What a difference a year makes in the schizo minds of global warmists.
On Sunday 11 February 2024 at 09:58:46 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 18:42:18 -0800 (PST), Rich <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
What a difference a year makes in the schizo minds of global warmists.The Earth is warming, and the cause is completely understood, and that
cause is human generated greenhouse gases. That is 100% certain, as
close to a fact as anything can be.
The Earth's climate is a very complex system, and we're still learning
about how adding energy to that system manifests in the form of
different parts of that system. But what we do know is that the
consequences are not good for the Earth's broader ecosystems, and not
good for humans.
We increasingly understand where it will get hotter, where it will get
cooler, where it will get wetter, where it will get drier. But even
knowing that it's not easy to model the effects on everything.
Dry, wet, cold, warm. Spin that wheel!!!
The phrase, "never say die" is taken to heart by the globalist warmers, no matter how
clueless they are about the actual mechanics of short and long-term climate conditions.
On Sunday 11 February 2024 at 09:58:46 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 18:42:18 -0800 (PST), Rich <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
What a difference a year makes in the schizo minds of global warmists.The Earth is warming, and the cause is completely understood, and that
cause is human generated greenhouse gases. That is 100% certain, as
close to a fact as anything can be.
I saw an ex-Greenpeacer today show how CO2 levels were 20 times that at one point in the past.
He basically said the panic over CO2 levels today is ridiculous as are all doomsday predictions that
have been made in the past.
On Sunday 11 February 2024 at 06:55:57 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Saturday, February 10, 2024 at 7:42:19?PM UTC-7, Rich wrote:
What a difference a year makes in the schizo minds of global warmists.Surely high levels of carbon dioxide emissions that will stress
the world climate system are a bad idea even if you can't
determine exactly _which_ kind of disaster will result from
doing so?
John Savard
Are they? We have 7 billion people in the world (the elephant in the room avoided by globalist warmers
because the growth is all in the Third World) and THAT is stressing food supplies. CO2 grows plants. The globalist
warmers want us to give up meat, most of the arable land on Earth is already under cultivation and it takes a LOT
more vegetable matter to feed humans than meat. The CO2 will come in handy.
On Sunday 11 February 2024 at 23:53:01 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:57:00 -0800 (PST), Rich <rande...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I saw an ex-Greenpeacer today show how CO2 levels were 20 times that at one >> >point in the past.
He basically said the panic over CO2 levels today is ridiculous as are all >> >doomsday predictions that have been made in the past.
In the distant past, in a world sitting in a very different climatic
state than the current one.
The problem isn't global warming. It is global warming occurring on a
decadal scale, which is not something any ecosystem can adapt to.
The fact life withstood massive quantities of CO2 (and whatever climate impact it had) kinds of puts that to a lie.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 161:03:01 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,056 |
| Messages: | 6,416,496 |