• Re: Celestron to Compete With Vaonis Stellina?

    From Chris L Peterson@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 9 07:38:49 2024
    On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 22:37:37 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
    wrote:

    I believe it was the Vaonis Stellina that was very controversial, as
    a telescope of modest aperture, but highly computerized, and with
    a high price tag, designed to take astrophotographs almost by
    itself.

    In looking for it, I also found the ZWO Seestar, an apparently similar >product in a much more modest price range - around $500.

    The product Celestron has announced today (January 8), only
    available for pre-order, is in the $5000 price range, and it only
    has a 6-inch aperture.

    But it definitely still has some quality features that make it stand
    out.

    The 6" optical portion is a Rowe-Ackermann Schmidt Astrograph.

    And the computer technology includes AI-assisted automatic
    stacking of multiple images.

    The product is the Celestron Origin Intelligent Home Observatory:

    https://www.celestron.com/products/celestron-origin-intelligent-home-observatory

    Now, if I could get it with their 11" RASA instead of a 6" one, then I
    would actually want one, although I couldn't afford it.

    John Savard

    I'm skeptical much of a market exists. Products like the Seestar are
    popular because they produce very nice results at a very modest price.
    They're great for imaging on the road, for public presentations, for
    those with a casual interest in astronomical imaging. You get up into
    the thousands of dollars range, however, and you're looking at much
    more serious imagers. And I think most of them are likely to prefer
    putting together their own kit, suited to their specific interests.
    For $5000 you can get a really nice imaging setup... and one that you
    can change around if your interests change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andreas Kempe@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 13 00:24:35 2024
    Den 2024-01-11 skrev Rich <rander3128@gmail.com>:

    Friend of mine has the same attitude, he's a die-hard visual
    observer (so am I, 90%) who owns a slew of scopes (5 AP refractors,
    a C8. C11, C14, Meade 10 inch SCT, Questar 3.5 (formerly had 7's), a
    TeleVue Oracle, 150mm Fuji ED binoculars, dozens of Zeiss, Leitz
    binos, etc, etc). But we see which way the wind is blowing and it
    is for imagers.


    I spent years only doing visual observation and I still enjoy it, but
    resolving what looks like a diffuse blob to my eyes into something
    with a colour palette and details has a magic feeling to it.

    Funnily enough, I don't enjoy the actual photographing nearly as much
    as doing visual observations since it means I'm just standing around, monitoring my automatics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)