1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ASTRO

  • Einsteinians Camouflage the Gravitational-Wave Hoax

    From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 24 05:11:34 2023
    "But the greatest confirmation that the speed of gravity equals the speed of light comes from the 2017 observation of a kilonova: the inspiral and merger of two neutron stars. A spectacular example of multi-messenger astronomy, a gravitational wave
    signal arrived first, recorded in both the LIGO and Virgo detectors. Then, 1.7 seconds later, the first electromagnetic (light) signal arrived: the high-energy gamma rays from the explosive cataclysm...Of course, we think that these two speeds are
    exactly identical. The speed of gravity should equal the speed of light so long as both gravitational waves and photons have no rest mass associated with them. The 1.7 second delay is very likely explained by the fact that gravitational waves pass
    through matter unperturbed, while light interacts electromagnetically, potentially slowing it down as it passes through the medium of space by just the smallest amount." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/07/06/ask-ethan-why-do-
    gravitational-waves-travel-exactly-at-the-speed-of-light/

    Initially the Einsteinian meant this (perhaps):

    "Gravitational waves pass through matter unperturbed, while light IS BLOCKED OR DEFLECTED BY MATTER."

    Then he saw the danger and replaced "IS BLOCKED OR DEFLECTED BY MATTER" with the following word salad:

    "Gravitational waves pass through matter unperturbed, while light interacts electromagnetically, potentially slowing it down as it passes through the medium of space by just the smallest amount."

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pentcho Valev@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 24 14:52:38 2023
    Photons are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians teach:

    "Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate
    at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/12/24/how-gravitational-waves-might-wind-up-proving-einstein-wrong/

    But LIGO fakers carelessly announced near-simultaneous arrival of gravitational waves and photons, "from the same location of the sky", which means that gravitational waves and photons travel hand in hand (same gravitationally deflected path, same speed,
    same passage through matter):

    "On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.
    si.edu/newsdesk/releases/astronomers-see-light-show-associated-gravitational-waves

    So Einsteinians have to camouflage LIGO fakers' gaffe - now they desperately prove that gravitational waves and photons undergo the same gravitational deflection:

    "We establish at high confidence (significantly greater than 5σ) that the gravitational waves of GW 170817 underwent gravitational deflection to arrive within 1.7 seconds of the photons." https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.01710.pdf

    LIGO fakers also realized that the hand-in-hand travel of gravitational waves and photons is an Achilles heel, and informed the gullible world that GW 170817 was the first and last time an electromagnetic counterpart was detected. No electromagnetic
    counterparts anymore:

    "The first such observation, which took place in August of 2017, made history for being the first time that both gravitational waves and light were detected from the same cosmic event. The April 25 merger, by contrast, did not result in any light being
    detected." https://phys.org/news/2020-01-ligo-virgo-gravitational-network-neutron-star.html

    "You might wonder why we haven’t seen knockout detections of electromagnetic radiation accompanying gravitational waves since the August 2017 discovery. Unfortunately, we probably just got lucky that time. “It was nearby, well-localized in space, and
    had everything going for it,” Berger said." https://gizmodo.com/mystery-deepens-around-newly-detected-ripples-in-space-1837581646

    "The first binary neutron star to be discovered in GWs, GW170817, came with a bright electromagnetic counterpart...Unfortunately most binary mergers, and in particular binary black hole (BBH) mergers, do not have associated electromagnetic counterparts."
    https://www.ligo.org/science/Publication-O3Cosmology/

    More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lou@21:1/5 to Pentcho Valev on Sat Feb 25 04:58:42 2023
    On Friday, 24 February 2023 at 13:11:36 UTC, Pentcho Valev wrote:
    "But the greatest confirmation that the speed of gravity equals the speed of light comes from the 2017 observation of a kilonova: the inspiral and merger of two neutron stars. A spectacular example of multi-messenger astronomy, a gravitational wave
    signal arrived first, recorded in both the LIGO and Virgo detectors. Then, 1.7 seconds later, the first electromagnetic (light) signal arrived: the high-energy gamma rays from the explosive cataclysm...Of course, we think that these two speeds are
    exactly identical. The speed of gravity should equal the speed of light so long as both gravitational waves and photons have no rest mass associated with them. The 1.7 second delay is very likely explained by the fact that gravitational waves pass
    through matter unperturbed, while light interacts electromagnetically, potentially slowing it down as it passes through the medium of space by just the smallest amount." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/07/06/ask-ethan-why-do-
    gravitational-waves-travel-exactly-at-the-speed-of-light/

    Initially the Einsteinian meant this (perhaps):

    "Gravitational waves pass through matter unperturbed, while light IS BLOCKED OR DEFLECTED BY MATTER."

    Then he saw the danger and replaced "IS BLOCKED OR DEFLECTED BY MATTER" with the following word salad:

    "Gravitational waves pass through matter unperturbed, while light interacts electromagnetically, potentially slowing it down as it passes through the medium of space by just the smallest amount."

    There seems to be a contradiction in the relativists argument. First of all if GW pass through matter unperturbed then how does the “wave” interact with the LIGO detector? Seeing as relativists say the detector detects the wave because the wave
    supposedly interacts with the detector to produce the subtle physical distortions in the detector length.
    And the second contradiction is if GW waves pass through Earth unperturbed then why is it that relativists say the reason why 3 detections including the new European detector are not common is “ because the earth blocks the wave from being detected by
    one of the detectors” !!?

    See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

    Pentcho Valev

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)