On 10.9.2024. 9:10, JTEM wrote:
Doc alter: Blah, blah, blah, TRUMP HATE!
Steven alter: Blah, blah, blah, TRUMP LOVE!
The whole thing is about as interesting as opening a jar
of peanut butter and discovering... peanut butter.
It's like watching a clock strike...
{Squeals in delight} "Omg! What do you think the next hour
will be? Maybe 7? Or nine? HOW COULD WE KNOW?!?!?"
How anyone FEELS about *This* candidate or *That* candidate
is not even irrelevant, it's annoying. I mean, like anyone
else is supposed to care?
Issues matter.
Past performance as a predictor of future actions? Sure.
Or, now get this, or what about manipulating us?
I've said it before though nowhere near enough but, do they
want a backlash?
One of the examples I raised in the past was how a N.H.
high school got rid of the urinals in the boys room because
one and only one parent allegedly said something.
So what? Whether one actually did or five said something,
what in Christ's almighty's name difference could it
possibly make?
"My trans boy can't use a urinal so absolutely nobody should
be allowed to."
That's not reasonable. Ever.
Was there some other decision they were hiding behind the
"Trans" excuse or are the people with actual power trying
real hard to produce a backlash?
Because one parent or five parents or even 12 parents
can't change a school's policy. They have absolutely no
power what so ever. They can complain until they are blue
in the face and unless and until the people with power decide
to do something, nothing gets done.
So is it honestly just a leadership problem? Does it honestly
come down to cowards in charge? Or do they want to act so
unreasonable that there's a backlash?
Does the evil lurking behind Biden, ruling in his name, want
a backlash?
Do they want Trump?
https://youtu.be/fJ9rUzIMcZQ?si=njdz4x2h-T15o56w&t=234
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)