The bulk of the research was on the SN1987a event and the evolution of the ring at the intersection of the two large external rings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g12g2Nq3_2I

The presence of hydrogen in carbonado diamonds found on Earth indicates that any supernova event had to have occurred close to the emergence of the Earth itself so just as easy to look at stellar evolution as a transition phase rather than the death of a
star, at least certain supernovae stars.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070109172003.htm

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:37:05 PM UTC-7, Gerald Kelleher wrote:

The presence of hydrogen in carbonado diamonds found on Earth indicates that any supernova event had to have occurred close to the emergence of the Earth itself ...

There is zero evidence in support of this claim. The supernova event could have been literally billions of years earlier.

There is no doubt that elements heavier than hydrogen and helium were created in supernovae, but that does not mean that these supernovae happened at the same time as the Earth was created. THAT would be impossible, according to current models.

You can't just make it up as you go along and expect anyone to believe it... evidence rules, and you have none.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011220.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2uCtot1aDg

When someone resolves a 500-year-old issue on direct/retrograde resolutions without proper attribution then they neither like the Universe and the Universe sure does not pay them attention. I adore what was handed on to me and appreciate it was simply
the lack of satellite observations to demonstrate the Earth moves by means of the annual change in the position of the stars free of RA/Dec modelling thereby setting the central Sun up for the back-and-forth motions of Venus and Mercury or their direct/
retrograde motion resolution.

A person has to have a feeling for creation and that I have not seen, here nor elsewhere even when celebrities mangle the explanation above.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011220.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2uCtot1aDg

When someone else sees the resolution of a 500-year-old issue on direct/retrograde resolutions without according the proper attrribution to the individual who gifted it to them then they neither like the Universe and the Universe will not return the
feeling. I adore what was handed on to me and appreciate it was simply the lack of satellite observations to demonstrate the Earth moves by means of the annual change in the position of the stars free of RA/Dec modelling thereby setting the central Sun
up for the back-and-forth motions of Venus and Mercury or their direct/retrograde motion resolution.

Things move on.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)