Seems odd they'd have picked Blue Origin over Space-X for this. Unless Musk ran afoul of Biden and the "agenda."
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nasa-bezos-blue-lunar-landers.html
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 11:39:11 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
Seems odd they'd have picked Blue Origin over Space-X for this. Unless Musk ran afoul of Biden and the "agenda."
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nasa-bezos-blue-lunar-landers.htmlLowest bidder?
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 11:39:11 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
Seems odd they'd have picked Blue Origin over Space-X for this. Unless Musk ran afoul of Biden and the "agenda."
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nasa-bezos-blue-lunar-landers.htmlLowest bidder?
On Sunday, 21 May 2023 at 11:04:18 UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 11:39:11 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
Seems odd they'd have picked Blue Origin over Space-X for this. Unless Musk ran afoul of Biden and the "agenda."
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nasa-bezos-blue-lunar-landers.html
Lowest bidder?
I hope not. Blue Origin doesn't have much of a track-record compared to Space-X.
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 3:41:25 AM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
On Sunday, 21 May 2023 at 11:04:18 UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 11:39:11 PM UTC-7, RichA wrote:
Seems odd they'd have picked Blue Origin over Space-X for this. Unless Musk ran afoul of Biden and the "agenda."
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-nasa-bezos-blue-lunar-landers.html
Lowest bidder?
I hope not. Blue Origin doesn't have much of a track-record compared to Space-X.Ever consider that lobbyists carry a lot of weight, and throw lots of cash around?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 03:18:23 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,770 |