gorilla”. Robinson 1960.
• The boisei “lineage has been characterized by sexual dimorphism of the degree seen in modern Gorilla for the length of its known history”. Leakey & Walker 1988.
• A.boisei teeth showed “a relative absence of prism decussation”; among extant hominoids, “Gorilla enamel showed rel.little decussation ...”. Beynon & Wood 1986.
• “The evolution of the australopithecine crania was the antithesis of the Homo line. Instead of becoming less ape-like, as in Homo, they become more ‘ape-like’. Cranial proportions and ectocranial features that were thought to be unique among
• “Plio-Pleistocene hominids had markedly abbreviated [enamel] growth periods relative to modern man, similar to those of the modem great apes”. Bromage & Dean 1985.therefore identify a hominid”. Martin 1985.
• “Enamel thickness has been secondarily reduced in the African apes and also, although at a different rate and extent, in the orang-utan. Thick enamel, previously the most important characteristic in arguments about the earliest hominid, does not
• “Cranial capacity, the relationship between endocast and skull, sulcal pattern, brain shape and cranial venous sinuses, all of these features appear to be consistent with an ape-like external cortical morphology in Hadar early hominids”. Falk1985.
• In the type-spm of A.afarensis, “the lower third premolar of ‘A.africanus afarensis’ LH-4 is completely apelike”. Ferguson 1987.in A.afarensis is also found only in the extant apes among other hominoids”. Kimbel cs 1984.
• “A.afarensis is much more similar cranially to the modern African apes than to modern humans”. Schoenemann 1989.
• “Olson's assertion that the lateral inflation of the A.L.m 333-45 mastoids is greater than in any extant ape is incorrect if the fossil is compared to P.troglodytes males or some Gorilla males and females. Moreover, the pattern of pneumatization
• “Prior to the identification of A.afarensis the asterionic notch was thought to characterize only the apes among hominoids. Kimbel and Rak relate this asterionic sutural figuration to the pattern of cranial cresting and temporal bonepneumatization shared by A. afarensis and the extant apes”. Kimbel cs 1984.
• “...that two presumed Paranthropus skulls were furnished with high sagittal crests implied that they had also possessed powerful occipital crests and ape-like planum nuchale... Nuchal crests which are no more prominent - and indeed some lessprominent - will be found in many adult apes”. Zuckerman 1954.
• In Sts.5, MLD-37/38, SK-47, SK-48, SK-83, Taung, KNM-ER 406, O.H.24 & O.H.5, “craniometric analysis showed that they had marked similarities to those of extant pongids. These basicranial similarities between Plio-Pleistocene hominids and extantapes suggest that the upper respiratory systems of these groups were also apelike in appearance... Markedly flexed basicrania [are] found only in modern humans after the second year...”. Laitman & Heimbuch 1982.
• “The total morphological pattern with regard to the nasal region of Australopithecus can be characterized by a flat, non-protruding nasal skeleton which does not differ qualitatively from the extant nonhuman hominoid pattern, one which is inmarked contrast to the protruding nasal skeleton of modern H.sapiens”. Franciscus & Trinkaus 1988.
Yes, we're all waiting for mv to say this confirms the
aquatic scenario. Expect to see this soon on his
dumbgwanawanawana land thing.
2000 meters above sea level. https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
My little little little boy,
- never heard of rivers??
- erectus?habilis?australopith
- do you understand the word "suggest"?? "no clear consensus"??
FREQUENTLY phonologically distinct from adults,
Pandora wrote:
2000 meters above sea level.
https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
It's not erectus.
If teeth are so authoritative, there was a Lucy or Ardi in Germany 10 million years ago.
There's a clear pattern here where the owners of paleo anthropology have
been getting more & more stringent in their Afro centric views. At this
point they're pretending that African were launching boats in the Mediterranean
hundreds of thousands of years ago... because remains that don't fit the narrative are being found in Europe, and they can't allow that...
There's no 2 million year old erectus remains in Africa. Sorry.
Not sorry.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
Yes, we're all waiting for mv to say this confirms the
aquatic scenario. Expect to see this soon on his
dumbgwanawanawana land thing.
If you read your own cite, the good Doctor is right. It doesn't match erectus. They don't even claim it does.
Op vrijdag 13 oktober 2023 om 18:39:37 UTC+2 schreef littor...@gmail.com:
2000 meters above sea level.
https://phys.org/news/2023-10-reexamination-ancient-jawbone-ethiopia-homo.html
Kudu runner:
Well, that does explain all the aquatic adaptations.
???
- never heard of rivers??
- was this Ethiopican jaw erectus?? habilis? australopith
- do you understand the words "suggest"?? "no clear consensus"??
Teeth *are* authoritative.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 498 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 56:33:21 |
Calls: | 9,812 |
Calls today: | 14 |
Files: | 13,754 |
Messages: | 6,190,889 |